From slabarre at labarrelaw.com Fri Mar 1 15:00:02 2019 From: slabarre at labarrelaw.com (Scott C. LaBarre) Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 08:00:02 -0700 Subject: [blindlaw] FW: Attorney and Legal Internship Vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <003a01d4d03f$73500c90$59f025b0$@labarrelaw.com> FYI From: DOJlawjobs (OARM) Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 7:30 AM To: Undisclosed recipients: Subject: Attorney and Legal Internship Vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice Below is a list of current attorney and legal internship vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice. The Department of Justice office places a high value on diversity of experiences and perspectives and encourages applications from all qualified men and women from all ethnic and racial backgrounds, veterans, LGBT individuals, and persons with disabilities. We welcome applications from candidates who are interested in positively contributing to Justice and hope that you will consider joining the dedicated public servants at the Department of Justice. To learn more about Justice and our legal careers, please visit our website at https://www.justice.gov/legal-careers. Manage Your Email: If you no longer wish to receive these email notifications, please reply to this email with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. If you would like to update your contact information, please submit the following information: SCHOOL OR ORGANIZATION: NAME: TITLE: PHONE: EMAIL: WEBSITE: Attorney Vacancies & Volunteer Legal Internships Hiring Organization Job Title State Posted/ Updated Hiring Organization USAO Western District of North Carolina Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State North Carolina Posted/ Updated March 1, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Middle District of Pennsylvania Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Pennsylvania Posted/ Updated February 28, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Trial Attorney State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated February 28, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Resident Legal Advisor, Gulf Region State Posted/ Updated February 27, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of Louisiana Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Louisiana Posted/ Updated February 26, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Western District of Michigan Job Title AUSA State Michigan Posted/ Updated February 26, 2019 Hiring Organization Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD) Job Title Law Clerk State California Posted/ Updated February 26, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of Indiana Job Title Law Clerk Intern State Indiana Posted/ Updated February 26, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Attorney Advisor (International)/Resident Legal Advisor, Georgia State Posted/ Updated February 25, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO District of Hawaii Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Hawaii Posted/ Updated February 25, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Southern District of Texas Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Texas Posted/ Updated February 25, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Student Volunteer State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated February 25, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Trial Attorney State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated February 22, 2019 Hiring Organization Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) Job Title Law Student Volunteer Summer 2019 State Washington Posted/ Updated February 22, 2019 Hiring Organization Civil Division (CIV) Job Title Unpaid Law Student Volunteer, Summer 2019 - National Courts Section State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated February 22, 2019 Hiring Organization Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) Job Title Trial Attorney - Multiple Positions State Posted/ Updated February 22, 2019 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 88 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Fri Mar 1 17:44:20 2019 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 17:44:20 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Press Release: Justice Department Reaches Agreement With Concord, New Hampshire, DOJ, Feb 26 2019 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-reaches-agreement-concord-new-hampshire-ensure-accessible-voting-machines Justice Department Reaches Agreement With Concord, New Hampshire, to Ensure Accessible Voting Machines in City Elections for Voters With Disabilities Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs February 26, 2019 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE The Justice Department today reached an agreement with the city of Concord, New Hampshire, to resolve a complaint alleging that the city violated Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by failing to provide an accessible ballot to a voter who is blind. Under the agreement, the city of Concord will provide voting machines that are accessible to voters who are blind or visually impaired. The city will have the accessible machines at its polling places starting in the November 2019 city election. In addition, the city will provide training to poll workers on the use of the accessible voting machines and will develop educational materials regarding the availability of the machines in city elections. "Through this settlement, the city of Concord will ensure that voting in city elections is accessible to voters who are blind or visually impaired," said Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband of the Civil Rights Division. "We commend the city's commitment to guaranteeing that voters with disabilities have equal access to voting." This settlement is part of the Department of Justice's ADA Voting Initiative, which protects the voting rights of individuals with disabilities. A hallmark of the ADA Voting Initiative is its collaboration with jurisdictions to ensure accessibility to both polling places and the ballot. Those interested in finding out more about this settlement or the ADA may call the Justice Department's toll-free ADA information line at 800-514-0301 or 800-514-0383 (TDD), or access its ADA website at www.ada.gov. ADA complaints may be filed online at http://www.ada.gov/complaint/. Topic(s): Civil Rights Component(s): Civil Rights Division Civil Rights - Disability Rights Section Civil Rights - Voting Section Press Release Number: 19-166 From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Fri Mar 1 18:59:04 2019 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 18:59:04 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Article: The Legal Picture for Web Accessibility in 2019, PracticalEcommerce, Jan 30 2019 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://www.practicalecommerce.com/the-legal-picture-for-web-accessibility-in-2019 The Legal Picture for Web Accessibility in 2019 PracticeEcommerce January 30, 2019 By Joseph C. Dolson The U.S. Department of Justice of not issued specific regulations on website accessibility. But U.S. courts have consistently ruled that the Americans with Disabilities Act requires commercial websites to be accessible for blind users. The U.S. Department of Justice has not issued regulations on website accessibility. But U.S. courts have consistently ruled that the Americans with Disabilities Act requires commercial websites to be accessible for disabled users. On December 26, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice published a notice for web accessibility. The notice, like many governmental documents, was confusing. The notice withdrew an "Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking," which had announced a new set of upcoming regulations for accessibility of web information under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Many observers assumed (i) the Advance Notice meant that the DoJ was going to issue regulations that forced websites to be accessible to users with disabilities, and (ii) having withdrawn the Advance Notice, the DoJ did not, ultimately, require accessible websites. Both of these assumptions are wrong. The Americans with Disabilities Act already required websites to be accessible to disabled users. This has been well established in U.S. courts - most recently in a decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals against Domino's Pizza. Moreover, the DoJ issued a clear statement, via a letter from the assistant U.S. attorney general, on September 25, 2018: The Department first articulated its interpretation that the ADA applies to public accommodations' websites over 20 years ago. This interpretation is consistent with the ADA's title III requirement that the goods, services, privileges, or activities provided by places of public accommodation be equally accessible to people with disabilities. In other words, the courts and the DoJ made clear their positions: an accessible website is required under the ADA. Where does this leave commercial websites? Obligations for Web Accessibility The lack of regulations governing web accessibility for commercial websites means there are no rules. You do not need to follow the guidelines established for federal websites, nor do you need to follow the international standards for accessibility published by the World Wide Web Consortium. But the Sept. 25 letter contains broad guidance on compliance with the ADA: Absent the adoption of specific technical requirements for websites through rulemaking, public accommodations have flexibility in how to comply with the ADA's general requirements of nondiscrimination and effective communication. Accordingly, noncompliance with a voluntary technical standard for website accessibility does not necessarily indicate noncompliance with the ADA. Thus, the DoJ grants flexibility in determining how to comply with the ADA's requirements. You have no obligation to follow web accessibility guidelines. But you do have an obligation to provide an accessible website. Almost any accessibility consultant will acknowledge that guidelines on website accessibility are flawed; there is no perfect description of web accessibility. However, few would argue that the guidelines are too strict. Usually, the flaws with guidelines are failures to address important issues. The lack of specificity means that the determination of an accessible website is not through compliance with a set of rules or regulations. Instead, the accessibility of individual sites is being arbitrated in the courts. Web Accessibility in the Courts All of this has produced a great number of web accessibility lawsuits. According to Seyfarth Shaw, an international law firm, the number of ADA Title III lawsuits (Title III is the section that prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability) has increased from 4,789 in 2015 to 10,163 in 2018. The firm attributes much of this increase to website accessibility. In 2018, there were nearly 2,000 web accessibility lawsuits filed. Before 2015, there were virtually none. I used to tell my clients that there was little chance they would be sued for an inaccessible site. But that is no longer the case - an inaccessible site is now a financial risk. (I am not an attorney, however.) Next Steps Even though the DoJ has not established guidelines for accessible websites, businesses (including ecommerce sites) are well advised to follow W3C's Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, version 2.1, at level AA. There are several reasons. First, multiple countries, include the U.S., follow those W3C guidelines for their own websites. This will protect you at some level internationally, and will certainly not hurt within the U.S. (The U.S. government is using WCAG 2.0 and not WCAG 2.1, the July 2018 revision. However, 2.1 offers considerable benefits with only a handful of new requirements.) Second, you need to start somewhere. While you aren't required to follow specific guidelines, there's no benefit to inventing your own techniques. Certainly there is room for interpretation when it comes to accessibility. But, still, following existing standards is considerably easier and safer than creating your own. Third, the federal government will almost certainly set regulations for web accessibility. It's unlikely they will deviate significantly from international standards. From rene0373 at gmail.com Sat Mar 2 19:00:45 2019 From: rene0373 at gmail.com (Elizabeth Rene) Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2019 11:00:45 -0800 Subject: [blindlaw] Accessibility of Fastcase and Casetext Message-ID: Dear listmates, Does anyone regularly use either Fastcase or Casetext for legal research? Are either of these tools accessible? Thanks. Elizabeth M René Attorney at Law WSBA #10710 KCBA #21824 rene0373 at gmail.com From tim at timeldermusic.com Sun Mar 3 19:22:41 2019 From: tim at timeldermusic.com (tim at timeldermusic.com) Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 11:22:41 -0800 Subject: [blindlaw] Accessibility of Fastcase and Casetext In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <028301d4d1f6$790d45e0$6b27d1a0$@timeldermusic.com> CaseTex: some of it is accessible, but I found some concerns when trying to use it as a replacement for browsing cases. Running the AI results on an uploaded brief seems to work well. I then review the results in Westlaw. -----Original Message----- From: Elizabeth Rene Sent: Saturday, March 2, 2019 11:01 AM To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org Subject: [blindlaw] Accessibility of Fastcase and Casetext Dear listmates, Does anyone regularly use either Fastcase or Casetext for legal research? Are either of these tools accessible? Thanks. Elizabeth M René Attorney at Law WSBA #10710 KCBA #21824 rene0373 at gmail.com From sanho817 at gmail.com Sun Mar 3 19:52:41 2019 From: sanho817 at gmail.com (Sanho Steele-Louchart) Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 13:52:41 -0600 Subject: [blindlaw] Inaccessible Databases Message-ID: All, Good afternoon. What are some strategies you use if you come across an inaccessible database? Do you have sighted assistants, which sounds expensive and generally makes me uncomfortable, or do you have methods of circumnavigating problems like these? I'm anticipating professors and colleagues assuming that my blindness would slow them down or that they'd have to babysit me in some way. This is of particular concern with regards to law review. I'd like to have solutions in mind as early as possible. Warmth, Sanho From p.harpur at law.uq.edu.au Sun Mar 3 21:53:30 2019 From: p.harpur at law.uq.edu.au (Paul Harpur) Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 21:53:30 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Inaccessible Databases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: If you are a student talk to the disability services people to see if they can get a specialist to show you some work arounds of the databases. I would also talk to the library about how they can help. Most databases are reasonably usable in law so you would probably need a little bit of help now and again. Both of these can be done without the professors finding out. Dr Paul Harpur BBus (HRm), LLB (Hons) LLM, PhD, solicitor of the High Court of Australia (non-practicing) Fulbright Future Scholar/International Distinguished Fellow, Burton Blatt Institute, SU, New York. Senior Lecturer   TC Beirne School of Law The University of Queensland Brisbane Qld 4072 Australia   T +61 7 3365 8864 M +61 417 635 609 E p.harpur at law.uq.edu.au TCB Profile/Google Citation Page  CRICOS code: 00025B Scientia ac Labore This email (including any attached files) is intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information of The University of Queensland. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that any transmission, distribution, printing or photocopying of this email is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please delete and notify me. Unless explicitly stated, the opinions expressed in this email do not represent the official position of The University of Queensland. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Sanho Steele-Louchart via BlindLaw Sent: Monday, 4 March 2019 5:53 AM To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org Cc: Sanho Steele-Louchart Subject: [blindlaw] Inaccessible Databases All, Good afternoon. What are some strategies you use if you come across an inaccessible database? Do you have sighted assistants, which sounds expensive and generally makes me uncomfortable, or do you have methods of circumnavigating problems like these? I'm anticipating professors and colleagues assuming that my blindness would slow them down or that they'd have to babysit me in some way. This is of particular concern with regards to law review. I'd like to have solutions in mind as early as possible. Warmth, Sanho _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/paulharpur%40gmail.com From cabusgeorgia at gmail.com Sun Mar 3 21:57:50 2019 From: cabusgeorgia at gmail.com (Georgia Cabus) Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 16:57:50 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Inaccessible Databases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Sanho, I'm new here but I can totally understand your concerns. Most of sighted people assumed blind people are slow and needed babysitting. I've been treated like that in almost any industry because of stereotype misconceptions. Anyway, I usually breakdown my tasks to the basic concept for the sake of being resourceful (cuz we had to find ways to be 'independent') if I come across something inaccessible such as database, I take a screenshot of it then use a text-to-speech to read it since database are more of texts than images. Its very versatile since majority of devices now have the 'basic' function to do a screenshot whether you're using a computer or smartphone I find it as an easy cheap way plus you don't have to as you said 'be babysitted' because the process is not complicated to learn/do on your own. Also, if your device happened to not work the simple knowledge can come in handy. As much as accessibility programs a help to us, devices CAN and WILL breakdown sometime eventhough AI tech now are equipped with the capacity to salvage themselves, when they do the functions are very limited. For instance, if your operating system goes to safe mode, its minimized to run essentially critical functions only and if you use high-end programs (i.e JAWS, ZOOMTEXT) those require certain specs to work. That's not helpful and to think if you are working on something with a deadline. Downside, some places intentionally block you on taking pics for privacy/security purposes. I'm pretty sure there's legal ways around it. I hope that helps. Quick question, if you don't mind. Are you a studying law right now? I'm doing my career exploration and I like to get some insight on this category. Thanks, Georgia C. On Sun, Mar 3, 2019, 2:54 PM Sanho Steele-Louchart via BlindLaw < blindlaw at nfbnet.org> wrote: > All, > > Good afternoon. What are some strategies you use if you come across an > inaccessible database? Do you have sighted assistants, which sounds > expensive and generally makes me uncomfortable, or do you have methods of > circumnavigating problems like these? I'm anticipating professors and > colleagues assuming that my blindness would slow them down or that they'd > have to babysit me in some way. This is of particular concern with regards > to law review. I'd like to have solutions in mind as early as possible. > > Warmth, > Sanho > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cabusgeorgia%40gmail.com > From sanho817 at gmail.com Sun Mar 3 22:44:13 2019 From: sanho817 at gmail.com (Sanho Steele-Louchart) Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 16:44:13 -0600 Subject: [blindlaw] Inaccessible Databases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <65708F28-293D-475A-AA83-E4E6B985C671@gmail.com> Hi, Georgia, Thank you. In response to your question, I'm an incoming 1L, although I've done other things over the past few years. I'd be happy to discuss career exploration off-list. Warmth, Sanho > On Mar 3, 2019, at 3:57 PM, Georgia Cabus via BlindLaw wrote: > > Hi Sanho, > > I'm new here but I can totally understand your concerns. Most of sighted > people assumed blind people are slow and needed babysitting. I've been > treated like that in almost any industry because of stereotype > misconceptions. > > Anyway, I usually breakdown my tasks to the basic concept for the sake of > being resourceful (cuz we had to find ways to be 'independent') if I come > across something inaccessible such as database, I take a screenshot of it > then use a text-to-speech to read it since database are more of texts than > images. Its very versatile since majority of devices now have the 'basic' > function to do a screenshot whether you're using a computer or smartphone I > find it as an easy cheap way plus you don't have to as you said 'be > babysitted' because the process is not complicated to learn/do on your own. > Also, if your device happened to not work the simple knowledge can come in > handy. As much as accessibility programs a help to us, devices CAN and WILL > breakdown sometime eventhough AI tech now are equipped with the capacity to > salvage themselves, when they do the functions are very limited. For > instance, if your operating system goes to safe mode, its minimized to run > essentially critical functions only and if you use high-end programs (i.e > JAWS, ZOOMTEXT) those require certain specs to work. That's not helpful > and to think if you are working on something with a deadline. > > Downside, some places intentionally block you on taking pics for > privacy/security purposes. I'm pretty sure there's legal ways around it. > > I hope that helps. > > Quick question, if you don't mind. Are you a studying law right now? I'm > doing my career exploration and I like to get some insight on this category. > > Thanks, > > Georgia C. > > On Sun, Mar 3, 2019, 2:54 PM Sanho Steele-Louchart via BlindLaw < > blindlaw at nfbnet.org> wrote: > >> All, >> >> Good afternoon. What are some strategies you use if you come across an >> inaccessible database? Do you have sighted assistants, which sounds >> expensive and generally makes me uncomfortable, or do you have methods of >> circumnavigating problems like these? I'm anticipating professors and >> colleagues assuming that my blindness would slow them down or that they'd >> have to babysit me in some way. This is of particular concern with regards >> to law review. I'd like to have solutions in mind as early as possible. >> >> Warmth, >> Sanho >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cabusgeorgia%40gmail.com >> > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sanho817%40gmail.com From cabusgeorgia at gmail.com Mon Mar 4 00:46:30 2019 From: cabusgeorgia at gmail.com (Georgia Cabus) Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 19:46:30 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Inaccessible Databases In-Reply-To: <65708F28-293D-475A-AA83-E4E6B985C671@gmail.com> References: <65708F28-293D-475A-AA83-E4E6B985C671@gmail.com> Message-ID: Sanho, Great! Here's my email cabusgeorgia at gmail.com On Sun, Mar 3, 2019, 5:45 PM Sanho Steele-Louchart via BlindLaw < blindlaw at nfbnet.org> wrote: > Hi, Georgia, > > Thank you. In response to your question, I'm an incoming 1L, although I've > done other things over the past few years. I'd be happy to discuss career > exploration off-list. > > Warmth, > Sanho > > > > On Mar 3, 2019, at 3:57 PM, Georgia Cabus via BlindLaw < > blindlaw at nfbnet.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Sanho, > > > > I'm new here but I can totally understand your concerns. Most of sighted > > people assumed blind people are slow and needed babysitting. I've been > > treated like that in almost any industry because of stereotype > > misconceptions. > > > > Anyway, I usually breakdown my tasks to the basic concept for the sake of > > being resourceful (cuz we had to find ways to be 'independent') if I come > > across something inaccessible such as database, I take a screenshot of it > > then use a text-to-speech to read it since database are more of texts > than > > images. Its very versatile since majority of devices now have the 'basic' > > function to do a screenshot whether you're using a computer or > smartphone I > > find it as an easy cheap way plus you don't have to as you said 'be > > babysitted' because the process is not complicated to learn/do on your > own. > > Also, if your device happened to not work the simple knowledge can come > in > > handy. As much as accessibility programs a help to us, devices CAN and > WILL > > breakdown sometime eventhough AI tech now are equipped with the capacity > to > > salvage themselves, when they do the functions are very limited. For > > instance, if your operating system goes to safe mode, its minimized to > run > > essentially critical functions only and if you use high-end programs (i.e > > JAWS, ZOOMTEXT) those require certain specs to work. That's not helpful > > and to think if you are working on something with a deadline. > > > > Downside, some places intentionally block you on taking pics for > > privacy/security purposes. I'm pretty sure there's legal ways around it. > > > > I hope that helps. > > > > Quick question, if you don't mind. Are you a studying law right now? I'm > > doing my career exploration and I like to get some insight on this > category. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Georgia C. > > > > On Sun, Mar 3, 2019, 2:54 PM Sanho Steele-Louchart via BlindLaw < > > blindlaw at nfbnet.org> wrote: > > > >> All, > >> > >> Good afternoon. What are some strategies you use if you come across an > >> inaccessible database? Do you have sighted assistants, which sounds > >> expensive and generally makes me uncomfortable, or do you have methods > of > >> circumnavigating problems like these? I'm anticipating professors and > >> colleagues assuming that my blindness would slow them down or that > they'd > >> have to babysit me in some way. This is of particular concern with > regards > >> to law review. I'd like to have solutions in mind as early as possible. > >> > >> Warmth, > >> Sanho > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> BlindLaw mailing list > >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > >> BlindLaw: > >> > >> > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cabusgeorgia%40gmail.com > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > BlindLaw mailing list > > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > > > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sanho817%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cabusgeorgia%40gmail.com > From slabarre at labarrelaw.com Mon Mar 4 22:21:05 2019 From: slabarre at labarrelaw.com (Scott C. LaBarre) Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 15:21:05 -0700 Subject: [blindlaw] =?utf-8?q?FW=3A_Last_Chance_to_Register_for_the_2019_?= =?utf-8?q?Jacobus_tenBroek_Disability_Law_Symposium_=E2=80=93_Marc?= =?utf-8?q?h_28-29?= In-Reply-To: <20190304212347.8AECC60694CD@lx-web-pri.localdomain> References: <20190304212347.8AECC60694CD@lx-web-pri.localdomain> Message-ID: <027701d4d2d8$8f727980$ae576c80$@labarrelaw.com> From: Lou Ann Blake Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 2:24 PM To: Mr. Scott Labarre Subject: Last Chance to Register for the 2019 Jacobus tenBroek Disability Law Symposium – March 28-29 Do Not Forget to Register for the National Federation of the Blind 2019 Jacobus tenBroek Disability Law Symposium “Public Attitudes and Stigma Affecting Our Right to Live in the World” March 28–March 29, 2019 at the National Federation of the Blind Jernigan Institute Baltimore, Maryland Registration to attend the 2019 Jacobus tenBroek Disability Law Symposium will be closing at midnight on Sunday, March 24, 2019. We have an exciting agenda . Don’t miss this important event! Read about last year’s exciting symposium in the February 2019 Braille Monitor article written by Stacie Dubnow, “Fifty Years After tenBroek: The Right to Live in the World Today and Tomorrow.” If you have already registered to attend the symposium but have not yet booked a hotel room, we have reserved a block of rooms at the Royal Sonesta Harbor Court Baltimore, located at 550 Light Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. Rooms may be reserved for March 26 through March 30, 2019 at the rate of $159.00 per night for singles or doubles, $179.00 for triples, and $199.00 for quads, plus applicable taxes and surcharges. If you wish to reserve a room, you can make your reservation online at Sonesta Reservations , or call the hotel directly at 410-234-0550, referring to the National Federation of the Blind block (group code 0326NATFED). Reservations must be made by 5:00 p.m., February 26, 2019. The NFB will provide a free morning and evening accessible shuttle between the hotel and the National Federation of the Blind. If you would like a Braille program and did not request it in your online registration, please email Lou Ann Blake . For additional information, please contact either Lou Ann Blake at lblake at nfb.org or Stacie Dubnow at sdubnow at nfb.org . National Federation of the Blind | 200 E Wells Street | Baltimore, MD 21230 | (410) 659-9314 Unsubscribe | Opt Out | Sign up for email newsletter 200 E WELLS ST BALTIMORE, MD 21230-4850 United States .. From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Tue Mar 5 22:15:48 2019 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 22:15:48 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] =?iso-8859-1?q?Article=3A_Beyonc=E9=27s_Parkwood_Ente?= =?iso-8859-1?q?rtainment_sued_over_website_accessibility=2C_Guardian=2C_J?= =?iso-8859-1?q?an_4_2019?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2019/jan/04/beyonce-parkwood-entertainment-sued-over-website-accessibility Beyoncé's Parkwood Entertainment sued over website accessibility: A lawsuit claims beyonce.com violates the Americans With Disabilities Act by failing to accommodate visually impaired users The Guardian January 4 2019 By Laura Snapes A class action lawsuit claims that Beyoncé's official website violates the Americans With Disabilities Act (1990) by denying visually impaired users equal access to its products and services, according to the Hollywood Reporter. Web accessibility requires photos to be coded with alt-text so that screen-readers used by visually impaired users can speak the alternative text. Dan Shaked, attorney for plaintiff Mary Conner, said: "There are many important pictures on beyonce.com that lack a text equivalent ... As a result, Plaintiff and blind beyonce.com customers are unable to determine what is on the website, browse the website or investigate and/or make purchases." The Guardian has contacted representatives for Beyoncé for comment. Conner is described in the suit as having "no vision whatsoever". Shaked describes music as "the one and only form of entertainment that truly presents an even playing field between the visually impaired and the sighted". Conner's hopes of attending a Beyoncé concert were restricted by her lack of access to the website, the suit claims. The complaint lists further issues including the lack of accessible drop-down menus and navigation links, and the inability to navigate using a keyboard instead of a mouse. The proposed lawsuit includes "all legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Beyonce.com and as a result have been denied access to the enjoyment of goods and services offered by Beyonce.com, during the relevant statutory period." Conner seeks a court injunction that would require Beyoncé's company to make the site accessible to blind and visually impaired customers in accordance with ADA rules, and is pursuing damages for those who have "been subject to unlawful discrimination". From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Wed Mar 6 21:18:00 2019 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 21:18:00 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Seeking a Legislative Attorney, 2 openings, Communications Law and Trade Law Message-ID: From: washingtonattorneyswithdisabilitiesassociation at googlegroups.com [mailto:washingtonattorneyswithdisabilitiesassociation at googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dana Klasky Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2019 12:40 PM To: WashingtonAttorneyswithDisabilitiesAssociation at googlegroups.com Subject: [WADA] Seeking a Legislative Attorney, 2 openings, Communications Law and Trade Law Seeking a Legislative Attorney (Communications Law) 2/13/2019 to 3/14/2019 $96,970 to $126,062 per year Summary: The Congressional Research Service (CRS), American Law Division (ALD), seeks a Legislative Attorney to analyze legal questions that emerge from the work of Congress related to communications law in particular and American public law generally. This is a non-litigating position emphasizing qualifications and interest in legal research and writing in a public service legislative context(Input information for appropriate position). Candidates with research experience in and broad general knowledge of legal issues regarding communications law in particular and American public law in general; who demonstrate strong research, writing, and oral communication skills; and who possess a portfolio of high quality legal analytical writing are encouraged to apply. Experience as a judicial clerk will be beneficial. The position’s primary focus is the broad area of communications law. However, given ALD’s relatively small staff and the breadth of issues ALD covers for Congress, candidates must also be capable of working in a number of different areas of the law and have the intellectual curiosity to seek out and maintain a broad portfolio of legal issues. Thus, applicants should also have knowledge of constitutional and administrative law and statutory interpretation. Qualifications: • Knowledge of communications law in particular and American public law generally** • Ability to analyze legal issues** • Ability to write in a legal context** • Ability to convey legal analysis and information orally through briefings, consultations and other presentations. CRS is fully committed to workforce diversity. Interested applicants must apply online https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/524321400 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Seeking a Legislative Attorney (Trade Law) 2/27/2019 to 3/27/2019 96,970 to $126,062 per year Summary: The Congressional Research Service (CRS), American Law Division (ALD), seeks a Legislative Attorney to analyze legal questions that emerge from the work of Congress related to trade law in particular and American public law generally. This is a non-litigating position emphasizing qualifications and interest in legal research and writing in a public service legislative context. Candidates with research experience in and broad general knowledge of legal issues regarding trade law in particular and American public law in general; who demonstrate strong research, writing, and oral communication skills; and who possess a portfolio of high quality legal analytical writing are encouraged to apply. Experience as a judicial clerk will be beneficial. The position’s primary focus is the broad area of trade law. However, given ALD’s relatively small staff and the breadth of issues ALD covers for Congress, candidates must also be capable of working in a number of different areas of the law and have the intellectual curiosity to seek out and maintain a broad portfolio of legal issues. Thus, applicants should also have knowledge of constitutional and administrative law and statutory interpretation. Qualifications: · Knowledge of trade law in particular and American public law generally** · Ability to analyze legal issues** · Ability to write in a legal context** · Ability to convey legal analysis and information orally through briefings, consultations and other presentations CRS is fully committed to workforce diversity. Interested applicants must apply online https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/525647800 Thank you, Dana Klasky, Legal Assistant Washington Civil & Disability Advocate Office: (206) 428-3558 Direct: (206) 428-3172 www.wacda.com 3513 NE 45th Street, Suite G Seattle, WA 98105 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Washington Attorneys with Disabilities Association" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to WashingtonAttorneyswithDisabilitiesAssociation+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to WashingtonAttorneyswithDisabilitiesAssociation at googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/WashingtonAttorneyswithDisabilitiesAssociation. