From chris.stewart at uky.edu Thu Nov 1 14:02:15 2018 From: chris.stewart at uky.edu (Stewart, Christopher K) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 09:02:15 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] conducting investigations In-Reply-To: <4b09d2df-e48d-f8a7-0774-6b7e91e80087@fiatfiendum.org> References: <4b09d2df-e48d-f8a7-0774-6b7e91e80087@fiatfiendum.org> Message-ID: That's really interesting info. And now that you mention it, it makes a lot of sense. In fact, everything I pointed out about tone of voice, body movement, Etc. are all things which require a baseline knowledge of the person. They're also instances where the person's reactions could, as you said, be the result of something completely different. I know investigators who swear they can spot someone lying, but I imagine that may well be confirmation bias. They tend to interview criminals. Criminals frequently lye. They've caught many criminals lying. Therefore their inclinations must have been correct. Anyhow, thanks for the info. On 11/1/18, Sai wrote: > FWIW: the research on this (which I know fairly well because it was > related to my master's thesis and also to my litigation about TSA's SPOT > program) is pretty solidly in favor of one conclusion: > > There does not exist any reliable way to detect lies, short of using an > fMRI scanner. The best results shown to date are barely even > statistically significant (let alone practically), and even those are > only in highly controlled and unnatural settings. > > > There are somewhat reliable ways to detect *emotions*, but they rely > substantially on knowing that specific person's baseline. So e.g. you > could detect that someone is nervous, angry, smug, etc. > > > However, knowing that emotion doesn't tell you whether they're lying or > not. > > Suppose e.g. that someone in a police interrogation room responds with > fear when accused of raping someone. Are they afraid of being caught? > Afraid of a false accusation? Reminded of a traumatic personal history? > Afraid of perceived aggression? Randomly thinking about something else? > Claustrophobic? Afraid they'll get a shiv while locked up? Afraid for > what might happen to their family? Afraid of being caught in an actual > lie? Afraid the cop will do a search and find the (totally unrelated) > crack rock in their sock? Etc. etc. > > > There are simply too many possible reasons someone can experience an > emotion. Without knowing that specific person very, very well, you can't > correctly make the jump (as various agencies would like to do) from > "expression of fear" to "sign of guilt". > > Same is true for every symptom you listed. > > Same is true for a polygraph, which is why it's inadmissible. It's pure > bullshit whose effects rely entirely on whether the subject believes it, > and whether you care about the risk of false confessions. > > "Gut feeling" has been repeatedly proven to be not just wrong, but often > worse than wrong — it heavily plays into confirmation bias, bigotry, > etc. Results are no better for "experienced" people like cops & judges. > > > If you want to catch someone in a lie, you have to rely on logic, > contradictory evidence, etc. Not whether or not the person fidgets. > > (Maybe your chairs are uncomfortable, or they need to go pee…) > > > I've attached some recent meta-analysis papers on the subject in case > you want to read for yourself. > > Sincerely, > Sai > President, Fiat Fiendum, Inc. > > On 10/31/18 16:48, Stewart, Christopher K via BlindLaw wrote: >> This claim is ableist and absurd. First, many common tells of lying >> are readily detectable to a blind person: throat clearing; vocal >> tension; shallower breathing; fidgiting or feet shuffling; over >> verbosity; unnatural hesitations inconsistent with the rest of their >> answers. I could go on and on. The notion that because we can't see >> one or two visual cues we can't spot a falsehood is ridiculous. >> >> Moreover, in investigative work, experienced investigators will tell >> you they often follow their gut. Of course blind people have gut >> instincts as well. But at the end of the day, as lawyers, what our gut >> says doesn't matter, it's what the testimony and the facts reveal. >> That's the record we work with. I've seen seasoned lawyers go down >> rabbit holes in depositions that leave me scratching my head, knowing >> they just waisted their time and didn't get what they were after. It >> happens, and it has nothing to do with whether or not they can see. >> >> Best, >> Chris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sai%40fiatfiendum.org >> > -- Chris K. Stewart Attorney at Law KBA #97351 Ph: (502)457-1757 From sai at fiatfiendum.org Thu Nov 1 14:21:41 2018 From: sai at fiatfiendum.org (Sai) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 15:21:41 +0100 Subject: [blindlaw] conducting investigations In-Reply-To: References: <4b09d2df-e48d-f8a7-0774-6b7e91e80087@fiatfiendum.org> Message-ID: > They tend to interview criminals. *Alleged* criminals entitled to, but rarely receiving, presumption of Innocence. One of the compounding problems is that the people targeted for investigation to begin with are a hugely skewed group. They then get pushed to plea, even if innocent, which in turn makes the prosecution think they were right, and feeds that cycle — completely regardless of actual accuracy. Which is why e.g. an experienced cop may well have a completely sincere and good faith "gut feeling" that the black guy did it and is lying, and not even be (consciously) racist, but still be wrong. Allowing this kind of totally spurious yet sincerely believed pseudo-evidence into the process, anywhere, inevitably and systemically worsens biases. Blinding (in the other sense) is actually one of the few things that provably improves your lie detection ability, because you don't get exposed to distractor information that would bias your logic. So if you're blind and can't see their mannerisms etc., that "disability" is actually a *good* thing for your ability to get to the truth. Ironic, and a bit of a pun… but it's true. Sincerely, Sai Sent from my phone; please excuse the concision and autocorrect typos. On Nov 1, 2018 15:02, "Stewart, Christopher K" wrote: That's really interesting info. And now that you mention it, it makes a lot of sense. In fact, everything I pointed out about tone of voice, body movement, Etc. are all things which require a baseline knowledge of the person. They're also instances where the person's reactions could, as you said, be the result of something completely different. I know investigators who swear they can spot someone lying, but I imagine that may well be confirmation bias. They tend to interview criminals. Criminals frequently lye. They've caught many criminals lying. Therefore their inclinations must have been correct. Anyhow, thanks for the info. On 11/1/18, Sai wrote: > FWIW: the research on this (which I know fairly well because it was > related to my master's thesis and also to my litigation about TSA's SPOT > program) is pretty solidly in favor of one conclusion: > > There does not exist any reliable way to detect lies, short of using an > fMRI scanner. The best results shown to date are barely even > statistically significant (let alone practically), and even those are > only in highly controlled and unnatural settings. > > > There are somewhat reliable ways to detect *emotions*, but they rely > substantially on knowing that specific person's baseline. So e.g. you > could detect that someone is nervous, angry, smug, etc. > > > However, knowing that emotion doesn't tell you whether they're lying or > not. > > Suppose e.g. that someone in a police interrogation room responds with > fear when accused of raping someone. Are they afraid of being caught? > Afraid of a false accusation? Reminded of a traumatic personal history? > Afraid of perceived aggression? Randomly thinking about something else? > Claustrophobic? Afraid they'll get a shiv while locked up? Afraid for > what might happen to their family? Afraid of being caught in an actual > lie? Afraid the cop will do a search and find the (totally unrelated) > crack rock in their sock? Etc. etc. > > > There are simply too many possible reasons someone can experience an > emotion. Without knowing that specific person very, very well, you can't > correctly make the jump (as various agencies would like to do) from > "expression of fear" to "sign of guilt". > > Same is true for every symptom you listed. > > Same is true for a polygraph, which is why it's inadmissible. It's pure > bullshit whose effects rely entirely on whether the subject believes it, > and whether you care about the risk of false confessions. > > "Gut feeling" has been repeatedly proven to be not just wrong, but often > worse than wrong — it heavily plays into confirmation bias, bigotry, > etc. Results are no better for "experienced" people like cops & judges. > > > If you want to catch someone in a lie, you have to rely on logic, > contradictory evidence, etc. Not whether or not the person fidgets. > > (Maybe your chairs are uncomfortable, or they need to go pee…) > > > I've attached some recent meta-analysis papers on the subject in case > you want to read for yourself. > > Sincerely, > Sai > President, Fiat Fiendum, Inc. > > On 10/31/18 16:48, Stewart, Christopher K via BlindLaw wrote: >> This claim is ableist and absurd. First, many common tells of lying >> are readily detectable to a blind person: throat clearing; vocal >> tension; shallower breathing; fidgiting or feet shuffling; over >> verbosity; unnatural hesitations inconsistent with the rest of their >> answers. I could go on and on. The notion that because we can't see >> one or two visual cues we can't spot a falsehood is ridiculous. >> >> Moreover, in investigative work, experienced investigators will tell >> you they often follow their gut. Of course blind people have gut >> instincts as well. But at the end of the day, as lawyers, what our gut >> says doesn't matter, it's what the testimony and the facts reveal. >> That's the record we work with. I've seen seasoned lawyers go down >> rabbit holes in depositions that leave me scratching my head, knowing >> they just waisted their time and didn't get what they were after. It >> happens, and it has nothing to do with whether or not they can see. >> >> Best, >> Chris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sai%40fiatfiendum.org >> > -- Chris K. Stewart Attorney at Law KBA #97351 Ph: (502)457-1757 From cjdavis9193 at gmail.com Thu Nov 1 15:38:38 2018 From: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com (Cody Davis) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 11:38:38 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? Message-ID: <70BCBA47-3083-4D83-A2D5-5746D02F3A89@gmail.com> All, Does anyone have any experience using an iPad Pro with Voiceover as a laptop replacement at work? I’m curious how viable of an option that would be. Did you have to use it along with a desktop, or were you able to use the iPad as your primary computer.? In your experience, if the iPad Pro a redundancy if I am already using an iPhone? Thanks for any input. Respectfully, Cody J. Davis, J.D., M.P.A. Email: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com Phone: (919) 349-9799 Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/codyjdavisesq From joshl at loevy.com Thu Nov 1 15:43:09 2018 From: joshl at loevy.com (Josh Loevy) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 10:43:09 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? In-Reply-To: <70BCBA47-3083-4D83-A2D5-5746D02F3A89@gmail.com> References: <70BCBA47-3083-4D83-A2D5-5746D02F3A89@gmail.com> Message-ID: <55426b618e03829154bb6e678df65951@mail.gmail.com> If I may add an addendum to this question... If you are using IOS as a laptop sub, can you speak to the word processing experience specifically? I have heard good things about Scrivener as a legal writing tool, has anyone used that? -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: unknown sender Subject: no subject Date: no date Size: 4284 URL: From agtolentino at gmail.com Thu Nov 1 15:49:46 2018 From: agtolentino at gmail.com (Aser Tolentino) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 08:49:46 -0700 Subject: [blindlaw] Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? In-Reply-To: <70BCBA47-3083-4D83-A2D5-5746D02F3A89@gmail.com> References: <70BCBA47-3083-4D83-A2D5-5746D02F3A89@gmail.com> Message-ID: <11648D1C-B9F2-4D5D-9895-82690E241CD7@gmail.com> Good morning, I like to think of the iPad Pro like the F/A-22 Raptor. It’s really sleek and sexy and does some things incredibly well, and some things less well. I occasionally get into a mood where I do as much on iOS as possible, but even though the smart keyboard and split screen do a lot to make iOS more multitasking friendly then it used to be, I would still say that it’s nothing like sitting in front of my laptop alt-tabbing between the web, two documents, email and a book. Scrivener is really cool, in fact I’m going to start a book on it for National Novel Writing Month today on an iPad, but I think to fully take advantage of it, you’d want to run it on a Mac: the PC version doesn’t work with JAWS. Because of the split-screen functionality, I would say there are advantages to the iPad over the phone, particularly if you have some sight, but mileage may vary there. I like taking notes on the iPhone but ultimately always return to Word for a more responsive and fleshed out proofing experience. Apps like Drafts that sync to the cloud make this workflow really smooth. Anyway, those are just my two cents. Please let me know if you have any questions you think I can help out with. Respectfully, Aser Tolentino, Esq. > On Nov 1, 2018, at 08:38, Cody Davis via BlindLaw wrote: > > All, > > Does anyone have any experience using an iPad Pro with Voiceover as a laptop replacement at work? I’m curious how viable of an option that would be. Did you have to use it along with a desktop, or were you able to use the iPad as your primary computer.? > > In your experience, if the iPad Pro a redundancy if I am already using an iPhone? > > Thanks for any input. > > > Respectfully, > Cody J. Davis, J.D., M.P.A. > Email: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com > Phone: (919) 349-9799 > Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/codyjdavisesq > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/agtolentino%40gmail.com From cjdavis9193 at gmail.com Thu Nov 1 15:53:46 2018 From: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com (Cody Davis) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 11:53:46 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? In-Reply-To: <11648D1C-B9F2-4D5D-9895-82690E241CD7@gmail.com> References: <70BCBA47-3083-4D83-A2D5-5746D02F3A89@gmail.com> <11648D1C-B9F2-4D5D-9895-82690E241CD7@gmail.com> Message-ID: Thanks for that input. Respectfully, Cody J. Davis, J.D., M.P.A. Email: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com Phone: (919) 349-9799 Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/codyjdavisesq > On Nov 1, 2018, at 11:49 AM, Aser Tolentino via BlindLaw wrote: > > Good morning, > > I like to think of the iPad Pro like the F/A-22 Raptor. It’s really sleek and sexy and does some things incredibly well, and some things less well. I occasionally get into a mood where I do as much on iOS as possible, but even though the smart keyboard and split screen do a lot to make iOS more multitasking friendly then it used to be, I would still say that it’s nothing like sitting in front of my laptop alt-tabbing between the web, two documents, email and a book. Scrivener is really cool, in fact I’m going to start a book on it for National Novel Writing Month today on an iPad, but I think to fully take advantage of it, you’d want to run it on a Mac: the PC version doesn’t work with JAWS. > > Because of the split-screen functionality, I would say there are advantages to the iPad over the phone, particularly if you have some sight, but mileage may vary there. I like taking notes on the iPhone but ultimately always return to Word for a more responsive and fleshed out proofing experience. Apps like Drafts that sync to the cloud make this workflow really smooth. Anyway, those are just my two cents. Please let me know if you have any questions you think I can help out with. > > Respectfully, > Aser Tolentino, Esq. > >> On Nov 1, 2018, at 08:38, Cody Davis via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> All, >> >> Does anyone have any experience using an iPad Pro with Voiceover as a laptop replacement at work? I’m curious how viable of an option that would be. Did you have to use it along with a desktop, or were you able to use the iPad as your primary computer.? >> >> In your experience, if the iPad Pro a redundancy if I am already using an iPhone? >> >> Thanks for any input. >> >> >> Respectfully, >> Cody J. Davis, J.D., M.P.A. >> Email: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com >> Phone: (919) 349-9799 >> Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/codyjdavisesq >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/agtolentino%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cjdavis9193%40gmail.com From slabarre at labarrelaw.com Fri Nov 2 13:24:37 2018 From: slabarre at labarrelaw.com (Scott C. LaBarre) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 07:24:37 -0600 Subject: [blindlaw] FW: Attorney and Legal Internship Vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <091601d472af$6762f9d0$3628ed70$@labarrelaw.com> fyi From: DOJlawjobs (OARM) Sent: Friday, November 2, 2018 6:20 AM To: Undisclosed recipients: Subject: Attorney and Legal Internship Vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice Below is a list of current attorney and legal internship vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice. The Department of Justice office places a high value on diversity of experiences and perspectives and encourages applications from all qualified men and women from all ethnic and racial backgrounds, veterans , LGBT individuals, and persons with disabilities . We welcome applications from candidates who are interested in positively contributing to Justice and hope that you will consider joining the dedicated public servants at the Department of Justice. To learn more about Justice and our legal careers, please visit our website at https://www.justice.gov/legal-careers. Manage Your Email: If you no longer wish to receive these email notifications, please reply to this email with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. If you would like to update your contact information, please submit the following information: SCHOOL OR ORGANIZATION: NAME: TITLE: PHONE: EMAIL: WEBSITE: Attorney Vacancies & Volunteer Legal Internships Hiring Organization Job Title State Posted/ Updated Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of Kentucky Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer State Kentucky Posted/ Updated November 2, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of Kentucky Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer State Kentucky Posted/ Updated November 2, 2018 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Supervisory Trial Attorney (Deputy Chief, Strategy, Policy, and Training Unit) State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 2, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of Kentucky Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer State Kentucky Posted/ Updated November 2, 2018 Hiring Organization National Security Division (NSD) Job Title Law Student Volunteer State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 1, 2018 Hiring Organization National Security Division (NSD) Job Title Attorney Advisor(s) State Posted/ Updated November 1, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of California Job Title Special Assistant U.S. Attorney (Uncompensated) State California Posted/ Updated November 1, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of California Job Title Special Assistant U.S. Attorney (Uncompensated) State California Posted/ Updated November 1, 2018 Hiring Organization Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Job Title Attorney Advisor (General) State Virginia Posted/ Updated November 1, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Western District of Virginia Job Title Law Student Volunteer State Virginia Posted/ Updated November 1, 2018 Hiring Organization United States Trustee Program (USTP) Job Title Assistant US Trustee (AUST) State Tennessee Posted/ Updated November 1, 2018 Hiring Organization Civil Rights Division (CRT) Job Title Trial Attorney State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 1, 2018 Hiring Organization Civil Rights Division (CRT) Job Title Trial Attorney HTPU State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 1, 2018 Hiring Organization Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Job Title General Attorney State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 1, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of Arkansas Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Arkansas Posted/ Updated October 31, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Southern District of Alabama Job Title Law Student Volunteer (Summer 2019) State Alabama Posted/ Updated October 31, 2018 Hiring Organization Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) Job Title Associate Director for Prosecutorial Operations State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated October 31, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of Ohio Job Title Law Student Volunteer - Summer 2019 State Ohio Posted/ Updated October 31, 2018 Hiring Organization Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Job Title Attorney State Virginia Posted/ Updated October 31, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of Georgia Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer State Georgia Posted/ Updated October 29, 2018 Hiring Organization United States Attorney's Office (USAO) Job Title Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) State Indiana Posted/ Updated October 29, 2018 Hiring Organization Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Job Title Attorney State Virginia Posted/ Updated October 29, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO District of Arizona Job Title AUSA State Arizona Posted/ Updated October 29, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO District of Arizona Job Title AUSA State Arizona Posted/ Updated October 29, 2018 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Supervisory Trial Attorney (Deputy Chief, Securities and Financial Fraud Unit) State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated October 29, 2018 Hiring Organization Job Title State Posted/ Updated Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Supervisory Trial Attorney (Deputy Chief, Securities and Financial Fraud Unit) State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated October 29, 2018 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title AUSA State California Posted/ Updated October 26, 2018 Hiring Organization Civil Rights Division (CRT) Job Title Lawe Student Volunteer - Spring, Summer, and Fall Housing & Civil Enforcement Section State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated October 26, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Western District of Pennsylvania Job Title Assistant U.S. Attorney State Pennsylvania Posted/ Updated October 26, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO District of Colorado Job Title Volunteer Law Student, Summer 2019 State Colorado Posted/ Updated October 26, 2018 Hiring Organization Civil Rights Division (CRT) Job Title Law Student Volunteer - Summer 2019 - Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated October 26, 2018 Hiring Organization Civil Rights Division (CRT) Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Spring, Summer, and Fall State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated October 26, 2018 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 88 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rene0373 at gmail.com Fri Nov 2 17:38:15 2018 From: rene0373 at gmail.com (Elizabeth Rene) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:38:15 -0700 Subject: [blindlaw] Conducting Investigations Message-ID: <0150D925-94C5-4012-AD1C-B04234430624@gmail.com> Amen, Chris, well put. This goes for jury service too, and for trying cases from the bench. Elizabeth M René Attorney at Law WSBA #10710 KCBA #21824 rene0373 at gmail.com From ETroutman at BrooksPierce.com Mon Nov 5 00:37:44 2018 From: ETroutman at BrooksPierce.com (Elizabeth Troutman) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:37:44 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] conducting investigations Message-ID: <94e3f6ad47fa42b5ba0d2c05fc67efd7@BrooksPierce.com> A huge thanks to everyone who responded to my post about investigations. It didn't feel right when I was told that blind people can't conduct investigations well, but it's hard to argue when you're genuinely uninformed. I am now armed with some good information to start addressing the assumptions and getting myself trained up. I feel so fortunate to have this group. Elizabeth From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of blindlaw-request at nfbnet.org Sent: Friday, November 2, 2018 8:00 AM To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org Subject: BlindLaw Digest, Vol 174, Issue 2 Send BlindLaw mailing list submissions to blindlaw at nfbnet.