[blindlaw] questions about paper files

Mon Apr 12 04:49:57 UTC 2010

Ross:

That was a good one.

A lot of good stuff in there.

Rod Alcidonis, Attorney and Counselor at Law
Alcidonis Law Office, LLC
6907B Rising Sun Ave. 1st floor
Philadelphia, PA 19111
Tel: (215) 305-8085
Fax: (215) 525-0999
Attorney at alcidonislaw.com
Licensed in Pennsylvania and New Jersey

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message and/or its attachment(s) is being sent 
by a lawyer and may contain privileged and confidential information and may 
be protected by attorney client and work product privileges. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, 
dissemination, reading, or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify 
Attorney Alcidonis at (215) 821-6047 or at Attorney at alcidonislaw.com, and 
permanently delete this message from your system. This communication is 
covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2510-2521.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Ross Doerr" <rumpole at roadrunner.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 3:45 PM
To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] questions about paper files

> Hello Craig:
> I'd say your question has two different answers to it. One for the office, 
> and one for hearings and negotiations settings.
> For my office , I work in an office with 9 other lawyers. I manage my 
> documents in a disciplined and structured way out of necessity.
> WE have only one secretary to handle all of us.
> Of course, in practical terms that means we each do almost everything 
> ourselves. So, when it comes to documents and dealing with other lawyers 
> in my office, I make sure they all know how I do things.
> I also make sure they know that, if they need a document out of one of my 
> files, they need to either hand it back to me in person so that I can be 
> the one to put it back, or that they can be trusted to return it to the 
> right place. Failure to do so is, as you can guess, a tragedy in the 
> making for me, and not them. For that reason, I am a very, very critical 
> person when it comes to my fellow lawyers getting into one of my paper 
> files.
> As you may guess, the paper file needs to be set up by me and in a way 
> that is organized for me. I have only had to snarl at a fellow attorney 
> twice in the past 7 years about "moving things around on me".
>
> My case notes and telephone log, evidence notes and exhibits list all go 
> onto my external hard drive and is backed up weekly to two other 
> locations, one at home and one at work. Is this extra work? You bet.
> Is it double coverage? You bet.
> Am I covered if one or two machines of mine or the offices die? You bet.
> That really isn't as much work as it sounds, I have found that the backups 
> take about 15 to twenty minutes a week, so it really isn't so bad once you 
> get used to doing it.
> I had our office manager, who was wise enough to have all of our server 
> information backed up to an off-site location daily, to move my local 
> "MyDocuments" folders onto the server directly - so in point of fact, I 
> have my stuff protected as much as I possibly can.
> You see, for me, the paper file is important, but my electronic file is 
> more important for obvious reasons.
> But everything in each of my paper files is referenced in my electronic 
> file.
> Paper documents and evidence that has come into the office for my files 
> are either scanned and then converted to text using K-1000 or some other 
> program, or is very strictly referenced in my electronic notes, such as, 
> for example those god-awful doctor's and nurses notes that come in that 
> handwriting that only a doctor or nurse can decode. (And they say blind 
> people have bad handwriting. Sheesh)
>  I then make certain that all documents are in one of two forms, depending 
> upon what type of situation I am going into. By this I mean, if it is to 
> be either a negotiation where I would want to show the other side specific 
> documents one at a time, or in a full blown hearing in court where an 
> evidence binder is a better idea.
> If it is a settlement negotiation, and I want the other side to see only 
> one documentt at a time, I make sure that each document is referenced 
> individually, with a cover sheet of braille on it. This way the other side 
> will see only a braille coversheet - this not only tells me what it is, 
> but drives the other side nuts if they are trying to peek at things on my 
> side of the table.
> Not that a fellow attorney would try to read something on my side of the 
> table deliberately, mind you.
> IT simply gives me additional control over the documentation and how it 
> can be seen, only when and where I wish it. We have all seen how 
> contentious some settings can be. So strict control over what your 
> opponent can chance a look at is important.
> There are two ways that documents can be referenced  electronically, at 
> least by me.
> I am, as some on this list know, a bit of self-taught computer geek. I 
> don't know all that much about programs, but what I do know is important 
> enough to warrant direct knowledge by me.
> I will, for example, have my exhibit list done up, and then drop my 
> electronic exhibits in the same MS word document as the list. I then go in 
> and hyperlink each item on the exhibit list to the document. In this way, 
> no matter what document adverse counsel or a judge or hearings officer 
> decides to look at or make reference to, I simply hit the link, or pull up 
> the bookmark list and pop down to it. I happen to use JAWS, and a link 
> list or bookmark list is very easy to pull up no matter where you are 
> inside a document. That comes in real handy for me, especially in some of 
> my Cases where I am advocating for adaptive technology.
> IS this extra work? Yes it is.
>  Do I bill the client for this? No, I don't.
> You only need to do this sort of thing a few times and it is faster and 
> easier to do than you think.
> In some ways this will put you on a fairly even footing with your sighted 
> adverse counsel. Well, as much as a blind attorney can be that is.
> What about when I am in court - assuming I have submitted an evidence 
> binder. Well, when sitting at counsel table it is easy to use either 
> braille or a laptop. I personally prefer the laptop. I have never had a 
> judge tell me to leave counsel table to stand at the podium. and place me 
> at a disadvantage. Would I carry my laptop up to a podium? Well, yes, I 
> could, but never have.
> Oh yes, one other thing about using a computer - I am blind enough that I 
> cannot see the screen at all. So I will use either a wired earpiece or my 
> blue tooth earpiece to hear what is on my screen. Nobody else can hear it, 
> so client confidentiality is as safeguarded as much as possible. It really 
> is a different way to practice law, but works, does not comprimise 
> anything for your client and gets the job done.
> Although there was that one time when a new, young and sighted attorney in 
> my office came with me to court to help, and spilled an entire pitcher of 
> ice water on the paper file, my laptop and me.
> Well, if you're going to have a mishap, do it in front of a superior court 
> judge and a courtroom full of your colleagues, right?
> That was one time I did stand up and do it all from the podium. If you 
> prepare enough, the foregoing type of mishap isn't as bad is it sounds. 
> Although, to this day, certain lawyers will ask me before a hearing if I 
> would like a drink of water.
> There are as many war stories about the "unexpected" during hearings as 
> there are lawyers on this list, and I think that some day we should all 
> write them down and post them somewhere. People won't believe a lot of 
> them, I promise you that. Like the time my spring-loaded umbrella erupted 
> out of my briefcase during a hearing at counsel table...
>
> I do some work in court, a lot of administrative hearings and do a lot of 
> settlement work, so over the years I have developed what works for me at 
> my level of training.
> I guess what I'm trying to say here is that you need to do what will work 
> for you, as an attorney doing your type of work.
> The way I have noted here about me is only one way, and it happens to work 
> for me.
> You will most certainly get a spectrum of different ideas from other 
> lawyers on this list, and I promise you they will all be good ideas.
> You should pick and choose, or modify until you hit on a method that makes 
> you comfortable and works for you.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Craig Spencer" <craigspencer2.0 at gmail.com>
> To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 1:02 PM
> Subject: [blindlaw] questions about paper files
>
>
>> For attorneys who work in offices with other attorneys, how do you 
>> address
>> managing the paper file for a case?
>>
>> Do you set-up the file yourself?  What about when a document needs to be
>> referenced or shown to the opposing side?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> blindlaw mailing list
>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>> blindlaw:
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/rumpole%40roadrunner.com
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2804 - Release Date: 04/11/10 
> 06:32:00
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> blindlaw:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/attorney%40alcidonislaw.com 