[blindlaw] favorable ruling in Enyart case
AZNOR99 at aol.com
AZNOR99 at aol.com
Sat Jan 30 14:21:40 UTC 2010
As I understand it, a written opinion has not yet been issued. The judge
indicated that the National Conference of Bar Examiners violated
Stephanie's rights by refusing to allow her to use the technology of her choice to
take the Multiple Choice Section of the Bar Exam. I was not present at the
ruling, I only heard Dr. Maurer discuss it this morning.
Congratulations, Stephanie! This has been a long time coming, and
hopefully all blind lawyers will now be able to use the accommodations they deem
necessary in all future Bar Examinations.
Ronza
In a message dated 1/30/2010 8:03:44 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
joltingjacksandefur at gmail.com writes:
Hey, I am unable to open this attachment. What is this rulling? And where
can I find it on Line? RJ
----- Original Message -----
From: <ckrugman at sbcglobal.net>
To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 5:47 AM
Subject: [blindlaw] favorable ruling in Enyart case
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindlaw:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/o
ptions/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/joltingjacksandefur%40gmail.com
>
_______________________________________________
blindlaw mailing list
blindlaw at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindlaw:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/aznor99%40aol.com
More information about the BlindLaw
mailing list