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to blindlaw-request at nfbnet.org You can reach the person managing the list at blindlaw-owner at nfbnet.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of BlindLaw digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: conducting investigations (Stewart, Christopher K) 2. Re: conducting investigations (Sai) 3. Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? (Cody Davis) 4. Re: Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? (Josh Loevy) 5. Re: Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? (Aser Tolentino) 6. Re: Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? (Cody Davis) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 09:02:15 -0500 From: "Stewart, Christopher K" > To: Sai > Cc: Blind Law Mailing List > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] conducting investigations Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" That's really interesting info. And now that you mention it, it makes a lot of sense. In fact, everything I pointed out about tone of voice, body movement, Etc. are all things which require a baseline knowledge of the person. They're also instances where the person's reactions could, as you said, be the result of something completely different. I know investigators who swear they can spot someone lying, but I imagine that may well be confirmation bias. They tend to interview criminals. Criminals frequently lye. They've caught many criminals lying. Therefore their inclinations must have been correct. Anyhow, thanks for the info. On 11/1/18, Sai > wrote: > FWIW: the research on this (which I know fairly well because it was > related to my master's thesis and also to my litigation about TSA's SPOT > program) is pretty solidly in favor of one conclusion: > > There does not exist any reliable way to detect lies, short of using an > fMRI scanner. The best results shown to date are barely even > statistically significant (let alone practically), and even those are > only in highly controlled and unnatural settings. > > > There are somewhat reliable ways to detect *emotions*, but they rely > substantially on knowing that specific person's baseline. So e.g. you > could detect that someone is nervous, angry, smug, etc. > > > However, knowing that emotion doesn't tell you whether they're lying or > not. > > Suppose e.g. that someone in a police interrogation room responds with > fear when accused of raping someone. Are they afraid of being caught? > Afraid of a false accusation? Reminded of a traumatic personal history? > Afraid of perceived aggression? Randomly thinking about something else? > Claustrophobic? Afraid they'll get a shiv while locked up? Afraid for > what might happen to their family? Afraid of being caught in an actual > lie? Afraid the cop will do a search and find the (totally unrelated) > crack rock in their sock? Etc. etc. > > > There are simply too many possible reasons someone can experience an > emotion. Without knowing that specific person very, very well, you can't > correctly make the jump (as various agencies would like to do) from > "expression of fear" to "sign of guilt". > > Same is true for every symptom you listed. > > Same is true for a polygraph, which is why it's inadmissible. It's pure > bullshit whose effects rely entirely on whether the subject believes it, > and whether you care about the risk of false confessions. > > "Gut feeling" has been repeatedly proven to be not just wrong, but often > worse than wrong ? it heavily plays into confirmation bias, bigotry, > etc. Results are no better for "experienced" people like cops & judges. > > > If you want to catch someone in a lie, you have to rely on logic, > contradictory evidence, etc. Not whether or not the person fidgets. > > (Maybe your chairs are uncomfortable, or they need to go pee?) > > > I've attached some recent meta-analysis papers on the subject in case > you want to read for yourself. > > Sincerely, > Sai > President, Fiat Fiendum, Inc. > > On 10/31/18 16:48, Stewart, Christopher K via BlindLaw wrote: >> This claim is ableist and absurd. First, many common tells of lying >> are readily detectable to a blind person: throat clearing; vocal >> tension; shallower breathing; fidgiting or feet shuffling; over >> verbosity; unnatural hesitations inconsistent with the rest of their >> answers. I could go on and on. The notion that because we can't see >> one or two visual cues we can't spot a falsehood is ridiculous. >> >> Moreover, in investigative work, experienced investigators will tell >> you they often follow their gut. Of course blind people have gut >> instincts as well. But at the end of the day, as lawyers, what our gut >> says doesn't matter, it's what the testimony and the facts reveal. >> That's the record we work with. I've seen seasoned lawyers go down >> rabbit holes in depositions that leave me scratching my head, knowing >> they just waisted their time and didn't get what they were after. It >> happens, and it has nothing to do with whether or not they can see. >> >> Best, >> Chris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sai at fiatfiendum.org >> > -- Chris K. Stewart Attorney at Law KBA #97351 Ph: (502)457-1757 ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 15:21:41 +0100 From: Sai > To: "Stewart, Christopher K" > Cc: Blind Law Mailing List > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] conducting investigations Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > They tend to interview criminals. *Alleged* criminals entitled to, but rarely receiving, presumption of Innocence. One of the compounding problems is that the people targeted for investigation to begin with are a hugely skewed group. They then get pushed to plea, even if innocent, which in turn makes the prosecution think they were right, and feeds that cycle ? completely regardless of actual accuracy. Which is why e.g. an experienced cop may well have a completely sincere and good faith "gut feeling" that the black guy did it and is lying, and not even be (consciously) racist, but still be wrong. Allowing this kind of totally spurious yet sincerely believed pseudo-evidence into the process, anywhere, inevitably and systemically worsens biases. Blinding (in the other sense) is actually one of the few things that provably improves your lie detection ability, because you don't get exposed to distractor information that would bias your logic. So if you're blind and can't see their mannerisms etc., that "disability" is actually a *good* thing for your ability to get to the truth. Ironic, and a bit of a pun? but it's true. Sincerely, Sai Sent from my phone; please excuse the concision and autocorrect typos. On Nov 1, 2018 15:02, "Stewart, Christopher K" > wrote: That's really interesting info. And now that you mention it, it makes a lot of sense. In fact, everything I pointed out about tone of voice, body movement, Etc. are all things which require a baseline knowledge of the person. They're also instances where the person's reactions could, as you said, be the result of something completely different. I know investigators who swear they can spot someone lying, but I imagine that may well be confirmation bias. They tend to interview criminals. Criminals frequently lye. They've caught many criminals lying. Therefore their inclinations must have been correct. Anyhow, thanks for the info. On 11/1/18, Sai > wrote: > FWIW: the research on this (which I know fairly well because it was > related to my master's thesis and also to my litigation about TSA's SPOT > program) is pretty solidly in favor of one conclusion: > > There does not exist any reliable way to detect lies, short of using an > fMRI scanner. The best results shown to date are barely even > statistically significant (let alone practically), and even those are > only in highly controlled and unnatural settings. > > > There are somewhat reliable ways to detect *emotions*, but they rely > substantially on knowing that specific person's baseline. So e.g. you > could detect that someone is nervous, angry, smug, etc. > > > However, knowing that emotion doesn't tell you whether they're lying or > not. > > Suppose e.g. that someone in a police interrogation room responds with > fear when accused of raping someone. Are they afraid of being caught? > Afraid of a false accusation? Reminded of a traumatic personal history? > Afraid of perceived aggression? Randomly thinking about something else? > Claustrophobic? Afraid they'll get a shiv while locked up? Afraid for > what might happen to their family? Afraid of being caught in an actual > lie? Afraid the cop will do a search and find the (totally unrelated) > crack rock in their sock? Etc. etc. > > > There are simply too many possible reasons someone can experience an > emotion. Without knowing that specific person very, very well, you can't > correctly make the jump (as various agencies would like to do) from > "expression of fear" to "sign of guilt". > > Same is true for every symptom you listed. > > Same is true for a polygraph, which is why it's inadmissible. It's pure > bullshit whose effects rely entirely on whether the subject believes it, > and whether you care about the risk of false confessions. > > "Gut feeling" has been repeatedly proven to be not just wrong, but often > worse than wrong ? it heavily plays into confirmation bias, bigotry, > etc. Results are no better for "experienced" people like cops & judges. > > > If you want to catch someone in a lie, you have to rely on logic, > contradictory evidence, etc. Not whether or not the person fidgets. > > (Maybe your chairs are uncomfortable, or they need to go pee?) > > > I've attached some recent meta-analysis papers on the subject in case > you want to read for yourself. > > Sincerely, > Sai > President, Fiat Fiendum, Inc. > > On 10/31/18 16:48, Stewart, Christopher K via BlindLaw wrote: >> This claim is ableist and absurd. First, many common tells of lying >> are readily detectable to a blind person: throat clearing; vocal >> tension; shallower breathing; fidgiting or feet shuffling; over >> verbosity; unnatural hesitations inconsistent with the rest of their >> answers. I could go on and on. The notion that because we can't see >> one or two visual cues we can't spot a falsehood is ridiculous. >> >> Moreover, in investigative work, experienced investigators will tell >> you they often follow their gut. Of course blind people have gut >> instincts as well. But at the end of the day, as lawyers, what our gut >> says doesn't matter, it's what the testimony and the facts reveal. >> That's the record we work with. I've seen seasoned lawyers go down >> rabbit holes in depositions that leave me scratching my head, knowing >> they just waisted their time and didn't get what they were after. It >> happens, and it has nothing to do with whether or not they can see. >> >> Best, >> Chris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sai at fiatfiendum.org >> > -- Chris K. Stewart Attorney at Law KBA #97351 Ph: (502)457-1757 ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 11:38:38 -0400 From: Cody Davis > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Subject: [blindlaw] Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? Message-ID: <70BCBA47-3083-4D83-A2D5-5746D02F3A89 at gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 All, Does anyone have any experience using an iPad Pro with Voiceover as a laptop replacement at work? I?m curious how viable of an option that would be. Did you have to use it along with a desktop, or were you able to use the iPad as your primary computer.? In your experience, if the iPad Pro a redundancy if I am already using an iPhone? Thanks for any input. Respectfully, Cody J. Davis, J.D., M.P.A. Email: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com Phone: (919) 349-9799 Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/codyjdavisesq ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 10:43:09 -0500 From: Josh Loevy > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? Message-ID: <55426b618e03829154bb6e678df65951 at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" If I may add an addendum to this question... If you are using IOS as a laptop sub, can you speak to the word processing experience specifically? I have heard good things about Scrivener as a legal writing tool, has anyone used that? -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: unknown sender Subject: no subject Date: no date Size: 4289 URL: > ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 08:49:46 -0700 From: Aser Tolentino > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? Message-ID: <11648D1C-B9F2-4D5D-9895-82690E241CD7 at gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Good morning, I like to think of the iPad Pro like the F/A-22 Raptor. It?s really sleek and sexy and does some things incredibly well, and some things less well. I occasionally get into a mood where I do as much on iOS as possible, but even though the smart keyboard and split screen do a lot to make iOS more multitasking friendly then it used to be, I would still say that it?s nothing like sitting in front of my laptop alt-tabbing between the web, two documents, email and a book. Scrivener is really cool, in fact I?m going to start a book on it for National Novel Writing Month today on an iPad, but I think to fully take advantage of it, you?d want to run it on a Mac: the PC version doesn?t work with JAWS. Because of the split-screen functionality, I would say there are advantages to the iPad over the phone, particularly if you have some sight, but mileage may vary there. I like taking notes on the iPhone but ultimately always return to Word for a more responsive and fleshed out proofing experience. Apps like Drafts that sync to the cloud make this workflow really smooth. Anyway, those are just my two cents. Please let me know if you have any questions you think I can help out with. Respectfully, Aser Tolentino, Esq. > On Nov 1, 2018, at 08:38, Cody Davis via BlindLaw > wrote: > > All, > > Does anyone have any experience using an iPad Pro with Voiceover as a laptop replacement at work? I?m curious how viable of an option that would be. Did you have to use it along with a desktop, or were you able to use the iPad as your primary computer.? > > In your experience, if the iPad Pro a redundancy if I am already using an iPhone? > > Thanks for any input. > > > Respectfully, > Cody J. Davis, J.D., M.P.A. > Email: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com > Phone: (919) 349-9799 > Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/codyjdavisesq > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/agtolentino at gmail.com ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 11:53:46 -0400 From: Cody Davis > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Thanks for that input. Respectfully, Cody J. Davis, J.D., M.P.A. Email: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com Phone: (919) 349-9799 Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/codyjdavisesq > On Nov 1, 2018, at 11:49 AM, Aser Tolentino via BlindLaw > wrote: > > Good morning, > > I like to think of the iPad Pro like the F/A-22 Raptor. It?s really sleek and sexy and does some things incredibly well, and some things less well. I occasionally get into a mood where I do as much on iOS as possible, but even though the smart keyboard and split screen do a lot to make iOS more multitasking friendly then it used to be, I would still say that it?s nothing like sitting in front of my laptop alt-tabbing between the web, two documents, email and a book. Scrivener is really cool, in fact I?m going to start a book on it for National Novel Writing Month today on an iPad, but I think to fully take advantage of it, you?d want to run it on a Mac: the PC version doesn?t work with JAWS. > > Because of the split-screen functionality, I would say there are advantages to the iPad over the phone, particularly if you have some sight, but mileage may vary there. I like taking notes on the iPhone but ultimately always return to Word for a more responsive and fleshed out proofing experience. Apps like Drafts that sync to the cloud make this workflow really smooth. Anyway, those are just my two cents. Please let me know if you have any questions you think I can help out with. > > Respectfully, > Aser Tolentino, Esq. > >> On Nov 1, 2018, at 08:38, Cody Davis via BlindLaw > wrote: >> >> All, >> >> Does anyone have any experience using an iPad Pro with Voiceover as a laptop replacement at work? I?m curious how viable of an option that would be. Did you have to use it along with a desktop, or were you able to use the iPad as your primary computer.? >> >> In your experience, if the iPad Pro a redundancy if I am already using an iPhone? >> >> Thanks for any input. >> >> >> Respectfully, >> Cody J. Davis, J.D., M.P.A. >> Email: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com >> Phone: (919) 349-9799 >> Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/codyjdavisesq >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/agtolentino at gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cjdavis9193 at gmail.com ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org ------------------------------ End of BlindLaw Digest, Vol 174, Issue 2 **************************************** Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail transmittal is privileged and confidential intended for the addressee only. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure of this information in any way or taking of any action in reliance on this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the person transmitting the information immediately. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware by Mimecast Ltd. From sai at fiatfiendum.org Mon Nov 5 09:58:34 2018 From: sai at fiatfiendum.org (Sai) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 10:58:34 +0100 Subject: [blindlaw] Supposedly suspicious behaviors (WAS: conducting investigations) In-Reply-To: <94e3f6ad47fa42b5ba0d2c05fc67efd7@BrooksPierce.com> References: <94e3f6ad47fa42b5ba0d2c05fc67efd7@BrooksPierce.com> Message-ID: On the subject of behaviors like gaze, sweat, shuffling, etc not actually having any legitimate bearing on determining suspicion: Here's an affidavit I filed in my case against all of TSA's policies. At page 41, heading "SPOT behaviors", I exhaustively list behaviors that are on the TSA SPOT ("behavior detection") profiling list, and explain how they are in fact symptoms of my disability, exercise of Constitutional rights, or just being a human. PDF (as filed): Google Docs version (as drafted): Google Docs version of TSA's SPOT checklist (transcribed by me): Many of the supposedly suspicious behaviors are specifically related to my blindness, namely: 1. "Observation and behavior analysis" - 4 or more points = selectee screening, 6 or more points = automatic referral to police * 1 point: Arrives ​late ​for ​flight, ​if ​known * 1 point: Avoids eye contact with security personnel or LEO * 2 points: Powerful ​grip ​of ​a ​bag ​and/or ​hand ​inside ​the ​bag * 2 points: Rigid ​posture, ​minimal ​body ​movements ​with ​arms ​close ​to ​sides * 3 points: Appears ​to ​be ​confused ​or ​disoriented * 3 points: Appears ​to ​be ​in ​disguise That's 12 points total, just for perceived symptoms related to my blindness. Well over the 6 points for police referral. 2. "Signs of deception" - 2 or more = automatic referral to police * Appearing ​not ​to ​understand ​questions * Distracted ​or ​inability ​to ​pay ​attention ​to ​present ​situation * Gazing down * No ​or ​little ​direct ​eye ​contact * Placing ​objects ​between ​self ​and ​official (My affidavit has explanations of why each one applies to me.) So basically, TSA's policy means that ordinary blind people are to be referred to police for behaviors that are perfectly normal symptoms of disability. If you total everything I list in that affidavit as normal for me, I have 56 points of "suspiciousness" (vs 6 for police referral) & 24 "signs of deception" (vs 2 for police referral). It's completely absurd. One part of my lawsuit seeks to permanently enjoin this program, and make TSA's documents about it public. The case is Sai v Pekoske, No. 15-2356 (1st Cir.). Original proceeding under 49 USC 46110, not an appeal. I'm IFP and need counsel, so if any of you are interested or know someone who may be, please get in touch. Sincerely, Sai President, Fiat Fiendum, Inc. On 11/5/18 01:37, Elizabeth Troutman via BlindLaw wrote: > A huge thanks to everyone who responded to my post about investigations. It didn't feel right when I was told that blind people can't conduct investigations well, but it's hard to argue when you're genuinely uninformed. I am now armed with some good information to start addressing the assumptions and getting myself trained up. I feel so fortunate to have this group. > Elizabeth > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of blindlaw-request at nfbnet.org > Sent: Friday, November 2, 2018 8:00 AM > To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org > Subject: BlindLaw Digest, Vol 174, Issue 2 > > Send BlindLaw mailing list submissions to > blindlaw at nfbnet.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > blindlaw-request at nfbnet.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > blindlaw-owner at nfbnet.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of BlindLaw digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: conducting investigations (Stewart, Christopher K) > 2. Re: conducting investigations (Sai) > 3. Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? > (Cody Davis) > 4. Re: Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? > (Josh Loevy) > 5. Re: Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? > (Aser Tolentino) > 6. Re: Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? > (Cody Davis) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 09:02:15 -0500 > From: "Stewart, Christopher K" > > To: Sai > > Cc: Blind Law Mailing List > > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] conducting investigations > Message-ID: > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > That's really interesting info. And now that you mention it, it makes > a lot of sense. In fact, everything I pointed out about tone of voice, > body movement, Etc. are all things which require a baseline knowledge > of the person. They're also instances where the person's reactions > could, as you said, be the result of something completely different. I > know investigators who swear they can spot someone lying, but I > imagine that may well be confirmation bias. They tend to interview > criminals. Criminals frequently lye. They've caught many criminals > lying. Therefore their inclinations must have been correct. > > Anyhow, thanks for the info. > > > > On 11/1/18, Sai > wrote: >> FWIW: the research on this (which I know fairly well because it was >> related to my master's thesis and also to my litigation about TSA's SPOT >> program) is pretty solidly in favor of one conclusion: >> >> There does not exist any reliable way to detect lies, short of using an >> fMRI scanner. The best results shown to date are barely even >> statistically significant (let alone practically), and even those are >> only in highly controlled and unnatural settings. >> >> >> There are somewhat reliable ways to detect *emotions*, but they rely >> substantially on knowing that specific person's baseline. So e.g. you >> could detect that someone is nervous, angry, smug, etc. >> >> >> However, knowing that emotion doesn't tell you whether they're lying or >> not. >> >> Suppose e.g. that someone in a police interrogation room responds with >> fear when accused of raping someone. Are they afraid of being caught? >> Afraid of a false accusation? Reminded of a traumatic personal history? >> Afraid of perceived aggression? Randomly thinking about something else? >> Claustrophobic? Afraid they'll get a shiv while locked up? Afraid for >> what might happen to their family? Afraid of being caught in an actual >> lie? Afraid the cop will do a search and find the (totally unrelated) >> crack rock in their sock? Etc. etc. >> >> >> There are simply too many possible reasons someone can experience an >> emotion. Without knowing that specific person very, very well, you can't >> correctly make the jump (as various agencies would like to do) from >> "expression of fear" to "sign of guilt". >> >> Same is true for every symptom you listed. >> >> Same is true for a polygraph, which is why it's inadmissible. It's pure >> bullshit whose effects rely entirely on whether the subject believes it, >> and whether you care about the risk of false confessions. >> >> "Gut feeling" has been repeatedly proven to be not just wrong, but often >> worse than wrong ? it heavily plays into confirmation bias, bigotry, >> etc. Results are no better for "experienced" people like cops & judges. >> >> >> If you want to catch someone in a lie, you have to rely on logic, >> contradictory evidence, etc. Not whether or not the person fidgets. >> >> (Maybe your chairs are uncomfortable, or they need to go pee?) >> >> >> I've attached some recent meta-analysis papers on the subject in case >> you want to read for yourself. >> >> Sincerely, >> Sai >> President, Fiat Fiendum, Inc. >> >> On 10/31/18 16:48, Stewart, Christopher K via BlindLaw wrote: >>> This claim is ableist and absurd. First, many common tells of lying >>> are readily detectable to a blind person: throat clearing; vocal >>> tension; shallower breathing; fidgiting or feet shuffling; over >>> verbosity; unnatural hesitations inconsistent with the rest of their >>> answers. I could go on and on. The notion that because we can't see >>> one or two visual cues we can't spot a falsehood is ridiculous. >>> >>> Moreover, in investigative work, experienced investigators will tell >>> you they often follow their gut. Of course blind people have gut >>> instincts as well. But at the end of the day, as lawyers, what our gut >>> says doesn't matter, it's what the testimony and the facts reveal. >>> That's the record we work with. I've seen seasoned lawyers go down >>> rabbit holes in depositions that leave me scratching my head, knowing >>> they just waisted their time and didn't get what they were after. It >>> happens, and it has nothing to do with whether or not they can see. >>> >>> Best, >>> Chris >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>> BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sai at fiatfiendum.org >>> >> > > > -- > Chris K. Stewart > Attorney at Law > KBA #97351 > Ph: > (502)457-1757 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 15:21:41 +0100 > From: Sai > > To: "Stewart, Christopher K" > > Cc: Blind Law Mailing List > > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] conducting investigations > Message-ID: > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > >> They tend to interview criminals. > > *Alleged* criminals entitled to, but rarely receiving, presumption of > Innocence. > > One of the compounding problems is that the people targeted for > investigation to begin with are a hugely skewed group. They then get pushed > to plea, even if innocent, which in turn makes the prosecution think they > were right, and feeds that cycle ? completely regardless of actual accuracy. > > Which is why e.g. an experienced cop may well have a completely sincere and > good faith "gut feeling" that the black guy did it and is lying, and not > even be (consciously) racist, but still be wrong. > > Allowing this kind of totally spurious yet sincerely believed > pseudo-evidence into the process, anywhere, inevitably and systemically > worsens biases. > > Blinding (in the other sense) is actually one of the few things that > provably improves your lie detection ability, because you don't get exposed > to distractor information that would bias your logic. > > So if you're blind and can't see their mannerisms etc., that "disability" > is actually a *good* thing for your ability to get to the truth. > > Ironic, and a bit of a pun? but it's true. > > Sincerely, > Sai > > Sent from my phone; please excuse the concision and autocorrect typos. > > On Nov 1, 2018 15:02, "Stewart, Christopher K" > > wrote: > > That's really interesting info. And now that you mention it, it makes > a lot of sense. In fact, everything I pointed out about tone of voice, > body movement, Etc. are all things which require a baseline knowledge > of the person. They're also instances where the person's reactions > could, as you said, be the result of something completely different. I > know investigators who swear they can spot someone lying, but I > imagine that may well be confirmation bias. They tend to interview > criminals. Criminals frequently lye. They've caught many criminals > lying. Therefore their inclinations must have been correct. > > Anyhow, thanks for the info. > > > > > On 11/1/18, Sai > wrote: >> FWIW: the research on this (which I know fairly well because it was >> related to my master's thesis and also to my litigation about TSA's SPOT >> program) is pretty solidly in favor of one conclusion: >> >> There does not exist any reliable way to detect lies, short of using an >> fMRI scanner. The best results shown to date are barely even >> statistically significant (let alone practically), and even those are >> only in highly controlled and unnatural settings. >> >> >> There are somewhat reliable ways to detect *emotions*, but they rely >> substantially on knowing that specific person's baseline. So e.g. you >> could detect that someone is nervous, angry, smug, etc. >> >> >> However, knowing that emotion doesn't tell you whether they're lying or >> not. >> >> Suppose e.g. that someone in a police interrogation room responds with >> fear when accused of raping someone. Are they afraid of being caught? >> Afraid of a false accusation? Reminded of a traumatic personal history? >> Afraid of perceived aggression? Randomly thinking about something else? >> Claustrophobic? Afraid they'll get a shiv while locked up? Afraid for >> what might happen to their family? Afraid of being caught in an actual >> lie? Afraid the cop will do a search and find the (totally unrelated) >> crack rock in their sock? Etc. etc. >> >> >> There are simply too many possible reasons someone can experience an >> emotion. Without knowing that specific person very, very well, you can't >> correctly make the jump (as various agencies would like to do) from >> "expression of fear" to "sign of guilt". >> >> Same is true for every symptom you listed. >> >> Same is true for a polygraph, which is why it's inadmissible. It's pure >> bullshit whose effects rely entirely on whether the subject believes it, >> and whether you care about the risk of false confessions. >> >> "Gut feeling" has been repeatedly proven to be not just wrong, but often >> worse than wrong ? it heavily plays into confirmation bias, bigotry, >> etc. Results are no better for "experienced" people like cops & judges. >> >> >> If you want to catch someone in a lie, you have to rely on logic, >> contradictory evidence, etc. Not whether or not the person fidgets. >> >> (Maybe your chairs are uncomfortable, or they need to go pee?) >> >> >> I've attached some recent meta-analysis papers on the subject in case >> you want to read for yourself. >> >> Sincerely, >> Sai >> President, Fiat Fiendum, Inc. >> >> On 10/31/18 16:48, Stewart, Christopher K via BlindLaw wrote: >>> This claim is ableist and absurd. First, many common tells of lying >>> are readily detectable to a blind person: throat clearing; vocal >>> tension; shallower breathing; fidgiting or feet shuffling; over >>> verbosity; unnatural hesitations inconsistent with the rest of their >>> answers. I could go on and on. The notion that because we can't see >>> one or two visual cues we can't spot a falsehood is ridiculous. >>> >>> Moreover, in investigative work, experienced investigators will tell >>> you they often follow their gut. Of course blind people have gut >>> instincts as well. But at the end of the day, as lawyers, what our gut >>> says doesn't matter, it's what the testimony and the facts reveal. >>> That's the record we work with. I've seen seasoned lawyers go down >>> rabbit holes in depositions that leave me scratching my head, knowing >>> they just waisted their time and didn't get what they were after. It >>> happens, and it has nothing to do with whether or not they can see. >>> >>> Best, >>> Chris >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>> BlindLaw: >>> > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sai at fiatfiendum.org >>> >> > > > -- > Chris K. Stewart > Attorney at Law > KBA #97351 > Ph: > (502)457-1757 > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 11:38:38 -0400 > From: Cody Davis > > To: Blind Law Mailing List > > Subject: [blindlaw] Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the > workplace? > Message-ID: <70BCBA47-3083-4D83-A2D5-5746D02F3A89 at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > All, > > Does anyone have any experience using an iPad Pro with Voiceover as a laptop replacement at work? I?m curious how viable of an option that would be. Did you have to use it along with a desktop, or were you able to use the iPad as your primary computer.? > > In your experience, if the iPad Pro a redundancy if I am already using an iPhone? > > Thanks for any input. > > > Respectfully, > Cody J. Davis, J.D., M.P.A. > Email: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com > Phone: (919) 349-9799 > Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/codyjdavisesq > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 10:43:09 -0500 > From: Josh Loevy > > To: Blind Law Mailing List > > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the > workplace? > Message-ID: <55426b618e03829154bb6e678df65951 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > If I may add an addendum to this question... > If you are using IOS as a laptop sub, can you speak to the word processing > experience specifically? I have heard good things about Scrivener as a > legal writing tool, has anyone used that? > -------------- next part -------------- > An embedded message was scrubbed... > From: unknown sender > Subject: no subject > Date: no date > Size: 4289 > URL: > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 08:49:46 -0700 > From: Aser Tolentino > > To: Blind Law Mailing List > > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the > workplace? > Message-ID: <11648D1C-B9F2-4D5D-9895-82690E241CD7 at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Good morning, > > I like to think of the iPad Pro like the F/A-22 Raptor. It?s really sleek and sexy and does some things incredibly well, and some things less well. I occasionally get into a mood where I do as much on iOS as possible, but even though the smart keyboard and split screen do a lot to make iOS more multitasking friendly then it used to be, I would still say that it?s nothing like sitting in front of my laptop alt-tabbing between the web, two documents, email and a book. Scrivener is really cool, in fact I?m going to start a book on it for National Novel Writing Month today on an iPad, but I think to fully take advantage of it, you?d want to run it on a Mac: the PC version doesn?t work with JAWS. > > Because of the split-screen functionality, I would say there are advantages to the iPad over the phone, particularly if you have some sight, but mileage may vary there. I like taking notes on the iPhone but ultimately always return to Word for a more responsive and fleshed out proofing experience. Apps like Drafts that sync to the cloud make this workflow really smooth. Anyway, those are just my two cents. Please let me know if you have any questions you think I can help out with. > > Respectfully, > Aser Tolentino, Esq. > >> On Nov 1, 2018, at 08:38, Cody Davis via BlindLaw > wrote: >> >> All, >> >> Does anyone have any experience using an iPad Pro with Voiceover as a laptop replacement at work? I?m curious how viable of an option that would be. Did you have to use it along with a desktop, or were you able to use the iPad as your primary computer.? >> >> In your experience, if the iPad Pro a redundancy if I am already using an iPhone? >> >> Thanks for any input. >> >> >> Respectfully, >> Cody J. Davis, J.D., M.P.A. >> Email: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com >> Phone: (919) 349-9799 >> Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/codyjdavisesq >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/agtolentino at gmail.com > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 11:53:46 -0400 > From: Cody Davis > > To: Blind Law Mailing List > > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the > workplace? > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Thanks for that input. > > Respectfully, > Cody J. Davis, J.D., M.P.A. > Email: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com > Phone: (919) 349-9799 > Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/codyjdavisesq > >> On Nov 1, 2018, at 11:49 AM, Aser Tolentino via BlindLaw > wrote: >> >> Good morning, >> >> I like to think of the iPad Pro like the F/A-22 Raptor. It?s really sleek and sexy and does some things incredibly well, and some things less well. I occasionally get into a mood where I do as much on iOS as possible, but even though the smart keyboard and split screen do a lot to make iOS more multitasking friendly then it used to be, I would still say that it?s nothing like sitting in front of my laptop alt-tabbing between the web, two documents, email and a book. Scrivener is really cool, in fact I?m going to start a book on it for National Novel Writing Month today on an iPad, but I think to fully take advantage of it, you?d want to run it on a Mac: the PC version doesn?t work with JAWS. >> >> Because of the split-screen functionality, I would say there are advantages to the iPad over the phone, particularly if you have some sight, but mileage may vary there. I like taking notes on the iPhone but ultimately always return to Word for a more responsive and fleshed out proofing experience. Apps like Drafts that sync to the cloud make this workflow really smooth. Anyway, those are just my two cents. Please let me know if you have any questions you think I can help out with. >> >> Respectfully, >> Aser Tolentino, Esq. >> >>> On Nov 1, 2018, at 08:38, Cody Davis via BlindLaw > wrote: >>> >>> All, >>> >>> Does anyone have any experience using an iPad Pro with Voiceover as a laptop replacement at work? I?m curious how viable of an option that would be. Did you have to use it along with a desktop, or were you able to use the iPad as your primary computer.? >>> >>> In your experience, if the iPad Pro a redundancy if I am already using an iPhone? >>> >>> Thanks for any input. >>> >>> >>> Respectfully, >>> Cody J. Davis, J.D., M.P.A. >>> Email: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com >>> Phone: (919) 349-9799 >>> Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/codyjdavisesq >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/agtolentino at gmail.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cjdavis9193 at gmail.com > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > > > ------------------------------ > > End of BlindLaw Digest, Vol 174, Issue 2 > **************************************** > > Confidentiality Notice: > > The information contained in this e-mail transmittal is privileged and confidential intended for the addressee only. If you are neither the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure of this information in any way or taking of any action in reliance on this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the person transmitting the information immediately. > > This email has been scanned for viruses and malware by Mimecast Ltd. > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sai%40fiatfiendum.org > From bluezinfandel at hotmail.com Mon Nov 5 15:42:47 2018 From: bluezinfandel at hotmail.com (Ben Fulton) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 15:42:47 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Supposedly suspicious behaviors (WAS: conducting investigations) Message-ID: OK, the obvious argument is that these indicators do not apply to blind and visually impaired people. Recognizing that someone is blind or visually impaired would negate much of this. I now use a dog, but used to use a cane, either of which made it pretty obvious that I am blind. Before then when I was visually impaired and didn't always use a cane, it did result in being asked more about apparently suspicious behaviours. Once I was actually kicked out of a club for stumbling on their poorly designed landing. They may argue for more training with respect to disabilities, but may not be willing to overhaul the entire policy. You may have to deal with them seeking for ways to justify maintaining their status quo. One reason I bring this up is because I am looking into a provision in the Ontario Human Rights Code that allows landlords sharing a kitchen or bathroom to discriminate on any of the prohibited grounds of discrimination. Normally if a room is being rented landlords aren't allowed to discriminate against the tenant, but the landlords can if they share a kitchen or bathroom. I'm anticipating the argument being that the private sphere is something the legislature doesn't want to interfere with. So, my argument is that by advertising publicly on Kijiji that the landlords have entered a commercial area where the constitution should apply, and therefore the provision in the human rights code is unconstitutional. But I'm trying to anticipate the arguments that will be running against me in this challenge. All the best, Ben Subject: [blindlaw] Supposedly suspicious behaviors (WAS: conducting investigations) Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On the subject of behaviors like gaze, sweat, shuffling, etc not actually having any legitimate bearing on determining suspicion: Here's an affidavit I filed in my case against all of TSA's policies. At page 41, heading "SPOT behaviors", I exhaustively list behaviors that are on the TSA SPOT ("behavior detection") profiling list, and explain how they are in fact symptoms of my disability, exercise of Constitutional rights, or just being a human. PDF (as filed): Google Docs version (as drafted): Google Docs version of TSA's SPOT checklist (transcribed by me): Many of the supposedly suspicious behaviors are specifically related to my blindness, namely: 1. "Observation and behavior analysis" - 4 or more points = selectee screening, 6 or more points = automatic referral to police * 1 point: Arrives ?late ?for ?flight, ?if ?known * 1 point: Avoids eye contact with security personnel or LEO * 2 points: Powerful ?grip ?of ?a ?bag ?and/or ?hand ?inside ?the ?bag * 2 points: Rigid ?posture, ?minimal ?body ?movements ?with ?arms ?close ?to ?sides * 3 points: Appears ?to ?be ?confused ?or ?disoriented * 3 points: Appears ?to ?be ?in ?disguise That's 12 points total, just for perceived symptoms related to my blindness. Well over the 6 points for police referral. 2. "Signs of deception" - 2 or more = automatic referral to police * Appearing ?not ?to ?understand ?questions * Distracted ?or ?inability ?to ?pay ?attention ?to ?present ?situation * Gazing down * No ?or ?little ?direct ?eye ?contact * Placing ?objects ?between ?self ?and ?official (My affidavit has explanations of why each one applies to me.) So basically, TSA's policy means that ordinary blind people are to be referred to police for behaviors that are perfectly normal symptoms of disability. If you total everything I list in that affidavit as normal for me, I have 56 points of "suspiciousness" (vs 6 for police referral) & 24 "signs of deception" (vs 2 for police referral). It's completely absurd. One part of my lawsuit seeks to permanently enjoin this program, and make TSA's documents about it public. The case is Sai v Pekoske, No. 15-2356 (1st Cir.). Original proceeding under 49 USC 46110, not an appeal. I'm IFP and need counsel, so if any of you are interested or know someone who may be, please get in touch. Sincerely, Sai President, Fiat Fiendum, Inc. On 11/5/18 01:37, Elizabeth Troutman via BlindLaw wrote: > A huge thanks to everyone who responded to my post about investigations. It didn't feel right when I was told that blind people can't conduct investigations well, but it's hard to argue when you're genuinely uninformed. I am now armed with some good information to start addressing the assumptions and getting myself trained up. I feel so fortunate to have this group. > Elizabeth From ttomasi at driowa.org Mon Nov 5 15:59:49 2018 From: ttomasi at driowa.org (Tai Tomasi) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 15:59:49 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Supposedly suspicious behaviors (WAS: conducting investigations) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ben: This issue is not as black and white as you perceive it. Many TSA agents do not immediately realize I am blind. The same is true in other areas of public participation, despite the fact that I am almost always using a cane or guide dog. Those who do not use canes or dogs likely encounter erroneous assumptions about their vision as well. Therefore, what should be obvious to all is not always so. Policies like the one Sai references should be less presumptive by design. I have similar concerns regarding the increased use of ocular scanners. Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. Pronouns: she/her/hers Staff Attorney 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org www.driowa.org Our Mission:  To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Ben Fulton via BlindLaw Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 9:43 AM To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org Cc: Ben Fulton Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Supposedly suspicious behaviors (WAS: conducting investigations) OK, the obvious argument is that these indicators do not apply to blind and visually impaired people. Recognizing that someone is blind or visually impaired would negate much of this. I now use a dog, but used to use a cane, either of which made it pretty obvious that I am blind. Before then when I was visually impaired and didn't always use a cane, it did result in being asked more about apparently suspicious behaviours. Once I was actually kicked out of a club for stumbling on their poorly designed landing. They may argue for more training with respect to disabilities, but may not be willing to overhaul the entire policy. You may have to deal with them seeking for ways to justify maintaining their status quo. One reason I bring this up is because I am looking into a provision in the Ontario Human Rights Code that allows landlords sharing a kitchen or bathroom to discriminate on any of the prohibited grounds of discrimination. Normally if a room is being rented landlords aren't allowed to discriminate against the tenant, but the landlords can if they share a kitchen or bathroom. I'm anticipating the argument being that the private sphere is something the legislature doesn't want to interfere with. So, my argument is that by advertising publicly on Kijiji that the landlords have entered a commercial area where the constitution should apply, and therefore the provision in the human rights code is unconstitutional. But I'm trying to anticipate the arguments that will be running against me in this challenge. All the best, Ben Subject: [blindlaw] Supposedly suspicious behaviors (WAS: conducting investigations) Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On the subject of behaviors like gaze, sweat, shuffling, etc not actually having any legitimate bearing on determining suspicion: Here's an affidavit I filed in my case against all of TSA's policies. At page 41, heading "SPOT behaviors", I exhaustively list behaviors that are on the TSA SPOT ("behavior detection") profiling list, and explain how they are in fact symptoms of my disability, exercise of Constitutional rights, or just being a human. PDF (as filed): Google Docs version (as drafted): Google Docs version of TSA's SPOT checklist (transcribed by me): Many of the supposedly suspicious behaviors are specifically related to my blindness, namely: 1. "Observation and behavior analysis" - 4 or more points = selectee screening, 6 or more points = automatic referral to police * 1 point: Arrives ?late ?for ?flight, ?if ?known * 1 point: Avoids eye contact with security personnel or LEO * 2 points: Powerful ?grip ?of ?a ?bag ?and/or ?hand ?inside ?the ?bag * 2 points: Rigid ?posture, ?minimal ?body ?movements ?with ?arms ?close ?to ?sides * 3 points: Appears ?to ?be ?confused ?or ?disoriented * 3 points: Appears ?to ?be ?in ?disguise That's 12 points total, just for perceived symptoms related to my blindness. Well over the 6 points for police referral. 2. "Signs of deception" - 2 or more = automatic referral to police * Appearing ?not ?to ?understand ?questions * Distracted ?or ?inability ?to ?pay ?attention ?to ?present ?situation * Gazing down * No ?or ?little ?direct ?eye ?contact * Placing ?objects ?between ?self ?and ?official (My affidavit has explanations of why each one applies to me.) So basically, TSA's policy means that ordinary blind people are to be referred to police for behaviors that are perfectly normal symptoms of disability. If you total everything I list in that affidavit as normal for me, I have 56 points of "suspiciousness" (vs 6 for police referral) & 24 "signs of deception" (vs 2 for police referral). It's completely absurd. One part of my lawsuit seeks to permanently enjoin this program, and make TSA's documents about it public. The case is Sai v Pekoske, No. 15-2356 (1st Cir.). Original proceeding under 49 USC 46110, not an appeal. I'm IFP and need counsel, so if any of you are interested or know someone who may be, please get in touch. Sincerely, Sai President, Fiat Fiendum, Inc. On 11/5/18 01:37, Elizabeth Troutman via BlindLaw wrote: > A huge thanks to everyone who responded to my post about investigations. It didn't feel right when I was told that blind people can't conduct investigations well, but it's hard to argue when you're genuinely uninformed. I am now armed with some good information to start addressing the assumptions and getting myself trained up. I feel so fortunate to have this group. > Elizabeth _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org From sai at fiatfiendum.org Mon Nov 5 16:33:07 2018 From: sai at fiatfiendum.org (Sai) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:33:07 +0100 Subject: [blindlaw] Supposedly suspicious behaviors (WAS: conducting investigations) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7768d76f-941f-bec9-0b5e-6ca5c59bbacc@fiatfiendum.org> Ben: My post doesn't have much to do with your concerns about cohabitating landlord discrimination, however. The law for that is about as different as it could be while still being disability related. In the US, it is common for cohabitating landlords — like roommates — to be allowed to discriminate in ways that absentee landlords are not. The reason is simply that it's their home, and they have some rights to decide who they want to live with, even if those decisions are bigoted. As a simple example, it's legal in the US to say "no blacks, no gays, no blind people" in a roommate ad — even though all of those would be blatantly illegal to say (or do) in a general renting ad with landlord off-premises. If someone's a homophobe, living with a gay person would genuinely impair their ability to enjoy and feel comfortable at home. Even bigots have the right to feel secure in their own home. There might be a gray area inbetween (you're only sharing a kitchen, after all), and maybe Canadian law differs. I'd guess you'll lose this, but I wish you good luck. As for TSA, I don't really give a damn if they're unwilling to overhaul their policies. I tried to negotiate repeatedly, and they refused. Now I'm suing them for violating the law. If the court agrees with me, then TSA will either obey or get sanctioned. Tai: The policy I reference has no exclusion whatsoever for disability. It's a list of behaviors and possessions. Nowhere in it does it say that you don't get the point for no eye contact because you're blind. You, Tai, are a reasonable person. You recognize that treating that as suspicious is utterly absurd. You want to read in some sort of "but don't count it if it's obviously justified" nullifier that isn't there. Sadly, TSA isn't reasonable. They actually do this. They've done it to me more than once, including calling the cops on me more than once. Even though my disabilities were obvious and declared. IMO this is of course a disproportionate-impact policy. So it's illegal as a matter of disability law. However, the underlying policy is also simply not justifiable on its face. The behaviors are simply not indicators that someone has a weapon, explosive, or incendiary — and that's all the TSA is allowed to search for. So I want it banned outright. It doesn't even pass rational basis scrutiny, let alone elevated or Rehab Act level. Some of it is even deliberately meant as a restraint on the content of speech (e.g. complaining about TSA policy), which is strict scrutiny. I'm not sure what you mean about ocular scanners. TSA doesn't have any, as far as I know. Maybe you mean CBP? Sincerely, Sai President, Fiat Fiendum, Inc. On 11/5/18 16:59, Tai Tomasi via BlindLaw wrote: > Ben: > > This issue is not as black and white as you perceive it. Many TSA agents do not immediately realize I am blind. The same is true in other areas of public participation, despite the fact that I am almost always using a cane or guide dog. Those who do not use canes or dogs likely encounter erroneous assumptions about their vision as well. Therefore, what should be obvious to all is not always so. Policies like the one Sai references should be less presumptive by design. I have similar concerns regarding the increased use of ocular scanners. > > Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. > Pronouns: she/her/hers > Staff Attorney > > > > 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 > Des Moines, Iowa 50309 > Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 > FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 > E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org > www.driowa.org > > Our Mission:  To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Ben Fulton via BlindLaw > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 9:43 AM > To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org > Cc: Ben Fulton > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Supposedly suspicious behaviors (WAS: conducting investigations) > > > > OK, the obvious argument is that these indicators do not apply to blind and visually impaired people. Recognizing that someone is blind or visually impaired would negate much of this. I now use a dog, but used to use a cane, either of which made it pretty obvious that I am blind. Before then when I was visually impaired and didn't always use a cane, it did result in being asked more about apparently suspicious behaviours. Once I was actually kicked out of a club for stumbling on their poorly designed landing. > > They may argue for more training with respect to disabilities, but may not be willing to overhaul the entire policy. You may have to deal with them seeking for ways to justify maintaining their status quo. > > One reason I bring this up is because I am looking into a provision in the Ontario Human Rights Code that allows landlords sharing a kitchen or bathroom to discriminate on any of the prohibited grounds of discrimination. Normally if a room is being rented landlords aren't allowed to discriminate against the tenant, but the landlords can if they share a kitchen or bathroom. > > I'm anticipating the argument being that the private sphere is something the legislature doesn't want to interfere with. > So, my argument is that by advertising publicly on Kijiji that the landlords have entered a commercial area where the constitution should apply, and therefore the provision in the human rights code is unconstitutional. > > But I'm trying to anticipate the arguments that will be running against me in this challenge. > > All the best, > Ben > > > > Subject: [blindlaw] Supposedly suspicious behaviors (WAS: conducting investigations) > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > On the subject of behaviors like gaze, sweat, shuffling, etc not actually having any legitimate bearing on determining suspicion: > > Here's an affidavit I filed in my case against all of TSA's policies. > > At page 41, heading "SPOT behaviors", I exhaustively list behaviors that are on the TSA SPOT ("behavior detection") profiling list, and explain how they are in fact symptoms of my disability, exercise of Constitutional rights, or just being a human. > > PDF (as filed): > > > Google Docs version (as drafted): > > > > Google Docs version of TSA's SPOT checklist (transcribed by me): > > > > Many of the supposedly suspicious behaviors are specifically related to my blindness, namely: > > 1. "Observation and behavior analysis" - 4 or more points = selectee screening, 6 or more points = automatic referral to police > * 1 point: Arrives ?late ?for ?flight, ?if ?known > * 1 point: Avoids eye contact with security personnel or LEO > * 2 points: Powerful ?grip ?of ?a ?bag ?and/or ?hand ?inside ?the ?bag > * 2 points: Rigid ?posture, ?minimal ?body ?movements ?with ?arms ?close ?to ?sides > * 3 points: Appears ?to ?be ?confused ?or ?disoriented > * 3 points: Appears ?to ?be ?in ?disguise > > That's 12 points total, just for perceived symptoms related to my blindness. Well over the 6 points for police referral. > > 2. "Signs of deception" - 2 or more = automatic referral to police > * Appearing ?not ?to ?understand ?questions > * Distracted ?or ?inability ?to ?pay ?attention ?to ?present ?situation > * Gazing down > * No ?or ?little ?direct ?eye ?contact > * Placing ?objects ?between ?self ?and ?official > > (My affidavit has explanations of why each one applies to me.) > > So basically, TSA's policy means that ordinary blind people are to be referred to police for behaviors that are perfectly normal symptoms of disability. > > > If you total everything I list in that affidavit as normal for me, I have 56 points of "suspiciousness" (vs 6 for police referral) & 24 "signs of deception" (vs 2 for police referral). > > It's completely absurd. One part of my lawsuit seeks to permanently enjoin this program, and make TSA's documents about it public. > > > The case is Sai v Pekoske, No. 15-2356 (1st Cir.). Original proceeding under 49 USC 46110, not an appeal. > > I'm IFP and need counsel, so if any of you are interested or know someone who may be, please get in touch. > > Sincerely, > Sai > President, Fiat Fiendum, Inc. > > On 11/5/18 01:37, Elizabeth Troutman via BlindLaw wrote: >> A huge thanks to everyone who responded to my post about investigations. It didn't feel right when I was told that blind people can't conduct investigations well, but it's hard to argue when you're genuinely uninformed. I am now armed with some good information to start addressing the assumptions and getting myself trained up. I feel so fortunate to have this group. >> Elizabeth > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sai%40fiatfiendum.org > From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Tue Nov 6 16:23:58 2018 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 16:23:58 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Info Announcement: The Digital Accessibility Summit 2018-19 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://www.accessibility.legal/ The Digital Accessibility Summit 2018-19 Accessibility Lawsuits, How to Handle Them; How to Avoid Them: Understand your accessibility legal obligations and risk management options...with the best minds in the field 2018 East Event Wednesday & Thursday December 5 & 6 American University Washington College of Law Conference Center, Washington, DC 2019 West Event Monday & Tuesday March 11 & 12 Sheraton Park Hotel at the Anaheim Resort, Anaheim, CA Are we at risk of digital accessibility lawsuits getting out of control? Collectively, let's be part of the solution. As a field, we need to provide a forum for all sides to get together. This is the forum. Speakers East: Minh. N. Vu, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP; Mike Paciello, Open Access Technologies; Dr. Chris M. Law, Accessibility Track; Deepa Goraya, Pina D'Intino Cognizant & Aequum Global Access; Eve Hill, Brown, Goldstein & Levy LLP; Anne Marie Estevez, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP; Dr. Jonathan Lazar, Towson University; Caroline Jackson, National Association of the Deaf; Robert Dinerstein, American University Washington College of Law; Gretchen Jacobs, US Access Board (Tentative) West: Lainey Feingold, The Law office of Lainey Feingold; Jack McElaney, Microassist; Jared Smith, WebAIM; Timothy Elder, TRE Legal Practice; Dan Goldstein; Howard A. Rosenblum, National Association of the Deaf; Kristina M. Launey, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP; Joshua A. Stein, Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.; Linda M. Dardarian Goldstein, Borgen, Dardarian & Ho; Debra Ruh, Ruh Global Communications; Karen Peltz Strauss, FCC The need for the Digital Accessibility Legal Summit There are many plaintiffs who want to partner with site owners and technology providers to find solutions to accessibility problems, and many plaintiffs' lawyers who represent clients with disabilities seeking to enforce their civil rights; but... there's also a common perception that many lawsuits are unscrupulous, which negatively impacts the perception of all people with disabilities using the law to advance access. There are many defendants who want to partner with people with disabilities and their communities to find solutions to problems, and many defense lawyers who seek a fair resolution of claims against their clients; but... there's a common perception that some companies feel they are being unjustly targeted for problems that are beyond their control and that some defense lawyers raise unscrupulous arguments. There are accessibility professionals helping companies to create more inclusive organizational cultures, products and services; but... there's also a common message promoting one-off technical fixes as solutions. There's conflicting viewpoints on what constitute best practices in our field. It's hard to find reliable, straight answers, and actionable guidance. So let's get together, provide a discussion forum, and debate best practices for plaintiffs, for defendants, and for accessibility professionals. * All sides together in one forum * The events are specifically focused on Digital Accessibility issues * Close access to subject matter experts * Curated content to provide you with actionable guidance * An easy investment choice: Each 8 hour day of content for about the price of 1 hour with a top legal expert * Attendees will receive a copy of the forthcoming publication "Digital Accessibility Legal Update and Guidance 2018-19" Agenda East Day 1 (December 5, 9am-5pm) Opening Keynote: Deepa Goraya Both Sides of The Story -Plaintiff and Defendant: Caroline Jackson & Anne Marie Estevez Digital Accessibility and Legal Considerations for People with Cognitive Disabilities: 'Won't Get Fooled Again.' Robert Dinerstein Lunch & Learn -Group Discussions Group A: Jonathan Lazar Group B: Minh N. Vu & Eve Hill Practice Update -Plaintiff Practice and Defendant Practice: Eve Hill & Minh N. Vu Resources for Practitioners -The Accessibility Switchboard information portal: Chris M. Law Evening -Social Mixer (with book signings) East Day 2 (December 6, 9am-5pm) Mini-Course -Organizational Risk Assessments and Risk Mitigation Tools: Pina D'Intino & Chris M. Law Lunch & Learn -Group Discussions (Switch sessions from Day 1) Regulatory Update: Gretchen Jacobs Digital accessibility and legal issues -Now, and the Future: Jonathan Lazar Closing Keynote: Mike Paciello West Day 1 (March 11, 9am-5pm) Opening Keynote: Howard A. Rosenblum Both Sides of The Story -Plaintiff and Defendant: Joshua Stein & Linda Dardarian An Introduction to Organizational Standards for Inclusion: Dan Goldstein Lunch & Learn -Group Discussions Group A: Jack McElaney & Dan Goldstein Group B: Tim Elder & Kristina Launey Practice Update -Plaintiff Practice and Defendant Practice: Kristina Launey & Tim Elder Resources for Practitioners - The Legal Resource Landscape: Jack McElaney Evening -Social Mixer (with book signings) West Day 2 (March 12, 9am-5pm) Mini-Course -Does Digital Accessibility Law have to be a Hammer? Structured Negotiation and other Collaborative Tools: Lainey Feingold Lunch & Learn -Group Discussions (Switch sessions from Day 1) Regulatory Update: Karen Peltz Strauss Digital accessibility and legal issues -Now, and the Future: Jared Smith Closing Keynote: Debra Ruh Notes: * This is the Preliminary Agenda. The agenda will be updated with timings of individual sessions soon. * The agenda and speakers are subject to change. Registration Each 8 hour day of content for about the price of 1 hour with a top legal expert. 2018 East Event Two days: $1,200 2019 West Event Two days: $1,200 Venue Information 2018 East Event American University Washington College of Law Conference Center 4300 Nebraska Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20016, USA. Hotel Room block booking: Marriott Courtyard Bethesda Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Ave, Chevy Chase, MD, 20815 The hotel is one metro stop from the College of Law event venue. Marriott Room rate is $229 from December 4th with this link. 2019 West Event Sheraton Park Hotel at the Anaheim Resort 1855 South Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, CA, 92802, USA. Sheraton room rate $125 throughout the whole week from March 10th with this link. The Digital Accessibility Legal Forum 2018-19 is an Accessibility Track Event Contact info at accessibility.legal +1-443-955-0955 McLean, VA, USA From Susan.Kelly at pima.gov Tue Nov 6 23:27:34 2018 From: Susan.Kelly at pima.gov (Susan Kelly) Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 23:27:34 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Anyone using iPad as laptop replacement in the workplace? In-Reply-To: <70BCBA47-3083-4D83-A2D5-5746D02F3A89@gmail.com> References: <70BCBA47-3083-4D83-A2D5-5746D02F3A89@gmail.com> Message-ID: <66F19C03-E61E-407F-91C2-1FE3F1288513@pima.gov> Yes. I also use the VoiceDream reader app, as it is extremely precise and helps for the tiny bit of residual vision I have, so that I can pull quotes from materials to paste into documents that I am composing (motions and briefs). The only problem is that our county continues to refuse to place any of its Apple products on the network, regardless of the agency or individual’s needs, so I also have to use the File Explorer app to load my case files. Small issue. And no - no redundancy. I use both as well. Susan C L Kelly Assistant Public Defender Pima County Public Defenders Office - Juvenile DIvision Ofc: 520-724-2994 Fax: 520-770-4168 On Nov 1, 2018, at 8:40 AM, Cody Davis via BlindLaw > wrote: ******* This message and sender come from outside Pima County. If you did not expect this message, proceed with caution. Verify the sender's identity before performing any action, such as clicking on a link or opening an attachment. ******* All, Does anyone have any experience using an iPad Pro with Voiceover as a laptop replacement at work? I’m curious how viable of an option that would be. Did you have to use it along with a desktop, or were you able to use the iPad as your primary computer.? In your experience, if the iPad Pro a redundancy if I am already using an iPhone? Thanks for any input. Respectfully, Cody J. Davis, J.D., M.P.A. Email: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com Phone: (919) 349-9799 Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/codyjdavisesq _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/susan.kelly%40pima.gov From jtfetter at yahoo.com Wed Nov 7 13:18:44 2018 From: jtfetter at yahoo.com (James T. Fetter) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 08:18:44 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Reading confidential documents with Aira? Message-ID: This may fall under the category of "asked and answered," but does anyone have experience using Aira to read confidential documents?  