[blindlaw] National Federation of theBlindRejectsNelson-CollinsAmendment

Sat Feb 7 20:02:18 UTC 2009

The system is called Convio, the same system that has been powering the
March for Independence operation.  I volunteered to build the legislative
advocacy component for John Paré two years ago and was told there were other
priorities ahead of this innovation.  I hope the renewed request receives
action this time, because it would indeed be a substantial improvement to
our grassroots network.

Joe Orozco

"Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity."--James M.
Barrie
-----Original Message-----
From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of Scott C. LaBarre
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 1:03 PM
To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] National Federation of
theBlindRejectsNelson-CollinsAmendment

That  is an excellent idea and I will recommend it to those who can
implement it.  You are right to say that the easier you can make it for
people to send a note etc, the likelihood that  they will do so goes way up.

Incidentally, one of the people  who implements our governmental affairs
action is James McCarthy and he is subscribed to this list.  Are you out
there Jim?  What say you?
Scott C. LaBarre, Esq.

LaBarre Law Offices P.C.
1660 South Albion Street, Ste. 918
Denver, Colorado 80222
303 504-5979 (voice)
303 757-3640 (fax)
slabarre at labarrelaw.com (e-mail)
www.labarrelaw.com (website)

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message may contain confidential and privileged
information. If you are not the designated recipient, you may not read,
copy, distribute or retain this message. If you received this message in
error, please notify the sender at 303) 504-5979 or slabarre at labarrelaw.com,
and destroy and delete it from your system. This message and any attachments
are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§
2510-2521.
----- Original Message -----
From: <ckrugman at sbcglobal.net>
To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] National Federation of theBlindRejectsNelson-Collins
Amendment

>I posted on another list that it would be helpful if NFB had a 
>legislative action center where members and supporters could send 
>emails or faxes to legislators on issues such as this. Today when this 
>came up I attempted to contact the offices of  Senators Boxer and 
>Feinstein and was unsuccessful due to busy signals. As  my time is 
>valuable I only was able to do it once. Usually when I have  time to 
>respond to such issues it is at night or on week ends when  legislative 
>offices are not open. I personally do not have the time to  prepare 
>emails or letters on numerous pieces of legislation. When an  
>organization provides such a service to its members and supporter the  
>organization is showing appreciation of the members continued 
>involvement  and support on such issues.
> Chuck
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Danielsen" <cdanielsen8 at aol.com>
> To: "'NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List'" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 2:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] National Federation of the  
>BlindRejectsNelson-Collins Amendment
>
>
>> Hi Everett,
>>
>> The money that would be stripped out of the stimulus package by the 
>> Nelson-Collins amendment is slated to go to state vocational 
>> rehabilitation agencies. Some state VR agencies are very good, some 
>> are awful, and most are probably somewhere in between. But many of 
>> them are currently cutting what services they do offer because of the 
>> economy. Even in states where the services blind people receive are 
>> not the best, it stands to reason that those services will not 
>> improve if they are cut further. Saying that we shouldn't fight the 
>> amendment because the services are lousy anyway is like saying you're 
>> starving, but then saying that if you can't have filet mignon you 
>> will pass on bread and water.
>>
>> I'm curious to know what you mean when you say that you do not like 
>> the language in NFB press releases. Is it the language you dislike or 
>> the policies it represents? I'm not asking to be sarcastic; I'm 
>> really curious about what it is specifically about the language that 
>> you dislike.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org 
>> [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of E.J. Zufelt
>> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 5:00 PM
>> To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] National Federation of the Blind 
>> RejectsNelson-Collins Amendment
>>
>> Good evening,
>>
>> I doubt that by rejecting the amendment that all Americans will have 
>> the training and insentive to work.
>> Since an overwhelming majority of blind and visually impaired 
>> American's are unemployed under the current system then leaving the 
>> system the way it is likely isn't the best idea.
>>
>> Perhaps the system needs more funding, perhaps it needs to be 
>> replaced with something better, but the current system at the current 
>> funding level isn't working.  I really dislike the language used in 
>> almost every NFB press release.
>>
>> Everett
>>
>> On 6-Feb-09, at 4:35 PM, Freeh, Jessica (by way of David Andrews 
>> <dandrews at visi.com
>> >) wrote:
>>
>>> FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
>>>
>>> CONTACT:
>>> Chris Danielsen
>>> Director of Public Relations
>>> National Federation of the Blind
>>> (410) 659-9314, extension 2330
>>> (410) 262-1281 (Cell)
>>> <mailto:cdanielsen at nfb.org>cdanielsen at nfb.org
>>>
>>> National Federation of the Blind Rejects Nelson-Collins Amendment
>>>
>>> Urges Senate to Retain Rehabilitation Funding
>>>
>>> Baltimore, Maryland (February 6, 2009): Dr. Marc Maurer, President 
>>> of the National Federation of the Blind, the oldest and largest 
>>> organization of blind people in the United States, said: "The 
>>> purpose of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 
>>> currently being debated in the United States Senate is to reduce 
>>> unemployment and to restore economic security for all Americans.  In 
>>> order to accomplish this goal for Americans who are blind or have 
>>> other disabilities, state vocational rehabilitation programs must be
adequately funded.
>>> The National Federation of the Blind urges all members of the United 
>>> States Senate to reject the Nelson-Collins Amendment and retain the 
>>> $500 million currently allocated for vocational rehabilitation.  By 
>>> doing so, the Senate will ensure that all Americans have the 
>>> training needed to work and contribute to this nation's economic
prosperity."
>>>
>>> # # #
>>>
>>>
>>> About the National Federation of the Blind
>>>
>>> With more than 50,000 members, the National Federation of the Blind 
>>> is the largest and most influential membership organization of blind 
>>> people in the United States.  The NFB improves blind people's lives 
>>> through advocacy, education, research, technology, and programs 
>>> encouraging independence and self-confidence.  It is the leading 
>>> force in the blindness field today and the voice of the nation's 
>>> blind.  In January 2004 the NFB opened the National Federation of 
>>> the Blind Jernigan Institute, the first research and training center 
>>> in the United States for the blind led by the blind.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> blindlaw mailing list
>>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
>>> for
>>> blindlaw:
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/everett%40
>>> zu
>>> felt.ca
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> blindlaw mailing list
>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> blindlaw:
>>
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cdanielsen8%40aol.
>> com
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
>> signature database 3834 (20090206) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
>> signature database 3834 (20090206) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> blindlaw mailing list
>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> blindlaw:
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ckrugman%40
>> sbcglobal.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindlaw:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/slabarre%40l
> abarrelaw.com
> 

_______________________________________________
blindlaw mailing list
blindlaw at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindlaw:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jsorozco%40gmail.c
om