[blindlaw] Re Senator's Update Last Post
Elizabeth Rene
emrene at earthlink.net
Sat May 19 00:47:00 UTC 2012
I think that the strongest argument you have is that the Coast Guard is
governed by the Department of Homeland Security, and that you've served
there in uniform already.
You could distinguish your situation from that of the regular armed services
(Defense Department), and neutralize some of the arguments that might be
raised against admitting an already-blind person to military service. Then
you could point to the competency of those blind servicemen still active
after being wounded to bolster your argument that you, too, will serve
competently.
My hope would be that this way you might win the support of people who might
otherwise feel politically obligated to oppose you.
Since you would probably be only the third or fourth blind person to serve
in uniform, and maybe only the first to get there without first being
wounded, I wonder whether a "getting to yes"strategy might not have a better
chance of getting what you want.
As you point out, the Coast Guard were more open-minded than the other
branches. Maybe if the other branches don't see you as a threat (dangerous
legal precedent), they won't have reason to oppose you.
Having been around during all of the "don't ask, don't tell"debate, you know
how all of the arguments, subtexts, and value avowals influenced decisions.
Maybe you could use that knowledge to inform a campaign of strategic
diplomacy that would get you in and leave you breathing room to serve
harmoniously day-to-day, year-to-year with your commanding officers.
Best,
Elizabeth
More information about the BlindLaw
mailing list