I have already reached out to Aira, but I'm not sure if the front-line support people understand the issue. I would expect that I would only need a signed confidentiality agreement stating that they were bound by whatever privilege I was bound by. If someone who has used Aira to read confidential documents could explain what they had to do to get a confidentiality agreement from, and signed by, Aira, that would be great. This is somewhat urgent for reasons beyond my control, though I can find another solution in the short term. Thanks. From ttomasi at driowa.org Wed Nov 7 14:18:01 2018 From: ttomasi at driowa.org (Tai Tomasi) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 14:18:01 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Notes from Aira Call Message-ID: Hello, all. Below is a summary of the call we had in late September to discuss use of Aira in legal practice. Apologies for not sending out these notes sooner. Overview of AIRA Mechanism to provide any visual information that is otherwise unavailable. Users wear smart glasses or use a smart phone app, initiate a call to an agent, all of whom have been hired based on their aptitude to describe. Agents must pass a test and undergo several weeks of training to hone describing skills. Once a connection is made, agent can see whatever the glasses or camera can see. Also has access to other information including GPS information. Agent then provides the information that blind explorer requests. Agents never tell "how" to complete a task. Ways for agent to access information include through smart glasses camera, phone camera, or through TeamViewer or Zoom session so that an agent can access whatever is on the computer screen. Safeguards for security and confidentiality: Agents undergo background checks, sign nondisclosure agreements, and sign confidentiality agreements. Aira uses encryption for information both transferred and stored. Data includes but is not limited to GPS data, IP address, duration of call, and video recordings. More info can be found in privacy policy. Retention for 18 months. If explorer asks, agent will stop recording or inform the explorer that recording cannot be stopped. Aira representative said it would be extremely rare for an agent to say a recording could not be stopped. Right now, by default, session is recorded for training purposes. Explorers can ask for sessions not to be recorded Example: photographs stay on server for 24 hours if taken for personal purposes. Taking picture of luggage so that explorer can later show it to an airport employee at baggage claim. But, if taking a picture for purposes of enhancing reading, believes it's part of the regular session and is part of the 18 month retention White paper on privacy and security: available on aira.io/security Questions: Q: Is there/can Aira implement a way for the explorer to verify and keep record of the fact that the agent has stopped recording a call? A: Aira reps said they'd look into this. Q: Does Aira ever release standard versions of its NDAs/confidentiality agreements for firms to review to see if such forms meet their confidentiality needs? A: Aira will look into this. Q: Who does the property obtained during a session belong to? A: look it up on terms of service, last updated in July. This probably warrants further discussion. Q: would Aira be willing to work with NABL to draft an agency agreement template that might make firms more willing to use Aira without fears of breaching privilege/confidentiality? A: positive response to this idea. Points for follow-up Get a list of what data is stored and for how long Is there precedent whereby Aira's services could be easily analogized to an interpreter/translator in a way that might ameliorate some concerns about third-party breaches of confidentiality and privilege? Contact Charles at aira.io security at aira.io Michael.hingson at aira.io Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. Pronouns: she/her/hers Staff Attorney [Description: DR%20IA%20LawCenter] 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org www.driowa.org Our Mission: To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 3845 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From jtfetter at yahoo.com Wed Nov 7 14:24:16 2018 From: jtfetter at yahoo.com (James T. Fetter) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 09:24:16 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Notes from Aira Call In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Tai, Thanks so much for doing this call and sending out the notes! So it looks like we'll need to work with Aira to iron out some major wrinkles. I'm happy to take the lead on this, though right now, I'm barely treading water with discovery and docs full of handwriting! On 11/7/2018 9:18 AM, Tai Tomasi via BlindLaw wrote: > Hello, all. Below is a summary of the call we had in late September to discuss use of Aira in legal practice. Apologies for not sending out these notes sooner. > > Overview of AIRA > Mechanism to provide any visual information that is otherwise unavailable. Users wear smart glasses or use a smart phone app, initiate a call to an agent, all of whom have been hired based on their aptitude to describe. Agents must pass a test and undergo several weeks of training to hone describing skills. Once a connection is made, agent can see whatever the glasses or camera can see. Also has access to other information including GPS information. Agent then provides the information that blind explorer requests. Agents never tell "how" to complete a task. > Ways for agent to access information include through smart glasses camera, phone camera, or through TeamViewer or Zoom session so that an agent can access whatever is on the computer screen. > > Safeguards for security and confidentiality: Agents undergo background checks, sign nondisclosure agreements, and sign confidentiality agreements. Aira uses encryption for information both transferred and stored. Data includes but is not limited to GPS data, IP address, duration of call, and video recordings. More info can be found in privacy policy. Retention for 18 months. > If explorer asks, agent will stop recording or inform the explorer that recording cannot be stopped. Aira representative said it would be extremely rare for an agent to say a recording could not be stopped. > Right now, by default, session is recorded for training purposes. Explorers can ask for sessions not to be recorded > Example: photographs stay on server for 24 hours if taken for personal purposes. Taking picture of luggage so that explorer can later show it to an airport employee at baggage claim. But, if taking a picture for purposes of enhancing reading, believes it's part of the regular session and is part of the 18 month retention > White paper on privacy and security: available on aira.io/security > > Questions: > Q: Is there/can Aira implement a way for the explorer to verify and keep record of the fact that the agent has stopped recording a call? > A: Aira reps said they'd look into this. > Q: Does Aira ever release standard versions of its NDAs/confidentiality agreements for firms to review to see if such forms meet their confidentiality needs? > A: Aira will look into this. > Q: Who does the property obtained during a session belong to? > A: look it up on terms of service, last updated in July. This probably warrants further discussion. > Q: would Aira be willing to work with NABL to draft an agency agreement template that might make firms more willing to use Aira without fears of breaching privilege/confidentiality? > A: positive response to this idea. > > Points for follow-up > Get a list of what data is stored and for how long > Is there precedent whereby Aira's services could be easily analogized to an interpreter/translator in a way that might ameliorate some concerns about third-party breaches of confidentiality and privilege? > > Contact > Charles at aira.io > security at aira.io > Michael.hingson at aira.io > > > > Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. > Pronouns: she/her/hers > Staff Attorney > > [Description: DR%20IA%20LawCenter] > > 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 > Des Moines, Iowa 50309 > Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 > FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 > E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org > www.driowa.org > > Our Mission: To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jtfetter%40yahoo.com From ttomasi at driowa.org Wed Nov 7 15:09:56 2018 From: ttomasi at driowa.org (Tai Tomasi) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:09:56 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Reading confidential documents with Aira? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: James and all: Aira has nondisclosure and confidentiality terms in their terms of service. The retainer I have clients sign stresses that their documents may be reviewed by non-attorney agents of my firm. I use Aira to read documents in confidential client matters. Before reading the documents, I ask the agent to stop recording my call. They have always agreed to do so. I continue to urge Aira to allow the user to discontinue recording so that we have confirmation that the call is no longer being recorded. I would prefer a way to verify this for myself. I then ask them to issue me a Zoom meeting ID which I type into Zoom. The agent and I are then entered into a Zoom meeting. Zoom allows you to share a window or your entire screen with the Aira agent. I limit the agent's access to only the window I specify and grant them control to use the mouse to scroll through the document as they read. Because video recording has been stopped and I have not sent documents to an Aira agent via email, the documents remain property of my firm. Therefore, Aira does not retain these materials. While the agent reads, I can also open a notepad document in which the agent or I can write notes about the document we are reviewing. My employer was satisfied with these safeguards, and I feel I am complying with my state's rules of professional conduct. I continue to urge firms to execute agency agreements with Aira, similar to those one would execute with a firm that provides language interpretation. I would like to see the National Association of Blind Lawyers and Aira collaborate to develop a model for such an agreement. From aliherky at gmail.com Wed Nov 7 17:53:09 2018 From: aliherky at gmail.com (Ali) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 11:53:09 -0600 Subject: [blindlaw] Reading confidential documents with Aira? Message-ID: <5be326cf.1c69fb81.eb123.5918@mx.google.com> Do you use a screen reader? ----- Original Message ----- From: Tai Tomasi via BlindLaw References: <5be326cf.1c69fb81.eb123.5918@mx.google.com> Message-ID: Of course, but the documents I sometimes have to read have handwriting all over them. Notwithstanding all the wonderful things Silicon Valley has done for us, it has yet to come up with a product that does a halfway decent job recognizing bad handwriting! On 11/7/2018 12:53 PM, Ali via BlindLaw wrote: > Do you use a screen reader? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Tai Tomasi via BlindLaw To: 'Blind Law Mailing List' Date sent: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:09:56 +0000 > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Reading confidential documents with Aira? > > James and all: > > Aira has nondisclosure and confidentiality terms in their terms of > service. The retainer I have clients sign stresses that their > documents may be reviewed by non-attorney agents of my firm. I use > Aira to read documents in confidential client matters. Before reading > the documents, I ask the agent to stop recording my call. They have > always agreed to do so. I continue to urge Aira to allow the user to > discontinue recording so that we have confirmation that the call is no > longer being recorded. I would prefer a way to verify this for myself. > I then ask them to issue me a Zoom meeting ID which I type into Zoom. > The agent and I are then entered into a Zoom meeting. Zoom allows you > to share a window or your entire screen with the Aira agent. I limit > the agent's access to only the window I specify and grant them control > to use the mouse to scroll through the document as they read. > > Because video recording has been stopped and I have not sent documents > to an Aira agent via email, the documents remain property of my firm. > Therefore, Aira does not retain these materials. While the agent > reads, I can also open a notepad document in which the agent or I can > write notes about the document we are reviewing. My employer was > satisfied with these safeguards, and I feel I am complying with my > state's rules of professional conduct. I continue to urge firms to > execute agency agreements with Aira, similar to those one would > execute with a firm that provides language interpretation. I would > like to see the National Association of Blind Lawyers and Aira > collaborate to develop a model for such an agreement. > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/aliherky%40 > gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jtfetter%40yahoo.com > From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Wed Nov 7 19:27:18 2018 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:27:18 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Northwest Justice Project Job openings Message-ID: From: Sue Encherman [mailto:Suee at nwjustice.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 11:19 AM To: Diversity Stakeholders Subject: [diversity-stakeholders] NJP Job openings Hi Everyone: NJP has 4 new job openings: Attorney positions in Seattle, Yakima and Aberdeen and a new Case Management Data Specialist in Seattle. . Please see attached and circulate to those who might be interested. Thanks Sue Susan Encherman Northwest Justice Project Director of Administration 401 2nd Ave. S. , Suite 407 Seattle, WA 98104 206-707-0800 (Direct) 206-464-1519 suee at nwjustice.org www.nwjustice.org [njplogo-vert] Combatting Injustice Strengthening Communities Protecting Human Dignity --- You are currently subscribed to diversity-stakeholders as: noel.nightingale at ed.gov. To unsubscribe click here: http://list.wsba.org/u?id=9689257.98490556339430b43adf9753d1310389&n=T&l=diversity-stakeholders&o=685303 (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken) or send a blank email to leave-685303-9689257.98490556339430b43adf9753d1310389 at list.wsba.org If you have any questions, or wish to change your email address, please contact the WSBA List Administrator. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3110 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Case Management Data Specialist.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 401986 bytes Desc: Case Management Data Specialist.pdf URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: CLEAR CV-VOCA Attorney Announcement 2018.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 304305 bytes Desc: CLEAR CV-VOCA Attorney Announcement 2018.pdf URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: VOCA Attorney Aberdeen 2018.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 368231 bytes Desc: VOCA Attorney Aberdeen 2018.pdf URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: VOCA Attorney yakima 2018.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 365074 bytes Desc: VOCA Attorney yakima 2018.pdf URL: From keribcu at gmail.com Thu Nov 8 03:49:49 2018 From: keribcu at gmail.com (Keri Svendsen) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:49:49 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] voting survey Message-ID: <9efc5075-6ddb-fad5-b47f-d826c81df517@gmail.com> Can someone give me the link once more? thanks, -- Keri Svendsen From tmatzick06 at gmail.com Thu Nov 8 04:15:02 2018 From: tmatzick06 at gmail.com (Tara Chavez) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:15:02 -0700 Subject: [blindlaw] voting survey In-Reply-To: <9efc5075-6ddb-fad5-b47f-d826c81df517@gmail.com> References: <9efc5075-6ddb-fad5-b47f-d826c81df517@gmail.com> Message-ID: It’s nfb.org/votersurvey Tara Chavez Premier designs distributor tarachavez.mypremierdesigns.com President, Albuquerque Chapter, National Federation of the Blind of New Mexico > On Nov 7, 2018, at 8:49 PM, Keri Svendsen via BlindLaw wrote: > > Can someone give me the link once more? > > > thanks, > > -- > Keri Svendsen > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/tmatzick06%40gmail.com From b.schulz at sbcglobal.net Fri Nov 9 00:55:36 2018 From: b.schulz at sbcglobal.net (Bryan Schulz) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 18:55:36 -0600 Subject: [blindlaw] eeoc claim Message-ID: <017501d477c6$edac50b0$c904f210$@sbcglobal.net> Hi, If you file an eeoc claim, does anyone know if you end up on some database that employers can search? Bryan Schulz --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From mildredrivera at yahoo.com Fri Nov 9 02:47:56 2018 From: mildredrivera at yahoo.com (Millie Rivera-Rau) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 02:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [blindlaw] eeoc claim In-Reply-To: <017501d477c6$edac50b0$c904f210$@sbcglobal.net> References: <017501d477c6$edac50b0$c904f210$@sbcglobal.net> Message-ID: <21544562.794386.1541731676910@mail.yahoo.com> No your charge should be kept confidential until you decide to take it to court or EEOC does depending on the merit. There’s no database then employers can search. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Thursday, November 8, 2018, 7:55 PM, Bryan Schulz via BlindLaw wrote: Hi, If you file an eeoc claim, does anyone know if you end up on some database that employers can search? Bryan Schulz --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mildredrivera%40yahoo.com From kelbycarlson at gmail.com Fri Nov 9 16:10:56 2018 From: kelbycarlson at gmail.com (Kelby Carlson) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:10:56 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Serious Lexis Issues Message-ID: Has anyone noticed any issues with LexisNexis developing over the last month or so? I am using NVDA 2018.3 and the site is barely functional. For example, I can no longer brows through titles of statutes; the contents quite simply do not show up on the page. I have not found a way to contact them to address this problem. -- Kelby Carlson From rahul.bajaj1038 at gmail.com Sat Nov 10 13:28:04 2018 From: rahul.bajaj1038 at gmail.com (Rahul Bajaj) Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 13:28:04 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Reading PDFs with JAWS has become infeasible Message-ID: <80B8B30E-7A43-4155-9EC8-000562306F3E@gmail.com> Hi everyone, I have JAWSb 2018 and acrobat dc. Jaws keeps automatically jumping up and down in PDFs when you select 'read entire document'. Control+up and down arrows also doesn't work for para-wise navigation; jaws says blank. Finally, even ctrl+shift+n works sporadically. I have spoken with VFO. They say that the first 2 problems, at least, have been widely reported in recent weeks. I am using OCR and word versions as ad hoc measures. Do others have any ideas, or can they report this to FS or Adobe if they are facing it? Best, Rahul Sent from my iPhone From bluezinfandel at hotmail.com Mon Nov 12 02:00:38 2018 From: bluezinfandel at hotmail.com (Ben Fulton) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 02:00:38 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Reading PDFs with JAWS has become infeasible Message-ID: Hi Rahul, I've always found Jaws annoying when it comes to pdf's. My solution is to use Kurzwell and turn the document into a word document. There are problems with this, There will be some letters off, and it won't work on handwriting very well, but it's the best solution I have. 1. Reading PDFs with JAWS has become infeasible (Rahul Bajaj) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 13:28:04 +0000 From: Rahul Bajaj To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org Subject: [blindlaw] Reading PDFs with JAWS has become infeasible Message-ID: <80B8B30E-7A43-4155-9EC8-000562306F3E at gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi everyone, I have JAWSb 2018 and acrobat dc. Jaws keeps automatically jumping up and down in PDFs when you select 'read entire document'. Control+up and down arrows also doesn't work for para-wise navigation; jaws says blank. Finally, even ctrl+shift+n works sporadically. I have spoken with VFO. They say that the first 2 problems, at least, have been widely reported in recent weeks. I am using OCR and word versions as ad hoc measures. Do others have any ideas, or can they report this to FS or Adobe if they are facing it? Best, Rahul Sent from my iPhone ------------------------------ From rthomas48 at gmail.com Tue Nov 13 19:41:02 2018 From: rthomas48 at gmail.com (Roderick Thomas) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:41:02 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] taking the bar exam Message-ID: Hey guys, I am a blind law school student in Orlando, Florida. I will be graduating in May of 2019. I am considering taking one part of the bar in July 2019, and the second half in February 2020. My plan is to break the bar exam down to two major sections, and study hard to pass one half of the test at a time. I would study and pass the Florida portion in July 2019, and study and pass the Multi state Bar Examination section in February 2020. I believe, that this would give me a better chance to pass the bar, since I will not be required to know so much information at one time. Once I  pass the Florida section, then I would only be responsible for passing the Multi State Bar Examination section. I think, this is a good way for me to approach the test because as a blind law school student it takes me so much longer to do certain things, compared to a non-blind law school student. What do you think? Has anyone ever taken this approach before? Other than the fact that I would need to pay for the bar twice, do you think this is a good idea? From jtfetter at yahoo.com Wed Nov 14 13:46:04 2018 From: jtfetter at yahoo.com (James T. Fetter) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:46:04 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] taking the bar exam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4c33bccb-4721-20e8-4d4f-84cc8e5bbcbe@yahoo.com> I'm not sure if any state would permit you to do this. Even if this is an option, though, I would highly recommend taking the bar all at once and getting it over with. There is a significant amount of overlap between the MBE and state materials. And having done bar prep once, I wouldn't recommend doing it twice, especially if you're working. Also, I can't imagine that any legal employer would be impressed with intentionally delaying your bar passage or splitting the exam somehow. I don't know of any attorneys who have done this, and most employers would wonder what else you couldn't handle, if you couldn't handle bar prep. This wouldn't matter, once you pass but would make you a less attractive candidate for any positions starting after law school but before bar results. The bar is difficult, but it is doable, if you put the work in on the front end, take a few--or more than a few--deep breaths, and recognize that the result, even if not positive, is not the end of the world. On 11/13/2018 2:41 PM, Roderick Thomas via BlindLaw wrote: > Hey guys, I am a blind law school student in Orlando, Florida. I will > be graduating in May of 2019. I am considering taking one part of the > bar in July 2019, and the second half in February 2020. My plan is to > break the bar exam down to two major sections, and study hard to pass > one half of the test at a time. I would study and pass the Florida > portion in July 2019, and study and pass the Multi state Bar > Examination section in February 2020. I believe, that this would give > me a better chance to pass the bar, since I will not be required to > know so much information at one time. Once I  pass the Florida > section, then I would only be responsible for passing the Multi State > Bar Examination section. I think, this is a good way for me to > approach the test because as a blind law school student it takes me so > much longer to do certain things, compared to a non-blind law school > student. What do you think? Has anyone ever taken this approach > before? Other than the fact that I would need to pay for the bar > twice, do you think this is a good idea? > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jtfetter%40yahoo.com > From shelleyrichards9 at gmail.com Wed Nov 14 14:10:10 2018 From: shelleyrichards9 at gmail.com (Shelley Richards) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 09:10:10 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] taking the bar exam In-Reply-To: <4c33bccb-4721-20e8-4d4f-84cc8e5bbcbe@yahoo.com> References: <4c33bccb-4721-20e8-4d4f-84cc8e5bbcbe@yahoo.com> Message-ID: <7A91B7F4-C2F7-4583-A625-7AEB8BF52B25@gmail.com> I seriously doubt that this would even be permitted, in any state. Asking to split the exam into two could very easily be called an accommodation witch fundamentally alters the nature of the exam. It’s not meant to be to separate tests. As a blind person who both completed law school, and completed the bar exam, it is very possible for blind people to prepare for and take the bar exam as one test like everybody else has to. You can, and should be, given extended time to complete the exam, but I think the idea of splitting it into two separate parts which you plan on taking six months apart is not a good idea, and it would not be permitted. More importantly you do have to realize that as a blind attorney after law school and the bar exam you will have to meet deadlines. Telling your employer that your blind in things take you longer is not an excuse for missing deadlines, we’re not having materials prepared for a court date. Certain things may have taken me longer in law school, but I always turned everything in on time, the same time it was do for the rest of the class. You have to be able to do that in a workplace setting. It is not as hard as you are thinking to study for both sections of the bar exam at the same time. There is a lot of overlap between the two. I think it would be more difficult to study twice for two different sections rather than to study all at once for the entire exam. In the end however, no matter what your thoughts are, I’m pretty positive that it would not be allowed. No, I do not know of anybody who has done this, nor do I know if anybody who’s tried to request it either. Good luck with the bar exam. I hope you do well. Shelley Palmadessa ESQ Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 14, 2018, at 08:46, James T. Fetter via BlindLaw wrote: > > I'm not sure if any state would permit you to do this. Even if this is an option, though, I would highly recommend taking the bar all at once and getting it over with. There is a significant amount of overlap between the MBE and state materials. And having done bar prep once, I wouldn't recommend doing it twice, especially if you're working. Also, I can't imagine that any legal employer would be impressed with intentionally delaying your bar passage or splitting the exam somehow. I don't know of any attorneys who have done this, and most employers would wonder what else you couldn't handle, if you couldn't handle bar prep. This wouldn't matter, once you pass but would make you a less attractive candidate for any positions starting after law school but before bar results. > > The bar is difficult, but it is doable, if you put the work in on the front end, take a few--or more than a few--deep breaths, and recognize that the result, even if not positive, is not the end of the world. > > > >> On 11/13/2018 2:41 PM, Roderick Thomas via BlindLaw wrote: >> Hey guys, I am a blind law school student in Orlando, Florida. I will be graduating in May of 2019. I am considering taking one part of the bar in July 2019, and the second half in February 2020. My plan is to break the bar exam down to two major sections, and study hard to pass one half of the test at a time. I would study and pass the Florida portion in July 2019, and study and pass the Multi state Bar Examination section in February 2020. I believe, that this would give me a better chance to pass the bar, since I will not be required to know so much information at one time. Once I pass the Florida section, then I would only be responsible for passing the Multi State Bar Examination section. I think, this is a good way for me to approach the test because as a blind law school student it takes me so much longer to do certain things, compared to a non-blind law school student. What do you think? Has anyone ever taken this approach before? Other than the fact that I would need to pay for the bar twice, do you think this is a good idea? