[blindlaw] West Publishing

[James Pepper]

I see you do not seem to understand that they are complying with Section 508
of the Rehabilitation Act, so they are building the ramps, it is not their
fault that you cannot read it because the product is made to the code to the
law.

What you perceive as inaccessibility is the failure of the law to make
content actually accessible.
James

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:42 PM, James Pepper <b75205 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well if you want to give away other people's property then what stops
> anyone from taking everything you own in the name of fairness.  After all
> you are not using it to the best advantage, I can use it better.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:35 PM, James Pepper <b75205 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The law for accessibility in documents is Section 508 and you can lay out
>> your content correctly and still not be accessible.  The problem here is
>> that there is no clear cut solution, whereas with a wheel chair ramp the
>> solution is obvious, you build it, but with accessibility in electronic
>> documents all you have to do is prove that the doucment is section 508
>> compliant and that is that.
>>
>> Section 508 is not accessibility.  We all know this right here on this
>> list.  What is needed is a definition of accessibility that is a real
>> solution and is not a plessy versus ferguson type of situation where people
>> claim that accessibility is in existence but it doesn't actually work.
>>
>> We are in the same boat.  The problem which has not been defined and I
>> define it here, is that software companies are only concerned with the
>> solution as it holds for their own software, they seek out section 508
>> compliance and that is all they can do.  They do not make their content
>> accessible to a wide range of products because you cannot anticipate all of
>> the scenarios and so we are stuck in this situation where a publisher can
>> lay out their content as accessible in section 508 and yet be completely
>> inaccessible when it gets to market.
>>
>> There are so many variables that it is a miracle that anything is
>> accessible.
>>
>> But if you want it to work every time, you will have to pay for it.  And
>> don't look now but when a company makes its ramps accessible to the disabled
>> that cost is recouped in the price of their product but you guys want them
>> to give away books for free. Should houses be free for the blind, give away
>> free cars.   I think we should re-evaluate this free book plan because there
>> is no incentive to innovate in accessibility.  Why should anyone fix this if
>> there is no benefit other than a pat on the back to solve this problem?  You
>> want your books for free, so does everyone else.
>>
>
>