[blindlaw] federal court procedural question

[Marina A. Cordova, Esq.]

Season's Greeting to Everyone!

 

I have a procedural question for federal court concerning preliminary
injunctions.  I previously included my motion and arguments for preliminary
injunction in my original complaint and first amended complaint.  However,
as more facts have arisen in the case it is necessary for me to submit the
motion for preliminary injunction separate.  I will be submitting my Second
Amended and First Supplemental Class Complaint.  Since this is the first
time the motion for preliminary injunction is separate do I just call it
"motion for preliminary injunction" or do I also call this a "second amended
motion for preliminary injunction?"  Probably the latter, right?

 

I know we're all in different federal districts, I'm in NM fed district
court (10th circuit), but many procedural rules are similar.

 

Sincerely,

Marina A. Cordova

Attorney at Law

551 W. Cordova Road, # 234

Santa Fe, NM 87505

Office (505) 467-8395

Fax (505) 467-8746

law at cordovafirm.com

 

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change
the world, indeed it's the only thing that ever has.  - Margaret Mead

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This email message (including attachments) is covered
by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC Section 2510-2521, and
is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender
by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are
the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through
this medium, please so advise the sender immediately.

 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1117 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/attachments/20101224/b3b1a64e/attachment.gif>