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jtfetter%40yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/shelleyrichards9%40gmail.com From kelbycarlson at gmail.com Wed Nov 14 19:19:23 2018 From: kelbycarlson at gmail.com (kelby carlson) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 14:19:23 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] taking the bar exam In-Reply-To: <7A91B7F4-C2F7-4583-A625-7AEB8BF52B25@gmail.com> References: <4c33bccb-4721-20e8-4d4f-84cc8e5bbcbe@yahoo.com> <7A91B7F4-C2F7-4583-A625-7AEB8BF52B25@gmail.com> Message-ID: <2A46ECEF-72E5-46B4-A622-11E82005F1ED@gmail.com> There is pretty much no way this would be allowed, and you shouldn't do it anyway for the reasons others have already said. I just passed the bar, and preping for it is very doable. I used Themis which was almost totally accessible. You should also see if your school has a supplemental bar prep course during the summer, or in the spring semester. Many (most?) law schools have them and they are very useful. Feel free to contact me off list if you have specific questions about the bar. Do you know which state you want to take it in? If not, I would strongly advise making a decision soon and getting your medical documentation together. The application for accommodations is extensive, and it is extremely stressful to try and get the materials at the last minute. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 14, 2018, at 9:10 AM, Shelley Richards via BlindLaw wrote: > > > > I seriously doubt that this would even be permitted, in any state. Asking to split the exam into two could very easily be called an accommodation witch fundamentally alters the nature of the exam. It’s not meant to be to separate tests. As a blind person who both completed law school, and completed the bar exam, it is very possible for blind people to prepare for and take the bar exam as one test like everybody else has to. You can, and should be, given extended time to complete the exam, but I think the idea of splitting it into two separate parts which you plan on taking six months apart is not a good idea, and it would not be permitted. More importantly you do have to realize that as a blind attorney after law school and the bar exam you will have to meet deadlines. Telling your employer that your blind in things take you longer is not an excuse for missing deadlines, we’re not having materials prepared for a court date. Certain things may have taken me longer in law school, but I always turned everything in on time, the same time it was do for the rest of the class. You have to be able to do that in a workplace setting. It is not as hard as you are thinking to study for both sections of the bar exam at the same time. There is a lot of overlap between the two. I think it would be more difficult to study twice for two different sections rather than to study all at once for the entire exam. In the end however, no matter what your thoughts are, I’m pretty positive that it would not be allowed. No, I do not know of anybody who has done this, nor do I know if anybody who’s tried to request it either. Good luck with the bar exam. I hope you do well. > Shelley Palmadessa ESQ > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Nov 14, 2018, at 08:46, James T. Fetter via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> I'm not sure if any state would permit you to do this. Even if this is an option, though, I would highly recommend taking the bar all at once and getting it over with. There is a significant amount of overlap between the MBE and state materials. And having done bar prep once, I wouldn't recommend doing it twice, especially if you're working. Also, I can't imagine that any legal employer would be impressed with intentionally delaying your bar passage or splitting the exam somehow. I don't know of any attorneys who have done this, and most employers would wonder what else you couldn't handle, if you couldn't handle bar prep. This wouldn't matter, once you pass but would make you a less attractive candidate for any positions starting after law school but before bar results. >> >> The bar is difficult, but it is doable, if you put the work in on the front end, take a few--or more than a few--deep breaths, and recognize that the result, even if not positive, is not the end of the world. >> >> >> >>> On 11/13/2018 2:41 PM, Roderick Thomas via BlindLaw wrote: >>> Hey guys, I am a blind law school student in Orlando, Florida. I will be graduating in May of 2019. I am considering taking one part of the bar in July 2019, and the second half in February 2020. My plan is to break the bar exam down to two major sections, and study hard to pass one half of the test at a time. I would study and pass the Florida portion in July 2019, and study and pass the Multi state Bar Examination section in February 2020. I believe, that this would give me a better chance to pass the bar, since I will not be required to know so much information at one time. Once I pass the Florida section, then I would only be responsible for passing the Multi State Bar Examination section. I think, this is a good way for me to approach the test because as a blind law school student it takes me so much longer to do certain things, compared to a non-blind law school student. What do you think? Has anyone ever taken this approach before? Other than the fact that I would need to pay for the bar twice, do you think this is a good idea? >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jtfetter%40yahoo.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/shelleyrichards9%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/kelbycarlson%40gmail.com From shanew at outlook.com Thu Nov 15 01:50:18 2018 From: shanew at outlook.com (Shane Wegner) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 01:50:18 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] [student question] Citing with Lexis and Westlaw Message-ID: Hello list, I am a 1L student and just getting the hang of Lexis and Westlaw using JAWS. I'm wondering if anyone has figured out how to pin cite with Lexis? If you are a mouse user, you can highlight text with the mouse and a context menu comes up where you can copy the text with a pin cite. https://help.lexisnexis.com/tabula-rasa/newlexis/copytexttoclipboard_hdi-task?lbu=US&locale=en_US&audience=res Is there a way to do this using a screen reader? Cheers, Shane From kelbycarlson at gmail.com Thu Nov 15 02:14:36 2018 From: kelbycarlson at gmail.com (kelby carlson) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 21:14:36 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] [student question] Citing with Lexis and Westlaw In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5F740040-1B15-475A-8B5C-08632DFE9BD6@gmail.com> Sadly, I have never managed to do this successfully on either site, and I have spoken to accessibility personnel with both. It is easier to copy the citation from Lexis since there is a button to do so, but you will not get a pin citation. You will need to search for the nearest asterisk to whatever you are citing which will give you the page number. Make sure you know which reporter you are citing to, though, as many cases are reported in multiple places and so have more than one set of page numbers. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 14, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Shane Wegner via BlindLaw wrote: > > Hello list, > > I am a 1L student and just getting the hang of Lexis and Westlaw using JAWS. I'm wondering if anyone has figured out how to pin cite with Lexis? > > If you are a mouse user, you can highlight text with the mouse and a context menu comes up where you can copy the text with a pin cite. https://help.lexisnexis.com/tabula-rasa/newlexis/copytexttoclipboard_hdi-task?lbu=US&locale=en_US&audience=res > > Is there a way to do this using a screen reader? > > Cheers, > Shane > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/kelbycarlson%40gmail.com From ttomasi at driowa.org Thu Nov 15 02:40:48 2018 From: ttomasi at driowa.org (Tai Tomasi) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 02:40:48 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] [student question] Citing with Lexis and Westlaw In-Reply-To: <5F740040-1B15-475A-8B5C-08632DFE9BD6@gmail.com> References: , <5F740040-1B15-475A-8B5C-08632DFE9BD6@gmail.com> Message-ID: To my knowledge, there is no accessible way to do this in either Lexis or westlaw. I would love to be proven wrong. Tai Tomasi, J.D., M.P.A. Email: ttomasi at driowa.org Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse my brevity and any grammatical errors. On Nov 14, 2018, at 8:15 PM, kelby carlson via BlindLaw > wrote: Sadly, I have never managed to do this successfully on either site, and I have spoken to accessibility personnel with both. It is easier to copy the citation from Lexis since there is a button to do so, but you will not get a pin citation. You will need to search for the nearest asterisk to whatever you are citing which will give you the page number. Make sure you know which reporter you are citing to, though, as many cases are reported in multiple places and so have more than one set of page numbers. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 14, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Shane Wegner via BlindLaw > wrote: Hello list, I am a 1L student and just getting the hang of Lexis and Westlaw using JAWS. I'm wondering if anyone has figured out how to pin cite with Lexis? If you are a mouse user, you can highlight text with the mouse and a context menu comes up where you can copy the text with a pin cite. https://help.lexisnexis.com/tabula-rasa/newlexis/copytexttoclipboard_hdi-task?lbu=US&locale=en_US&audience=res Is there a way to do this using a screen reader? Cheers, Shane _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/kelbycarlson%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Thu Nov 15 19:02:10 2018 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 19:02:10 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Civil Litigation Attorney for King County, Washington Message-ID: From: King County, WA [mailto:KingCounty at subscriptions.kingcounty.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 12:46 PM Subject: Civil Litigation Attorney Civil Litigation Attorney 11/14/2018 12:34 PM PST King County is seeking an experienced civil litigation attorney to join the Civil Division of the Prosecuting Attorney's Office. Our Civil Division serves as the law firm for all King County agencies. We value diversity and strive to hire a workforce that reflects the community that we serve. It is essential to our mission that we create and maintain an office that is diverse and inclusive. The Prosecuting Attorney's Office is committed to Equity and Social Justice work and we require our lawyers and staff to continually develop their own cultural competence. You are an experienced civil litigation attorney (tort and/or municipal liability defense preferred) with leadership, integrity, compassion and professionalism who wants to be part of a litigation team dedicated to doing justice for the people of King County. You are prepared to assume immediate responsibility for leading a litigation team with a full litigation case load in state and federal court. You have significant first chair courtroom experience litigating significant tort matters, extensive motion practice experience, and have managed related discovery, preferably in an electronic database. Application Materials: Please submit on-line application, a resume, cover letter, short writing sample and answers to the supplemental questions. Partial applications will be disqualified from consideration. [Image removed by sender. King County logo] ________________________________ [Image removed by sender. Bookmark and Share] Update your preferences or unsubscribe. If you have questions about this service, you may contact us directly or search FAQs here. View King County's privacy policy. Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page. . [https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif] Virus-free. www.avast.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 389 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 348 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 332 bytes Desc: image003.jpg URL: From kelbycarlson at gmail.com Thu Nov 15 20:33:46 2018 From: kelbycarlson at gmail.com (kelby carlson) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 15:33:46 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process Message-ID: <94CBF9A6-0410-433F-8E39-E09FD4C170BB@gmail.com> I am working for a county district attorney. We are working on getting me necessary accommodations. However, human resources is insisting that they, rather than the DA, get to decide what accommodations are reasonable. Essentially we have put in a request and HR has not contacted me in several weeks, and refuses to move forward with the process. Does anybody know ADA protocols with respect to who engages in the interactive process for getting accommodations? HR is not equipped to determine the essential functions of this job or which accommodations will work. Sent from my iPhone From jtfetter at yahoo.com Thu Nov 15 21:04:48 2018 From: jtfetter at yahoo.com (James T. Fetter) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:04:48 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process In-Reply-To: <94CBF9A6-0410-433F-8E39-E09FD4C170BB@gmail.com> References: <94CBF9A6-0410-433F-8E39-E09FD4C170BB@gmail.com> Message-ID: <55ceb7f2-9b74-5358-ab31-bc6b92040a2a@yahoo.com> I could be totally off-base here, but I don't think that any division of a given company has any sort of exclusive legal duty to carry out the interactive process. HR needs to get over itself. It sounds like you may need to go up the chain of command--or ask your boss to do so, if s/he is supportive. On 11/15/2018 3:33 PM, kelby carlson via BlindLaw wrote: > I am working for a county district attorney. We are working on getting me necessary accommodations. However, human resources is insisting that they, rather than the DA, get to decide what accommodations are reasonable. Essentially we have put in a request and HR has not contacted me in several weeks, and refuses to move forward with the process. Does anybody know ADA protocols with respect to who engages in the interactive process for getting accommodations? HR is not equipped to determine the essential functions of this job or which accommodations will work. > > Sent from my iPhone > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jtfetter%40yahoo.com From ttomasi at driowa.org Thu Nov 15 21:11:36 2018 From: ttomasi at driowa.org (Tai Tomasi) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 21:11:36 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process In-Reply-To: <94CBF9A6-0410-433F-8E39-E09FD4C170BB@gmail.com> References: <94CBF9A6-0410-433F-8E39-E09FD4C170BB@gmail.com> Message-ID: Request a meeting with HR and your supervisor to discuss accommodations. Put the request in writing. The interactive process should involve someone with more direct knowledge of your job duties and what you may need to perform essential functions. Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. Pronouns: she/her/hers Staff Attorney 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org www.driowa.org Our Mission:  To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of kelby carlson via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 2:34 PM To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org Cc: kelby carlson Subject: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process I am working for a county district attorney. We are working on getting me necessary accommodations. However, human resources is insisting that they, rather than the DA, get to decide what accommodations are reasonable. Essentially we have put in a request and HR has not contacted me in several weeks, and refuses to move forward with the process. Does anybody know ADA protocols with respect to who engages in the interactive process for getting accommodations? HR is not equipped to determine the essential functions of this job or which accommodations will work. Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org From kelbycarlson at gmail.com Thu Nov 15 21:19:32 2018 From: kelbycarlson at gmail.com (kelby carlson) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:19:32 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process In-Reply-To: References: <94CBF9A6-0410-433F-8E39-E09FD4C170BB@gmail.com> Message-ID: <9A8BE212-BB93-4ACC-9215-093AF31867D7@gmail.com> Ty, This already took place. HR knows exactly what accommodationss I need, they just won't respond to requests for further interaction/information. The DA is very upset about this, because they are fully willing to provide the accommodations which HR is obstructing. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 15, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Tai Tomasi via BlindLaw wrote: > > Request a meeting with HR and your supervisor to discuss accommodations. Put the request in writing. The interactive process should involve someone with more direct knowledge of your job duties and what you may need to perform essential functions. > > Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. > Pronouns: she/her/hers > Staff Attorney > > > > 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 > Des Moines, Iowa 50309 > Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 > FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 > E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org > www.driowa.org > > Our Mission: To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of kelby carlson via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 2:34 PM > To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org > Cc: kelby carlson > Subject: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process > > I am working for a county district attorney. We are working on getting me necessary accommodations. However, human resources is insisting that they, rather than the DA, get to decide what accommodations are reasonable. Essentially we have put in a request and HR has not contacted me in several weeks, and refuses to move forward with the process. Does anybody know ADA protocols with respect to who engages in the interactive process for getting accommodations? HR is not equipped to determine the essential functions of this job or which accommodations will work. > > Sent from my iPhone > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/kelbycarlson%40gmail.com From ttomasi at driowa.org Thu Nov 15 21:23:47 2018 From: ttomasi at driowa.org (Tai Tomasi) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 21:23:47 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process In-Reply-To: <9A8BE212-BB93-4ACC-9215-093AF31867D7@gmail.com> References: <94CBF9A6-0410-433F-8E39-E09FD4C170BB@gmail.com> <9A8BE212-BB93-4ACC-9215-093AF31867D7@gmail.com> Message-ID: Take the request up the chain of command. Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. Pronouns: she/her/hers Staff Attorney 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org www.driowa.org Our Mission:  To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of kelby carlson via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 3:20 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: kelby carlson Subject: Re: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process Ty, This already took place. HR knows exactly what accommodationss I need, they just won't respond to requests for further interaction/information. The DA is very upset about this, because they are fully willing to provide the accommodations which HR is obstructing. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 15, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Tai Tomasi via BlindLaw wrote: > > Request a meeting with HR and your supervisor to discuss accommodations. Put the request in writing. The interactive process should involve someone with more direct knowledge of your job duties and what you may need to perform essential functions. > > Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. > Pronouns: she/her/hers > Staff Attorney > > > > 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 > Des Moines, Iowa 50309 > Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 > FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 > E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org > www.driowa.org > > Our Mission: To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of kelby carlson via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 2:34 PM > To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org > Cc: kelby carlson > Subject: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process > > I am working for a county district attorney. We are working on getting me necessary accommodations. However, human resources is insisting that they, rather than the DA, get to decide what accommodations are reasonable. Essentially we have put in a request and HR has not contacted me in several weeks, and refuses to move forward with the process. Does anybody know ADA protocols with respect to who engages in the interactive process for getting accommodations? HR is not equipped to determine the essential functions of this job or which accommodations will work. > > Sent from my iPhone > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/kelbycarlson%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org From laura.wolk at gmail.com Thu Nov 15 21:28:33 2018 From: laura.wolk at gmail.com (Laura Wolk) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:28:33 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process In-Reply-To: References: <94CBF9A6-0410-433F-8E39-E09FD4C170BB@gmail.com> <9A8BE212-BB93-4ACC-9215-093AF31867D7@gmail.com> Message-ID: <8A7C4645-31AA-420E-9E1B-1ACE746D5110@gmail.com> Is HR physically in the same building or close by? Can you and your boss go there in person" Documented of course. Email and phone calls can just go ignored. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 15, 2018, at 4:23 PM, Tai Tomasi via BlindLaw wrote: > > Take the request up the chain of command. > > Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. > Pronouns: she/her/hers > Staff Attorney > > > > 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 > Des Moines, Iowa 50309 > Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 > FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 > E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org > www.driowa.org > > Our Mission: To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of kelby carlson via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 3:20 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: kelby carlson > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process > > Ty, > > This already took place. HR knows exactly what accommodationss I need, they just won't respond to requests for further interaction/information. The DA is very upset about this, because they are fully willing to provide the accommodations which HR is obstructing. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Nov 15, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Tai Tomasi via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> Request a meeting with HR and your supervisor to discuss accommodations. Put the request in writing. The interactive process should involve someone with more direct knowledge of your job duties and what you may need to perform essential functions. >> >> Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. >> Pronouns: she/her/hers >> Staff Attorney >> >> >> >> 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 >> Des Moines, Iowa 50309 >> Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 >> FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 >> E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org >> www.driowa.org >> >> Our Mission: To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities >> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >> >> This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of kelby carlson via BlindLaw >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 2:34 PM >> To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org >> Cc: kelby carlson >> Subject: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process >> >> I am working for a county district attorney. We are working on getting me necessary accommodations. However, human resources is insisting that they, rather than the DA, get to decide what accommodations are reasonable. Essentially we have put in a request and HR has not contacted me in several weeks, and refuses to move forward with the process. Does anybody know ADA protocols with respect to who engages in the interactive process for getting accommodations? HR is not equipped to determine the essential functions of this job or which accommodations will work. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/kelbycarlson%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/laura.wolk%40gmail.com From ttomasi at driowa.org Thu Nov 15 21:46:18 2018 From: ttomasi at driowa.org (Tai Tomasi) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 21:46:18 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process In-Reply-To: <8A7C4645-31AA-420E-9E1B-1ACE746D5110@gmail.com> References: <94CBF9A6-0410-433F-8E39-E09FD4C170BB@gmail.com> <9A8BE212-BB93-4ACC-9215-093AF31867D7@gmail.com> <8A7C4645-31AA-420E-9E1B-1ACE746D5110@gmail.com> Message-ID: Agreed. If you can visit HR with your supervisor, that would be best. Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. Pronouns: she/her/hers Staff Attorney 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org www.driowa.org Our Mission:  To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Laura Wolk via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 3:29 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Laura Wolk Subject: Re: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process Is HR physically in the same building or close by? Can you and your boss go there in person" Documented of course. Email and phone calls can just go ignored. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 15, 2018, at 4:23 PM, Tai Tomasi via BlindLaw wrote: > > Take the request up the chain of command. > > Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. > Pronouns: she/her/hers > Staff Attorney > > > > 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 > Des Moines, Iowa 50309 > Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 > FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 > E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org > www.driowa.org > > Our Mission: To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of kelby carlson via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 3:20 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: kelby carlson > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process > > Ty, > > This already took place. HR knows exactly what accommodationss I need, they just won't respond to requests for further interaction/information. The DA is very upset about this, because they are fully willing to provide the accommodations which HR is obstructing. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Nov 15, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Tai Tomasi via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> Request a meeting with HR and your supervisor to discuss accommodations. Put the request in writing. The interactive process should involve someone with more direct knowledge of your job duties and what you may need to perform essential functions. >> >> Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. >> Pronouns: she/her/hers >> Staff Attorney >> >> >> >> 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 >> Des Moines, Iowa 50309 >> Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 >> FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 >> E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org >> www.driowa.org >> >> Our Mission: To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities >> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >> >> This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of kelby carlson via BlindLaw >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 2:34 PM >> To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org >> Cc: kelby carlson >> Subject: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process >> >> I am working for a county district attorney. We are working on getting me necessary accommodations. However, human resources is insisting that they, rather than the DA, get to decide what accommodations are reasonable. Essentially we have put in a request and HR has not contacted me in several weeks, and refuses to move forward with the process. Does anybody know ADA protocols with respect to who engages in the interactive process for getting accommodations? HR is not equipped to determine the essential functions of this job or which accommodations will work. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/kelbycarlson%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/laura.wolk%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org From kelbycarlson at gmail.com Fri Nov 16 11:16:23 2018 From: kelbycarlson at gmail.com (kelby carlson) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 06:16:23 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process In-Reply-To: References: <94CBF9A6-0410-433F-8E39-E09FD4C170BB@gmail.com> <9A8BE212-BB93-4ACC-9215-093AF31867D7@gmail.com> <8A7C4645-31AA-420E-9E1B-1ACE746D5110@gmail.com> Message-ID: Unfortunately, I'm as far up the chain of command as I can go. My boss (the DA) is trying to get HR to move forward, but they won't. We may have to speak to the county commissioner. Thankfully my supervisors are on my side; from what I understand it's often the opposite. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 15, 2018, at 4:46 PM, Tai Tomasi via BlindLaw wrote: > > Agreed. If you can visit HR with your supervisor, that would be best. > > Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. > Pronouns: she/her/hers > Staff Attorney > > > > 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 > Des Moines, Iowa 50309 > Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 > FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 > E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org > www.driowa.org > > Our Mission: To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Laura Wolk via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 3:29 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Laura Wolk > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process > > Is HR physically in the same building or close by? Can you and your boss go there in person" Documented of course. Email and phone calls can just go ignored. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Nov 15, 2018, at 4:23 PM, Tai Tomasi via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> Take the request up the chain of command. >> >> Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. >> Pronouns: she/her/hers >> Staff Attorney >> >> >> >> 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 >> Des Moines, Iowa 50309 >> Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 >> FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 >> E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org >> www.driowa.org >> >> Our Mission: To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities >> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >> >> This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of kelby carlson via BlindLaw >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 3:20 PM >> To: Blind Law Mailing List >> Cc: kelby carlson >> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process >> >> Ty, >> >> This already took place. HR knows exactly what accommodationss I need, they just won't respond to requests for further interaction/information. The DA is very upset about this, because they are fully willing to provide the accommodations which HR is obstructing. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Nov 15, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Tai Tomasi via BlindLaw wrote: >>> >>> Request a meeting with HR and your supervisor to discuss accommodations. Put the request in writing. The interactive process should involve someone with more direct knowledge of your job duties and what you may need to perform essential functions. >>> >>> Ms. Tai Tomasi, J.D. >>> Pronouns: she/her/hers >>> Staff Attorney >>> >>> >>> >>> 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 >>> Des Moines, Iowa 50309 >>> Tel: 515-278-2502; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 >>> FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 >>> E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org >>> www.driowa.org >>> >>> Our Mission: To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities >>> >>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >>> >>> This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of kelby carlson via BlindLaw >>> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 2:34 PM >>> To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org >>> Cc: kelby carlson >>> Subject: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process >>> >>> I am working for a county district attorney. We are working on getting me necessary accommodations. However, human resources is insisting that they, rather than the DA, get to decide what accommodations are reasonable. Essentially we have put in a request and HR has not contacted me in several weeks, and refuses to move forward with the process. Does anybody know ADA protocols with respect to who engages in the interactive process for getting accommodations? HR is not equipped to determine the essential functions of this job or which accommodations will work. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/kelbycarlson%40gmail.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/laura.wolk%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/kelbycarlson%40gmail.com From slabarre at labarrelaw.com Fri Nov 16 14:11:04 2018 From: slabarre at labarrelaw.com (Scott C. LaBarre) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 07:11:04 -0700 Subject: [blindlaw] FW: Attorney and Legal Internship Vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <01f101d47db6$369ff700$a3dfe500$@labarrelaw.com> fyi From: DOJlawjobs (OARM) Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 6:07 AM To: Undisclosed recipients: Subject: Attorney and Legal Internship Vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice Below is a list of current attorney and legal internship vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice. The Department of Justice office places a high value on diversity of experiences and perspectives and encourages applications from all qualified men and women from all ethnic and racial backgrounds, veterans , LGBT individuals, and persons with disabilities . We welcome applications from candidates who are interested in positively contributing to Justice and hope that you will consider joining the dedicated public servants at the Department of Justice. To learn more about Justice and our legal careers, please visit our website at https://www.justice.gov/legal-careers. Manage Your Email: If you no longer wish to receive these email notifications, please reply to this email with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. If you would like to update your contact information, please submit the following information: SCHOOL OR ORGANIZATION: NAME: TITLE: PHONE: EMAIL: WEBSITE: Attorney Vacancies & Volunteer Legal Internships Hiring Organization Job Title State Posted/ Updated Hiring Organization Civil Division (CIV) Job Title Unpaid Law Student Volunteer, Summer- Fraud Section State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 16, 2018 Hiring Organization Civil Division (CIV) Job Title Unpaid Law Student Volunteer, Academic Year- Fraud Section State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 16, 2018 Hiring Organization Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Job Title Attorney Advisor State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 15, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO District of Arizona Job Title Law Clerk, Student Volunteer, Tucson Branch, Summer 2019 State Arizona Posted/ Updated November 15, 2018 Hiring Organization Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Job Title Supervisory Attorney State Virginia Posted/ Updated November 15, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Middle District of Tennessee Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Tennessee Posted/ Updated November 15, 2018 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Trial Attorney (Privilege Review) State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 15, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Southern District of Illinois Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Illinois Posted/ Updated November 15, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Central District of Illinois Job Title Assistant US Attorney State Illinois Posted/ Updated November 15, 2018 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Uncompensated Special Assistant United States Attorney (SAUSA) State California Posted/ Updated November 14, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of California Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State California Posted/ Updated November 14, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of California Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State California Posted/ Updated November 14, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of California Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State California Posted/ Updated November 14, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of California Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State California Posted/ Updated November 14, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO District of Hawaii Job Title Summer Law Clerk State Hawaii Posted/ Updated November 14, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Middle District of Alabama Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer State Alabama Posted/ Updated November 14, 2018 Hiring Organization Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Job Title Attorney Advisor State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 14, 2018 Hiring Organization Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer 2019 State California Posted/ Updated November 13, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Southern District of Florida Job Title Assistant United States Attorney (Appellate) State Florida Posted/ Updated November 13, 2018 Hiring Organization Civil Division (CIV) Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer- Environmental Torts State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 13, 2018 Hiring Organization Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) Job Title Law Student Volunteer State New York Posted/ Updated November 13, 2018 Hiring Organization United States Trustee Program (USTP) Job Title Assistant US Trustee (AUST) State California Posted/ Updated November 13, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Western District of North Carolina Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State North Carolina Posted/ Updated November 12, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Western District of Tennessee Job Title Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) State Tennessee Posted/ Updated November 9, 2018 Hiring Organization Civil Division (CIV) Job Title Trial Attorney State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 9, 2018 Hiring Organization Job Title State Posted/ Updated Hiring Organization Civil Division (CIV) Job Title Trial Attorney State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 9, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of Pennsylvania Job Title Summer Legal Intern State Pennsylvania Posted/ Updated November 9, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of Oklahoma Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer 2019 State Oklahoma Posted/ Updated November 9, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Western District of Michigan Job Title Summer 2019 Volunteer Law Intern State Michigan Posted/ Updated November 9, 2018 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 88 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ckrugman at sbcglobal.net Sat Nov 17 05:09:23 2018 From: ckrugman at sbcglobal.net (ckrugman at sbcglobal.net) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:09:23 -0800 Subject: [blindlaw] taking the plunge Message-ID: <000a01d47e33$b585e570$2091b050$@sbcglobal.net> After many years working as a paralegal I am seriously considering taking the plunge of on line law school. I am seriously looking at Northwestern California University school of Law in Sacramento. Has anyone had any experiences with this particular law school? I met with them a few years ago and at that time I was told that they have had blind students participate in their program. At my age I am not wanting to incur much student debt and I am not in a position to relocate. Any info is appreciated. Regards. Chuck Krugman, MSW Paralegal 1237 P Street Fresno ca 93721 559-266-9237 --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From dandrews at visi.com Sun Nov 18 20:49:18 2018 From: dandrews at visi.com (David Andrews) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 14:49:18 -0600 Subject: [blindlaw] HR and the Interactive Process In-Reply-To: <94CBF9A6-0410-433F-8E39-E09FD4C170BB@gmail.com> References: <94CBF9A6-0410-433F-8E39-E09FD4C170BB@gmail.com> Message-ID: I think the ADA just designates one entity as an organization. It does not speak to components within a larger entity. You will just have to work that out! Dave At 02:33 PM 11/15/2018, you wrote: >I am working for a county district attorney. We are working on >getting me necessary accommodations. However, human resources is >insisting that they, rather than the DA, get to decide what >accommodations are reasonable. Essentially we have put in a request >and HR has not contacted me in several weeks, and refuses to move >forward with the process. Does anybody know ADA protocols with >respect to who engages in the interactive process for getting >accommodations? HR is not equipped to determine the essential >functions of this job or which accommodations will work. > >Sent from my iPhone From glnorman15 at hotmail.com Tue Nov 20 15:43:16 2018 From: glnorman15 at hotmail.com (GL Norman) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:43:16 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Dialogue Wash. D.C. Feb. Message-ID: Trans-Atlantic Reflection on Power of Technology for Inclusion February 22, 2019 at the German Marshall Fund of the U.S. Gary C. Norman, Esq. L.L.M. (AMMF 2008) Convener Debra V. Hamilton, Esq. Hamilton Law and Mediation, PLLC Master of Ceremony and Co-Facilitator For accommodations or for reservations, contact the German Marshall Fund of the U.S. Join one of our distinguished alumni of the AMMF program, and a lawyer with a disability, to engage in a coffee conversation (or other beverage with light snacks) on the role technology will play and will continue to play, in either building or in eroding diversity and inclusion, as well as civil rights, in the Trans-Atlantic partnership. Join him at 1:30 P.M. 1744 R. Street, N.W. Upstairs in the board room (Elevator access available) Gary, the robust commentary of other alumni, as well as European interlocuters, will seek to arrive at a consensus-based document of recommendations on the impact of technology on civil rights and human rights. Kerry Thompson and he co-hosted and co-implemented two dialogues in 2018 as part of an Alumni Action grant. As follow-up to his joint dialogue work and his column in the Maryland Daily Record on technology and civil rights, we host this conversation exploring: * Is technology, such as social media, connecting us or further eroding us as Trans-Atlantic leaders? Especially in terms of democracy and inclusion? * Is our technology eco system fully accessible yet to a range of populations, such as the disabled? * What role will AI play in expanding or in eroding civil rights? * Is there a Trans-Atlantic business case for diversity and inclusion, and ensuring technology supports this? For general questions, please telephone Gary C. Norman, Esq. L.L.M. at (410) 241-6745. From