[blindlaw] Arguing in courts using soft copy documents

Dan Beitz dbeitz at wiennergould.com
Thu Sep 7 13:44:44 UTC 2017


It is easy when you are arguing, because there isn't a second stream of audio.  When the other side is arguing, you make sure you are in a position to take notes, so you can rebut.  This also isn't an issue.  When you are trying to find something when others are talking is when you really have to concentrate.  It really is just practice.  I know it's doable, as I have tried cases using this technique.  I really have no other choice though, as my braille reading is way too slow to be useful in court.



Daniel K. Beitz
Wienner & Gould, P.C.
950 University Dr., Ste. 350
Rochester, MI  48307
Phone:  (248) 841-9405
Fax:  (248) 652-2729
dbeitz at wiennergould.com

www.wiennergould.com


This email transmission and any documents, files or previous email messages attached
to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged.  If you are
not the intended recipient or the individual responsible for delivering this email
to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
or distribution or use of any of the information contained herein or attached to
this email is strictly prohibited.  Should you receive this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this email or by telephoning
us at (248) 841-9400.


-----Original Message-----
From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw
Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 9:22 AM
To: Blind Law Mailing List
Cc: Singh, Nandini
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Arguing in courts using soft copy documents

So I am wondering about this. How are you able to listen to what your screenreader is telling you and what is happening in the courtroom? I realize that part of the technique involves minimizing two streams of audible information, but how is this done well? I have not been able to do so, though I would like to.

-----Original Message-----
From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Dan Beitz via BlindLaw
Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 9:16 AM
To: Blind Law Mailing List
Cc: Dan Beitz
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Arguing in courts using soft copy documents

You can also use an iPad with an air pod in one ear.



Daniel K. Beitz
Wienner & Gould, P.C.
950 University Dr., Ste. 350
Rochester, MI  48307
Phone:  (248) 841-9405
Fax:  (248) 652-2729
dbeitz at wiennergould.com

www.wiennergould.com


This email transmission and any documents, files or previous email messages attached to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient or the individual responsible for delivering this email to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution or use of any of the information contained herein or attached to this email is strictly prohibited.  Should you receive this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this email or by telephoning us at (248) 841-9400.

-----Original Message-----
From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Melissa Allman via BlindLaw
Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 7:27 AM
To: Blind Law Mailing List
Cc: mrallman116 at gmail.com
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Arguing in courts using soft copy documents

In court, I use a notetaker with a braille display. This allows me to reference documents without any speech output so that I am not distracted and so that opposing counsel and other individuals do not hear what I am Reading. I hope that helps some.
Melissa Allman

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 7, 2017, at 3:36 AM, Rahul Bajaj via BlindLaw <blindlaw at nfbnet.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> I hope this message finds you well. Here in India, courts have 
> increasingly begun using soft copy documents at oral argument.
> While this has the potential of making the practice of law more 
> accessible to the disabled than has been hitherto possible, it may 
> also give rise to some logistical challenges.
> More specifically, I wonder how a blind lawyer would be able to use 
> screen reading technology and refer to the documentation that they are 
> relying on while also conversing with the judge and answering their 
> questions.
> 
> So if any of you have any experience of litigating in courts which 
> have gone fully digital, please share your experiences.
> 
> Best,
> Rahul
> 
> _______________________________________________
> BlindLaw mailing list
> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mrallman116%40gm
> ail.com

_______________________________________________
BlindLaw mailing list
BlindLaw at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/dbeitz%40wiennergould.com

_______________________________________________
BlindLaw mailing list
BlindLaw at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com

_______________________________________________
BlindLaw mailing list
BlindLaw at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/dbeitz%40wiennergould.com




More information about the BlindLaw mailing list