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. From amatney at loeb.com Thu Mar 7 19:18:08 2019 From: amatney at loeb.com (Angela Matney) Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 19:18:08 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Fwd: New AMT associate position(s) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Loeb & Loeb is seeking to hire two new associates to join our Advanced Media and Technology (AMT) department. One position is located in Nashville; the other can be located in DC, New York, LA, Chicago, or Nashville. I've included the job description for the latter position below. The other is similar. The AMT Department is an exciting place to work. I'd be happy to answer any questions. Feel free to email me at amatney at loeb.com. The description follows: Loeb & Loeb's Advanced Media and Technology (AMT) department is seeking an attorney with 2-4 years of experience to join in its New York, Chicago, DC, Nashville, or LA office. ​ The AMT department is a multi-disciplinary department with nearly 60 attorneys that have deep expertise in counseling and transactions in the advertising, marketing, media, technology, intellectual property, and data privacy space. ​ The ideal candidate will have strong experience with drafting and negotiating significant commercial transactions involving technology, data privacy, and marketing-related services, as well as meaningful exposure to advertising, marketing, technology, intellectual property, mobile, social or emerging media, and privacy issues. Successful candidates will have excellent drafting, writing and analytical abilities, strong interpersonal and communication skills, accurate and strong attention to detail, high level of organization, and the ability to manage multiple projects and interface directly with clients. Loeb's AMT department works with many Fortune 500 clients in a variety of industries, including automotive, financial, technology, telecommunications, food, consumer package goods, among others, as well as numerous advertising and marketing agencies. Superior academic credentials and applicable state bar admission are required. For questions regarding this position, please contact our Recruiting Coordinator, Katie Wildes (kwildes at loeb.com). ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender. Please destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you, Loeb & Loeb LLP. ________________________________ From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Fri Mar 8 00:22:30 2019 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 00:22:30 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Web page : The Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA), Peatworks Message-ID: http://www.peatworks.org/policy/accessible-technology-and-law/IDEA The Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA) Peatworks Undated/No Author The year 2018 closed with the passage of the 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA) in December, which promises to make federal websites more accessible, user friendly, and secure. This new law requires federal agencies to modernize the websites and digital services they offer, according to eight specific criteria, including accessibility for people with disabilities. All federal agencies in the Executive Branch must already meet the accessibility standards of Rehabilitation Act Section 508, as codified in the Section 508 Rule published by the U.S. Access Board. However, IDEA is noteworthy for several reasons, including its emphasis on increasing agencies' compliance with Section 508. Within 180 days of the law's passage, all new and redesigned federal websites must comply with the new criteria, and agencies must submit plans to Congress for how they will accelerate the use of electronic signatures. IDEA also requires federal chief information officers (CIOs) to coordinate with other executives and ensure that departments plan adequate funding and resources to execute these requirements. The provisions include several significant requirements to make federal websites more user friendly, usable, and robust for all users, including a requirement that digital formats of all paper-based forms be available within two years. Under the requirements of IDEA, federal websites must: *provide a customized digital experience to individual users *maintain a consistent appearance *be fully functional and usable on common mobile devices *use an industry-standard secure connection *contain a search function that allows users to easily search content intended for public use These user-friendly requirements overlap substantially with principles of Universal Design, and their use by federal agencies should help make federal websites easier to use for everyone, including people with disabilities. From slabarre at labarrelaw.com Fri Mar 8 13:18:26 2019 From: slabarre at labarrelaw.com (Scott C. LaBarre) Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 06:18:26 -0700 Subject: [blindlaw] FW: Attorney and Legal Internship Vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <001901d4d5b1$6aa939f0$3ffbadd0$@labarrelaw.com> fyi From: DOJlawjobs (OARM) Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 6:14 AM To: Undisclosed recipients: Subject: Attorney and Legal Internship Vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice Below is a list of current attorney and legal internship vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice. The Department of Justice office places a high value on diversity of experiences and perspectives and encourages applications from all qualified men and women from all ethnic and racial backgrounds, veterans, LGBT individuals, and persons with disabilities. We welcome applications from candidates who are interested in positively contributing to Justice and hope that you will consider joining the dedicated public servants at the Department of Justice. To learn more about Justice and our legal careers, please visit our website at https://www.justice.gov/legal-careers. Manage Your Email: If you no longer wish to receive these email notifications, please reply to this email with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. If you would like to update your contact information, please submit the following information: SCHOOL OR ORGANIZATION: NAME: TITLE: PHONE: EMAIL: WEBSITE: Attorney Vacancies & Volunteer Legal Internships Hiring Organization Job Title State Posted/ Updated Hiring Organization National Security Division (NSD) Job Title Deputy Chief for Compliance, GS-0905-15 State Posted/ Updated March 7, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of Mississippi Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer State Mississippi Posted/ Updated March 7, 2019 Hiring Organization Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Job Title Attorney Advisor State Georgia Posted/ Updated March 7, 2019 Hiring Organization Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Job Title Attorney Advisor State Mississippi Posted/ Updated March 7, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Attorney Advisor State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated March 7, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Attorney Advisor, Counterterrorism State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated March 7, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Western District of Wisconsin Job Title Criminal Assistant United States Attorney State Wisconsin Posted/ Updated March 7, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Western District of Wisconsin Job Title Civil Assistant United States Attorney State Wisconsin Posted/ Updated March 7, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO District of Puerto Rico Job Title 2019 Volunteer Summer Law Program State Puerto Rico Posted/ Updated March 6, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Southern District of Ohio Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Ohio Posted/ Updated March 6, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section, Law Student Volunteer, Fall 2019 State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated March 5, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Resident Legal Advisor, Kenya State Posted/ Updated March 5, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO District of Maryland Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Maryland Posted/ Updated March 5, 2019 Hiring Organization Civil Division (CIV) Job Title Attorney - Term State Vermont Posted/ Updated March 5, 2019 Hiring Organization United States Attorney's Office (USAO) Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Florida Posted/ Updated March 4, 2019 Hiring Organization United States Attorney's Office (USAO) Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Florida Posted/ Updated March 4, 2019 Hiring Organization United States Trustee Program (USTP) Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Fall 2019 State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated March 4, 2019 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 88 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rthomas48 at gmail.com Fri Mar 8 23:48:06 2019 From: rthomas48 at gmail.com (Roderick Thomas) Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 18:48:06 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] pro docs Message-ID: Hey guys, I am in the legal defense clinic at school and the school uses pro docs, but it does not work with jaws. Does anyone know of any other software or way that I could get samples of different kinds of motions and pleadings? I am greatly concerned because I am going to be looking for a job in a law firm very soon, and every law firm that I have looked at so far uses pro docs. However, pro docs does not work with Jaws at all. From gerard.sadlier at gmail.com Sat Mar 9 00:15:26 2019 From: gerard.sadlier at gmail.com (Gerard Sadlier) Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 00:15:26 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Relativity Message-ID: Hi all I remember someone on the list had successfully used Relativity with JAWS or NVDA. I will need to use this at work. Could someone tell me how to? Thanks a mill Ger From glnorman15 at hotmail.com Sun Mar 10 18:58:41 2019 From: glnorman15 at hotmail.com (GL Norman) Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:58:41 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Summary Dialogue Held at G.M.F. Message-ID: Find a summary of an important conversation held in Wash. D.C. "We have published a summary of the event on the brief website and it can be found here" https://sciencetechbrief.com/2019/03/08/transatlantic-reflections-on-the-power-of-technology-for-inclusion-a-summary/. From p.harpur at law.uq.edu.au Sun Mar 10 19:38:07 2019 From: p.harpur at law.uq.edu.au (Paul Harpur) Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:38:07 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Summary Dialogue Held at G.M.F. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: This link appears to be broken Dr Paul Harpur BBus (HRm), LLB (Hons) LLM, PhD, solicitor of the High Court of Australia (non-practicing) Fulbright Future Scholar/International Distinguished Fellow, Burton Blatt Institute, SU, New York. Senior Lecturer   TC Beirne School of Law The University of Queensland Brisbane Qld 4072 Australia   T +61 7 3365 8864 M +61 417 635 609 E p.harpur at law.uq.edu.au TCB Profile/Google Citation Page  CRICOS code: 00025B Scientia ac Labore This email (including any attached files) is intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information of The University of Queensland. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that any transmission, distribution, printing or photocopying of this email is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please delete and notify me. Unless explicitly stated, the opinions expressed in this email do not represent the official position of The University of Queensland. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of GL Norman via BlindLaw Sent: Monday, 11 March 2019 4:59 AM To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org; GDB_paw at groups.io Cc: GL Norman Subject: [blindlaw] Summary Dialogue Held at G.M.F. Find a summary of an important conversation held in Wash. D.C. "We have published a summary of the event on the brief website and it can be found here" https://sciencetechbrief.com/2019/03/08/transatlantic-reflections-on-the-power-of-technology-for-inclusion-a-summary/. _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/paulharpur%40gmail.com From dwiniecki at handid.org Sun Mar 10 19:52:46 2019 From: dwiniecki at handid.org (Donald Winiecki) Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 13:52:46 -0600 Subject: [blindlaw] Summary Dialogue Held at G.M.F. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dr. Harpur, The link is working for me. Perhaps your E-mail reader breaking this URL into pieces with hard carriage returns at the end of each line. This will prevent the link from working. I have used the tool at http://tinyurl.com to make a short version of the same URL that will not be broken onto multiple lines in your E-mail reader. You will find that shortened URL below. http://tinyurl.com/yxbx2pya The original (and much longer) URL is included immediately below *.* https://sciencetechbrief.com/2019/03/08/transatlantic-reflections-on-the-power-of-technology-for-inclusion-a-summary/ Hope this helps, _don On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 1:39 PM Paul Harpur via BlindLaw < blindlaw at nfbnet.org> wrote: > This link appears to be broken > > > Dr Paul Harpur > BBus (HRm), LLB (Hons) LLM, PhD, solicitor of the High Court of Australia > (non-practicing) > Fulbright Future Scholar/International Distinguished Fellow, Burton Blatt > Institute, SU, New York. > Senior Lecturer > > TC Beirne School of Law > The University of Queensland > Brisbane Qld 4072 Australia > > T +61 7 3365 8864 M +61 417 635 609 > E p.harpur at law.uq.edu.au TCB Profile/Google Citation Page > CRICOS code: 00025B > > > > > Scientia ac Labore > > This email (including any attached files) is intended solely for the > addressee and may contain confidential information of The University of > Queensland. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that any > transmission, distribution, printing or photocopying of this email is > prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please delete and > notify me. Unless explicitly stated, the opinions expressed in this email > do not represent the official position of The University of Queensland. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of GL > Norman via BlindLaw > Sent: Monday, 11 March 2019 4:59 AM > To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org; GDB_paw at groups.io > Cc: GL Norman > Subject: [blindlaw] Summary Dialogue Held at G.M.F. > > Find a summary of an important conversation held in Wash. D.C. > > "We have published a summary of the event on the brief website and it can > be found here" > > https://sciencetechbrief.com/2019/03/08/transatlantic-reflections-on-the-power-of-technology-for-inclusion-a-summary/ > < > https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsciencetechbrief.com%2F2019%2F03%2F08%2Ftransatlantic-reflections-on-the-power-of-technology-for-inclusion-a-summary%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5e6252fc4c6346bbb06708d6a3e382a1%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636876594869909339&sdata=3ntg1wC72itOSsD7QPWv%2FPuqSCiIh0i5zqYXfXJEuuE%3D&reserved=0 > >. > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/paulharpur%40gmail.com > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/dwiniecki%40handid.org > From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Mon Mar 11 17:49:36 2019 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:49:36 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Federal communications Commission attorney position Message-ID: From: Jobs [mailto:jobs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Maurer, Patricia via Jobs Sent: Monday, March 11, 2019 7:50 AM To: 'jobs at nfbnet.org' Cc: Maurer, Patricia Subject: [Jobs] FW: Diversity Notification -----Original Message----- From: careerconnector at monstergovt.com [mailto:careerconnector at monstergovt.com] Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2019 3:33 AM To: Maurer, Patricia Subject: Diversity Notification National Federation of the Blind Sir/Madam Dear Sir/Madam: Your organization and its members might be interested in the following vacancy announcement: Announcement Number: ATTY-OEA-2019-003 Vacancy Description: Attorney-Advisor (General) Open Period: 03/08/2019 to 03/25/2019 Series/Grade: GS-0905B Attorney Advisor-12/13/14 Salary: (USD) $81,548 - (USD) $148,967 Hiring Agency: Federal Communications Commission Duty Location: Washington, DC, US For more information, please visit the vacancy announcement located at https://careerconnector.jobs.treas.gov/cc/fcc/vacancy/viewVacancyDetail!execute.hms?orgId=1751&jnum=175631. Thank you. Human Resources Management Federal Communications Commission -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Jobs mailing list Jobs at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/jobs_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Jobs: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/jobs_nfbnet.org/noel.nightingale%40ed.gov From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Tue Mar 12 16:54:25 2019 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:54:25 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] ACLU of Washington is hiring a Youth Policy Counsel - please share Message-ID: From: John Midgley Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 9:34 AM To: ATJ Community Subject: [atj-community] ACLU is hiring a Youth Policy Counsel - please share The job description is attached and can also be found on the ACLU website --- You are currently subscribed to atj-community as: daquiz.abigail at dol.gov. To access web features of this list, visit list.wsba.org/read/ Please send an email to the list administrator to update the list administrator with changes to your email address. -- -- You received this message because you are a federal agency attorney and subscribed to the FANGS group. To SEND A MESSAGE to this group, email to fangseattle at googlegroups.com. To UNSUBSCRIBE from this group, email fangseattle+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fangseattle?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Federal Attorneys Networking Group of Seattle" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fangseattle+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PAG - Youth Policy Counsel March 2019.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 149498 bytes Desc: PAG - Youth Policy Counsel March 2019.pdf URL: From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Thu Mar 14 18:59:21 2019 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 18:59:21 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Federal Communications commission attorney position Message-ID: From: Jobs [mailto:jobs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Maurer, Patricia via Jobs Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 7:44 AM To: 'jobs at nfbnet.org' Cc: Maurer, Patricia Subject: [Jobs] FW: Diversity Notification -----Original Message----- From: careerconnector at monstergovt.com [mailto:careerconnector at monstergovt.com] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 3:34 AM To: Maurer, Patricia Subject: Diversity Notification National Federation of the Blind Sir/Madam Dear Sir/Madam: Your organization and its members might be interested in the following vacancy announcement: Announcement Number: ATTY-WTB-2019-013 Vacancy Description: Attorney-Advisor Open Period: 03/13/2019 to 03/27/2019 Series/Grade: GS-0905B Attorney Advisor-13/14 Salary: (USD) $96,970 - (USD) $148,967 Hiring Agency: Federal Communications Commission Duty Location: Washington, DC, US For more information, please visit the vacancy announcement located at https://careerconnector.jobs.treas.gov/cc/fcc/vacancy/viewVacancyDetail!execute.hms?orgId=1751&jnum=173957. Thank you. Human Resources Management Federal Communications Commission -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Jobs mailing list Jobs at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/jobs_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Jobs: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/jobs_nfbnet.org/noel.nightingale%40ed.gov From michael.steven.n at gmail.com Thu Mar 14 19:54:51 2019 From: michael.steven.n at gmail.com (Michael S. Nunez) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 12:54:51 -0700 Subject: [blindlaw] Fwd: Disability Rights California looking to hire attorney to work on sensory disabilities access issues. Message-ID: Hello everyone, I am forwarding the below and attached job posting for a friend who is an attorney at Disability Rights California ("DRC"). DRC is looking to hire an attorney to work on sensory disability access issues. Best, Mike ----- Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 10:40 AM Subject: FW: Sensory Disabilities attorney posting Hi, Mike. Hope all is well with you. Wanted to see if you know of anyone who might be a good fit for a Sensory Disabilities Attorney position. The job description is in the body of this email and also in the attached WORD document. -Aaron Staff Attorney 1 Sensory Disabilities Civil Rights Practice Group (Oakland or San Diego office) SALARY RANGE: $57,585 - $77,169 DOE Apply by February 8, 2019 to be considered for the first round of interviews. The Sensory Disabilities Attorney will support and expand our existing litigation efforts on communication access for individuals with sensory disabilities. Current work includes challenging the Social Security Administration's failure to provide accessible kiosk's for individuals who are blind or have visual impairments; challenging California's failure to provide accessible Medicaid notices and materials for individuals who are blind or have visual impairments; and ensuring that people with developmental disabilities who are also Deaf or have hearing impairments and live in group homes have access to effective communication. The Civil Right Practice Group is a statewide team of attorneys focused on litigating complex and impactful cases to stop discrimination against people with disabilities. Our current goals include increasing and maintaining affordable, accessible housing; advocating against the criminalization of people with disabilities including those that are homeless; enforcing disability access rights and reducing discrimination in private and public programs and services; and ensuring that people with disabilities have access to courts, administrative agencies, and legal services. Minimum Qualifications: Juris Doctor degree (JD) plus admission to the California State Bar, plus 1-2 years' experience. Working at DRC is more than just a job - it is a rare opportunity to do what you are good at while making a difference! DRC offers competitive salaries and a generous benefit package. To view the detailed job description and complete the application process visit http://www.disabilityrightsca.org/Jobs/index.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Staff Attorney 1 Sensory Disabilities flyer 1.18.19.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 75257 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rwayne1 at nyc.rr.com Thu Mar 14 23:19:13 2019 From: rwayne1 at nyc.rr.com (Ray Wayne) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:19:13 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Question About HUD Rules Message-ID: <853F55A9276247E1966D79D8B6458AFC@RayWaynePC> Hi All: If anyone is familiar with the HUD rules pertainig to certification or re-certification of tenant eligibility for HUD-subsidized housing, please contact me off list. Thanks in advance. Ray Wayne, NYC From gerard.sadlier at gmail.com Fri Mar 15 00:30:05 2019 From: gerard.sadlier at gmail.com (Gerard Sadlier) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:30:05 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Urgent, Using Trial View Message-ID: Hello Has anyone used Trial View with JAWS? Trial View is an electronic platform for accessing documents at trial. I can use the system but I can't read the underlying documents on the system. I'm told this is because they are a HTML 5 rendering of a document, whatever that means. Any help very much appreciated, as trial has now started!!! Kind regards Ger From slabarre at labarrelaw.com Fri Mar 15 14:38:12 2019 From: slabarre at labarrelaw.com (Scott C. LaBarre) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 08:38:12 -0600 Subject: [blindlaw] FW: Attorney and Legal Internship Vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <027901d4db3c$b79f5420$26ddfc60$@labarrelaw.com> fyi From: DOJlawjobs (OARM) Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 7:11 AM To: Undisclosed recipients: Subject: Attorney and Legal Internship Vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice Below is a list of current attorney and legal internship vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice. The Department of Justice office places a high value on diversity of experiences and perspectives and encourages applications from all qualified men and women from all ethnic and racial backgrounds, veterans, LGBT individuals, and persons with disabilities. We welcome applications from candidates who are interested in positively contributing to Justice and hope that you will consider joining the dedicated public servants at the Department of Justice. To learn more about Justice and our legal careers, please visit our website at https://www.justice.gov/legal-careers. Manage Your Email: If you no longer wish to receive these email notifications, please reply to this email with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. If you would like to update your contact information, please submit the following information: SCHOOL OR ORGANIZATION: NAME: TITLE: PHONE: EMAIL: WEBSITE: Attorney Vacancies & Volunteer Legal Internships Hiring Organization Job Title State Posted/ Updated Hiring Organization USAO District of Connecticut Job Title Civil Assistant United States Attorney State Connecticut Posted/ Updated March 14, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO District of Connecticut Job Title Criminal Assistant United States Attorney - Cybercrime State Connecticut Posted/ Updated March 14, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO District of Connecticut Job Title Criminal Assistant United States Attorney State Connecticut Posted/ Updated March 14, 2019 Hiring Organization Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) Job Title Law Student Volunteer, Summer 2019 State Louisiana Posted/ Updated March 14, 2019 Hiring Organization Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) Job Title Volunteer Legal Intern State Michigan Posted/ Updated March 14, 2019 Hiring Organization National Security Division (NSD) Job Title Attorney Advisor, GS-0905-13/14/15 State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated March 14, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO District of the Virgin Islands Job Title ATTORNEY, AUSA, CIVIL DIVISION State Virgin Islands Posted/ Updated March 13, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Southern District of Florida Job Title Assistant United States Attorney (Appellate) State Florida Posted/ Updated March 13, 2019 Hiring Organization Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Job Title Attorney State Virginia Posted/ Updated March 13, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Western District of Virginia Job Title Assistant United States Attorney (Criminal Division) State Virginia Posted/ Updated March 13, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of New York Job Title Assistant United States Attorney (Criminal) State New York Posted/ Updated March 12, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO District of Arizona Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Arizona Posted/ Updated March 12, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of Virginia Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Virginia Posted/ Updated March 12, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Southern District of Ohio Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Ohio Posted/ Updated March 12, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of Florida Job Title Law Student Volunteer State Florida Posted/ Updated March 11, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Middle District of Tennessee Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Tennessee Posted/ Updated March 11, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO District of New Jersey Job Title Summer Law Student Volunteer State New Jersey Posted/ Updated March 11, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO District of New Jersey Job Title Assistant US Attorney State New Jersey Posted/ Updated March 11, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO District of New Jersey Job Title Assistant US Attorney - Civil State New Jersey Posted/ Updated March 11, 2019 Hiring Organization Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Job Title General Attorney State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated March 11, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of Oklahoma Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Oklahoma Posted/ Updated March 11, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Resident Legal Advisor, Kosovo State Posted/ Updated March 11, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Regional Resident Legal Advisor, Bulgaria and Romania State Posted/ Updated March 11, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Resident Legal Advisor, Albania State Posted/ Updated March 11, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Southern District of New York Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State New York Posted/ Updated March 8, 2019 Hiring Organization Job Title State Posted/ Updated Hiring Organization Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD) Job Title Trial Attorney State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated March 8, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Western District of Louisiana Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Louisiana Posted/ Updated March 8, 2019 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 88 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mnowicki4 at icloud.com Fri Mar 15 19:00:17 2019 From: mnowicki4 at icloud.com (Michal Nowicki) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 14:00:17 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] AbacusLaw Accessibility Message-ID: Hi Everyone, My firm uses AbacusLaw for client billing. Although I am not yet required to use Abacus myself, I anticipate I will be after my position evolves into a permanent, salaried job. Can any of you offer any insights as to Abacus accessibility? If it it is at all accessible, does it work better with JAWS or NVDA? Also, if there are accessibility issues, are there any publicly-available JAWS scripts that address them? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Best, Michal Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From laura.wolk at gmail.com Fri Mar 15 19:17:26 2019 From: laura.wolk at gmail.com (Laura Wolk) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 15:17:26 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] AbacusLaw Accessibility In-Reply-To: <5c8bf696.1c69fb81.f1c0d.a9a6SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> References: <5c8bf696.1c69fb81.f1c0d.a9a6SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> Message-ID: I don't know if it's accessible, but if it isn't, just timekeep using excel and ask your assistant to input it for you. Many sighted people do this as well. On 3/15/19, Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > My firm uses AbacusLaw for client billing. Although I am not yet required to > use Abacus myself, I anticipate I will be after my position evolves into a > permanent, salaried job. Can any of you offer any insights as to Abacus > accessibility? If it it is at all accessible, does it work better with JAWS > or NVDA? Also, if there are accessibility issues, are there any > publicly-available JAWS scripts that address them? Any input would be > greatly appreciated. > > Best, > > Michal > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/laura.wolk%40gmail.com > From NSingh at cov.com Fri Mar 15 19:26:55 2019 From: NSingh at cov.com (Singh, Nandini) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 19:26:55 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] AbacusLaw Accessibility In-Reply-To: References: <5c8bf696.1c69fb81.f1c0d.a9a6SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> Message-ID: I agree with this. All these fancy software-based timekeeping tools are meant to make the generation of pro formas easier. You can be as old school as using a timer and a Word doc to keep track of billable hours, which is exactly what some partners at my firm do. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Laura Wolk via BlindLaw Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 3:17 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Laura Wolk Subject: Re: [blindlaw] AbacusLaw Accessibility I don't know if it's accessible, but if it isn't, just timekeep using excel and ask your assistant to input it for you. Many sighted people do this as well. On 3/15/19, Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > My firm uses AbacusLaw for client billing. Although I am not yet required to > use Abacus myself, I anticipate I will be after my position evolves into a > permanent, salaried job. Can any of you offer any insights as to Abacus > accessibility? If it it is at all accessible, does it work better with JAWS > or NVDA? Also, if there are accessibility issues, are there any > publicly-available JAWS scripts that address them? Any input would be > greatly appreciated. > > Best, > > Michal > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/laura.wolk%40gmail.com > _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com From mnowicki4 at icloud.com Fri Mar 15 22:02:39 2019 From: mnowicki4 at icloud.com (Michal Nowicki) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 17:02:39 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] AbacusLaw Accessibility In-Reply-To: References: <5c8bf696.1c69fb81.f1c0d.a9a6SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> Message-ID: If Abacus turns out to be inaccessible, I will definitely do that. However, I don’t want to give up on it without first looking into whether it works. Michal Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 2:28 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Singh, Nandini Subject: Re: [blindlaw] AbacusLaw Accessibility I agree with this. All these fancy software-based timekeeping tools are meant to make the generation of pro formas easier. You can be as old school as using a timer and a Word doc to keep track of billable hours, which is exactly what some partners at my firm do. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Laura Wolk via BlindLaw Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 3:17 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Laura Wolk Subject: Re: [blindlaw] AbacusLaw Accessibility I don't know if it's accessible, but if it isn't, just timekeep using excel and ask your assistant to input it for you. Many sighted people do this as well. On 3/15/19, Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > My firm uses AbacusLaw for client billing. Although I am not yet required to > use Abacus myself, I anticipate I will be after my position evolves into a > permanent, salaried job. Can any of you offer any insights as to Abacus > accessibility? If it it is at all accessible, does it work better with JAWS > or NVDA? Also, if there are accessibility issues, are there any > publicly-available JAWS scripts that address them? Any input would be > greatly appreciated. > > Best, > > Michal > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/laura.wolk%40gmail.com > _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com From mnowicki4 at icloud.com Mon Mar 18 01:24:03 2019 From: mnowicki4 at icloud.com (Michal Nowicki) Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 20:24:03 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] National Association of Blind Lawyers Annual Meeting, July 9, 2019 In-Reply-To: <06ED9CC5-2A77-49E0-99AA-2C75AB4F7F61@gmail.com> References: <064b01d4ae8c$f5090310$df1b0930$@labarrelaw.com> <06ED9CC5-2A77-49E0-99AA-2C75AB4F7F61@gmail.com> Message-ID: Scott, I hope I am not responding too late. As you may recall, I participated remotely on last year’s judicial clerkship panel, discussing my externship with Judge Gallo. If this year’s agenda has not yet been finalized, I would love to contribute again this year. As I previously posted, I recently started working as an Associate Attorney at Marashlian & Donahue, PLLC: a small firm specializing in telecom and data privacy law. At Marashlian & Donahue, I have done some work with the 21st-Century Communications & Video Accessibility Act (CVAA), which, in some respects, modernizes the ADA to reflect technological developments. I would love to give a presentation on how the CVAA helps blind people. I would be sure to highlight how it affects blind attorneys in the workplace. I already ran this idea by the managing partner at my firm, and the firm is happy to support me fully in this endeavor. I also know that you frequently have a panel discussion on adaptive techniques we use in our practice. If you plan to have such a discussion this year, I would be delighted to participate. Please don’t hesitate to e-mail me off-list at mnowicki4 at iCloud.com if you would like to discuss these ideas further. Please note that there is an m at the start of my e-mail address, which may not be apparent if rely on speech synthesizer pronunciation. I look forward to hearing from you and to reuniting with everyone in July. Best, Michal Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Cody Davis via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 1:06 PM To: slabarre at labarrelaw.com; Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Cody Davis Subject: Re: [blindlaw] National Association of Blind Lawyers Annual Meeting,July 9, 2019 Scott, I have an idea for a topic, but haven’t given much thought to how it would be executed. I seek pro bono and public service opportunities where I can and I have noticed a few barriers for blind attorneys. First, many pro bono opportunities that are organized by bar associations or the groups often involve a sort of one-time clinic with brief training before hand. In these scenarios, it can be difficult to be involved as a blind attorney as these events are not put together with accessibility in mind and structuring accommodations can be difficult on short notice or for one-time events. For those on-going projects or service opportunities, there is somewhat of a battle making different aspects of service accessible. For example, I serve on the board of and volunteer for a non-profit that operates a diversion program. I am constantly struggling to ensure case files and materials are accessible. I think it is a position quiet different from seeking accommodations in the workplace because you are there not as an employee, but as a volunteer. If you think it’s an interesting topic, we can certainly discuss it further and I can further explain the frustrations I have encountered. Respectfully, Cody J. Davis, J.D., M.P.A. Email: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com Phone: (919) 349-9799 Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/codyjdavisesq > On Jan 17, 2019, at 12:49 PM, Scott C. LaBarre via BlindLaw wrote: > > Hello everybody, I hope your 2019 is getting off to a good start. As you > know, NABL is a proud division of the National Federation of the Blind, and > we will be meeting at the NFB's Annual Convention being held this year in > Las Vegas from July 7 through 12. NABL will meet the afternoon of July 9th. > I hope that many, many of you will be joining us. > > > > We are starting the planning for this year's meeting, and I would like to > get any thoughts for topics and speakers you would like to hear from this > year. Many of our members are able to convert our seminars into CLE credits > because we provide materials and attendance certificates. > > > > So please let me know of your ideas. > > slabarre at labarrelaw.com > > > > Thanks so much! > > > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cjdavis9193%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Mon Mar 18 16:54:49 2019 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:54:49 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Article: Cracking Down on Fake Service Dogs, Route Fifty, March 17 2019 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://www.routefifty.com/health-human-services/2019/03/laws-fake-service-dogs/155610/ Cracking Down on Fake Service Dogs Route Fifty March 17, 2019 By Kate Elizabeth Queram On a trip to Walt Disney World, Karen Shirk and her service dog were forced to take roundabout routes between attractions to avoid a woman with a snarling chihuahua clad in a service dog vest. "We had to go way out of our way at least eight times to get to the ride we were going to, because this woman was there with this fake service dog chihuahua," said Shirk, CEO of 4 Paws For Ability, an Ohio-based nonprofit that trains and places service dogs with children and veterans. "It was in her bag, but it would jump out and come barking and lunging and snapping at us." She's not alone. In Hawaii, a dog posing as a service animal attacked a legitimate service dog, traumatizing the disabled veteran the pooch was trained to help. In South Carolina, workers at the Greenville-Spartanburg International Airport have been bitten by animals in service vests and forced to clean up pet waste after the animals defecate and urinate on airport floors. Fake service dogs are on the rise, a problem advocates say has increased in recent years thanks largely to the preponderance of service dog vests and bogus certification paperwork available for purchase online. In 2016, 77 percent of graduates from assistance dog organization Canine Companions for Independence had encountered a fraudulent or out-of-control service dog. More than 25 percent had 10 or more encounters, and more than half had those encounters result in their service dog being bitten, snapped at or distracted. Across the country, legislators have taken note. As of January, 28 states had passed laws cracking down on the practice, with at least two more in the process of considering similar legislation. Advocates say those measures are necessary to protect people with disabilities who require legitimate service dogs to complete everyday tasks. "These people don't have a disability by choice. They need their service dogs to help them with their daily living tasks," said Susan Guy, chief operating officer for Canine Partners for Life, a service dog training and placement nonprofit based in Pennsylvania. "Then there are other people out there who just want to have their pet out with them because it's fun, or it makes them feel comfortable. That harms the people with legitimate service dogs because then people are looking at them a little more closely; looking at the dog and wondering if it's a legitimate service dog. That's a real disservice." 'Working Animals, Not Pets' The Americans with Disabilities Act defines service dogs as "dogs that are individually trained to do work or perform tasks for people with disabilities," including guiding a blind person, pulling a wheelchair or alerting and protecting a person who is having a seizure. "Service animals are working animals, not pets," the definition continues. "The work or task a dog has been trained to provide must be directly related to the person's disability. Dogs whose sole function is to provide comfort or emotional support do not qualify as service animals under the ADA." Because of their unique capabilities, service dogs have the right to accompany their owners in public places where animals would normally not be permitted, including restaurants, shops and hospitals. Even when it's not obvious what service the dog provides, business owners are prohibited from asking questions about a person's disability and cannot request medical documentation or training certification paperwork, and cannot request a demonstration of the dog's abilities. Service dogs can be asked to leave a business only if they become disruptive or are not housebroken. Those guidelines were written to make life easier for people with disabilities, Shirk said. "The intentions were good, but it almost sort of backfired," she said. "Fake service dogs are a problem all over the world, but it's probably worse here because our rules and regulations are so lenient. In other countries, dogs have to pass national standard testing and you have to have some kind of identification. Here, you can self-train your dog and you don't need anything." There's no tracking system for service dogs in the United States. There's also no national registry or agreed-upon set of training standards, which can make it difficult to police the problem, said Sally Day, director of development for Service Dogs of Virginia. "The waters are really muddy. Anybody can go online and print out documentation that says that their dog is a registered service animal," she said. "But there is no national registry for service dogs. If there was, it would have been written into the ADA law. The thinking behind that was that it would be an additional burden for someone with a disability because they'd then have to register their dog, but it creates that muddy water." That, along with a proliferation of online retailers selling dog vests and bogus certification papers, makes it easy for anyone with internet access to make their dog look the part of a working service animal. "There are hundreds of online sellers and fake registries. You see ads all over Facebook that say things like, 'Take your pet anywhere,'" Shirk said. "You can go on Amazon and buy a vest that says 'service dog.' Anybody who wants to can fake their dogs, in public, as service dogs." That amounts to impersonating someone with a disability, Guy said. On its own, it's unethical, but problems begin to snowball when a dog that isn't trained to spend its life in public spaces begins venturing with its owner to restaurants, stores and airports. "We train all of our dogs to the specific situation, so if a future client says to us, 'I fly a lot for work,' we go to the airport. We train going through security, going on the escalators, climbing the steps to get on the plane, being in the plane," Day said. "People who just don't want to be away from their pet aren't doing that, so they're potentially traumatizing the animal. That's why you hear about people being lunged at and nipped at-because those dogs are not trained to be in the situations they're placed in." The result can be traumatic. Shirk's service dog was attacked by an untrained dog wearing a working dog vest, and she's had numerous clients report similar incidents. It can also add to existing stigma against people with disabilities, leading business owners and airport workers to be wary even of well-trained service dogs who actually help their handlers. "I think these people justify it because they don't think they're hurting anybody, but life for people with disabilities is already hard enough," Shirk said. "We don't need them making it harder. When they do these things, they ruin a good thing for people who have true disabilities who actually need assistance to access the community." Proposed Laws Legislators are increasingly aware of the issue. Oregon and South Carolina are currently considering legislation to penalize people who misrepresent their pets as service dogs, and a third bill is seeking sponsorship in Montana. Each levies a fine and makes the offense a civil infraction or a misdemeanor, with community service as a possible penalty in some versions. In South Carolina, the proposed bill would make it a misdemeanor to intentionally misrepresent a pet or emotional support animal as a service animal. Fines would range from $350 for a first offense up to $5,000 and 10 hours of community service for third and subsequent offenses. The bill is meant to protect members of the public from animals who do not have the right to be in stores and airport terminals, according to state Sen. Scott Talley, a Republican from Spartanburg who co-sponsored the legislation. "The Greenville-Spartanburg Airport is in my district, and based on issues that arose there, I worked with the administration to draft this bill," he said. "We are simply trying to protect the public from animals that are being misrepresented and have caused problems." The existence of such laws may work as deterrents, Guy said. But they're difficult to enforce given the restrictions put in place by the ADA. "Let's say a business owner calls the police and says, 'There is someone in here with a service dog and I don't think it's legitimate,'" she said. "If the person admits it, that's one thing, but if they don't, there's nothing in place to prove whether it is a service dog. There's no national registry or paperwork. There are physical disabilities you can recognize, but some service dogs assist people with disabilities that you can't see, like Type 1 diabetes or epilepsy. And you can't ask about the disability and you can't ask the dog to perform its service skills." Other solutions have been debated in the service dog community. Day favors a proposal that would require service dog owners annually to take what's known as a public access test, where an expert assesses whether a dog is properly trained to assist its owner in public. People who pass the test could receive an identification card with both a date of issue and an expiration date. "If I was a business owner, I'd really like that, but I think we're pretty far from it," she said. Shirk supports the idea of regulating the online sale of service dog vests, as well as cracking down on fake dog registries. An oft-discussed option is establishing a national registry, though that would raise similar questions of enforcement and oversight, Guy said. Barring that, most advocates day-to-day simply try to educate people on the characteristics of a trained service animal-and why it's unfair to try to make your dog look like a working service dog if it isn't trained to be one. "Just having that heightened awareness of fake service dogs could be good for our industry," she said. "We're trying to educate people about how it's morally wrong to say that you have a disability when you don't. You are impersonating someone with a disability, and on top of that it's not safe for the dog to be out in public. It's just not the right thing to do." From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Wed Mar 20 15:31:19 2019 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:31:19 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Managing Attorney (Three Positions)King County Washington Message-ID: From: King County, WA [mailto:KingCounty at subscriptions.kingcounty.gov] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 4:47 PM Subject: Managing Attorney (Three Positions) Managing Attorney (Three Positions) 03/18/2019 03:55 PM PDT The King County Department of Public Defense is nationally recognized for providing excellent legal representation. DPD represents indigent persons in several practice areas, including felonies, misdemeanors (on both a county and municipal level), juvenile offenders, family defense, involuntary commitment, civil commitment of sexually violent predators, and contempt of court. DPD is committed to effective, high-quality, client-centered representation and consists of one central administrative office and four independent divisions. The Department is seeking three Managing Attorneys to lead its Northwest Defenders Division, Society of Counsel Representing Accused Persons Division, and the Defenders Association Division. As a division director, the Managing Attorney is responsible for ensuring that the divisions provide effective, high-quality, and client-centered representation in each case assigned to the division. The Managing Attorney is a part of the Public Defender's leadership team responsible for providing guidance, oversight and support to a highly skilled public defense team. King County As the only county in the United States named after Martin Luther King, Jr., King County is a vibrant community with residents that represent countries from around the world. It is a region with increasing diversity that cherishes the artistic and social traditions of many cultures.?Together, we're changing the way government delivers service and winning national recognition as a model of excellence. We continue to build on an enduring legacy of shared values of equity and social justice, employee engagement, innovative thinking, and continuous improvement. With this commitment, King County has adopted a pro-equity agenda aimed at advancing regional change and is developing the systems and standards necessary to achieve better outcomes for all of our residents, regardless of their race or income. All of these qualities make King County one of the nation's best places to live, work, and play. Who May Apply This position is open to all qualified applicants. Work Schedule This position is exempt from the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, and is therefore not eligible for overtime pay. The position's base work schedule is Monday through Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm; work outside of the normal workday will be required. Forms and Materials Required An online employment application,completed at www.kingcounty.gov/jobs, with employment history going back at least ten years if you have ten years of employment (or more to include all relevant experience), a resume, and a cover letter summarizing why you are interested in this position, and why you believe you will be a strong fit for the position are required. Please see application instructions at the end of this posting for more details. Questions For more information regarding this recruitment, please contact: Susan Eddy, SPHR, SHRM-SCP Human Resource Manager susan.eddy at kingcounty.gov 206-477-6003 [Image removed by sender. King County logo] ________________________________ [Image removed by sender. Bookmark and Share] Update your preferences or unsubscribe. If you have questions about this service, you may contact us directly or search FAQs here. View King County's privacy policy. Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page. . [https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif] Virus-free. www.avast.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 389 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 348 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 332 bytes Desc: image003.jpg URL: From PChang at nfb.org Wed Mar 20 17:04:07 2019 From: PChang at nfb.org (Chang, Patti) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 17:04:07 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] NJ estates atty - Message-ID: We have a meber who is looking for someone to draft a POA and a living will. Does anyone have a recommendation or can anyone this list do the work? Patti Chang Director of Outreach 200 East Wells Street, Baltimore, MD 21230 (410) 659-9314, extension 2422 | pchang at nfb.org [National Federation of the Blind] [Facebook] [Twitter] [Youtube] The National Federation of the Blind is a community of members and friends who believe in the hopes and dreams of the nation's blind. Every day we work together to help blind people live the lives they want. Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more visit the Mimecast website. From rene0373 at gmail.com Thu Mar 21 17:16:13 2019 From: rene0373 at gmail.com (Elizabeth Rene) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:16:13 -0700 Subject: [blindlaw] Courtroom information technology for judges Message-ID: <04EA17DD-63B3-42F1-9A42-902DB7A0A199@gmail.com> Hello list mates, I have just been invited to interview for the position of judge/magistrate pro tempore in the Seattle Municipal Court. This is the busiest Municipal Court in my state. I’m excited about this because I served the court as an assistant city prosecutor years ago. Back in the day, I have a little hope of ever serving as an SMC judge pro tem because I didn’t expect it information system to be accessible to me. I’m taking the plunge now and hoping there’s better technology on offer. (I’ve prepared for pro tem service by taking CLEs presented by my state’s association of district and municipal court judges, getting onto the state-wide pro tem registry, serving on my state’s Commission on judicial conduct and court rules committee, and trying to stay current on criminal law & procedure and evidence. I’ve also been an ALJ and presided at character & fitness hearings for my bar association.) My question to you all is, are there any blind judges out there who use electronic information technology in the courtroom? Has it been accessible to you? If not, how do you find out what you need to know in real time? How do you make entries were necessary. Have your clerks been helpful to you? Seattle municipal court calendars are heavy, with vigorous motion practice, jury trials, bench calendars, night court, and in-and out of custody arraignments. The SMC includes a mental health court, a drug court, a domestic violence court, and a veterans‘ court to provide enhanced services to these offender populations. There is some civil jurisdiction too. The magistrates under its supervision handle traffic infractions and civil municipal code violations that can involve complex fact situations and initial legal rulings. If any blind judges have any tips at all for me about anything to do with being a judge, I’d be very grateful to learn them. Being on the State pro tem registry allows me to preside anywhere in Washington if the court needs assistance. So I can gain experience in tiny jurisdictions as well as in this major metropolis. If anyone knows a blind judge, either inside or outside of the NFB, please pass their name along. Many thanks! Elizabeth Elizabeth M René Attorney at Law WSBA #10710 KCBA #21824 rene0373 at gmail.com From NSingh at cov.com Thu Mar 21 17:42:05 2019 From: NSingh at cov.com (Singh, Nandini) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 17:42:05 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Courtroom information technology for judges In-Reply-To: <04EA17DD-63B3-42F1-9A42-902DB7A0A199@gmail.com> References: <04EA17DD-63B3-42F1-9A42-902DB7A0A199@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0bd09026b6fa4cb6b0683b5dae0edb75@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Off the top of my head, I can think of David Tatel of the D.C. Circuit and Bruce Selya of the First Circuit. I feel like I remember hearing about a federal district court judge in Connecticut when I was in law school, but I would have to do some digging to figure out who that is. These judges would be a pretty good place to start, even though their docket is very different from what you may encounter. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Rene via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 1:16 PM To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org Cc: Elizabeth Rene Subject: [blindlaw] Courtroom information technology for judges Hello list mates, I have just been invited to interview for the position of judge/magistrate pro tempore in the Seattle Municipal Court. This is the busiest Municipal Court in my state. I’m excited about this because I served the court as an assistant city prosecutor years ago. Back in the day, I have a little hope of ever serving as an SMC judge pro tem because I didn’t expect it information system to be accessible to me. I’m taking the plunge now and hoping there’s better technology on offer. (I’ve prepared for pro tem service by taking CLEs presented by my state’s association of district and municipal court judges, getting onto the state-wide pro tem registry, serving on my state’s Commission on judicial conduct and court rules committee, and trying to stay current on criminal law & procedure and evidence. I’ve also been an ALJ and presided at character & fitness hearings for my bar association.) My question to you all is, are there any blind judges out there who use electronic information technology in the courtroom? Has it been accessible to you? If not, how do you find out what you need to know in real time? How do you make entries were necessary. Have your clerks been helpful to you? Seattle municipal court calendars are heavy, with vigorous motion practice, jury trials, bench calendars, night court, and in-and out of custody arraignments. The SMC includes a mental health court, a drug court, a domestic violence court, and a veterans‘ court to provide enhanced services to these offender populations. There is some civil jurisdiction too. The magistrates under its supervision handle traffic infractions and civil municipal code violations that can involve complex fact situations and initial legal rulings. If any blind judges have any tips at all for me about anything to do with being a judge, I’d be very grateful to learn them. Being on the State pro tem registry allows me to preside anywhere in Washington if the court needs assistance. So I can gain experience in tiny jurisdictions as well as in this major metropolis. If anyone knows a blind judge, either inside or outside of the NFB, please pass their name along. Many thanks! Elizabeth Elizabeth M René Attorney at Law WSBA #10710 KCBA #21824 rene0373 at gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com From ttomasi at driowa.org Thu Mar 21 18:03:04 2019 From: ttomasi at driowa.org (Tai Tomasi) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 18:03:04 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Courtroom information technology for judges In-Reply-To: <0bd09026b6fa4cb6b0683b5dae0edb75@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> References: <04EA17DD-63B3-42F1-9A42-902DB7A0A199@gmail.com> <0bd09026b6fa4cb6b0683b5dae0edb75@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: Elizabeth: Here is an article discussing Richard Bernstein's appointment to the Michigan Supreme Court. Judge Bernstein is blind. The article lists a few others. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/28/blind-judge-michigan_n_6386856.html Judge Bernstein appears to rely heavily on human readers, but that doesn't necessarily mean he lacks experience with courtroom information technology. I know you said you have been an ALJ before, but talking to Parnell Diggs may be useful. He is an ALJ and may have some tips for you. Finally, you may want to speak with list members who have served as judicial externs/clerks. They may have insight into the IT systems in use. Tim Elder, Michal Nowicki, Chris Stewart, and Laura Wolk are just a few. Although I externed for a judge in law school, I did not use any of the courtroom information technology systems. Best, Tai Tomasi, J.D. Pronouns: she/her/hers Staff Attorney 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Tel: 515-278-2502 x15; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org http://driowa.org/ Our Mission:  To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 12:42 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Singh, Nandini Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Courtroom information technology for judges Off the top of my head, I can think of David Tatel of the D.C. Circuit and Bruce Selya of the First Circuit. I feel like I remember hearing about a federal district court judge in Connecticut when I was in law school, but I would have to do some digging to figure out who that is. These judges would be a pretty good place to start, even though their docket is very different from what you may encounter. