[Blind-international-students] introducing myself andcomments on your discussion

Mon Aug 9 16:53:07 UTC 2010

Hi, List,

I thought the Federation calls for everybody being the SAME, so why 
need we specify the limitations of blind people as a reason to make 
things accessible to us? How about thinking of it in terms of 
accessibility to everyone? It seems if technology were accessible to 
everyone, it may be inclusive enough to in compass blind folks 
anyway? . Further, call this semantic but referring to us as the 
"blind" seems a little dehumanizing, doncha think? Perhaps blind 
people is more comfortable? 04 AM 8/9/2010, you wrote:
>Dear Dan and list,
>
>
>
>
>
>You may be interested to read the issue below that was brought 
>before congress by the NFB in february 2010.  It is also attached.
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>Bruce
>
>
>
>A TECHNOLOGY BILL OF RIGHTS FOR THE BLIND
>
>
>
>
>
>Purpose:  To mandate that consumer electronics, home appliances, 
>kiosks, and electronic office technology provide user interfaces 
>that are accessible through nonvisual means.
>
>
>
>
>
>Background:  In recent years rapid advances in microchip and digital 
>technology have led to increasingly complex user interfaces for 
>everyday products such as consumer electronics, home appliances, 
>kiosks, and electronic office technology.  Many new devices in these 
>categories require interaction with visual displays, on-screen 
>menus, touch screens, and other user interfaces that are 
>inaccessible to individuals who are blind or have low 
>vision.  Settings on the stove, dishwasher, or home entertainment 
>system are no longer controlled by knobs, switches, and buttons that 
>can be readily identified and whose settings can be easily 
>discerned.  Inaccessibility of these devices is a major barrier to a 
>blind person's independence and productivity.  If a blind person 
>cannot operate the interfaces of basic office equipment such as 
>copiers and fax machines, this is a potential threat to that 
>person's opportunity to join the workforce or to maintain an existing job.
>
>
>
>Many popular nonvisual mechanisms are available for manufacturers to 
>create interfaces accessible to everyone.  For example, 
>text-to-speech technology is inexpensive and more ubiquitous than it 
>has ever been-it is used in everything from automated telephone 
>systems to the weather forecasting service broadcast by the National 
>Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Indeed, a few manufacturers 
>have incorporated this technology into their products to create 
>talking menus or to articulate what is on the display screen, but 
>many manufacturers have continued to design interfaces that do not 
>include any nonvisual means of use, rendering the devices 
>inaccessible to blind people.
>
>
>
>
>
>Need for Legislation:  Currently no enforceable mandates exist for 
>manufacturers of consumer electronics, home appliances, kiosks, and 
>electronic office technology to make their products accessible to 
>all consumers.  There are also no accessibility standards to provide 
>guidance to manufacturers on how to avoid creating barriers to 
>access by the blind.
>
>
>
>Congress should therefore enact a Technology Bill of Rights for the 
>Blind which:
>
>  a.. establishes that manufacturers must create accessible user 
> interfaces for their products,
>  b.. provides a means for enforcement, and
>  c.. establishes standards that will provide meaningful benchmarks 
> that manufacturers can use to make their products accessible.
>
>
>This legislation does not mandate a single, one-size-fits-all 
>solution for all consumer technology, home appliances, kiosks, or 
>electronic office technology.  Rather it mandates regulations 
>setting meaningful accessibility standards that allow manufacturers 
>to select from a menu of potential solutions or create new 
>ones.  This will not only give manufacturers the freedom and 
>flexibility they desire, but will also encourage innovations that 
>make consumer technology more usable for everyone.
>
>
>
>
>
>Proposed Legislation:  Congress should enact a Technology Bill of 
>Rights for the Blind that:
>
>
>
>  a.. Mandates that all consumer electronics, home appliances, 
> kiosks, and electronic office technology be designed so that blind 
> people are able to access the same functions as sighted people by 
> nonvisual means and with substantially equivalent ease of use.
>
>
>  a.. Creates a commission to establish standards for nonvisual 
> accessibility of electronic devices intended for use in the home or 
> office. Such a commission should represent all stakeholders, including:
>-          organizations of the blind;
>
>-          manufacturers of consumer electronics, home appliances, 
>kiosks, and electronic office technology, or associations 
>representing such manufacturers; and
>
>-          experts on universal design, electronic engineering, and 
>related fields.
>
>
>
>  a.. Endows the Department of Justice with the authority to enforce 
> the regulations promulgated by the commission established by this legislation.
>
>
>  a.. Authorizes the commission to reexamine and rewrite standards 
> periodically as consumer electronic technology continues to evolve.
>
>
>
>
>Requested Action:  Please support blind Americans and cosponsor a 
>Technology Bill of Rights for the Blind to ensure that blind people 
>can fully participate in all aspects of American society.  Increased 
>access leads to increased independence, increased employment, and 
>increased tax revenue.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Contact Information:
>
>Lauren McLarney
>
>Government Programs Specialist
>
>NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND
>
>Phone:  (410) 659-9314, extension 2207
>
>Email:  lmclarney at nfb.org
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Weiner" <dcwein at dcwein.cnc.net>
>To: "'Blind International Students Mailing List'" 
><blind-international-students at nfbnet.org>
>Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 6:40 AM
>Subject: Re: [Blind-international-students] introducing myself 
>andcomments on your discussion
>
>
>>And, on the subject of accessibility issues for which there is no
>>work-around, what abut the plethora of new house-hold appliances which have
>>read-outs and no
>>Feasible work-around?
>>In the apartment where I used to live, there were washers and driers on the
>>first floor.
>>Totally flat buttons, and you were obliged to use a card to start the
>>machine. You could not tell when you were close to running out of money on
>>your card. To recharge the card, you needed to use a machine that was
>>totally inaccessible.
>>I'm sure everyone has come across similar appliances in the last few years.
>>Is there anyone working on ideas to handle this frustrating maddening
>>dilemma?
>>
>>Dan W
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Blind-international-students mailing list
>>Blind-international-students at nfbnet.org
>>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-international-students_nfbnet.org
>>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
>>for Blind-international-students:
>>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blind-international-students_nfbnet.org/bjsexton%40comcast.net 
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Blind-international-students mailing list
>Blind-international-students at nfbnet.org
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-international-students_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
>for Blind-international-students:
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blind-international-students_nfbnet.org/carlymih%40earthlink.net