[blindlaw] Great Opinion in Enyart v. NCBE
RJ Sandefur
joltingjacksandefur at gmail.com
Tue Jan 4 22:02:46 UTC 2011
Do you think these Falks will appeal this disision to the U.S supreme court?
RJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott C. LaBarre" <slabarre at labarrelaw.com>
To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 4:01 PM
Subject: [blindlaw] Great Opinion in Enyart v. NCBE
Friends, we secured a wonderful victory in the Enyart case. Please find an
accessible pdf attached. The Panel upheld Judge Breyer's original ruling
that NCBE must provide the requested accommodations of Stephanie Enyart.
Additionally, the 9th Circuit made it clear that the DOJ regulation
requiring that test administraters provide the accommodations that best
insure that a person with a disability to take the exam on a level playing
field applies.
Scott C. LaBarre, Esq.
LaBarre Law Offices P.C.
1660 South Albion Street, Ste. 918
Denver, Colorado 80222
303 504-5979 (voice)
303 757-3640 (fax)
slabarre at labarrelaw.com (e-mail)
www.labarrelaw.com (website)
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message may contain confidential and privileged
information. If you are not the designated recipient, you may not read,
copy, distribute or retain this message. If you received this message in
error, please notify the sender at 303) 504-5979 or slabarre at labarrelaw.com,
and destroy and delete it from your system. This message and any attachments
are covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindlaw:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/joltingjacksandefur%40gmail.com
>
More information about the BlindLaw
mailing list