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Rene via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 1:16 PM To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org Cc: Elizabeth Rene Subject: [blindlaw] Courtroom information technology for judges Hello list mates, I have just been invited to interview for the position of judge/magistrate pro tempore in the Seattle Municipal Court. This is the busiest Municipal Court in my state. I’m excited about this because I served the court as an assistant city prosecutor years ago. Back in the day, I have a little hope of ever serving as an SMC judge pro tem because I didn’t expect it information system to be accessible to me. I’m taking the plunge now and hoping there’s better technology on offer. (I’ve prepared for pro tem service by taking CLEs presented by my state’s association of district and municipal court judges, getting onto the state-wide pro tem registry, serving on my state’s Commission on judicial conduct and court rules committee, and trying to stay current on criminal law & procedure and evidence. I’ve also been an ALJ and presided at character & fitness hearings for my bar association.) My question to you all is, are there any blind judges out there who use electronic information technology in the courtroom? Has it been accessible to you? If not, how do you find out what you need to know in real time? How do you make entries were necessary. Have your clerks been helpful to you? Seattle municipal court calendars are heavy, with vigorous motion practice, jury trials, bench calendars, night court, and in-and out of custody arraignments. The SMC includes a mental health court, a drug court, a domestic violence court, and a veterans‘ court to provide enhanced services to these offender populations. There is some civil jurisdiction too. The magistrates under its supervision handle traffic infractions and civil municipal code violations that can involve complex fact situations and initial legal rulings. If any blind judges have any tips at all for me about anything to do with being a judge, I’d be very grateful to learn them. Being on the State pro tem registry allows me to preside anywhere in Washington if the court needs assistance. So I can gain experience in tiny jurisdictions as well as in this major metropolis. If anyone knows a blind judge, either inside or outside of the NFB, please pass their name along. Many thanks! Elizabeth Elizabeth M René Attorney at Law WSBA #10710 KCBA #21824 rene0373 at gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org From sbg at sbgaal.com Thu Mar 21 18:22:08 2019 From: sbg at sbgaal.com (Shannon) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:22:08 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Courtroom information technology for judges In-Reply-To: <04EA17DD-63B3-42F1-9A42-902DB7A0A199@gmail.com> References: <04EA17DD-63B3-42F1-9A42-902DB7A0A199@gmail.com> Message-ID: Congratulations! Shannon Brady Geihsler Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 Lubbock, Texas 79401 Phone: (806) 763-3999 Mobile: (806) 781-9296 Fax: (806) 749-3752 E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 21, 2019, at 12:16 PM, Elizabeth Rene via BlindLaw wrote: > > Hello list mates, > I have just been invited to interview for the position of judge/magistrate pro tempore in the Seattle Municipal Court. This is the busiest Municipal Court in my state. I’m excited about this because I served the court as an assistant city prosecutor years ago. > Back in the day, I have a little hope of ever serving as an SMC judge pro tem because I didn’t expect it information system to be accessible to me. I’m taking the plunge now and hoping there’s better technology on offer. (I’ve prepared for pro tem service by taking CLEs presented by my state’s association of district and municipal court judges, getting onto the state-wide pro tem registry, serving on my state’s Commission on > judicial conduct and court rules committee, and trying to stay current on criminal law & procedure and evidence. I’ve also been an ALJ and presided at character & fitness hearings for my bar association.) > My question to you all is, are there any blind judges out there who use electronic information technology in the courtroom? Has it been accessible to you? If not, how do you find out what you need to know in real time? How do you make entries were necessary. Have your clerks been helpful to you? > Seattle municipal court calendars are heavy, with vigorous motion practice, jury trials, bench calendars, night court, and in-and out of custody arraignments. The SMC includes a mental health court, a drug court, a domestic violence court, and a veterans‘ court to provide enhanced services to these offender populations. There is some civil jurisdiction too. The magistrates under its supervision handle traffic infractions and civil municipal code violations that can involve complex fact situations and initial legal rulings. If any blind judges have any tips at all for me about anything to do with being a judge, I’d be very grateful to learn them. > Being on the State pro tem registry allows me to preside anywhere in Washington if the court needs assistance. So I can gain experience in tiny jurisdictions as well as in this major metropolis. If anyone knows a blind judge, either inside or outside of the NFB, please pass their name along. > Many thanks! > Elizabeth > > > > Elizabeth M René > Attorney at Law > WSBA #10710 > KCBA #21824 > rene0373 at gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sbg%40sbgaal.com From ttomasi at driowa.org Thu Mar 21 18:39:04 2019 From: ttomasi at driowa.org (Tai Tomasi) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 18:39:04 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Courtroom information technology for judges In-Reply-To: References: <04EA17DD-63B3-42F1-9A42-902DB7A0A199@gmail.com> Message-ID: Yes, I forgot to add my congratulations! Tai Tomasi, J.D. Pronouns: she/her/hers Staff Attorney 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Tel: 515-278-2502 x15; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org http://driowa.org/ Our Mission:  To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Shannon via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 1:22 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Shannon Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Courtroom information technology for judges Congratulations! Shannon Brady Geihsler Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 Lubbock, Texas 79401 Phone: (806) 763-3999 Mobile: (806) 781-9296 Fax: (806) 749-3752 E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 21, 2019, at 12:16 PM, Elizabeth Rene via BlindLaw wrote: > > Hello list mates, > I have just been invited to interview for the position of judge/magistrate pro tempore in the Seattle Municipal Court. This is the busiest Municipal Court in my state. I’m excited about this because I served the court as an assistant city prosecutor years ago. > Back in the day, I have a little hope of ever serving as an SMC judge > pro tem because I didn’t expect it information system to be accessible > to me. I’m taking the plunge now and hoping there’s better technology on offer. (I’ve prepared for pro tem service by taking CLEs presented by my state’s association of district and municipal court judges, getting onto the state-wide pro tem registry, serving on my state’s Commission on judicial conduct and court rules committee, and trying to stay current on criminal law & procedure and evidence. I’ve also been an ALJ and presided at character & fitness hearings for my bar association.) My question to you all is, are there any blind judges out there who use electronic information technology in the courtroom? Has it been accessible to you? If not, how do you find out what you need to know in real time? How do you make entries were necessary. Have your clerks been helpful to you? > Seattle municipal court calendars are heavy, with vigorous motion practice, jury trials, bench calendars, night court, and in-and out of custody arraignments. The SMC includes a mental health court, a drug court, a domestic violence court, and a veterans‘ court to provide enhanced services to these offender populations. There is some civil jurisdiction too. The magistrates under its supervision handle traffic infractions and civil municipal code violations that can involve complex fact situations and initial legal rulings. If any blind judges have any tips at all for me about anything to do with being a judge, I’d be very grateful to learn them. > Being on the State pro tem registry allows me to preside anywhere in Washington if the court needs assistance. So I can gain experience in tiny jurisdictions as well as in this major metropolis. If anyone knows a blind judge, either inside or outside of the NFB, please pass their name along. > Many thanks! > Elizabeth > > > > Elizabeth M René > Attorney at Law > WSBA #10710 > KCBA #21824 > rene0373 at gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sbg%40sbgaal.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org From jtfetter at yahoo.com Thu Mar 21 20:16:07 2019 From: jtfetter at yahoo.com (James T. Fetter) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:16:07 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Courtroom information technology for judges In-Reply-To: <04EA17DD-63B3-42F1-9A42-902DB7A0A199@gmail.com> References: <04EA17DD-63B3-42F1-9A42-902DB7A0A199@gmail.com> Message-ID: Elizabeth, First of all, congratulations! We are in desperate need of more judges with visible disabilities, including blindness; the relative lack of resources on accessibility for blind judges indicates as much. I also externed, but I mainly just assisted with writing opinions. I interacted with ECF and my state Supreme Court's web-based public docket, both of which were accessible. I thus am unfortunately not much help on how to handle all the paper that is likely to be flying around in your courtroom. On 3/21/2019 1:16 PM, Elizabeth Rene via BlindLaw wrote: > Hello list mates, > I have just been invited to interview for the position of judge/magistrate pro tempore in the Seattle Municipal Court. This is the busiest Municipal Court in my state. I’m excited about this because I served the court as an assistant city prosecutor years ago. > Back in the day, I have a little hope of ever serving as an SMC judge pro tem because I didn’t expect it information system to be accessible to me. I’m taking the plunge now and hoping there’s better technology on offer. (I’ve prepared for pro tem service by taking CLEs presented by my state’s association of district and municipal court judges, getting onto the state-wide pro tem registry, serving on my state’s Commission on > judicial conduct and court rules committee, and trying to stay current on criminal law & procedure and evidence. I’ve also been an ALJ and presided at character & fitness hearings for my bar association.) > My question to you all is, are there any blind judges out there who use electronic information technology in the courtroom? Has it been accessible to you? If not, how do you find out what you need to know in real time? How do you make entries were necessary. Have your clerks been helpful to you? > Seattle municipal court calendars are heavy, with vigorous motion practice, jury trials, bench calendars, night court, and in-and out of custody arraignments. The SMC includes a mental health court, a drug court, a domestic violence court, and a veterans‘ court to provide enhanced services to these offender populations. There is some civil jurisdiction too. The magistrates under its supervision handle traffic infractions and civil municipal code violations that can involve complex fact situations and initial legal rulings. If any blind judges have any tips at all for me about anything to do with being a judge, I’d be very grateful to learn them. > Being on the State pro tem registry allows me to preside anywhere in Washington if the court needs assistance. So I can gain experience in tiny jurisdictions as well as in this major metropolis. If anyone knows a blind judge, either inside or outside of the NFB, please pass their name along. > Many thanks! > Elizabeth > > > > Elizabeth M René > Attorney at Law > WSBA #10710 > KCBA #21824 > rene0373 at gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jtfetter%40yahoo.com From NSingh at cov.com Thu Mar 21 21:20:43 2019 From: NSingh at cov.com (Singh, Nandini) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 21:20:43 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page Message-ID: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. any ideas would be appreciated. Regards, Nikki Nandini Singh Covington & Burling LLP One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001-4956 T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com www.cov.com This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. From b.schulz at sbcglobal.net Thu Mar 21 21:31:41 2019 From: b.schulz at sbcglobal.net (Bryan Schulz) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:31:41 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In-Reply-To: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> References: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: <013e01d4e02d$7ab8ab60$702a0220$@sbcglobal.net> Hi, I'm not sure exactly why this is happening but if you can remember to hit insert+j and make note of what line number you are on, that can speed manually finding your place again. Bryan -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 4:21 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Singh, Nandini Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. any ideas would be appreciated. Regards, Nikki Nandini Singh Covington & Burling LLP One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001-4956 T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com www.cov.com This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/b.schulz%40sbcglobal.n et --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com Thu Mar 21 21:52:16 2019 From: sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com (Scott Greenblatt) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 17:52:16 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In-Reply-To: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> References: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: I’m not sure why you’re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can give you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or placeholder whatever it’s called into the webpage before you switch out by using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it should Sincerely, Scott Greenblatt Esq. 914-274f-0232 sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw wrote: > > I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. any ideas would be appreciated. > > Regards, > Nikki > > > Nandini Singh > > Covington & Burling LLP > One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW > Washington, DC 20001-4956 > T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com > www.cov.com > > This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sgreenblatt76%40gmail.com From ttomasi at driowa.org Thu Mar 21 21:54:09 2019 From: ttomasi at driowa.org (Tai Tomasi) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 21:54:09 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In-Reply-To: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> References: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: I haven't noticed this issue. Tai Tomasi, J.D. Pronouns: she/her/hers Staff Attorney 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Tel: 515-278-2502 x15; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org http://driowa.org/ Our Mission:  To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 4:21 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Singh, Nandini Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. any ideas would be appreciated. Regards, Nikki Nandini Singh Covington & Burling LLP One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001-4956 T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com www.cov.com This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org From NSingh at cov.com Thu Mar 21 21:56:25 2019 From: NSingh at cov.com (Singh, Nandini) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 21:56:25 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In-Reply-To: References: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: I guess I can place a bookmark where the main content begins. I am often jumping back and forth between a case and a wordprocessor, so having multiple bookmarks may be impractical as I continue reading through the case. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott Greenblatt via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:52 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Scott Greenblatt Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page I’m not sure why you’re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can give you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or placeholder whatever it’s called into the webpage before you switch out by using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it should Sincerely, Scott Greenblatt Esq. 914-274f-0232 sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw wrote: > > I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. any ideas would be appreciated. > > Regards, > Nikki > > > Nandini Singh > > Covington & Burling LLP > One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW > Washington, DC 20001-4956 > T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com > www.cov.com > > This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sgreenblatt76%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com From jlynnbarrow at gmail.com Thu Mar 21 22:46:45 2019 From: jlynnbarrow at gmail.com (Jen Barrow) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 18:46:45 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In-Reply-To: References: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: <52BCEA16-9606-4D79-8934-69893B7D6159@gmail.com> Hi Nikki, Yes, I experience the same problem as you described. It’s very frustrating when I’m looking at a case on Westlaw and I switch over to word to write some notes, and then the JAWS focus is back at the top when I return to IE. I also started to notice this rather recently… But I can’t remember when. Jen Sent from my iPhone *This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately and delete all copies of this message. > On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:56 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw wrote: > > I guess I can place a bookmark where the main content begins. I am often jumping back and forth between a case and a wordprocessor, so having multiple bookmarks may be impractical as I continue reading through the case. > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott Greenblatt via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:52 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Scott Greenblatt > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page > > I’m not sure why you’re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can give you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or placeholder whatever it’s called into the webpage before you switch out by using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it should > > Sincerely, > Scott Greenblatt Esq. > 914-274f-0232 > sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. any ideas would be appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> Nikki >> >> >> Nandini Singh >> >> Covington & Burling LLP >> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >> T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com >> www.cov.com >> >> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sgreenblatt76%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jlynnbarrow%40gmail.com From BrianUnitt at holsteinlaw.com Thu Mar 21 23:40:05 2019 From: BrianUnitt at holsteinlaw.com (Brian Unitt) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 23:40:05 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In-Reply-To: <52BCEA16-9606-4D79-8934-69893B7D6159@gmail.com> References: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> , <52BCEA16-9606-4D79-8934-69893B7D6159@gmail.com> Message-ID: <7FB38E4A-1B95-4624-9F15-CF3051D4BCFD@holsteinlaw.com> What browser are you using? I am using chrome with the latest update for JAWS 2019, and I am not experiencing that problem. Brian Sent from my iPhone On Mar 21, 2019, at 3:48 PM, Jen Barrow via BlindLaw > wrote: Hi Nikki, Yes, I experience the same problem as you described. It’s very frustrating when I’m looking at a case on Westlaw and I switch over to word to write some notes, and then the JAWS focus is back at the top when I return to IE. I also started to notice this rather recently… But I can’t remember when. Jen Sent from my iPhone *This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately and delete all copies of this message. > On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:56 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: > > I guess I can place a bookmark where the main content begins. I am often jumping back and forth between a case and a wordprocessor, so having multiple bookmarks may be impractical as I continue reading through the case. > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott Greenblatt via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:52 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Scott Greenblatt > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page > > I’m not sure why you’re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can give you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or placeholder whatever it’s called into the webpage before you switch out by using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it should > > Sincerely, > Scott Greenblatt Esq. > 914-274f-0232 > sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: >> >> I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. any ideas would be appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> Nikki >> >> >> Nandini Singh >> >> Covington & Burling LLP >> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >> T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com >> www.cov.com >> >> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sgreenblatt76%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jlynnbarrow%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com ________________________________ From NSingh at cov.com Fri Mar 22 03:51:32 2019 From: NSingh at cov.com (Singh, Nandini) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 03:51:32 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In-Reply-To: <7FB38E4A-1B95-4624-9F15-CF3051D4BCFD@holsteinlaw.com> References: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> , <52BCEA16-9606-4D79-8934-69893B7D6159@gmail.com> <7FB38E4A-1B95-4624-9F15-CF3051D4BCFD@holsteinlaw.com> Message-ID: <85e8decf268d4f17a1de20aea3870ecf@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> I am using IE 11 and JAWS 2018. Does JAWS now work with Chrome? -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian Unitt via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 7:40 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Brian Unitt Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page What browser are you using? I am using chrome with the latest update for JAWS 2019, and I am not experiencing that problem. Brian Sent from my iPhone On Mar 21, 2019, at 3:48 PM, Jen Barrow via BlindLaw > wrote: Hi Nikki, Yes, I experience the same problem as you described. It’s very frustrating when I’m looking at a case on Westlaw and I switch over to word to write some notes, and then the JAWS focus is back at the top when I return to IE. I also started to notice this rather recently… But I can’t remember when. Jen Sent from my iPhone *This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately and delete all copies of this message. > On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:56 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: > > I guess I can place a bookmark where the main content begins. I am often jumping back and forth between a case and a wordprocessor, so having multiple bookmarks may be impractical as I continue reading through the case. > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott Greenblatt via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:52 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Scott Greenblatt > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page > > I’m not sure why you’re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can give you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or placeholder whatever it’s called into the webpage before you switch out by using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it should > > Sincerely, > Scott Greenblatt Esq. > 914-274f-0232 > sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: >> >> I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. any ideas would be appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> Nikki >> >> >> Nandini Singh >> >> Covington & Burling LLP >> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >> T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com >> www.cov.com >> >> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sgreenblatt76%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jlynnbarrow%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com ________________________________ _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com From slabarre at labarrelaw.com Fri Mar 22 12:25:08 2019 From: slabarre at labarrelaw.com (Scott C. LaBarre) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:25:08 -0600 Subject: [blindlaw] FW: Attorney and Legal Internship Vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <01c801d4e0aa$49e566e0$ddb034a0$@labarrelaw.com> fyi From: DOJlawjobs (OARM) Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 5:55 AM To: Undisclosed recipients: Subject: Attorney and Legal Internship Vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice Below is a list of current attorney and legal internship vacancies at the U.S. Department of Justice. The Department of Justice office places a high value on diversity of experiences and perspectives and encourages applications from all qualified men and women from all ethnic and racial backgrounds, veterans, LGBT individuals, and persons with disabilities. We welcome applications from candidates who are interested in positively contributing to Justice and hope that you will consider joining the dedicated public servants at the Department of Justice. To learn more about Justice and our legal careers, please visit our website at https://www.justice.gov/legal-careers. Manage Your Email: If you no longer wish to receive these email notifications, please reply to this email with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. If you would like to update your contact information, please submit the following information: SCHOOL OR ORGANIZATION: NAME: TITLE: PHONE: EMAIL: WEBSITE: Attorney Vacancies & Volunteer Legal Internships Hiring Organization Job Title State Posted/ Updated Hiring Organization USAO Southern District of Alabama Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Alabama Posted/ Updated March 21, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Southern District of Alabama Job Title Assistant United States Attorney (Violent Crimes) State Alabama Posted/ Updated March 21, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of California Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State California Posted/ Updated March 21, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of California Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State California Posted/ Updated March 21, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of California Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State California Posted/ Updated March 21, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of California Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State California Posted/ Updated March 21, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of California Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State California Posted/ Updated March 21, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of California Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State California Posted/ Updated March 21, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Eastern District of California Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State California Posted/ Updated March 21, 2019 Hiring Organization Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Job Title Counsel to the Inspector General State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated March 21, 2019 Hiring Organization Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Job Title Attorney Advisor State Pennsylvania Posted/ Updated March 21, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of Ohio Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Ohio Posted/ Updated March 21, 2019 Hiring Organization United States Trustee Program (USTP) Job Title Trial Attorney (Appellate) State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated March 21, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Western District of Wisconsin Job Title Civil Assistant United States Attorney State Wisconsin Posted/ Updated March 20, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Middle District of Tennessee Job Title Uncompensated Special Assistant United States Attorney State Tennessee Posted/ Updated March 20, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Resident Legal Advisor, Gulf Region State Posted/ Updated March 20, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Resident Legal Advisor, Kosovo State Posted/ Updated March 20, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO District of Colorado Job Title Volunteer Law Student, Fall 2019 State Colorado Posted/ Updated March 20, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Regional Resident Legal Advisor, Bulgaria and Romania State Posted/ Updated March 20, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of Indiana Job Title Assistant U.S. Attorney State Indiana Posted/ Updated March 19, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of Indiana Job Title Assistant U.S. Attorney State Indiana Posted/ Updated March 19, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO District of Arizona Job Title Assistant U.S. Attorney State Arizona Posted/ Updated March 19, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO District of Arizona Job Title Assistant U.S. Attorney State Arizona Posted/ Updated March 19, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Attorney Advisor (International)/Resident Legal Advisor, El Salvador State Posted/ Updated March 19, 2019 Hiring Organization Criminal Division (CRM) Job Title Attorney Advisor (International)/Resident Legal Advisor, Paraguay State Posted/ Updated March 19, 2019 Hiring Organization Job Title State Posted/ Updated Hiring Organization USAO District of Idaho Job Title AUSA State Idaho Posted/ Updated March 18, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of Georgia Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Georgia Posted/ Updated March 18, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of Georgia Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Georgia Posted/ Updated March 18, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Northern District of Georgia Job Title Assistant United States Attorney State Georgia Posted/ Updated March 18, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO Central District of Illinois Job Title Law Student Volunteer State Illinois Posted/ Updated March 18, 2019 Hiring Organization Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Job Title Attorney Advisor State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated March 18, 2019 Hiring Organization USAO District of Nevada Job Title Law Student Volunteer State Nevada Posted/ Updated March 15, 2019 Hiring Organization Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Job Title General Attorney State District of Columbia Posted/ Updated March 15, 2019 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 88 bytes Desc: not available URL: From amatney at loeb.com Fri Mar 22 12:52:28 2019 From: amatney at loeb.com (Angela Matney) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:52:28 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In-Reply-To: References: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> , Message-ID: I've occasionally experienced this, but there doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason as to when. I definitely have noticed it on PLC (which is affiliated with Westlaw), but not every time I use the site. Do you have the option of using Chrome? That seems to work better for me. If it's installed on your machine, I recommend giving it a try. It's my default browser now. Good luck. Sent from my iPhone ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender. Please destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you, Loeb & Loeb LLP. ________________________________ On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:58 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: I guess I can place a bookmark where the main content begins. I am often jumping back and forth between a case and a wordprocessor, so having multiple bookmarks may be impractical as I continue reading through the case. