[blindlaw] Discriminating Signs
AZNOR99 at aol.com
AZNOR99 at aol.com
Mon Sep 12 02:52:47 UTC 2011
I know of several who've done so in different places throughout the
country. Some State Transportation Departments even subsidize the cost of such
signs in the interest of promoting pedestrian and neighborhood safety. The
City has the ability and arguably the right to erect signs it viewes are in
the public good. We may disagree that this sort of sign is for the good
of anyone, but others might have differing opinions. Whether such a sign is
legal is exactly at the heart of this discussion.
In a message dated 9/11/2011 10:45:19 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
stone_troll at sbcglobal.net writes:
Other than the anecdote I related earlier, I know of no instance until
this one where such a sign was put up without the consent and cooperation of
the person for whom the sign was intended, except in the case of severely
disabled children or if a legal guardian had the sign put up. I was not
aware that it was legal for a town to decide that such a sign was appropriate.
Mark BurningHawk
Skype and Twitter: BurningHawk1969
Home: Http://MarkBurningHawk.net/
Namaste!
_______________________________________________
blindlaw mailing list
blindlaw at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindlaw:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/aznor99%40aol.com
More information about the BlindLaw
mailing list