[Art_beyond_sight_advocacy] Term - relief vs tactile

Virginia virginials at hotmail.com
Fri Jan 20 16:58:48 UTC 2012


Hi, Lisa:

I have never heard the word haptic. I don't think I would use that one. I
think the word tactile would be good to use. As you said, this word invites
people to touch it. 

Just my 2 cents.

Virginia Small

-----Original Message-----
From: art_beyond_sight_advocacy-bounces at nfbnet.org
[mailto:art_beyond_sight_advocacy-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Lisa
Yayla
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 6:24 AM
To: 'accessibleimage at freelists.org'; 'Accessto Art Museums'; 'Art Beyond
SightLearning Tools'; 'Art BeyondSight Educators List'; 'Art BeyondSight
Theory and Research'; 'Art Beyond Sight Advocacy'
Subject: [Art_beyond_sight_advocacy] Term - relief vs tactile

Hi,

Again I am calling to the collective knowledge and wisdom of this group. My
question is about what to call a tactile graphic. Hmm, you think, strange
question after all these years and shouldn't the questioner know better?

Ok, here are the questions - is the term "tactile graphic" better than the
term "relief graphic" ? Is the term "haptic graphic" better than both? Or
does it not make much difference?

By saying tactile one gives the idea that the graphic is to be touched, but
saying relief, doesn't necessarily. Haptic perhaps gives the additional
information that there should be movement to gain information - that is the
hand should move over the graphic.

Like to hear what you think.

Thanks,

Lisa







-Scanned by Exchange Hosted Services- 
_______________________________________________
Art_beyond_sight_advocacy mailing list
Art_beyond_sight_advocacy at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/art_beyond_sight_advocacy_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Art_beyond_sight_advocacy:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/art_beyond_sight_advocacy_nfbnet.org/virgi
nials%40hotmail.com





More information about the Art_Beyond_Sight_Advocacy mailing list