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott Greenblatt via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:52 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Scott Greenblatt Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page I’m not sure why you’re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can give you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or placeholder whatever it’s called into the webpage before you switch out by using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it should Sincerely, Scott Greenblatt Esq. 914-274f-0232 sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: > > I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. any ideas would be appreciated. > > Regards, > Nikki > > > Nandini Singh > > Covington & Burling LLP > One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW > Washington, DC 20001-4956 > T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com > www.cov.com > > This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sgreenblatt76%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/amatney%40loeb.com From bluezinfandel at hotmail.com Fri Mar 22 12:55:32 2019 From: bluezinfandel at hotmail.com (Ben Fulton) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:55:32 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page Message-ID: Hi Nikki, You could try calling freedom scientific to figure out this problem, but chances are they will say something stupid like that it's not an issue with their software, but some kind of third party software issue. I've been pretty upset about their customer service. If a government program hadn't covered the tab, I doubt I ever would have purchased this software. Kind regards, Ben Fulton I am using IE 11 and JAWS 2018. Does JAWS now work with Chrome? -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian Unitt via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 7:40 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Brian Unitt Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page What browser are you using? I am using chrome with the latest update for JAWS 2019, and I am not experiencing that problem. Brian Sent from my iPhone On Mar 21, 2019, at 3:48 PM, Jen Barrow via BlindLaw > wrote: Hi Nikki, Yes, I experience the same problem as you described. It?s very frustrating when I?m looking at a case on Westlaw and I switch over to word to write some notes, and then the JAWS focus is back at the top when I return to IE. I also started to notice this rather recently? But I can?t remember when. Jen Sent from my iPhone *This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately and delete all copies of this message. > On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:56 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: > > I guess I can place a bookmark where the main content begins. I am often jumping back and forth between a case and a wordprocessor, so having multiple bookmarks may be impractical as I continue reading through the case. > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott Greenblatt via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:52 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Scott Greenblatt > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page > > I?m not sure why you?re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can give you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or placeholder whatever it?s called into the webpage before you switch out by using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it should > > Sincerely, > Scott Greenblatt Esq. > 914-274f-0232 > sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: >> >> I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. any ideas would be appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> Nikki From laura.wolk at gmail.com Fri Mar 22 13:03:37 2019 From: laura.wolk at gmail.com (Laura Wolk) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:03:37 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I've also had this happen, even in Chrome. Sometimes a restart fixes it, sometimes not. I am grateful for the suggestion of a temporary bookmark. On 3/22/19, Ben Fulton via BlindLaw wrote: > Hi Nikki, > > You could try calling freedom scientific to figure out this problem, but > chances are they will say something stupid like that it's not an issue with > their software, but some kind of third party software issue. I've been > pretty upset about their customer service. If a government program hadn't > covered the tab, I doubt I ever would have purchased this software. > > Kind regards, > Ben Fulton > > I am using IE 11 and JAWS 2018. Does JAWS now work with Chrome? > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian Unitt > via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 7:40 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Brian Unitt > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page > > What browser are you using? I am using chrome with the latest update for > JAWS 2019, and I am not experiencing that problem. > Brian > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 21, 2019, at 3:48 PM, Jen Barrow via BlindLaw > > wrote: > > Hi Nikki, > > Yes, I experience the same problem as you described. It?s very frustrating > when I?m looking at a case on Westlaw and I switch over to word to write > some notes, and then the JAWS focus is back at the top when I return to IE. > I also started to notice this rather recently? But I can?t remember when. > > Jen > > > Sent from my iPhone > > *This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If > you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately and delete > all copies of this message. > >> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:56 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >> > wrote: >> >> I guess I can place a bookmark where the main content begins. I am often >> jumping back and forth between a case and a wordprocessor, so having >> multiple bookmarks may be impractical as I continue reading through the >> case. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott >> Greenblatt via BlindLaw >> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:52 PM >> To: Blind Law Mailing List >> Cc: Scott Greenblatt >> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page >> >> I?m not sure why you?re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can give >> you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or >> placeholder whatever it?s called into the webpage before you switch out by >> using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on >> the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit >> the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this >> helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it >> should >> >> Sincerely, >> Scott Greenblatt Esq. >> 914-274f-0232 >> sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >>> > wrote: >>> >>> I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work >>> online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or >>> whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I >>> bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on >>> the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to >>> say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off >>> my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web >>> page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the >>> meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it >>> was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not >>> sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. >>> I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not >>> remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. >>> any ideas would be appreciated. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Nikki > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/laura.wolk%40gmail.com > From maurakutnyak at gmail.com Fri Mar 22 13:53:42 2019 From: maurakutnyak at gmail.com (Maura Kutnyak) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:53:42 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <89C05D52-D9C9-4178-AC87-E71D3C199921@gmail.com> More difficult to diagnose when these problems occur in consistently. Could it be that the webpage is refreshing and that brings the focus back to the top? Sincerely, Maura Kutnyak 716-563-9882 > On Mar 22, 2019, at 9:03 AM, Laura Wolk via BlindLaw wrote: > > I've also had this happen, even in Chrome. Sometimes a restart fixes > it, sometimes not. I am grateful for the suggestion of a temporary > bookmark. > > > >> On 3/22/19, Ben Fulton via BlindLaw wrote: >> Hi Nikki, >> >> You could try calling freedom scientific to figure out this problem, but >> chances are they will say something stupid like that it's not an issue with >> their software, but some kind of third party software issue. I've been >> pretty upset about their customer service. If a government program hadn't >> covered the tab, I doubt I ever would have purchased this software. >> >> Kind regards, >> Ben Fulton >> >> I am using IE 11 and JAWS 2018. Does JAWS now work with Chrome? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian Unitt >> via BlindLaw >> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 7:40 PM >> To: Blind Law Mailing List >> Cc: Brian Unitt >> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page >> >> What browser are you using? I am using chrome with the latest update for >> JAWS 2019, and I am not experiencing that problem. >> Brian >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Mar 21, 2019, at 3:48 PM, Jen Barrow via BlindLaw >> > wrote: >> >> Hi Nikki, >> >> Yes, I experience the same problem as you described. It?s very frustrating >> when I?m looking at a case on Westlaw and I switch over to word to write >> some notes, and then the JAWS focus is back at the top when I return to IE. >> I also started to notice this rather recently? But I can?t remember when. >> >> Jen >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> *This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If >> you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately and delete >> all copies of this message. >> >>> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:56 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >>> > wrote: >>> >>> I guess I can place a bookmark where the main content begins. I am often >>> jumping back and forth between a case and a wordprocessor, so having >>> multiple bookmarks may be impractical as I continue reading through the >>> case. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott >>> Greenblatt via BlindLaw >>> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:52 PM >>> To: Blind Law Mailing List >>> Cc: Scott Greenblatt >>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page >>> >>> I?m not sure why you?re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can give >>> you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or >>> placeholder whatever it?s called into the webpage before you switch out by >>> using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on >>> the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit >>> the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this >>> helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it >>> should >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> Scott Greenblatt Esq. >>> 914-274f-0232 >>> sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work >>>> online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or >>>> whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I >>>> bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on >>>> the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to >>>> say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off >>>> my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web >>>> page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the >>>> meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it >>>> was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not >>>> sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. >>>> I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not >>>> remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. >>>> any ideas would be appreciated. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Nikki >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/laura.wolk%40gmail.com >> > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/maurakutnyak%40gmail.com From cjdavis9193 at gmail.com Fri Mar 22 14:59:04 2019 From: cjdavis9193 at gmail.com (Cody Davis) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:59:04 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In-Reply-To: <89C05D52-D9C9-4178-AC87-E71D3C199921@gmail.com> References: <89C05D52-D9C9-4178-AC87-E71D3C199921@gmail.com> Message-ID: <09322F2B-5F8B-4550-BF3D-145238002552@gmail.com> My fix has been to download the .rtf version of the materials from Westlaw. I never try reading while in the browser on Westlaw if I know I will be jumping back and forth between the document and notes, especially when dealing with longer materials like a case. Cody Davis From slabarre at labarrelaw.com Fri Mar 22 15:32:00 2019 From: slabarre at labarrelaw.com (Scott C. LaBarre) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:32:00 -0600 Subject: [blindlaw] FW: New Job Opportunities in the Trial Court and Appeals Court - March 22, 2019 In-Reply-To: <1132366408767.1116406273370.1470612392.0.231045JL.2002@scheduler.constantcontact.com> References: <1132366408767.1116406273370.1470612392.0.231045JL.2002@scheduler.constantcontact.com> Message-ID: <02b201d4e0c4$653e2390$2fba6ab0$@labarrelaw.com> From: Trial Court HR Department Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 8:46 AM To: slabarre at labarrelaw.com Subject: New Job Opportunities in the Trial Court and Appeals Court - March 22, 2019 The Massachusetts Trial Court has new job openings. Thank you for your interest in the Massachusetts Trial Court and Appeals Court Job Opportunities. Please share the following new Massachusetts Trial Court job opportunities with your organization. * Case Specialist Series - Palmer District Court - US-MA-Palmer - Closing on 4/1/2019 * Probation Case Specialist - Essex Juvenile Court - US-MA-Salem - Closing on 4/1/2019 * Courtroom Monitor Series - Hampden Superior Court - US-MA-Springfield - Closing on 4/2/2019 * Court Interpreter - Spanish - Essex County - US-MA-Boston - Closing on 4/4/2019 All current Job Postings and instructions on how to apply online can be found at: https://careers-trialcourtsofmass.icims.com/jobs/intro Summary of Benefits for Trial Court Employees Please note the Trial Court has an online application process. Paper, faxed, or emailed applications or resumes are not accepted. https://www.mass.gov/jobs-with-the-court-system The Massachusetts Judicial Branch is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. Massachusetts Trial Court Human Resources Department matrialcourtjobs at jud.state.ma.us Forward this email This email was sent to slabarre at labarrelaw.com by hr.department at jud.state.ma.us | Update Profile/Email Address | Rapid removal with SafeUnsubscribe ™ | Privacy Policy . Trial Court Communications | John Adams Courthouse | One Pemberton Square | Boston | MA | 02108 From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Fri Mar 22 17:19:39 2019 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 17:19:39 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] : U.S. Department of Justice Attorney Vacancies Update0office of legal council Message-ID: From: U.S. Department of Justice [mailto:usdoj at public.govdelivery.com] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 10:17 AM Subject: U.S. Department of Justice Attorney Vacancies Update [U.S. Department of Justice] You are subscribed to Attorney Vacancies for U.S. Department of Justice. This information has recently been updated, and is now available. Attorney-Adviser 03/22/2019 12:00 PM EDT Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) Washington, District of Columbia Application Deadline: April 22, 2019 The Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, is seeking highly qualified attorneys to serve as Attorney-Advisers in Washington, D.C. The Office's principal function is to assist the Attorney General in fulfilling the role of legal adviser to the President and Executive Branch agencies. For more information, please visit OLC's internet website, http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/. OLC's responsibilities include the following: * Advising the Attorney General, the White House Counsel, all executive departments and agencies, and the various components of the Department of Justice on constitutional and statutory matters; * Resolving legal disputes within the Executive Branch through the issuance of authoritative legal opinions; * Reviewing for constitutionality proposed legislation; and * Reviewing for form and legality all executive orders and substantive proclamations and memoranda proposed to be issued by the President as well as all Attorney General Orders and regulations. ________________________________ [Instagram icon] | [FaceBook icon] | [YouTube] | [Twitter icon] ________________________________ You have received this e-mail because you have asked to be notified of changes to the U.S. Department of Justice website. GovDelivery is providing this service on behalf of the Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW * Washington, DC 20530 * 202-514-2000 and may not use your subscription information for any other purposes. Manage your Subscriptions | Department of Justice Privacy Policy | GovDelivery Privacy Policy From rene0373 at gmail.com Fri Mar 22 17:41:31 2019 From: rene0373 at gmail.com (Elizabeth Rene) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:41:31 -0700 Subject: [blindlaw] courtroom information technology for judges Message-ID: <57519730-1ED7-4BCC-A5DC-96FC033BCB0D@gmail.com> Dear listmates, I want to send my full-hearted thanks to all those of you who have sent congratulations, advice, and the names of blind judges to contact. I’ll keep you posted as to how things go with the interview. Meanwhile, I’ll be observing in the various court rooms and maybe checking out the technology and it’s Accessibility so I can best prepare. It’s wonderful to me that blind judges have made it to the federal courts of appeal and to a state Supreme Court. How great it must be to be in law school now and have such bright hopes, with role models to follow. Far from law school myself, I am still so excited to know that those people are out there. Elizabeth M René Attorney at Law WSBA #10710 KCBA #21824 rene0373 at gmail.com From BrianUnitt at holsteinlaw.com Fri Mar 22 17:55:32 2019 From: BrianUnitt at holsteinlaw.com (Brian Unitt) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 17:55:32 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In-Reply-To: <85e8decf268d4f17a1de20aea3870ecf@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> References: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> , <52BCEA16-9606-4D79-8934-69893B7D6159@gmail.com> <7FB38E4A-1B95-4624-9F15-CF3051D4BCFD@holsteinlaw.com> <85e8decf268d4f17a1de20aea3870ecf@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: <4A95BD82E7BAD44D9AEB0A8A59AA51140C3D2C6F@MBX030-E1-VA-6.exch030.domain.local> Yes, Chrome now works with JAWS. It used to be terrible, but now it is my default browser. Brian Brian C. Unitt Certified Specialist, Appellate Law The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization Holstein, Taylor and Unitt A Professional Corporation 4300 Latham Street, Suite 103 Riverside, CA 92501 Tel: 951-682-7030 Fax: 951-684-8061 www.holsteinlaw.com mailto:brianunitt at holsteinlaw.com From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 8:52 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Singh, Nandini Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page I am using IE 11 and JAWS 2018. Does JAWS now work with Chrome? -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian Unitt via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 7:40 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Brian Unitt Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page What browser are you using? I am using chrome with the latest update for JAWS 2019, and I am not experiencing that problem. Brian Sent from my iPhone On Mar 21, 2019, at 3:48 PM, Jen Barrow via BlindLaw > wrote: Hi Nikki, Yes, I experience the same problem as you described. It’s very frustrating when I’m looking at a case on Westlaw and I switch over to word to write some notes, and then the JAWS focus is back at the top when I return to IE. I also started to notice this rather recently… But I can’t remember when. Jen Sent from my iPhone *This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately and delete all copies of this message. > On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:56 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: > > I guess I can place a bookmark where the main content begins. I am often jumping back and forth between a case and a wordprocessor, so having multiple bookmarks may be impractical as I continue reading through the case. > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott Greenblatt via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:52 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Scott Greenblatt > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page > > I’m not sure why you’re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can give you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or placeholder whatever it’s called into the webpage before you switch out by using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it should > > Sincerely, > Scott Greenblatt Esq. > 914-274f-0232 > sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: >> >> I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. any ideas would be appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> Nikki >> >> >> Nandini Singh >> >> Covington & Burling LLP >> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >> T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com >> www.cov.com >> >> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sgreenblatt76%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jlynnbarrow%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com ________________________________ _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com ________________________________ From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Fri Mar 22 20:58:01 2019 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 20:58:01 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] =?windows-1252?q?Blog=3A_Domino=92s_To_Ask_Supreme_Co?= =?windows-1252?q?urt_To_Consider_Whether_ADA_Website/Mobile_App_Accessibi?= =?windows-1252?q?lity_Lawsuits_Violate_Due_Process=2C_Seyfarth_Shaw=2C_Ma?= =?windows-1252?q?rch_21_2019?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=24ed5361-3dba-4baa-b58d-d97cfbbe6823 Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process Blog ADA Title III News & Insights Blog Seyfarth Shaw LLP March 21 2019 By Minh N. Vu . Seyfarth Synopsis: Domino’s Likely to File Petition for Certiorari from Ninth Circuit’s Ruling in Robles v. Domino’s. As we reported, the Ninth Circuit held in January that a blind plaintiff could move forward with his ADA Title III lawsuit against Domino’s Pizza for having an allegedly inaccessible website and mobile app. The court determined that allowing the claim to move forward was not a violation of Domino’s due process rights, even though the ADA and its regulations contain no definition of, or technical specifications for, “accessible” public accommodations websites. We believe Domino’s will be petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court for certiorari because on March 6, 2019, it requested a sixty-day extension of time to file said petition. The request was filed by a newly-engaged Supreme Court specialist which further confirms our conclusion that a petition will be filed. Justice Kagan granted the request, and Domino’s Petition for Certiorari is due on June 14, 2019. There is a lot at stake with this petition. Congress and the DOJ have taken no action to stop the tsunami of lawsuits against thousands of businesses about their allegedly inaccessible websites. A Supreme Court decision could put an end to the litigation frenzy and provide some relief for businesses. Stay tuned for updates on this exciting development. From mnowicki4 at icloud.com Fri Mar 22 23:45:09 2019 From: mnowicki4 at icloud.com (Michal Nowicki) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 18:45:09 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In-Reply-To: <4A95BD82E7BAD44D9AEB0A8A59AA51140C3D2C6F@MBX030-E1-VA-6.exch030.domain.local> References: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <52BCEA16-9606-4D79-8934-69893B7D6159@gmail.com> <7FB38E4A-1B95-4624-9F15-CF3051D4BCFD@holsteinlaw.com> <85e8decf268d4f17a1de20aea3870ecf@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <4A95BD82E7BAD44D9AEB0A8A59AA51140C3D2C6F@MBX030-E1-VA-6.exch030.domain.local> Message-ID: I experience this issue from time to time. I set JAWS placemarkers to be safe. As for reading cases on Westlaw, I prefer to read them on the website, because I can jump quickly between footnotes and text most easily that way thanks to the hyperlinks. Michal Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Brian Unitt via BlindLaw Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 12:56 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Brian Unitt Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page Yes, Chrome now works with JAWS. It used to be terrible, but now it is my default browser. Brian Brian C. Unitt Certified Specialist, Appellate Law The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization Holstein, Taylor and Unitt A Professional Corporation 4300 Latham Street, Suite 103 Riverside, CA 92501 Tel: 951-682-7030 Fax: 951-684-8061 www.holsteinlaw.com mailto:brianunitt at holsteinlaw.com From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 8:52 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Singh, Nandini Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page I am using IE 11 and JAWS 2018. Does JAWS now work with Chrome? -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian Unitt via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 7:40 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Brian Unitt Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page What browser are you using? I am using chrome with the latest update for JAWS 2019, and I am not experiencing that problem. Brian Sent from my iPhone On Mar 21, 2019, at 3:48 PM, Jen Barrow via BlindLaw > wrote: Hi Nikki, Yes, I experience the same problem as you described. It’s very frustrating when I’m looking at a case on Westlaw and I switch over to word to write some notes, and then the JAWS focus is back at the top when I return to IE. I also started to notice this rather recently… But I can’t remember when. Jen Sent from my iPhone *This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately and delete all copies of this message. > On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:56 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: > > I guess I can place a bookmark where the main content begins. I am often jumping back and forth between a case and a wordprocessor, so having multiple bookmarks may be impractical as I continue reading through the case. > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott Greenblatt via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:52 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Scott Greenblatt > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page > > I’m not sure why you’re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can give you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or placeholder whatever it’s called into the webpage before you switch out by using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it should > > Sincerely, > Scott Greenblatt Esq. > 914-274f-0232 > sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: >> >> I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. any ideas would be appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> Nikki >> >> >> Nandini Singh >> >> Covington & Burling LLP >> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >> T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com >> www.cov.com >> >> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sgreenblatt76%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jlynnbarrow%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com ________________________________ _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com ________________________________ _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com From mnowicki4 at icloud.com Sat Mar 23 01:40:55 2019 From: mnowicki4 at icloud.com (Michal Nowicki) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 20:40:55 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] =?utf-8?q?Blog=3A_Domino=E2=80=99s_To_Ask_Supreme_Cou?= =?utf-8?q?rt_To_Consider_Whether_ADA_Website/Mobile_App_Accessibility_Law?= =?utf-8?q?suits_Violate_Due_Process=2C_Seyfarth_Shaw=2C_March_21_2019?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: All, I think we all know how important This case is for all of us. Assuming that the Supreme Court will indeed review it, how do you expect it to rule? Will the WCAG guidelines save us? Finally, can we help as an organization (e.g., by filing an amicus brief)? Michal Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Nightingale, Noel via BlindLaw Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 3:59 PM To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org Cc: Nightingale, Noel Subject: [blindlaw] Blog: Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, March 21 2019 https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=24ed5361-3dba-4baa-b58d-d97cfbbe6823 Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process Blog ADA Title III News & Insights Blog Seyfarth Shaw LLP March 21 2019 By Minh N. Vu . Seyfarth Synopsis: Domino’s Likely to File Petition for Certiorari from Ninth Circuit’s Ruling in Robles v. Domino’s. As we reported, the Ninth Circuit held in January that a blind plaintiff could move forward with his ADA Title III lawsuit against Domino’s Pizza for having an allegedly inaccessible website and mobile app. The court determined that allowing the claim to move forward was not a violation of Domino’s due process rights, even though the ADA and its regulations contain no definition of, or technical specifications for, “accessible” public accommodations websites. We believe Domino’s will be petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court for certiorari because on March 6, 2019, it requested a sixty-day extension of time to file said petition. The request was filed by a newly-engaged Supreme Court specialist which further confirms our conclusion that a petition will be filed. Justice Kagan granted the request, and Domino’s Petition for Certiorari is due on June 14, 2019. There is a lot at stake with this petition. Congress and the DOJ have taken no action to stop the tsunami of lawsuits against thousands of businesses about their allegedly inaccessible websites. A Supreme Court decision could put an end to the litigation frenzy and provide some relief for businesses. Stay tuned for updates on this exciting development. _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com From sbg at sbgaal.com Sat Mar 23 03:46:36 2019 From: sbg at sbgaal.com (Shannon) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 22:46:36 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] =?utf-8?q?Blog=3A_Domino=E2=80=99s_To_Ask_Supreme_Cou?= =?utf-8?q?rt_To_Consider_Whether_ADA_Website/Mobile_App_Accessibility_Law?= =?utf-8?q?suits_Violate_Due_Process=2C_Seyfarth_Shaw=2C_March_21_2019?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <48AD4F66-B755-477B-8790-E2A993F3475F@sbgaal.com> Sorry if this is a dumb question but what are the guidelines that you’re referring to? Shannon Brady Geihsler Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 Lubbock, Texas 79401 Phone: (806) 763-3999 Mobile: (806) 781-9296 Fax: (806) 749-3752 E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 22, 2019, at 8:40 PM, Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: > > All, > > I think we all know how important This case is for all of us. Assuming that the Supreme Court will indeed review it, how do you expect it to rule? Will the WCAG guidelines save us? Finally, can we help as an organization (e.g., by filing an amicus brief)? > > Michal > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > From: Nightingale, Noel via BlindLaw > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 3:59 PM > To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org > Cc: Nightingale, Noel > Subject: [blindlaw] Blog: Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, March 21 2019 > > > https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=24ed5361-3dba-4baa-b58d-d97cfbbe6823 > > Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process > Blog ADA Title III News & Insights Blog > Seyfarth Shaw LLP > March 21 2019 > By Minh N. Vu . > > Seyfarth Synopsis: Domino’s Likely to File Petition for Certiorari from Ninth Circuit’s Ruling in Robles v. Domino’s. > > As we reported, the Ninth Circuit held in January that a blind plaintiff could move forward with his ADA Title III lawsuit against Domino’s Pizza for having an allegedly inaccessible website and mobile app. The court determined that allowing the claim to move forward was not a violation of Domino’s due process rights, even though the ADA and its regulations contain no definition of, or technical specifications for, “accessible” public accommodations websites. > > We believe Domino’s will be petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court for certiorari because on March 6, 2019, it requested a sixty-day extension of time to file said petition. The request was filed by a newly-engaged Supreme Court specialist which further confirms our conclusion that a petition will be filed. Justice Kagan granted the request, and Domino’s Petition for Certiorari is due on June 14, 2019. > > There is a lot at stake with this petition. Congress and the DOJ have taken no action to stop the tsunami of lawsuits against thousands of businesses about their allegedly inaccessible websites. A Supreme Court decision could put an end to the litigation frenzy and provide some relief for businesses. > > Stay tuned for updates on this exciting development. > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sbg%40sbgaal.com From mnowicki4 at icloud.com Sat Mar 23 04:44:42 2019 From: mnowicki4 at icloud.com (Michael Nowicki) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 23:44:42 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] =?utf-8?q?Blog=3A_Domino=E2=80=99s_To_Ask_Supreme_Cou?