[blindlaw] supreme court opinion
RJ Sandefur
joltingjacksandefur at gmail.com
Sat Jan 23 12:11:13 UTC 2010
Do you think this opinion will have a positive or negitive effect on the
NFB? The way I understand it, the opinion says, any corperation, may
actively compain for a partictuar person. So the NFB could say, "John smith
votted againist the ADA." Basically, what did the court do? I feel as
citizens these opinions arn't being explained to us, so we are not really
informed as to what's going on. RJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Will May" <editor.nftb at gmail.com>
To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] supreme court opinion
> Doesn't differentiate between for profit and not for profit
> corporation, so NFB etc would be included.
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:53 PM, RJ Sandefur
> <joltingjacksandefur at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Since the NFB, is a corperation, would it be effectedin any by the United
>> States supreme court opinion releaced yesterday? I've attached a copy of
>> the opinion. RJ
>> _______________________________________________
>> blindlaw mailing list
>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> blindlaw:
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/editor.nftb%40gmail.com
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindlaw:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/joltingjacksandefur%40gmail.com
More information about the BlindLaw
mailing list