joshl at loevy.com Tue Nov 20 20:02:13 2018 From: joshl at loevy.com (Josh Loevy) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:02:13 -0600 Subject: [blindlaw] question for litigators Message-ID: <1d8d6497631bda2599f29cb7fa4e6ceb@mail.gmail.com> Hey All, I am in the midst of putting together some case charts to manage document analysis. I wanted to see if anyone has developed a case charting system they like. I am using the pattern jury instructions as a foundation, but am trying to figure out the best and most accessible format. From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Wed Nov 21 16:35:35 2018 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 16:35:35 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Attorney Opportunities at the Washington Attorney General's Office Message-ID: From: Linda Nakamura [mailto:LindaP2 at atg.wa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 5:52 PM To: Diversity Stakeholders Subject: [diversity-stakeholders] Attorney Opportunities at the WA Attorney General's Office Importance: High Strongly united in the knowledge that only by fostering the inclusion of people from all backgrounds, cultures and attributes, can employees of the Washington State Attorney General's Office achieve their fullest potential and best advance the goals and mission of the Office, we invite you to consider applying for the following opportunities. Click on the link below to access full position descriptions and qualifications for each opportunity. You can also visit the state's centralized recruitment site at www.careers.wa.gov. For information about the AGO, visit www.atg.wa.gov. AAG - University of Washington Division in Seattle (DL: 12/11/18) AAG - Ecology Division in Olympia (DL: 12/9/18) AAG - Torts Division in Olympia (DL: 12/5/18) AAG - Criminal Justice Division in Seattle (DL: 12/4/18) AAG - Regional Services Division in Yakima (DL: 12/4/18) AAG - Natural Resources Division in Olympia (DL: 12/3/18) AAG - Antitrust Division in Seattle (DL: 12/2/18) AAG - Fish, Wildlife and Parks Division in Olympia (DL: 11/28/18) AAG (Developing and Experienced) - Wing Luke Civil Rights Unit in Seattle (DL: 11/25/18) The AGO is an equal opportunity employer and does not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, sexual orientation/gender identity, age, disability, honorably discharged veteran or military status, retaliation or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a person with a disability. Persons requiring reasonable accommodation in the application process or requiring information in an alternative format may contact Tracy Robinson at 360-586-7693. Those with a hearing impairment in need of accommodation are encouraged to contact the Washington Relay Service at 1-800-676-3777 or www.washingtonrelay.com Linda Nakamura Linda Nakamura Attorney and Law Clerk Recruitment Administrator Washington State Attorney General's Office 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 464-6446 Contents of this e-mail may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination, or use of this e-mail or its contents by other than the addressee is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact me and delete it. In consideration and preservation of our natural resources, please print this e-mail only if necessary. --- You are currently subscribed to diversity-stakeholders as: noel.nightingale at ed.gov. To unsubscribe click here: http://list.wsba.org/u?id=9689257.98490556339430b43adf9753d1310389&n=T&l=diversity-stakeholders&o=699314 (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken) or send a blank email to leave-699314-9689257.98490556339430b43adf9753d1310389 at list.wsba.org If you have any questions, or wish to change your email address, please contact the WSBA List Administrator. From sai at fiatfiendum.org Thu Nov 22 16:29:15 2018 From: sai at fiatfiendum.org (Sai) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 17:29:15 +0100 Subject: [blindlaw] question for litigators In-Reply-To: <1d8d6497631bda2599f29cb7fa4e6ceb@mail.gmail.com> References: <1d8d6497631bda2599f29cb7fa4e6ceb@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4f36d0a0-cfb7-e458-e350-08dc46e0307e@fiatfiendum.org> Are you preparing for a trial actually likely to go to jury? What topic? Is what you mean, when referring to jury instructions as a template, just that they provide a handy outline of the elements that need to be proved or attacked? E.g. there are areas, like FOIA or APA, where pattern jury instructions don't really apply, Those cases almost always end with MSJs, not even a bench trial. (And those are the only kind I've done personally.) I like to just use outlines and spreadsheets. That's basically how I draft everything, really, and how I keep track of e.g. issues for appeal, case cites, etc as well. That's also what I did when drafting bench memos. First I'd make an outline of the facts and record (regardless of the law to apply). (That's just because it helps my memory to think of things in context and have a better timeline than the record usually gives. It's probably more efficient to first check the law and then filter out the facts that aren't relevant.) Then I'd check what laws apply, what cases are good or not, standard of review (my judge was appellate), etc. — and categorize those all into a handful of groups, based more or less on what aspects they go to and pro/con on what issues. The outline helped me spot a few cases when the one or both parties failed to address some important issue and I'd have to do more research on it, since it wasn't briefed enough. For Answers, MSJs, Vaughn indices, and the like, I like to make a spreadsheet of all the claims and responses, then just go through each one, categorizing into a separate column and pulling out the language that's not repetitive. They're damn near impossible to keep straight otherwise. (Especially an Answer; those'll just put you to sleep.) However, I am by no means an experienced litigator, I use computers mostly sighted (at least for litigation purposes). And I'm not even sure if the above is the kind of answer you were hoping for. Maybe you could elaborate so others could give a better answer? Sincerely, Sai President, Fiat Fiendum, Inc. On 11/20/18 21:02, Josh Loevy via BlindLaw wrote: > Hey All, > > I am in the midst of putting together some case charts to manage document > analysis. I wanted to see if anyone has developed a case charting system > they like. I am using the pattern jury instructions as a foundation, but am > trying to figure out the best and most accessible format. > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sai%40fiatfiendum.org > From slabarre at labarrelaw.com Mon Nov 26 14:53:39 2018 From: slabarre at labarrelaw.com (Scott C. LaBarre) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 07:53:39 -0700 Subject: [blindlaw] FW: Attorney and Legal Internship Vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <014401d48597$d1b6efd0$7524cf70$@labarrelaw.com> From: DOJlawjobs (OARM) Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 6:26 AM To: Undisclosed recipients: Subject: Attorney and Legal Internship Vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice Below is a list of current attorney and legal internship vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice. The Department of Justice office places a high value on diversity of experiences and perspectives and encourages applications from all qualified men and women from all ethnic and racial backgrounds, veterans , LGBT individuals, and persons with disabilities . We welcome applications from candidates who are interested in positively contributing to Justice and hope that you will consider joining the dedicated public servants at the Department of Justice. To learn more about Justice and our legal careers, please visit our website at https://www.justice.gov/legal-careers. Manage Your Email: If you no longer wish to receive these email notifications, please reply to this email with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. If you would like to update your contact information, please submit the following information: SCHOOL OR ORGANIZATION: NAME: TITLE: PHONE: EMAIL: WEBSITE: Attorney Vacancies & Volunteer Legal Internships Hiring Organization Job Title State Posted/ Updated Hiring Organization Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer 2019, OSG State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 26, 2018 Hiring Organization Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Job Title Staff Attorney State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 23, 2018 Hiring Organization Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Job Title Supervisory Attorney Advisor (Chief, Office of Equal Employment Opportunity) State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 23, 2018 Hiring Organization Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Job Title Attorney Advisor State Texas Posted/ Updated November 23, 2018 Hiring Organization National Security Division (NSD) Job Title LAW STUDENT VOLUNTEER, SPRING 2019 /SUMMER 2019 /FALL 2019, FOREIGN INVESTMENT REVIEW STAFF (FIRS) State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 21, 2018 Hiring Organization Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) Job Title Law Student Volunteer State Colorado Posted/ Updated November 21, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO District of Kansas Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer State Kansas Posted/ Updated November 21, 2018 Hiring Organization Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD) Job Title Deputy Chief State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 21, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of Oklahoma Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Oklahoma Posted/ Updated November 21, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO District of Nevada Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Nevada Posted/ Updated November 20, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO District of Nevada Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Nevada Posted/ Updated November 20, 2018 Hiring Organization Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) Job Title SUMMER 2019 LAW STUDENT VOLUNTEER State Texas Posted/ Updated November 20, 2018 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Trial Attorney State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 20, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of Iowa Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Fall State Iowa Posted/ Updated November 20, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of Iowa Job Title Law Student Volunteer-Summer 2019 State Iowa Posted/ Updated November 20, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO District of Kansas Job Title Law Student Volunteer State Kansas Posted/ Updated November 20, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO District of Vermont Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer State Vermont Posted/ Updated November 20, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO District of Maine Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer State Maine Posted/ Updated November 19, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of Virginia Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer State Virginia Posted/ Updated November 19, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of Virginia Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer State Virginia Posted/ Updated November 19, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO District of Hawaii Job Title Summer Law Clerk State Hawaii Posted/ Updated November 19, 2018 Hiring Organization Civil Division (CIV) Job Title Unpaid Law Student Volunteer, Academic Year- Fraud Section State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 19, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO District of Idaho Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Idaho Posted/ Updated November 19, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Middle District of Louisiana Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Louisiana Posted/ Updated November 19, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of Ohio Job Title Assistant United States Attorney (Criminal) State Ohio Posted/ Updated November 19, 2018 Hiring Organization Job Title State Posted/ Updated Hiring Organization Civil Division (CIV) Job Title Trial Attorney State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 19, 2018 Hiring Organization Civil Division (CIV) Job Title Trial Attorney State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 19, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of Tennessee Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Tennessee Posted/ Updated November 19, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of Tennessee Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Tennessee Posted/ Updated November 19, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of Washington Job Title Attorney State Washington Posted/ Updated November 19, 2018 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of Washington Job Title Attorney State Washington Posted/ Updated November 19, 2018 Hiring Organization United States Trustee Program (USTP) Job Title Law Student Volunteer State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated November 19, 2018 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 88 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Mon Nov 26 17:06:08 2018 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:06:08 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Disability Rights Washington is hiring a Prisoners' Rights Litigator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: DRW’s Amplifying Voices of Inmates with Disabilities (AVID) Program seeks a full-time prisoners’ rights litigator with a demonstrated interest in conducting impact litigation to enforce the legal rights of incarcerated individuals enduring abuse, neglect, or other human and civil rights violations. This position will require a licensed attorney with the ability to conduct systemic investigations, develop complex advocacy strategies, and represent both classes and individuals. The AVID Program enjoys DRW’s unique access authority, which will allow the attorney the ability to see firsthand the conditions in Washington’s prisons and jails, even in the most secluded and segregated parts of those facilities. The ideal candidate would have lived and/or professional experience relating to the AVID Program’s practice areas, which include, but are not limited to: addressing discrimination, improving conditions of confinement for people experiencing incarceration, supporting community reentry from institutionalization or incarceration, and ending abuse and neglect. DRW seeks applicants who have the ability to work independently in a team of supportive colleagues and are seeking to join in our mission to “advance the dignity, equality, and self-determination of people with disabilities.” People with disabilities, people of color, formerly institutionalized or incarcerated individuals, and those from other oppressed groups and all protected classes are strongly encouraged to apply. For a full job description, visit: https://www.disabilityrightswa.org/2018/11/19/now-hiring-prisoners-rights-litigation-attorney/. Please spread the word about this opportunity! Heather McKimmie, Attorney Director of AVID Program Amplifying Voices of Inmates with Disabilities Pronouns: she/her/hers Disability Rights Washington 315 5th Avenue S, Suite 850 | Seattle, WA 98104 voice: 206.324.1521 or 800.562.2702 | fax: 206.957.0729 DRW phones open: Monday – Friday | 8:30 – 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 – 4:30 p.m. www.disabilityrightswa.org | www.rootedinrights.org| www.donatetodrw.org Disability Rights Washington (DRW) is a private non-profit organization that protects the rights of people with disabilities statewide. Our mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self-determination of people with disabilities. We work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights. The contents of this message and any attachment(s) may contain confidential or privileged information. Any disclosure, copying, distribution, or unauthorized use of the contents of this message is prohibited and doing so may destroy the confidential nature of the communication. If you have received this message by mistake, please do not review, disclose, copy, or distribute the email. Instead, please notify us immediately by replying to this message or phoning us. Additionally, people sending email to DRW have a reasonable expectation of privacy. However, DRW does not use encryption, and all email coming to DRW is routed through a third party internet service provider (ISP) before it reaches DRW. Although it is unlikely that an ISP will intercept and review a message, it is a possibility, especially if a message is incorrectly addressed and "bounced back" to the sender. --- You are currently subscribed to atj-community as: daquiz.abigail at dol.gov. To access web features of this list, visit list.wsba.org/read/ Please send an email to the list administrator to update the list administrator with changes to your email address. -- -- You received this message because you are a federal agency attorney and subscribed to the FANGS group. To SEND A MESSAGE to this group, email to fangseattle at googlegroups.com. To UNSUBSCRIBE from this group, email fangseattle+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fangseattle?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Federal Attorneys Networking Group of Seattle" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fangseattle+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Mon Nov 26 17:56:41 2018 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:56:41 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] University of Washington Tacoma Hiring legal pathways director Message-ID: From: washingtonattorneyswithdisabilitiesassociation at googlegroups.com [mailto:washingtonattorneyswithdisabilitiesassociation at googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dana Klasky Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 9:31 AM To: WashingtonAttorneyswithDisabilitiesAssociation at googlegroups.com Subject: [WADA] UW Tacoma Hiring The Legal Pathways Initiative at UW Tacoma is hiring for a new Director. The Legal Pathways Program "seeks to unite students, faculty, staff and the Tacoma community in law-related education, research, events, networking and other programming that prepares students for success in law school and other law-related professions. A priority for this initiative is to contribute to enlarging the pathway into the legal professions for first generation students and students of color." The position advertisement, with further information, is posted at: http://uwhires.admin.washington.edu/ENG/candidates/default.cfm?szCategory=jobprofile&jobhistory=1&szOrderID=162195. The priority deadline for applications is December 15. -- Dana Klasky, Legal Assistant Washington Civil & Disability Advocate (206) 402-5846 www.wacda.com 3513 NE 45th Street, Suite G Seattle, WA 98105 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Washington Attorneys with Disabilities Association" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to WashingtonAttorneyswithDisabilitiesAssociation+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to WashingtonAttorneyswithDisabilitiesAssociation at googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/WashingtonAttorneyswithDisabilitiesAssociation. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. From Vyingling at nfb.org Thu Nov 29 19:23:04 2018 From: Vyingling at nfb.org (Yingling, Valerie) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:23:04 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Request from Mamadi Corra, American Association for the Advancement of Science fellow at the Federal Judicial Center Message-ID: NFB received the following request: My name is Mamadi Corra, and I am an AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science) fellow at the Federal Judicial Center in Washington DC. I am working on a project to identify accessibility issues at the federal court level (barriers to access to federal courts), and possible recommendations to address such issues. I am also blind and I just moved to DC. I think my project would be enhanced by speaking with individuals who work with the federal judiciary (judges, lawyers, litigants, etc.), to ascertain difficulties they might have had/continue to have with accessing the federal courts (physical and electronic). Please email me directly if you can speak with me and/or offer suggestions. Thanks much in advance! Mamadi K. Corra, Ph.D. 2018-19 American Association for the Advancement of Science Law & Science Judicial Fellow Federal Judicial Center Research Division Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building One Columbus Circle, NE Washington, DC 20002-8003 (202) 502-4252 mcorra at fjc.gov Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more visit the Mimecast website. From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Thu Nov 29 19:38:38 2018 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:38:38 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] King County council Chief Legal Counsel Message-ID: From: Calderon, Tracy [mailto:Tracy.Calderon at kingcounty.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 3:39 PM To: Conrad at wacda.com; stuarpix at microsoft.com; Nightingale, Noel Subject: KCC- Chief Legal Counsel advertisement... Importance: High This position opens Friday. Please post this job announcement on your website and any publications your organization produces. Please let me know if there is a fee associated with this posting. I look forward to hearing back from you soon. Thank you. Tracy Calderon Senior HR Business Partner 206-477-0979 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2018-2019 Chief Legal Counsel summary newspaper ad.doc Type: application/msword Size: 52736 bytes Desc: 2018-2019 Chief Legal Counsel summary newspaper ad.doc URL: From jlynnbarrow at gmail.com Fri Nov 30 00:52:51 2018 From: jlynnbarrow at gmail.com (Jen Barrow) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:52:51 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Fillable Government Forms and Screen Readers Message-ID: <016601d48847$05e471e0$11ad55a0$@gmail.com> Hi, All. I recently started a new job in nonprofit immigration law. I'm so thrilled, except that I'm encountering some significant difficulty with completing the gazillion different government forms involved in seeking immigration status using JAWS. I'm hoping that some of you who routinely interact with unwieldy federal forms can share your tips and tricks with me. I'm opening the fillable forms in Adobe Pro, and in theory, they should work fine. I can tab through the form, check boxes and input text. However, the user experience is awful. For example, JAWS jumps around the form and reads parts of the form that are not yet visible to sighted people-like #8 somehow is showing up between #3 and #4 when navigating with JAWS. In certain fields, JAWS says "blank" even though I typed something in; sighted people tell me text is inputted. JAWS reads a lengthy paragraph of instructions before each edit field-like it will read: lengthy paragraph first name edit. These and other wonky behaviors render the more complex forms unusable. I'm not particularly tech savvy, so I'm not sure if the difficulty is with JAWS, Adobe Pro or the construction of the form itself. or I suppose even user incompetence. There has to be a better way. Does anyone have more success opening fillable forms in another program, like Foxit? Or perhaps using a different screen reader? Or hiring someone to write JAWS scripts? I would really appreciate any advice you can offer! Thanks, Jen