[blindlaw] concerned for a friend

Lawrence Berger lberger at sfmslaw.com
Wed May 9 21:36:02 UTC 2012


I'm replying late, so I apologize if I'm just going over old ground, but:
in many states, you can collect unemployment at the same time you are
receiving severance pay.  This does vary state-by-state, but the state
unemployment compensation agency may be able to help.


Larry Berger
Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP
mailto:lberger at sfmslaw.com
(610) 891-9880     phone



-----Original Message-----
From: Albrektson, David M CIV 70, FFSC [mailto:david.albrektson at navy.mil]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 7:59 AM
To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org
Subject: [blindlaw] concerned for a friend

The folowing post has no disability-related issues although I wonder if
there may be some issues re: age-discrimination - not sure if it's OK to
post to this list.  My apology if this post is outside the list's scope.
I'm just interested in getting some feedback, ideas, etc.

A friend of mine, 61 y/o, was told recently by her employer that 'your
skill-set no longer matches our needs' and she was let go from her job.
She's worked as a bookkeeper for this small company for almost 10 years.
Strangely, the employer is paying her some kind of a severance pay,
although rather than lump-summing it, they're giving her a weekly check.
My friend has no idea what the amount of her severance will be...severance
was never discussed, never spelled-out, and she has been unable to obtain
clarification from the employer despite her requests for same.  My friend
says she cannot apply for unemployment compensation at this time because
she is still receiving money from her former employer.  She is dubious she
will find another job here in Rhode Island - lousy economy and she says
'Who's going to employ a 61 year-old woman?'.  She is worried that if she
does not apply for unemployment benefits within a certain time period, she
may miss-out on the government's offer for 'extended benefits'.  She's
also concerned that while she was formerly identified as 'fully vested' in
the company's retirement plan, her current status has been changed  to
'80% vested'.  I've advised her to consult an attorney and she is
considering so doing but has not moved on this matter as yet.

Dav eA




More information about the BlindLaw mailing list