[blindlaw] Hospital "fall risk" policies for blind/visually impaired patients

[Al Elia]

		What jurisdiction is the hospital in?
		

		Get Outlook for iOS
	





On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:19 PM -0400, "Andrew Webb via BlindLaw" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org> wrote:










Not specifically that I knew of, but I will ask the relevant players.



-----Original Message-----
From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Chang,
Patti via BlindLaw
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 4:09 PM
To: Blind Law Mailing List
Cc: Chang, Patti
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Hospital "fall risk" policies for blind/visually
impaired patients

Hasn't EFE in Chicago done some work on this?


-----Original Message-----
From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Webb
via BlindLaw
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 3:54 PM
To: 'Blind Law Mailing List'
Cc: Andrew Webb
Subject: [blindlaw] Hospital "fall risk" policies for blind/visually
impaired patients

Hello,

 

Has anyone here had experience addressing (from the legal standpoint) a
hospital's policy requiring that a blind patient be automatically classified
as a fall risk upon admission?  Client is legally blind, generally healthy,
exercises vigorously, and has excellent travel and cane skills. Client was
recently admitted to hospital for observation, and was required to wear a
bright yellow bracelet labled "fall risk" throughout the stay. Client was
forbidden from standing up from bed without a nurse present, and even
required to have a nurse present in the bathroom when client went to
relieve, etc. (Nurse was partitioned only by a hanging plastic sheet within
the bathroom, in order to afford client some "privacy." Client describes the
experience as similar to a dog relieving while being watched by the master.
Client protested the policy throughout the stay, but nurss and hospital
administrators were absolutely inflexible. There was no other basis
(medications, other conditions, etc.) on which to classify client as a fall
risk, and hospital cited no basis other than blindness for the
classification.

 

 

I have yet to dig into the case law, or visit the DOJ website in search of
relevant consent decrees, etc.  Just wondered if anybody had any direct
experience here, could offer any comments or relevant resources/authorities.

 

Thanks,

Andrew

 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
BlindLaw mailing list
BlindLaw at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
BlindLaw:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/pchang%40nfb.org

Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is
confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others
authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in
relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may
be unlawful.

This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been
automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a
Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for
your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and
compliance. To find out more visit the Mimecast website.
_______________________________________________
BlindLaw mailing list
BlindLaw at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
BlindLaw:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/awebb2168%40gmail.com


_______________________________________________
BlindLaw mailing list
BlindLaw at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/al.elia%40aol.com