[blindlaw] favorable ruling in Enyart case

Sun Jan 31 19:16:06 UTC 2010

Scott,

This is great news and it's awesome that the judge ruled without oral
argument. Congratulations on this victory.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of Scott C. LaBarre
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 2:42 PM
To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] favorable ruling in Enyart case

Friends, I am part of the legal team that secured this victory and was
present yesterday when Judge Breyer announced his decision.  His written
order will come out next week and we will certainly pass it on.  I doubt
very much that the National Conference of Bar Examiners will appeal this but
one never knows.  If they do, we will know immediately because they will
need to request extremely expedited review.  They are  under order to
provide the requested accommodations for the February 2010 bar exam.  This
is a wonderful victory and I cannot tell  you how good it felt to hear Judge
Breyer's decision yesterday morning.  We were prepared to make substantial
arguments in favor of our motion for preliminary injunction but were
delighted to see that Judge Breyer granted our motion immediately from the
bench.  Opposing counsel attempted to talk him out of it or in some way get
him to limit the ruling, but he batted such attempts away.
Scott C. LaBarre, Esq.

LaBarre Law Offices P.C.
1660 South Albion Street, Ste. 918
Denver, Colorado 80222
303 504-5979 (voice)
303 757-3640 (fax)
slabarre at labarrelaw.com (e-mail)
www.labarrelaw.com (website)

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message may contain confidential and privileged
information. If you are not the designated recipient, you may not read,
copy, distribute or retain this message. If you received this message in
error, please notify the sender at 303) 504-5979 or slabarre at labarrelaw.com,
and destroy and delete it from your system. This message and any attachments
are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§
2510-2521.
----- Original Message -----
From: "RJ Sandefur" <joltingjacksandefur at gmail.com>
To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] favorable ruling in Enyart case

> Do you think this case will make it to the court of appeals? Even to 
> the US supreme court? RJ
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <AZNOR99 at aol.com>
> To: <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 9:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] favorable ruling in Enyart case
>
>
>> As I understand it,  a written opinion has not yet been  issued.  The 
>> judge indicated that the National Conference of Bar Examiners  
>> violated Stephanie's rights by refusing to allow her to use the 
>> technology of  her choice to take the Multiple Choice Section of the 
>> Bar Exam.  I was not  present at the ruling, I only heard Dr. Maurer 
>> discuss it this morning.
>>
>> Congratulations, Stephanie!  This has been a long time coming, and 
>> hopefully all blind lawyers will now be able to use the 
>> accommodations they deem necessary in all future Bar Examinations.
>>
>> Ronza
>>
>>
>>
>> In a message dated 1/30/2010 8:03:44 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
>> joltingjacksandefur at gmail.com writes:
>>
>> Hey, I  am unable to open this attachment. What is this rulling? And 
>> where can I  find it on Line? RJ
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From:  <ckrugman at sbcglobal.net>
>> To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List"  <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 5:47  AM
>> Subject: [blindlaw] favorable ruling in Enyart case
>>
>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> blindlaw mailing  list
>>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>>> To  unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
>>> for
>>>  blindlaw:
>>>  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/o
>> ptions/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/joltingjacksandefur%40gmail.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> blindlaw  mailing  list
>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>> To  unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
>> for
>> blindlaw:
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/aznor99%40a
>> ol.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> blindlaw mailing list
>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> blindlaw:
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/joltingjack
>> sandefur%40gmail.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindlaw:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/slabarre%40l
> abarrelaw.com
> 

_______________________________________________
blindlaw mailing list
blindlaw at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindlaw:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cdanielsen8%40aol.
com

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4822 (20100131) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4822 (20100131) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com