= =?utf-8?q?rt_To_Consider_Whether_ADA_Website/Mobile_App_Accessibility_Law?= =?utf-8?q?suits_Violate_Due_Process=2C_Seyfarth_Shaw=2C_March_21_2019?= In-Reply-To: <48AD4F66-B755-477B-8790-E2A993F3475F@sbgaal.com> References: <48AD4F66-B755-477B-8790-E2A993F3475F@sbgaal.com> Message-ID: <120B0594-BB9E-40DC-A645-F921FB0A3379@icloud.com> Wev accessibility content guidelines. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 22, 2019, at 10:46 PM, Shannon via BlindLaw wrote: > > Sorry if this is a dumb question but what are the guidelines that you’re referring to? > > Shannon Brady Geihsler > Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC > 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 > Lubbock, Texas 79401 > Phone: (806) 763-3999 > Mobile: (806) 781-9296 > Fax: (806) 749-3752 > E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com > NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 22, 2019, at 8:40 PM, Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> All, >> >> I think we all know how important This case is for all of us. Assuming that the Supreme Court will indeed review it, how do you expect it to rule? Will the WCAG guidelines save us? Finally, can we help as an organization (e.g., by filing an amicus brief)? >> >> Michal >> >> Sent from Mail for Windows 10 >> >> From: Nightingale, Noel via BlindLaw >> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 3:59 PM >> To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org >> Cc: Nightingale, Noel >> Subject: [blindlaw] Blog: Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, March 21 2019 >> >> >> https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=24ed5361-3dba-4baa-b58d-d97cfbbe6823 >> >> Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process >> Blog ADA Title III News & Insights Blog >> Seyfarth Shaw LLP >> March 21 2019 >> By Minh N. Vu . >> >> Seyfarth Synopsis: Domino’s Likely to File Petition for Certiorari from Ninth Circuit’s Ruling in Robles v. Domino’s. >> >> As we reported, the Ninth Circuit held in January that a blind plaintiff could move forward with his ADA Title III lawsuit against Domino’s Pizza for having an allegedly inaccessible website and mobile app. The court determined that allowing the claim to move forward was not a violation of Domino’s due process rights, even though the ADA and its regulations contain no definition of, or technical specifications for, “accessible” public accommodations websites. >> >> We believe Domino’s will be petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court for certiorari because on March 6, 2019, it requested a sixty-day extension of time to file said petition. The request was filed by a newly-engaged Supreme Court specialist which further confirms our conclusion that a petition will be filed. Justice Kagan granted the request, and Domino’s Petition for Certiorari is due on June 14, 2019. >> >> There is a lot at stake with this petition. Congress and the DOJ have taken no action to stop the tsunami of lawsuits against thousands of businesses about their allegedly inaccessible websites. A Supreme Court decision could put an end to the litigation frenzy and provide some relief for businesses. >> >> Stay tuned for updates on this exciting development. >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sbg%40sbgaal.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com From sanho817 at gmail.com Sat Mar 23 15:41:12 2019 From: sanho817 at gmail.com (Sanho Steele-Louchart) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 10:41:12 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Visual Interpretation of Jury and Exhibits Message-ID: <0AEBEBC2-4611-4F1E-B784-B4E2653E5762@gmail.com> Good morning, Can someone tell me a bit about your chosen methods of discerning jury body language and unfamiliar or inaccessible exhibits in trial? I imagine co-counsel could whisper jury reactions to you after the fact, but I'm hoping for maximal independence and, ideally, real-time feedback while presenting. I assume that at the very least, real-time feedback isn't much of an option. Warmth, Sanho From sbg at sbgaal.com Sat Mar 23 17:40:21 2019 From: sbg at sbgaal.com (Shannon) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 12:40:21 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] =?utf-8?q?Blog=3A_Domino=E2=80=99s_To_Ask_Supreme_Cou?= =?utf-8?q?rt_To_Consider_Whether_ADA_Website/Mobile_App_Accessibility_Law?= =?utf-8?q?suits_Violate_Due_Process=2C_Seyfarth_Shaw=2C_March_21_2019?= In-Reply-To: <120B0594-BB9E-40DC-A645-F921FB0A3379@icloud.com> References: <48AD4F66-B755-477B-8790-E2A993F3475F@sbgaal.com> <120B0594-BB9E-40DC-A645-F921FB0A3379@icloud.com> Message-ID: Who issued the guidelines? Shannon Brady Geihsler Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 Lubbock, Texas 79401 Phone: (806) 763-3999 Mobile: (806) 781-9296 Fax: (806) 749-3752 E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 22, 2019, at 11:44 PM, Michael Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: > > Wev accessibility content guidelines. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 22, 2019, at 10:46 PM, Shannon via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> Sorry if this is a dumb question but what are the guidelines that you’re referring to? >> >> Shannon Brady Geihsler >> Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC >> 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 >> Lubbock, Texas 79401 >> Phone: (806) 763-3999 >> Mobile: (806) 781-9296 >> Fax: (806) 749-3752 >> E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com >> NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Mar 22, 2019, at 8:40 PM, Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: >>> >>> All, >>> >>> I think we all know how important This case is for all of us. Assuming that the Supreme Court will indeed review it, how do you expect it to rule? Will the WCAG guidelines save us? Finally, can we help as an organization (e.g., by filing an amicus brief)? >>> >>> Michal >>> >>> Sent from Mail for Windows 10 >>> >>> From: Nightingale, Noel via BlindLaw >>> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 3:59 PM >>> To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org >>> Cc: Nightingale, Noel >>> Subject: [blindlaw] Blog: Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, March 21 2019 >>> >>> >>> https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=24ed5361-3dba-4baa-b58d-d97cfbbe6823 >>> >>> Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process >>> Blog ADA Title III News & Insights Blog >>> Seyfarth Shaw LLP >>> March 21 2019 >>> By Minh N. Vu . >>> >>> Seyfarth Synopsis: Domino’s Likely to File Petition for Certiorari from Ninth Circuit’s Ruling in Robles v. Domino’s. >>> >>> As we reported, the Ninth Circuit held in January that a blind plaintiff could move forward with his ADA Title III lawsuit against Domino’s Pizza for having an allegedly inaccessible website and mobile app. The court determined that allowing the claim to move forward was not a violation of Domino’s due process rights, even though the ADA and its regulations contain no definition of, or technical specifications for, “accessible” public accommodations websites. >>> >>> We believe Domino’s will be petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court for certiorari because on March 6, 2019, it requested a sixty-day extension of time to file said petition. The request was filed by a newly-engaged Supreme Court specialist which further confirms our conclusion that a petition will be filed. Justice Kagan granted the request, and Domino’s Petition for Certiorari is due on June 14, 2019. >>> >>> There is a lot at stake with this petition. Congress and the DOJ have taken no action to stop the tsunami of lawsuits against thousands of businesses about their allegedly inaccessible websites. A Supreme Court decision could put an end to the litigation frenzy and provide some relief for businesses. >>> >>> Stay tuned for updates on this exciting development. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sbg%40sbgaal.com >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sbg%40sbgaal.com From mnowicki4 at icloud.com Sat Mar 23 17:40:20 2019 From: mnowicki4 at icloud.com (Michal Nowicki) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 12:40:20 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] courtroom information technology for judges In-Reply-To: <57519730-1ED7-4BCC-A5DC-96FC033BCB0D@gmail.com> References: <57519730-1ED7-4BCC-A5DC-96FC033BCB0D@gmail.com> Message-ID: Congratulations, Elizabeth. Do you read Braille? If so, have you considered using a Braille display, connected wirelessly to a smartphone or tablet, for quick access to electronic documents? As for paper documents, scanning them with an app like Seeing AI or KNFB Reader, or getting a reader are probably your best options. Good luck! Michal Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Elizabeth Rene via BlindLaw Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 12:42 PM To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org Cc: Elizabeth Rene Subject: Re: [blindlaw] courtroom information technology for judges Dear listmates, I want to send my full-hearted thanks to all those of you who have sent congratulations, advice, and the names of blind judges to contact. I’ll keep you posted as to how things go with the interview. Meanwhile, I’ll be observing in the various court rooms and maybe checking out the technology and it’s Accessibility so I can best prepare. It’s wonderful to me that blind judges have made it to the federal courts of appeal and to a state Supreme Court. How great it must be to be in law school now and have such bright hopes, with role models to follow. Far from law school myself, I am still so excited to know that those people are out there. Elizabeth M René Attorney at Law WSBA #10710 KCBA #21824 rene0373 at gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com From mnowicki4 at icloud.com Sat Mar 23 18:30:50 2019 From: mnowicki4 at icloud.com (Michal Nowicki) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 13:30:50 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] =?utf-8?q?Blog=3A_Domino=E2=80=99s_To_Ask_Supreme_Cou?= =?utf-8?q?rt_To_Consider_Whether_ADA_Website/Mobile_App_Accessibility_Law?= =?utf-8?q?suits_Violate_Due_Process=2C_Seyfarth_Shaw=2C_March_21_2019?= In-Reply-To: References: <48AD4F66-B755-477B-8790-E2A993F3475F@sbgaal.com> <120B0594-BB9E-40DC-A645-F921FB0A3379@icloud.com> Message-ID: The World Wide Web Consortium. These guidelines are widely recognized internationally and have frequently been incorporated into settlement agreements. I’m surprised you’ve never heard of them. Michal Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Shannon via BlindLaw Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 12:41 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Shannon Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Blog: Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, March 21 2019 Who issued the guidelines? Shannon Brady Geihsler Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 Lubbock, Texas 79401 Phone: (806) 763-3999 Mobile: (806) 781-9296 Fax: (806) 749-3752 E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 22, 2019, at 11:44 PM, Michael Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: > > Wev accessibility content guidelines. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 22, 2019, at 10:46 PM, Shannon via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> Sorry if this is a dumb question but what are the guidelines that you’re referring to? >> >> Shannon Brady Geihsler >> Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC >> 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 >> Lubbock, Texas 79401 >> Phone: (806) 763-3999 >> Mobile: (806) 781-9296 >> Fax: (806) 749-3752 >> E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com >> NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Mar 22, 2019, at 8:40 PM, Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: >>> >>> All, >>> >>> I think we all know how important This case is for all of us. Assuming that the Supreme Court will indeed review it, how do you expect it to rule? Will the WCAG guidelines save us? Finally, can we help as an organization (e.g., by filing an amicus brief)? >>> >>> Michal >>> >>> Sent from Mail for Windows 10 >>> >>> From: Nightingale, Noel via BlindLaw >>> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 3:59 PM >>> To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org >>> Cc: Nightingale, Noel >>> Subject: [blindlaw] Blog: Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, March 21 2019 >>> >>> >>> https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=24ed5361-3dba-4baa-b58d-d97cfbbe6823 >>> >>> Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process >>> Blog ADA Title III News & Insights Blog >>> Seyfarth Shaw LLP >>> March 21 2019 >>> By Minh N. Vu . >>> >>> Seyfarth Synopsis: Domino’s Likely to File Petition for Certiorari from Ninth Circuit’s Ruling in Robles v. Domino’s. >>> >>> As we reported, the Ninth Circuit held in January that a blind plaintiff could move forward with his ADA Title III lawsuit against Domino’s Pizza for having an allegedly inaccessible website and mobile app. The court determined that allowing the claim to move forward was not a violation of Domino’s due process rights, even though the ADA and its regulations contain no definition of, or technical specifications for, “accessible” public accommodations websites. >>> >>> We believe Domino’s will be petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court for certiorari because on March 6, 2019, it requested a sixty-day extension of time to file said petition. The request was filed by a newly-engaged Supreme Court specialist which further confirms our conclusion that a petition will be filed. Justice Kagan granted the request, and Domino’s Petition for Certiorari is due on June 14, 2019. >>> >>> There is a lot at stake with this petition. Congress and the DOJ have taken no action to stop the tsunami of lawsuits against thousands of businesses about their allegedly inaccessible websites. A Supreme Court decision could put an end to the litigation frenzy and provide some relief for businesses. >>> >>> Stay tuned for updates on this exciting development. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sbg%40sbgaal.com >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sbg%40sbgaal.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com From sbg at sbgaal.com Sat Mar 23 19:22:41 2019 From: sbg at sbgaal.com (Shannon) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 14:22:41 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] =?utf-8?q?Blog=3A_Domino=E2=80=99s_To_Ask_Supreme_Cou?= =?utf-8?q?rt_To_Consider_Whether_ADA_Website/Mobile_App_Accessibility_Law?= =?utf-8?q?suits_Violate_Due_Process=2C_Seyfarth_Shaw=2C_March_21_2019?= In-Reply-To: References: <48AD4F66-B755-477B-8790-E2A993F3475F@sbgaal.com> <120B0594-BB9E-40DC-A645-F921FB0A3379@icloud.com> Message-ID: I do not do disability law I do criminal defense Shannon Brady Geihsler Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 Lubbock, Texas 79401 Phone: (806) 763-3999 Mobile: (806) 781-9296 Fax: (806) 749-3752 E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 23, 2019, at 1:30 PM, Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: > > The World Wide Web Consortium. These guidelines are widely recognized internationally and have frequently been incorporated into settlement agreements. I’m surprised you’ve never heard of them. > > Michal > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > From: Shannon via BlindLaw > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 12:41 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Shannon > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Blog: Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, March 21 2019 > > Who issued the guidelines? > > Shannon Brady Geihsler > Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC > 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 > Lubbock, Texas 79401 > Phone: (806) 763-3999 > Mobile: (806) 781-9296 > Fax: (806) 749-3752 > E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com > NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 22, 2019, at 11:44 PM, Michael Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> Wev accessibility content guidelines. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Mar 22, 2019, at 10:46 PM, Shannon via BlindLaw wrote: >>> >>> Sorry if this is a dumb question but what are the guidelines that you’re referring to? >>> >>> Shannon Brady Geihsler >>> Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC >>> 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 >>> Lubbock, Texas 79401 >>> Phone: (806) 763-3999 >>> Mobile: (806) 781-9296 >>> Fax: (806) 749-3752 >>> E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com >>> NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/o From mnowicki4 at icloud.com Sun Mar 24 02:10:49 2019 From: mnowicki4 at icloud.com (Michal Nowicki) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 21:10:49 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] =?utf-8?q?Blog=3A_Domino=E2=80=99s_To_Ask_Supreme_Cou?= =?utf-8?q?rt_To_Consider_Whether_ADA_Website/Mobile_App_Accessibility_Law?= =?utf-8?q?suits_Violate_Due_Process=2C_Seyfarth_Shaw=2C_March_21_2019?= In-Reply-To: References: <48AD4F66-B755-477B-8790-E2A993F3475F@sbgaal.com> <120B0594-BB9E-40DC-A645-F921FB0A3379@icloud.com> Message-ID: I understand. For now, the Supreme Court only granted Domino’s an extension to file its petition for certiorari. Contrary to what the blog post suggests, it is very plausible that in the end, the Court may decide not to hear the case after all. We will have to wait and see what happens. Michal Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Shannon via BlindLaw Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 2:24 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Shannon Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Blog: Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, March 21 2019 I do not do disability law I do criminal defense Shannon Brady Geihsler Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 Lubbock, Texas 79401 Phone: (806) 763-3999 Mobile: (806) 781-9296 Fax: (806) 749-3752 E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 23, 2019, at 1:30 PM, Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: > > The World Wide Web Consortium. These guidelines are widely recognized internationally and have frequently been incorporated into settlement agreements. I’m surprised you’ve never heard of them. > > Michal > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > From: Shannon via BlindLaw > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 12:41 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Shannon > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Blog: Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, March 21 2019 > > Who issued the guidelines? > > Shannon Brady Geihsler > Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC > 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 > Lubbock, Texas 79401 > Phone: (806) 763-3999 > Mobile: (806) 781-9296 > Fax: (806) 749-3752 > E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com > NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 22, 2019, at 11:44 PM, Michael Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> Wev accessibility content guidelines. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Mar 22, 2019, at 10:46 PM, Shannon via BlindLaw wrote: >>> >>> Sorry if this is a dumb question but what are the guidelines that you’re referring to? >>> >>> Shannon Brady Geihsler >>> Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC >>> 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 >>> Lubbock, Texas 79401 >>> Phone: (806) 763-3999 >>> Mobile: (806) 781-9296 >>> Fax: (806) 749-3752 >>> E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com >>> NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/o _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com From NSingh at cov.com Sun Mar 24 02:31:24 2019 From: NSingh at cov.com (Singh, Nandini) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 02:31:24 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] =?utf-8?q?Blog=3A_Domino=E2=80=99s_To_Ask_Supreme_Cou?= =?utf-8?q?rt_To_Consider_Whether_ADA_Website/Mobile_App_Accessibility_Law?= =?utf-8?q?suits_Violate_Due_Process=2C_Seyfarth_Shaw=2C_March_21_2019?= In-Reply-To: References: <48AD4F66-B755-477B-8790-E2A993F3475F@sbgaal.com> <120B0594-BB9E-40DC-A645-F921FB0A3379@icloud.com> Message-ID: <85e7e9d70c694add89aa9296729b7113@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> I also suspect that the law firm that NFB usually retains--forgetting the full name at the moment--must be aware of this and may be considering writing an amicus, assuming it is not opposite Domino's counsel. I have to confess I am not familiar who exactly the parties are and who represents them. As a fun fact, I think I read that the Supreme Court has more recently taken fewer petitions. That worked for me, as one of my cases, prosecuted by a pro se plaintiff with a set of ambitious but meritless claims, did not proceed any further. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 10:11 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Michal Nowicki Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Blog: Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, March 21 2019 I understand. For now, the Supreme Court only granted Domino’s an extension to file its petition for certiorari. Contrary to what the blog post suggests, it is very plausible that in the end, the Court may decide not to hear the case after all. We will have to wait and see what happens. Michal Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Shannon via BlindLaw Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 2:24 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Shannon Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Blog: Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, March 21 2019 I do not do disability law I do criminal defense Shannon Brady Geihsler Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 Lubbock, Texas 79401 Phone: (806) 763-3999 Mobile: (806) 781-9296 Fax: (806) 749-3752 E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 23, 2019, at 1:30 PM, Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: > > The World Wide Web Consortium. These guidelines are widely recognized internationally and have frequently been incorporated into settlement agreements. I’m surprised you’ve never heard of them. > > Michal > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > From: Shannon via BlindLaw > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 12:41 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Shannon > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Blog: Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, March 21 2019 > > Who issued the guidelines? > > Shannon Brady Geihsler > Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC > 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 > Lubbock, Texas 79401 > Phone: (806) 763-3999 > Mobile: (806) 781-9296 > Fax: (806) 749-3752 > E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com > NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 22, 2019, at 11:44 PM, Michael Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> Wev accessibility content guidelines. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Mar 22, 2019, at 10:46 PM, Shannon via BlindLaw wrote: >>> >>> Sorry if this is a dumb question but what are the guidelines that you’re referring to? >>> >>> Shannon Brady Geihsler >>> Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC >>> 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 >>> Lubbock, Texas 79401 >>> Phone: (806) 763-3999 >>> Mobile: (806) 781-9296 >>> Fax: (806) 749-3752 >>> E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com >>> NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/o _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com From dandrews at visi.com Sun Mar 24 03:23:18 2019 From: dandrews at visi.com (David Andrews) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 22:23:18 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] =?iso-8859-1?q?Blog=3A_Domino=E2=80=99s_To_Ask__Supre?= =?iso-8859-1?q?me_Cou_rt_To_Consider_Whether_ADA_Website/Mobile_App_Acces?= =?iso-8859-1?q?sibility__Law_suits_Violate_Due_Process=2C_Seyfarth_Shaw?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=2C_March_21_2019?= In-Reply-To: References: <48AD4F66-B755-477B-8790-E2A993F3475F@sbgaal.com> <120B0594-BB9E-40DC-A645-F921FB0A3379@icloud.com> Message-ID: The world wide web consortium. Dave At 12:40 PM 3/23/2019, you wrote: >Who issued the guidelines? Shannon Brady >Geihsler Law Office of Shannon Brady >Geihsler,PLLC 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 >Lubbock, Texas 79401 Phone: (806) 763-3999 >Mobile: (806) 781-9296 Fax: (806) 749-3752 >E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com NOTICE the information >contained in this communication is protected by >the attorney/client and/or the work/product >privileges. It along with any attachments here >to, is also covered by the Electronic >Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections >2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal >and confidential use of the recipient(s) named >in the communication, and the privileges are not >waived by virtue of this having been sent by >electronic mail. If the person actually >receiving this communication or any other reader >of the communication is not the named recipient, >any use, dissemination, distribution or copying >of the communication is strictly prohibited. If >you have received this communication in error, >please immediately notify us by telephone >(please call collect) and delete the original >from your system. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar >22, 2019, at 11:44 PM, Michael Nowicki via >BlindLaw wrote: > > Wev >accessibility content guidelines. > > Sent from >my iPhone > >> On Mar 22, 2019, at 10:46 PM, >Shannon via BlindLaw >wrote: >> >> Sorry if this is a dumb question >but what are the guidelines that you’re >referring to? >> >> Shannon Brady Geihsler >> >Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC >> >1001 Main Street, Suite 803 >> Lubbock, Texas >79401 >> Phone: (806) 763-3999 >> >Mobile: (806) 781-9296 >> Fax: (806) >749-3752 >> E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com >> NOTICE >the information contained in this communication >is protected by the attorney/client and/or the >work/product privileges. It along with any >attachments here to, is also covered by the >Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. >sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the >personal and confidential use of the >recipient(s) named in the communication, and the >privileges are not waived by virtue of this >having been sent by electronic mail. If the >person actually receiving this communication or >any other reader of the communication is not the >named recipient, any use, dissemination, >distribution or copying of the communication is >strictly prohibited. If you have received this >communication in error, please immediately >notify us by telephone (please call collect) and >delete the original from your system. >> >> >Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Mar 22, 2019, at >8:40 PM, Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw > wrote: >>> >>> >All, >>> >>> I think we all know how important >This case is for all of us. Assuming that the >Supreme Court will indeed review it, how do you >expect it to rule? Will the WCAG guidelines save >us? Finally, can we help as an organization >(e.g., by filing an amicus brief)? >>> >>> >Michal >>> >>> Sent from Mail for Windows >10 >>> >>> From: Nightingale, Noel via >BlindLaw >>> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 3:59 >PM >>> To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org >>> Cc: >Nightingale, Noel >>> Subject: [blindlaw] Blog: >Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider >Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility >Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, >March 21 2019 >>> >>> >>> >https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=24ed5361-3dba-4baa-b58d-d97cfbbe6823 > >>> >>> Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To >Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App >Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process >>> >Blog ADA Title III News & Insights Blog >>> >Seyfarth Shaw LLP >>> March 21 2019 >>> By Minh >N. Vu . >>> >>> Seyfarth Synopsis: Domino’s >Likely to File Petition for Certiorari from >Ninth Circuit’s Ruling in Robles v. >Domino’s. >>> >>> As we reported, the Ninth >Circuit held in January that a blind plaintiff >could move forward with his ADA Title III >lawsuit against Domino’s Pizza for having an >allegedly inaccessible website and mobile app. >The court determined that allowing the claim to >move forward was not a violation of Domino’s >due process rights, even though the ADA and its >regulations contain no definition of, or >technical specifications for, “accessible” >public accommodations websites. >>> >>> We >believe Domino’s will be petitioning the U.S. >Supreme Court for certiorari because on March 6, >2019, it requested a sixty-day extension of time >to file said petition. The request was filed by >a newly-engaged Supreme Court specialist which >further confirms our conclusion that a petition >will be filed. Justice Kagan granted the >request, and Domino’s Petition for Certiorari >is due on June 14, 2019. >>> >>> There is a lot >at stake with this petition. Congress and the >DOJ have taken no action to stop the tsunami of >lawsuits against thousands of businesses about >their allegedly inaccessible websites. A Supreme >Court decision could put an end to the >litigation frenzy and provide some relief for >businesses. >>> >>> Stay tuned for updates on this exciting development. >>> --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From michael.mcglashon at comcast.net Sun Mar 24 08:40:40 2019 From: michael.mcglashon at comcast.net (MIKE MCGLASHON) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 04:40:40 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] =?utf-8?q?Blog=3A_Domino=E2=80=99s_To_Ask_Supreme_Cou?= =?utf-8?q?rt_To_Consider_Whether_ADA_Website/Mobile_App_Accessibil?= =?utf-8?q?ity_Lawsuits_Violate_Due_Process=2C_Seyfarth_Shaw=2C_Mar?= =?utf-8?q?ch_21_2019?= References: <48AD4F66-B755-477B-8790-E2A993F3475F@sbgaal.com> <120B0594-BB9E-40DC-A645-F921FB0A3379@icloud.com> Message-ID: <003701d4e21d$458637e0$d092a7a0$@comcast.net> Which is what you guys want, you want the court not to grant cert, For if it does not, then the guidelines may be continued to be enforced; If they do, however, Then domino's get to claim that the rules being enforced, (the guidelines), are not in fact binding law at all, And forcing one to follow nonbinding law, noncongressional statutes, is against the 14th amend due process clause; Please advise as you like. Mike M. Mike mcglashon Email: Michael.mcglashon at comcast.net Ph: 618 783 9331 -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 10:11 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Michal Nowicki Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Blog: Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, March 21 2019 I understand. For now, the Supreme Court only granted Domino’s an extension to file its petition for certiorari. Contrary to what the blog post suggests, it is very plausible that in the end, the Court may decide not to hear the case after all. We will have to wait and see what happens. Michal Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Shannon via BlindLaw Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 2:24 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Shannon Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Blog: Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, March 21 2019 I do not do disability law I do criminal defense Shannon Brady Geihsler Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 Lubbock, Texas 79401 Phone: (806) 763-3999 Mobile: (806) 781-9296 Fax: (806) 749-3752 E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 23, 2019, at 1:30 PM, Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: > > The World Wide Web Consortium. These guidelines are widely recognized internationally and have frequently been incorporated into settlement agreements. I’m surprised you’ve never heard of them. > > Michal > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > From: Shannon via BlindLaw > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 12:41 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Shannon > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Blog: Domino’s To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process, Seyfarth Shaw, March 21 2019 > > Who issued the guidelines? > > Shannon Brady Geihsler > Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC > 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 > Lubbock, Texas 79401 > Phone: (806) 763-3999 > Mobile: (806) 781-9296 > Fax: (806) 749-3752 > E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com > NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges. It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512. It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail. If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 22, 2019, at 11:44 PM, Michael Nowicki via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> Wev accessibility content guidelines. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Mar 22, 2019, at 10:46 PM, Shannon via BlindLaw wrote: >>> >>> Sorry if this is a dumb question but what are the guidelines that you’re referring to? >>> >>> Shannon Brady Geihsler >>> Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler,PLLC >>> 1001 Main Street, Suite 803 >>> Lubbock, Texas 79401 >>> Phone: (806) 763-3999 >>> Mobile: (806) 781-9296 >>> Fax: (806) 749-3752 >>> E-Mail: sbg at sbgaal.com >>> NOTICE the information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/o _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/michael.mcglashon%40comcast.net From slabarre at labarrelaw.com Sun Mar 24 16:11:10 2019 From: slabarre at labarrelaw.com (Scott C. LaBarre) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 10:11:10 -0600 Subject: [blindlaw] About the Robles v. Dominos Case Message-ID: <078b01d4e25c$323acd10$96b06730$@labarrelaw.com> Hello Everyone, there has been some discussion about the Robles case. The NFB has been heavily involved in this matter. Jessie Webber of Brown, Goldstein, and Levy argued before the 9th Circuit for 13 amici which included the NFB. You can watch the oral arguments here: https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/view_video.php?pk_vid=0000014434 I have also attached the 9th Circuit ruling which is at issue. We are closely monitoring this matter and will continue participating as an amicus. I suspect that there is a very small chance that the Supreme Court will grant cert in this matter. Best, Scott -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Document.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 148055 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mnowicki4 at icloud.com Sun Mar 24 16:25:23 2019 From: mnowicki4 at icloud.com (Michal Nowicki) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 11:25:23 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] About the Robles v. Dominos Case In-Reply-To: <078b01d4e25c$323acd10$96b06730$@labarrelaw.com> References: <078b01d4e25c$323acd10$96b06730$@labarrelaw.com> Message-ID: Hi Scott, Thank you for this update. I will definitely watch the oral arguments and read the 9th Circuit ruling. Michal Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Scott C. LaBarre via BlindLaw Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2019 11:13 AM To: 'Blind Law Mailing List' Cc: Scott C. LaBarre Subject: [blindlaw] About the Robles v. Dominos Case Hello Everyone, there has been some discussion about the Robles case. The NFB has been heavily involved in this matter. Jessie Webber of Brown, Goldstein, and Levy argued before the 9th Circuit for 13 amici which included the NFB. You can watch the oral arguments here: https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/view_video.php?pk_vid=0000014434 I have also attached the 9th Circuit ruling which is at issue. We are closely monitoring this matter and will continue participating as an amicus. I suspect that there is a very small chance that the Supreme Court will grant cert in this matter. Best, Scott From sbg at sbgaal.com Sun Mar 24 17:01:26 2019 From: sbg at sbgaal.com (Shannon) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 12:01:26 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Visual Interpretation of Jury and Exhibits In-Reply-To: <0AEBEBC2-4611-4F1E-B784-B4E2653E5762@gmail.com> References: <0AEBEBC2-4611-4F1E-B784-B4E2653E5762@gmail.com> Message-ID: <019501d4e263$384bfa10$a8e3ee30$@sbgaal.com> I think it would be a good idea to have a brainstorming conference call session on this topic so we can all learn from each other. I know in the past, I hae always had other attorneys assist with seeing the body language etc. from my voir dire panel and I have had braille notes on the topics I want to cover, but I would love to hear how others handle this challenging situation. Sincerely, Shannon Brady Geihsler Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler, PLLC 1001 Main St., Suite 803 Lubbock, Texas 79401 Office:  (806) 763-3999 Mobile:  (806) 781-9296 Fax:  (806) 749-3752 E-Mail:  sbg at sbgaal.com This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Sanho Steele-Louchart via BlindLaw Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 10:41 AM To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org Cc: Sanho Steele-Louchart Subject: [blindlaw] Visual Interpretation of Jury and Exhibits Good morning, Can someone tell me a bit about your chosen methods of discerning jury body language and unfamiliar or inaccessible exhibits in trial? I imagine co-counsel could whisper jury reactions to you after the fact, but I'm hoping for maximal independence and, ideally, real-time feedback while presenting. I assume that at the very least, real-time feedback isn't much of an option. Warmth, Sanho _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sbg%40sbgaal.com From rene0373 at gmail.com Sun Mar 24 17:22:18 2019 From: rene0373 at gmail.com (Elizabeth Rene) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 10:22:18 -0700 Subject: [blindlaw] courtroom information technology for judges Message-ID: <035A41BF-E66D-4467-A3AF-814A649615C7@gmail.com> Hi Michael, Yes, I read braille, and know about the other technologies you mention. My question addresses state-wine, online information systems used in Washington and elsewhere to inform judges regarding criminal records, legal financial obligations (LFOs) at sentencing, etc. I am looking to see whether these platforms are accessible. Thanks. Elizabeth M René Attorney at Law WSBA #10710 KCBA #21824 rene0373 at gmail.com From rahul.bajaj1038 at gmail.com Sun Mar 24 18:06:33 2019 From: rahul.bajaj1038 at gmail.com (Rahul Bajaj) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 18:06:33 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Courtroom information technology for judges In-Reply-To: References: <04EA17DD-63B3-42F1-9A42-902DB7A0A199@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Elizabeth, Many congratulations! 1. I have interviewed many blind judges. These include: David Tatel, David Szumowski [San Diego County Court judge]; and Zak Yacoob [judge on the South African Constitutional Court]. You can find their interviews online, if you search on Google for the IDAP interview series and add the names I just mentioned to the search terms. Judge Szumowski also recently published his autobiography. 2. I have also had a detailed conversation with Justice Bernstein who has been referenced once in this thread. Another judge, who has MS and is not blind but nonetheless may have useful insights about serving as a judge with a disability is 9th circuit judge Ronald Gould. The IDAP series features his interview as well. 3. I have the contact details of these judges and would be happy to put you in touch with any of them, should you wish. Best, Rahul On 21/03/2019, James T. Fetter via BlindLaw wrote: > Elizabeth, > > First of all, congratulations! We are in desperate need of more judges > with visible disabilities, including blindness; the relative lack of > resources on accessibility for blind judges indicates as much. I also > externed, but I mainly just assisted with writing opinions. I interacted > with ECF and my state Supreme Court's web-based public docket, both of > which were accessible. I thus am unfortunately not much help on how to > handle all the paper that is likely to be flying around in your courtroom. > > > On 3/21/2019 1:16 PM, Elizabeth Rene via BlindLaw wrote: > >> Hello list mates, >> I have just been invited to interview for the position of judge/magistrate >> pro tempore in the Seattle Municipal Court. This is the busiest Municipal >> Court in my state. I’m excited about this because I served the court as an >> assistant city prosecutor years ago. >> Back in the day, I have a little hope of ever serving as an SMC judge pro >> tem because I didn’t expect it information system to be accessible to me. >> I’m taking the plunge now and hoping there’s better technology on offer. >> (I’ve prepared for pro tem service by taking CLEs presented by my state’s >> association of district and municipal court judges, getting onto the >> state-wide pro tem registry, serving on my state’s Commission on >> judicial conduct and court rules committee, and trying to stay current on >> criminal law & procedure and evidence. I’ve also been an ALJ and presided >> at character & fitness hearings for my bar association.) >> My question to you all is, are there any blind judges out there who use >> electronic information technology in the courtroom? Has it been accessible >> to you? If not, how do you find out what you need to know in real time? >> How do you make entries were necessary. Have your clerks been helpful to >> you? >> Seattle municipal court calendars are heavy, with vigorous motion >> practice, jury trials, bench calendars, night court, and in-and out of >> custody arraignments. The SMC includes a mental health court, a drug >> court, a domestic violence court, and a veterans‘ court to provide >> enhanced services to these offender populations. There is some civil >> jurisdiction too. The magistrates under its supervision handle traffic >> infractions and civil municipal code violations that can involve complex >> fact situations and initial legal rulings. If any blind judges have any >> tips at all for me about anything to do with being a judge, I’d be very >> grateful to learn them. >> Being on the State pro tem registry allows me to preside anywhere in >> Washington if the court needs assistance. So I can gain experience in tiny >> jurisdictions as well as in this major metropolis. If anyone knows a blind >> judge, either inside or outside of the NFB, please pass their name along. >> Many thanks! >> Elizabeth >> >> >> >> Elizabeth M René >> Attorney at Law >> WSBA #10710 >> KCBA #21824 >> rene0373 at gmail.com >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jtfetter%40yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/rahul.bajaj1038%40gmail.com > -- -- Rahul Bajaj Candidate for the BCL Rhodes Scholar (India and Linacre 2018) University of Oxford From dlmlaw at sbcglobal.net Sun Mar 24 20:58:16 2019 From: dlmlaw at sbcglobal.net (Daniel McBride) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 15:58:16 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] About the Robles v. Dominos Case In-Reply-To: <078b01d4e25c$323acd10$96b06730$@labarrelaw.com> References: <078b01d4e25c$323acd10$96b06730$@labarrelaw.com> Message-ID: <008501d4e284$4e7248a0$eb56d9e0$@sbcglobal.net> Scott: Thank you for posting the attachment of the Robles opinion and the link to the oral arguments. I have taken the time to read the opinion and listen to the oral arguments. There are several axioms in life to come to mind in considering the Robles matter. First is that bad case facts make for bad case law. Next is that you might win the battle yet lose the war. Finally, one should be careful what one asks for because you just might get it. Like Mr. Robles, I am blind. Like Mr. Robles, I have occasion to order Domino's pizza. When I am aware that Domino's has a pizza special going that applies to "on-line" orders only, I call Domino's on the phone. I advise them that I am a blind person and cannot access their "on-line" only special. Not once has Domino's ever denied me their "on-line only" special price via the phone. Every time, I get my pizza and get it at the "on-line" only price. And I am willing to wager that Domino's would do this for all blind persons. What concerns me about the Robles case, and any similar case, is the potential for untenable results for violating all three of the above tenets. I think the Robles case carries the potential for bad case law, that it might not be the wisest choice of battles to pick in the war and that one just might get what they asked for. Along with Shannon Geistler, I was completely unaware of the World Wide Web Consortium, and WCAG, until Mitchell's post yesterday and your post today. So I did a little research on W3C. As of today, it has 452 members. I have looked at the entire list. It is replete with Fortune 500 giants and includes the likes of Facebook, Google and Thompson Reuters, all of whom I have issues with. Another red flag is that the Electronic Frontier Foundation withdrew its membership in 2017, over differences with the group. I can tell you that I would much rather call Domino's on the phone and be given the "on-line only" special price than to trust the W3C with setting standards that would affect my life. But, as stated earlier, if you ask for it you just might get it. I shall certainly monitor to see how Robles develops, but, if Mr. Robles has picked the wrong battle and it results in bad case law, Robles (and the rest of us) is sure to get what he asked for. This concludes my rant. Kindest regards, Daniel McBride Fort Worth, Texas -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott C. LaBarre via BlindLaw Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2019 11:11 AM To: 'Blind Law Mailing List' Cc: Scott C. LaBarre Subject: [blindlaw] About the Robles v. Dominos Case Hello Everyone, there has been some discussion about the Robles case. The NFB has been heavily involved in this matter. Jessie Webber of Brown, Goldstein, and Levy argued before the 9th Circuit for 13 amici which included the NFB. You can watch the oral arguments here: https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/view_video.php?pk_vid=0000014434 I have also attached the 9th Circuit ruling which is at issue. We are closely monitoring this matter and will continue participating as an amicus. I suspect that there is a very small chance that the Supreme Court will grant cert in this matter. Best, Scott From lmendez716 at gmail.com Mon Mar 25 14:35:13 2019 From: lmendez716 at gmail.com (Luis Mendez) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:35:13 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] About the Robles v. Dominos Case In-Reply-To: <008501d4e284$4e7248a0$eb56d9e0$@sbcglobal.net> References: <078b01d4e25c$323acd10$96b06730$@labarrelaw.com> <008501d4e284$4e7248a0$eb56d9e0$@sbcglobal.net> Message-ID: <00aa01d4e317$f5956a70$e0c03f50$@gmail.com> Dear Daniel: I am certain that some retailers remain willing to provide alternative telephone access. After all, that is just good customer service. However, telephone access to many services is increasingly difficult to get. Moreover, the point of the Robles litigation, as I understand it, is furthering enablement of unassisted access to E-commerce, which is increasingly the dominant means for conducting business. It is unlikely that the Robles litigation will eliminate the requirement that e-commerce access be linked to brick-and-mortar establishments, but a successful outcome may spur further action to address that increasingly Archaic distinction. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Daniel McBride via BlindLaw Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2019 4:58 PM To: slabarre at labarrelaw.com; 'Blind Law Mailing List' Cc: Daniel McBride Subject: Re: [blindlaw] About the Robles v. Dominos Case Scott: Thank you for posting the attachment of the Robles opinion and the link to the oral arguments. I have taken the time to read the opinion and listen to the oral arguments. There are several axioms in life to come to mind in considering the Robles matter. First is that bad case facts make for bad case law. Next is that you might win the battle yet lose the war. Finally, one should be careful what one asks for because you just might get it. Like Mr. Robles, I am blind. Like Mr. Robles, I have occasion to order Domino's pizza. When I am aware that Domino's has a pizza special going that applies to "on-line" orders only, I call Domino's on the phone. I advise them that I am a blind person and cannot access their "on-line" only special. Not once has Domino's ever denied me their "on-line only" special price via the phone. Every time, I get my pizza and get it at the "on-line" only price. And I am willing to wager that Domino's would do this for all blind persons. What concerns me about the Robles case, and any similar case, is the potential for untenable results for violating all three of the above tenets. I think the Robles case carries the potential for bad case law, that it might not be the wisest choice of battles to pick in the war and that one just might get what they asked for. Along with Shannon Geistler, I was completely unaware of the World Wide Web Consortium, and WCAG, until Mitchell's post yesterday and your post today. So I did a little research on W3C. As of today, it has 452 members. I have looked at the entire list. It is replete with Fortune 500 giants and includes the likes of Facebook, Google and Thompson Reuters, all of whom I have issues with. Another red flag is that the Electronic Frontier Foundation withdrew its membership in 2017, over differences with the group. I can tell you that I would much rather call Domino's on the phone and be given the "on-line only" special price than to trust the W3C with setting standards that would affect my life. But, as stated earlier, if you ask for it you just might get it. I shall certainly monitor to see how Robles develops, but, if Mr. Robles has picked the wrong battle and it results in bad case law, Robles (and the rest of us) is sure to get what he asked for. This concludes my rant. Kindest regards, Daniel McBride Fort Worth, Texas -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott C. LaBarre via BlindLaw Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2019 11:11 AM To: 'Blind Law Mailing List' Cc: Scott C. LaBarre Subject: [blindlaw] About the Robles v. Dominos Case Hello Everyone, there has been some discussion about the Robles case. The NFB has been heavily involved in this matter. Jessie Webber of Brown, Goldstein, and Levy argued before the 9th Circuit for 13 amici which included the NFB. You can watch the oral arguments here: https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/view_video.php?pk_vid=0000014434 I have also attached the 9th Circuit ruling which is at issue. We are closely monitoring this matter and will continue participating as an amicus. I suspect that there is a very small chance that the Supreme Court will grant cert in this matter. Best, Scott _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/lmendez716%40gmail.com From rthomas48 at gmail.com Tue Mar 26 11:08:41 2019 From: rthomas48 at gmail.com (Roderick Thomas) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 07:08:41 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] question Message-ID: <384e155e-81dd-db1e-ee54-65ac489e883c@gmail.com> Hey Guys, I am getting ready to graduate in a couple of months. I will be the first blind or vision impaired student to graduate in my law school history. I would like to be a public defender after law school, but I do not know that many blind lawyers that are public defenders. Also, I will not be able to attend the convention in Las Vegas this year because I will be studding for the bar exam. Does anyone know of any blind lawyers that work in a public defender’s office? I would like to call and speak with them if possible? I would like to know what problems they faced in working as a blind lawyer in the public defender’s office. Also, I would like to know how they are currently overcoming their problems. From rthomas48 at gmail.com Tue Mar 26 11:29:12 2019 From: rthomas48 at gmail.com (Roderick Thomas) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 07:29:12 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] contact information Message-ID: Hey guys, I forgot to put my contact information in my email regarding the public defender office question. Please forgive me. My email address is rthomas48 at gmail.com. Sincerely,, Roderick Thomas From davant1958 at gmail.com Tue Mar 26 11:56:14 2019 From: davant1958 at gmail.com (Denise R Avant) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:56:14 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] question In-Reply-To: <384e155e-81dd-db1e-ee54-65ac489e883c@gmail.com> References: <384e155e-81dd-db1e-ee54-65ac489e883c@gmail.com> Message-ID: There are at least three assistant public defenders who are on this list or members of NFB. are you wanting to do trial work appellate work or post conviction work? Denise R. Avant President National Federation of the Blind of Illinois Live the life you want Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 26, 2019, at 6:08 AM, Roderick Thomas via BlindLaw wrote: > > Hey Guys, I am getting ready to graduate in a couple of months. I will be the first blind or vision impaired student to graduate in my law school history. I would like to be a public defender after law school, but I do not know that many blind lawyers that are public defenders. Also, I will not be able to attend the convention in Las Vegas this year because I will be studding for the bar exam. Does anyone know of any blind lawyers that work in a public defender’s office? I would like to call and speak with them if possible? I would like to know what problems they faced in working as a blind lawyer in the public defender’s office. Also, I would like to know how they are currently overcoming their problems. > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/davant1958%40gmail.com From rthomas48 at gmail.com Tue Mar 26 13:33:22 2019 From: rthomas48 at gmail.com (Roderick Thomas) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:33:22 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] question In-Reply-To: References: <384e155e-81dd-db1e-ee54-65ac489e883c@gmail.com> Message-ID: I would like to do trial work. On 3/26/2019 7:56 AM, Denise R Avant via BlindLaw wrote: > There are at least three assistant public defenders who are on this list or members of NFB. are you wanting to do trial work appellate work or post conviction work? > > Denise R. Avant > President > National Federation of the Blind of Illinois > Live the life you want > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 26, 2019, at 6:08 AM, Roderick Thomas via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> Hey Guys, I am getting ready to graduate in a couple of months. I will be the first blind or vision impaired student to graduate in my law school history. I would like to be a public defender after law school, but I do not know that many blind lawyers that are public defenders. Also, I will not be able to attend the convention in Las Vegas this year because I will be studding for the bar exam. Does anyone know of any blind lawyers that work in a public defender’s office? I would like to call and speak with them if possible? I would like to know what problems they faced in working as a blind lawyer in the public defender’s office. Also, I would like to know how they are currently overcoming their problems. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/davant1958%40gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/rthomas48%40gmail.com From davant1958 at gmail.com Tue Mar 26 13:54:55 2019 From: davant1958 at gmail.com (davant1958 at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:54:55 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] question In-Reply-To: References: <384e155e-81dd-db1e-ee54-65ac489e883c@gmail.com> Message-ID: <00aa01d4e3db$7f128490$7d378db0$@gmail.com> I have sent you the name of someone who does it now. Denise R. Avant, Esq. President, National Federation of the Blind of Illinois 773-991-8050 Live the life you want. For more information about NFBI, Go to www.nfbofillinois.org -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Roderick Thomas via BlindLaw Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 8:33 AM To: Denise R Avant via BlindLaw Cc: Roderick Thomas Subject: Re: [blindlaw] question I would like to do trial work. On 3/26/2019 7:56 AM, Denise R Avant via BlindLaw wrote: > There are at least three assistant public defenders who are on this list or members of NFB. are you wanting to do trial work appellate work or post conviction work? > > Denise R. Avant > President > National Federation of the Blind of Illinois Live the life you want > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 26, 2019, at 6:08 AM, Roderick Thomas via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> Hey Guys, I am getting ready to graduate in a couple of months. I will be the first blind or vision impaired student to graduate in my law school history. I would like to be a public defender after law school, but I do not know that many blind lawyers that are public defenders. Also, I will not be able to attend the convention in Las Vegas this year because I will be studding for the bar exam. Does anyone know of any blind lawyers that work in a public defender’s office? I would like to call and speak with them if possible? I would like to know what problems they faced in working as a blind lawyer in the public defender’s office. Also, I would like to know how they are currently overcoming their problems. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/davant1958%40gm >> ail.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/rthomas48%40gmai > l.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/davant1958%40gmail.com From awildheir at gmail.com Tue Mar 26 22:59:31 2019 From: awildheir at gmail.com (Aimee Harwood) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:59:31 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Domino's To Ask Supreme Court To Consider Whether ADA Website/Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuits Violate Due Process | ADA Title III Message-ID: Hey guys, I'm sure you guys probably are aware of this. I just wanted to toss it out there on the small chance you hadn't heard. I don't think it would be a violation of due process. Obviously, they make the company aware and give them time to correct the issue before filing a lawsuit. I would think they should be aware of the ADA by now. Therefore, they should know to make sure each facet of their business meets the standard. But, that's just me.when does the ADA become something a reasonable person should already know? https://www.adatitleiii.com/2019/03/dominos-to-ask-supreme-court-to-consider-whether-ada-website-mobile-app-accessibility-lawsuits-violate-due-process/ Aimee Sent from my iPhone From kelbycarlson at gmail.com Wed Mar 27 15:33:21 2019 From: kelbycarlson at gmail.com (Kelby Carlson) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:33:21 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Getting Practice Books for Offline Reading Message-ID: All, Have any of you found avenues for getting standard practice books in accessible formats that can be read offline and not just in Westlaw or Lexis? I am speaking of actual practice books such as West's Standard Practice by state, not hornbooks better suited for law school. It would be very helpful to have at least some resources like this that I can use without the internet. I have not had luck finding them on Bookshare. Currently I work in the criminal field. Are there any particular treatises for practice anyone in that field has found indispensable? -- Kelby Carlson From NSingh at cov.com Wed Mar 27 15:51:12 2019 From: NSingh at cov.com (Singh, Nandini) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:51:12 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Getting Practice Books for Offline Reading In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <23dd0d1e12da40b7a9bbd5a8b4bb2b44@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Other than requesting your firm to scan in a treatise, I am not sure that I am aware of accessible, offline equivalents. To your second question, I work in white collar criminal defense, and I know that we often consult the two-volume ABA treatise on privilege and work product, which is on Lexis. We also spend plenty of time in the DOJ USAM that has been revised and renamed to the Justice Manual. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Kelby Carlson via BlindLaw Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:33 AM To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org Cc: Kelby Carlson Subject: [blindlaw] Getting Practice Books for Offline Reading All, Have any of you found avenues for getting standard practice books in accessible formats that can be read offline and not just in Westlaw or Lexis? I am speaking of actual practice books such as West's Standard Practice by state, not hornbooks better suited for law school. It would be very helpful to have at least some resources like this that I can use without the internet. I have not had luck finding them on Bookshare. Currently I work in the criminal field. Are there any particular treatises for practice anyone in that field has found indispensable? -- Kelby Carlson _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com From ttomasi at driowa.org Wed Mar 27 16:09:10 2019 From: ttomasi at driowa.org (Tai Tomasi) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:09:10 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Getting Practice Books for Offline Reading In-Reply-To: <23dd0d1e12da40b7a9bbd5a8b4bb2b44@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> References: <23dd0d1e12da40b7a9bbd5a8b4bb2b44@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: You could also ask your employer to purchase a digital version of a particular treatise from the publisher for your use. I haven't needed to purchase one in several years, but in the past, West was good about providing accessible versions. Tai Tomasi, J.D. Pronouns: she/her/hers Staff Attorney 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Tel: 515-278-2502 x15; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org http://driowa.org/ Our Mission:  To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans with disabilities CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any printouts. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 10:51 AM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Singh, Nandini Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Getting Practice Books for Offline Reading Other than requesting your firm to scan in a treatise, I am not sure that I am aware of accessible, offline equivalents. To your second question, I work in white collar criminal defense, and I know that we often consult the two-volume ABA treatise on privilege and work product, which is on Lexis. We also spend plenty of time in the DOJ USAM that has been revised and renamed to the Justice Manual. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Kelby Carlson via BlindLaw Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:33 AM To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org Cc: Kelby Carlson Subject: [blindlaw] Getting Practice Books for Offline Reading All, Have any of you found avenues for getting standard practice books in accessible formats that can be read offline and not just in Westlaw or Lexis? I am speaking of actual practice books such as West's Standard Practice by state, not hornbooks better suited for law school. It would be very helpful to have at least some resources like this that I can use without the internet. I have not had luck finding them on Bookshare. Currently I work in the criminal field. Are there any particular treatises for practice anyone in that field has found indispensable? -- Kelby Carlson _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org From kelbycarlson at gmail.com Wed Mar 27 16:12:42 2019 From: kelbycarlson at gmail.com (Kelby Carlson) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 12:12:42 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Getting Practice Books for Offline Reading In-Reply-To: References: <23dd0d1e12da40b7a9bbd5a8b4bb2b44@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: We actually have a subscription to West in our office and West provided me with their criminal statute book, so they may be willing to provide me with the treatises I'm looking for. On 3/27/19, Tai Tomasi via BlindLaw wrote: > You could also ask your employer to purchase a digital version of a > particular treatise from the publisher for your use. I haven't needed to > purchase one in several years, but in the past, West was good about > providing accessible versions. > > Tai Tomasi, J.D. > Pronouns: she/her/hers > Staff Attorney > > > > 400 East Court Ave., Ste. 300 > Des Moines, Iowa 50309 > Tel: 515-278-2502 x15; Toll Free: 1-800-779-2502 > FAX: 515-278-0539; Relay 711 > E-mail: ttomasi at driowa.org > http://driowa.org/ > > Our Mission:  To defend and promote the human and legal rights of Iowans > with disabilities > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of > Disability Rights Iowa and are intended solely for the use of the named > recipient(s). This e-mail may contain privileged attorney-client > communications or work product. Any dissemination by anyone other than an > intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are > prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or from > making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you have received this > e-mail in error, notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail, any > attachments, and all copies from any drives or storage media and destroy any > printouts. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via > BlindLaw > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 10:51 AM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Singh, Nandini > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Getting Practice Books for Offline Reading > > Other than requesting your firm to scan in a treatise, I am not sure that I > am aware of accessible, offline equivalents. > > To your second question, I work in white collar criminal defense, and I know > that we often consult the two-volume ABA treatise on privilege and work > product, which is on Lexis. We also spend plenty of time in the DOJ USAM > that has been revised and renamed to the Justice Manual. > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Kelby > Carlson via BlindLaw > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:33 AM > To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org > Cc: Kelby Carlson > Subject: [blindlaw] Getting Practice Books for Offline Reading > > All, > > Have any of you found avenues for getting standard practice books in > accessible formats that can be read offline and not just in Westlaw or > Lexis? I am speaking of actual practice books such as West's Standard > Practice by state, not hornbooks better suited for law school. It would be > very helpful to have at least some resources like this that I can use > without the internet. I have not had luck finding them on Bookshare. > > Currently I work in the criminal field. Are there any particular treatises > for practice anyone in that field has found indispensable? > > > > -- > Kelby Carlson > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ttomasi%40driowa.org > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/kelbycarlson%40gmail.com > -- Kelby Carlson From BrianUnitt at holsteinlaw.com Wed Mar 27 21:44:56 2019 From: BrianUnitt at holsteinlaw.com (Brian Unitt) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 21:44:56 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In-Reply-To: <5d51ad00-bda7-4d0c-b34e-473cc27179bf@HUB030-VA-5.exch030.domain.local> References: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <52BCEA16-9606-4D79-8934-69893B7D6159@gmail.com> <7FB38E4A-1B95-4624-9F15-CF3051D4BCFD@holsteinlaw.com> <85e8decf268d4f17a1de20aea3870ecf@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <4A95BD82E7BAD44D9AEB0A8A59AA51140C3D2C6F@MBX030-E1-VA-6.exch030.domain.local> <5d51ad00-bda7-4d0c-b34e-473cc27179bf@HUB030-VA-5.exch030.domain.local> Message-ID: <4A95BD82E7BAD44D9AEB0A8A59AA51140C3D9A41@MBX030-E1-VA-6.exch030.domain.local> In my previous response to this thread, I failed to mention that I use the text.westlaw.com version of the Westlaw site, and maybe that is why I don’t have the problem of losing my place on the page. Hope that might help. Brian Brian C. Unitt Certified Specialist in Appellate Law The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization Holstein, Taylor and Unitt A Professional Corporation 4300 Latham Street, Suite 103 Riverside, CA 92501 Tel: 951-682-7030 Fax: 951-684-8061 www.holsteinlaw.com mailto:brianunitt at holsteinlaw.com From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 4:45 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Michal Nowicki Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page I experience this issue from time to time. I set JAWS placemarkers to be safe. As for reading cases on Westlaw, I prefer to read them on the website, because I can jump quickly between footnotes and text most easily that way thanks to the hyperlinks. Michal Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Brian Unitt via BlindLaw Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 12:56 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Brian Unitt Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page Yes, Chrome now works with JAWS. It used to be terrible, but now it is my default browser. Brian Brian C. Unitt Certified Specialist, Appellate Law The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization Holstein, Taylor and Unitt A Professional Corporation 4300 Latham Street, Suite 103 Riverside, CA 92501 Tel: 951-682-7030 Fax: 951-684-8061 www.holsteinlaw.com mailto:brianunitt at holsteinlaw.com From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 8:52 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Singh, Nandini Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page I am using IE 11 and JAWS 2018. Does JAWS now work with Chrome? -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian Unitt via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 7:40 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Brian Unitt Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page What browser are you using? I am using chrome with the latest update for JAWS 2019, and I am not experiencing that problem. Brian Sent from my iPhone On Mar 21, 2019, at 3:48 PM, Jen Barrow via BlindLaw > wrote: Hi Nikki, Yes, I experience the same problem as you described. It’s very frustrating when I’m looking at a case on Westlaw and I switch over to word to write some notes, and then the JAWS focus is back at the top when I return to IE. I also started to notice this rather recently… But I can’t remember when. Jen Sent from my iPhone *This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately and delete all copies of this message. > On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:56 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: > > I guess I can place a bookmark where the main content begins. I am often jumping back and forth between a case and a wordprocessor, so having multiple bookmarks may be impractical as I continue reading through the case. > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott Greenblatt via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:52 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Scott Greenblatt > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page > > I’m not sure why you’re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can give you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or placeholder whatever it’s called into the webpage before you switch out by using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it should > > Sincerely, > Scott Greenblatt Esq. > 914-274f-0232 > sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: >> >> I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. any ideas would be appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> Nikki >> >> >> Nandini Singh >> >> Covington & Burling LLP >> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >> T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com >> www.cov.com >> >> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sgreenblatt76%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jlynnbarrow%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com ________________________________ _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com ________________________________ _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com ________________________________ From NSingh at cov.com Wed Mar 27 21:50:39 2019 From: NSingh at cov.com (Singh, Nandini) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 21:50:39 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In-Reply-To: <4A95BD82E7BAD44D9AEB0A8A59AA51140C3D9A41@MBX030-E1-VA-6.exch030.domain.local> References: <94b2fdb8f5ed4704aba4600e728c2662@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <52BCEA16-9606-4D79-8934-69893B7D6159@gmail.com> <7FB38E4A-1B95-4624-9F15-CF3051D4BCFD@holsteinlaw.com> <85e8decf268d4f17a1de20aea3870ecf@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <4A95BD82E7BAD44D9AEB0A8A59AA51140C3D2C6F@MBX030-E1-VA-6.exch030.domain.local> <5d51ad00-bda7-4d0c-b34e-473cc27179bf@HUB030-VA-5.exch030.domain.local> <4A95BD82E7BAD44D9AEB0A8A59AA51140C3D9A41@MBX030-E1-VA-6.exch030.domain.local> Message-ID: <1c8b64b01ec54c6298cd0b37bb507186@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Understood. I am beginning to suspect that it is an issue with the browser, so since I am due for a new laptop with updated firm image, I can switch over to JAWS 2019 and the latest version of Chrome. I am hoping these updates will do the trick. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian Unitt via BlindLaw Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 5:45 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Brian Unitt Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page In my previous response to this thread, I failed to mention that I use the text.westlaw.com version of the Westlaw site, and maybe that is why I don’t have the problem of losing my place on the page. Hope that might help. Brian Brian C. Unitt Certified Specialist in Appellate Law The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization Holstein, Taylor and Unitt A Professional Corporation 4300 Latham Street, Suite 103 Riverside, CA 92501 Tel: 951-682-7030 Fax: 951-684-8061 www.holsteinlaw.com mailto:brianunitt at holsteinlaw.com From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Michal Nowicki via BlindLaw Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 4:45 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Michal Nowicki Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page I experience this issue from time to time. I set JAWS placemarkers to be safe. As for reading cases on Westlaw, I prefer to read them on the website, because I can jump quickly between footnotes and text most easily that way thanks to the hyperlinks. Michal Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Brian Unitt via BlindLaw Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 12:56 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Brian Unitt Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page Yes, Chrome now works with JAWS. It used to be terrible, but now it is my default browser. Brian Brian C. Unitt Certified Specialist, Appellate Law The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization Holstein, Taylor and Unitt A Professional Corporation 4300 Latham Street, Suite 103 Riverside, CA 92501 Tel: 951-682-7030 Fax: 951-684-8061 www.holsteinlaw.com mailto:brianunitt at holsteinlaw.com From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 8:52 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Singh, Nandini Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page I am using IE 11 and JAWS 2018. Does JAWS now work with Chrome? -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian Unitt via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 7:40 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Brian Unitt Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page What browser are you using? I am using chrome with the latest update for JAWS 2019, and I am not experiencing that problem. Brian Sent from my iPhone On Mar 21, 2019, at 3:48 PM, Jen Barrow via BlindLaw > wrote: Hi Nikki, Yes, I experience the same problem as you described. It’s very frustrating when I’m looking at a case on Westlaw and I switch over to word to write some notes, and then the JAWS focus is back at the top when I return to IE. I also started to notice this rather recently… But I can’t remember when. Jen Sent from my iPhone *This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately and delete all copies of this message. > On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:56 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: > > I guess I can place a bookmark where the main content begins. I am often jumping back and forth between a case and a wordprocessor, so having multiple bookmarks may be impractical as I continue reading through the case. > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott Greenblatt via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:52 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Scott Greenblatt > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page > > I’m not sure why you’re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can give you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or placeholder whatever it’s called into the webpage before you switch out by using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it should > > Sincerely, > Scott Greenblatt Esq. > 914-274f-0232 > sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: >> >> I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. any ideas would be appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> Nikki >> >> >> Nandini Singh >> >> Covington & Burling LLP >> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >> T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com >> www.cov.com >> >> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sgreenblatt76%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jlynnbarrow%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com ________________________________ _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com ________________________________ _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com ________________________________ _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com From NSingh at cov.com Thu Mar 28 14:34:58 2019 From: NSingh at cov.com (Singh, Nandini) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:34:58 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App Message-ID: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Does anyone happen to know how accessible the encrypted messaging app Signal is for iPhone? I shall find out soon enough when I install it this weekend, but I thought I would still ask here. Regards, Nikki Nandini Singh Covington & Burling LLP One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001-4956 T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com www.cov.com This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. From cannona at fireantproductions.com Thu Mar 28 14:40:26 2019 From: cannona at fireantproductions.com (Aaron Cannon) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:40:26 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App In-Reply-To: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> References: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: It's quite accessible. I use it every day on my iPhone. The desktop app is also not too bad. Good luck. Aaron On 3/28/19, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw wrote: > Does anyone happen to know how accessible the encrypted messaging app Signal > is for iPhone? I shall find out soon enough when I install it this weekend, > but I thought I would still ask here. > > Regards, > Nikki > > > Nandini Singh > > Covington & Burling LLP > One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW > Washington, DC 20001-4956 > T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com > www.cov.com > > This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is > confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, > please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has > been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your > system. Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantproductions.com > From NSingh at cov.com Thu Mar 28 14:55:58 2019 From: NSingh at cov.com (Singh, Nandini) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:55:58 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App In-Reply-To: References: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: That is good to hear. I have to do it for work. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Cannon via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 10:40 AM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Aaron Cannon Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App It's quite accessible. I use it every day on my iPhone. The desktop app is also not too bad. Good luck. Aaron On 3/28/19, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw wrote: > Does anyone happen to know how accessible the encrypted messaging app Signal > is for iPhone? I shall find out soon enough when I install it this weekend, > but I thought I would still ask here. > > Regards, > Nikki > > > Nandini Singh > > Covington & Burling LLP > One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW > Washington, DC 20001-4956 > T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com > www.cov.com > > This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is > confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, > please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has > been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your > system. Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantproductions.com > _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com From howardadelsberg at gmail.com Thu Mar 28 14:59:08 2019 From: howardadelsberg at gmail.com (Howard Adelsberg) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:59:08 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App In-Reply-To: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> References: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: <4080117E-86C6-4E87-8928-D9042D1B4F52@gmail.com> What is it? > On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw wrote: > > Does anyone happen to know how accessible the encrypted messaging app Signal is for iPhone? I shall find out soon enough when I install it this weekend, but I thought I would still ask here. > > Regards, > Nikki > > > Nandini Singh > > Covington & Burling LLP > One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW > Washington, DC 20001-4956 > T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com > www.cov.com > > This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/howard.adelsberg%40gmail.com From NSingh at cov.com Thu Mar 28 15:01:49 2019 From: NSingh at cov.com (Singh, Nandini) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:01:49 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App In-Reply-To: <4080117E-86C6-4E87-8928-D9042D1B4F52@gmail.com> References: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <4080117E-86C6-4E87-8928-D9042D1B4F52@gmail.com> Message-ID: I have not used it yet, but my understanding is that it is an application to facilitate encrypted communication, both calls and text messaging. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Howard Adelsberg via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 10:59 AM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Howard Adelsberg Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App What is it? > On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw wrote: > > Does anyone happen to know how accessible the encrypted messaging app Signal is for iPhone? I shall find out soon enough when I install it this weekend, but I thought I would still ask here. > > Regards, > Nikki > > > Nandini Singh > > Covington & Burling LLP > One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW > Washington, DC 20001-4956 > T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com > www.cov.com > > This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/howard.adelsberg%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com From howardadelsberg at gmail.com Thu Mar 28 15:03:50 2019 From: howardadelsberg at gmail.com (Howard Adelsberg) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 11:03:50 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App In-Reply-To: References: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <4080117E-86C6-4E87-8928-D9042D1B4F52@gmail.com> Message-ID: It sounds similar to WhatsApp > On Mar 28, 2019, at 11:01 AM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw wrote: > > I have not used it yet, but my understanding is that it is an application to facilitate encrypted communication, both calls and text messaging. > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Howard Adelsberg via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 10:59 AM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Howard Adelsberg > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App > > What is it? > >> On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> Does anyone happen to know how accessible the encrypted messaging app Signal is for iPhone? I shall find out soon enough when I install it this weekend, but I thought I would still ask here. >> >> Regards, >> Nikki >> >> >> Nandini Singh >> >> Covington & Burling LLP >> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >> T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com >> www.cov.com >> >> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/howard.adelsberg%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/howardadelsberg%40gmail.com From amatney at loeb.com Thu Mar 28 15:06:42 2019 From: amatney at loeb.com (Angela Matney) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:06:42 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App In-Reply-To: References: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <4080117E-86C6-4E87-8928-D9042D1B4F52@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1BAC65FD6F6D1140A9F58F9D21A1A539245E0BD5@SM-EXMAIL03.loeb.com> This is correct. I don’t have any experience with the desktop version, but I’ve used the mobile version for calls and texts, and it’s quite accessible. The company also seems to be at least somewhat committed to maintaining accessibility. In the notes for a recent update to the mobile app, they mentioned that they had made improvements for Voiceover users (sorry, I don’t remember exactly how the app was improved). Angie Angela Matney, CIPP/US Attorney at Law [Loeb & Loeb LLP] Loeb and Loeb, LLP 901 New York Avenue NW, Suite 300 East | Washington, DC 20001 Direct Dial: 202.618.5038 | Fax:202.403.3407 | E-mail:amatney at loeb.com8 Los Angeles | New York | Chicago | Nashville | Washington, DC | San Francisco | Beijing | Hong Kong | www.loeb.com ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender. Please destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you, Loeb & Loeb LLP. ________________________________ From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 11:02 AM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Singh, Nandini Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App I have not used it yet, but my understanding is that it is an application to facilitate encrypted communication, both calls and text messaging. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Howard Adelsberg via BlindLaw Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 10:59 AM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Howard Adelsberg Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App What is it? > On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > wrote: > > Does anyone happen to know how accessible the encrypted messaging app Signal is for iPhone? I shall find out soon enough when I install it this weekend, but I thought I would still ask here. > > Regards, > Nikki > > > Nandini Singh > > Covington & Burling LLP > One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW > Washington, DC 20001-4956 > T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com > www.cov.com > > This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/howard.adelsberg%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/amatney%40loeb.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2157 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov Thu Mar 28 19:01:48 2019 From: Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov (Nightingale, Noel) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:01:48 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Diversity Notification References: <1032682437.369044.1553758654379.JavaMail.careerconnector@mgsapps.monster.com> Message-ID: From: Jobs [mailto:jobs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Maurer, Patricia via Jobs Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 5:15 AM To: 'jobs at nfbnet.org' Cc: Maurer, Patricia Subject: [Jobs] FW: Diversity Notification -----Original Message----- From: careerconnector at monstergovt.com [mailto:careerconnector at monstergovt.com] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 3:38 AM To: Maurer, Patricia Subject: Diversity Notification National Federation of the Blind Sir/Madam Dear Sir/Madam: Your organization and its members might be interested in the following vacancy announcement: Announcement Number: ATTY-MB-2019-001 Vacancy Description: Attorney-Advisor (General) (GS-905) Open Period: 03/27/2019 to 04/17/2019 Series/Grade: GS-0905B Attorney Advisor-11/12/13/14 Salary: (USD) $68,036 - (USD) $148,967 Hiring Agency: Federal Communications Commission Duty Location: District of Columbia, DC, US For more information, please visit the vacancy announcement located at https://careerconnector.jobs.treas.gov/cc/fcc/vacancy/viewVacancyDetail!execute.hms?orgId=1751&jnum=175739. Thank you. Human Resources Management Federal Communications Commission -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Jobs mailing list Jobs at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/jobs_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Jobs: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/jobs_nfbnet.org/noel.nightingale%40ed.gov From sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com Thu Mar 28 23:45:10 2019 From: sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com (Scott Greenblatt) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:45:10 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Social Security benefits representation Message-ID: I am a new attorney thinking of throwing my hat into this area of representation and I am hoping that members on this list can help give me some guidance. Please tell me how I might get started educating myself on carrying out this type of representation. Where can I go to study up on the process? Are the application documents in accessible format for me to help clients fill out? If not, what suggestions do you have to get an accessible copy of these application documents? Can you please explain to me what goes into developing this type of case and what documentation must be gathered to prove someone’s disability? I know that even with a lawyer’s help that very few cases will receive benefits after the initial application, so what goes into the appellate process of these cases? If I’ve done my due diligence and gathered all the necessary documentation to submit with the initial application is there nothing more to do then get it before an administrative law judge to argue the case? I would also like to know how the practitioners on this list charge for these types of services. All advice will be greatly appreciated as I dearly need some mentoring help. Sincerely, Scott Greenblatt Esq. 914-274f-0232 sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com Sent from my iPhone From laura.wolk at gmail.com Fri Mar 29 01:24:01 2019 From: laura.wolk at gmail.com (Laura Wolk) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 21:24:01 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] slightly off-topic: Braille display to borrow? Message-ID: Hi all, My very old Focus 40 classic has suddenly stopped working. I have a super important brief due next week, and Braille is my go-to for proofing and editing. Though I am getting more comfortable using Jaws sound schemes, I am a Braille reader through and through. If anyone has a Braille display they either don't use or could part with temporarily while I purchase a new one, please contact me off-list. I will pay for shipping, insurance, etc. Thanks! On 3/27/19, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw wrote: > Understood. I am beginning to suspect that it is an issue with the browser, > so since I am due for a new laptop with updated firm image, I can switch > over to JAWS 2019 and the latest version of Chrome. I am hoping these > updates will do the trick. > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian Unitt > via BlindLaw > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 5:45 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Brian Unitt > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page > > In my previous response to this thread, I failed to mention that I use the > text.westlaw.com version of the Westlaw site, and maybe that is why I don’t > have the problem of losing my place on the page. Hope that might help. > > Brian > Brian C. Unitt > Certified Specialist in Appellate Law > The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization > > Holstein, Taylor and Unitt > A Professional Corporation > 4300 Latham Street, Suite 103 > Riverside, CA 92501 > Tel: 951-682-7030 > Fax: 951-684-8061 > www.holsteinlaw.com > mailto:brianunitt at holsteinlaw.com > > From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Michal Nowicki via > BlindLaw > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 4:45 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Michal Nowicki > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page > > I experience this issue from time to time. I set JAWS placemarkers to be > safe. > > As for reading cases on Westlaw, I prefer to read them on the website, > because I can jump quickly between footnotes and text most easily that way > thanks to the hyperlinks. > > Michal > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > From: Brian Unitt via BlindLaw > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 12:56 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Brian Unitt > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page > > Yes, Chrome now works with JAWS. It used to be terrible, but now it is my > default browser. > > Brian > Brian C. Unitt > Certified Specialist, Appellate Law > The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization > > Holstein, Taylor and Unitt > A Professional Corporation > 4300 Latham Street, Suite 103 > Riverside, CA 92501 > Tel: 951-682-7030 > Fax: 951-684-8061 > www.holsteinlaw.com > mailto:brianunitt at holsteinlaw.com > > From: BlindLaw > On > Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 8:52 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > > Cc: Singh, Nandini > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page > > I am using IE 11 and JAWS 2018. Does JAWS now work with Chrome? > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian Unitt > via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 7:40 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Brian Unitt > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page > > What browser are you using? I am using chrome with the latest update for > JAWS 2019, and I am not experiencing that problem. > Brian > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 21, 2019, at 3:48 PM, Jen Barrow via BlindLaw > > > wrote: > > Hi Nikki, > > Yes, I experience the same problem as you described. It’s very frustrating > when I’m looking at a case on Westlaw and I switch over to word to write > some notes, and then the JAWS focus is back at the top when I return to IE. > I also started to notice this rather recently… But I can’t remember when. > > Jen > > > Sent from my iPhone > > *This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If > you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately and delete > all copies of this message. > >> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:56 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >> > >> wrote: >> >> I guess I can place a bookmark where the main content begins. I am often >> jumping back and forth between a case and a wordprocessor, so having >> multiple bookmarks may be impractical as I continue reading through the >> case. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott >> Greenblatt via BlindLaw >> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:52 PM >> To: Blind Law Mailing List >> Cc: Scott Greenblatt >> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page >> >> I’m not sure why you’re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can give >> you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or >> placeholder whatever it’s called into the webpage before you switch out by >> using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on >> the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit >> the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this >> helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it >> should >> >> Sincerely, >> Scott Greenblatt Esq. >> 914-274f-0232 >> sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >>> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work >>> online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or >>> whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I >>> bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on >>> the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to >>> say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off >>> my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web >>> page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the >>> meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it >>> was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not >>> sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before. >>> I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not >>> remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop. >>> any ideas would be appreciated. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Nikki >>> >>> >>> Nandini Singh >>> >>> Covington & Burling LLP >>> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >>> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >>> T +1 202 662 5113 | >>> nsingh at cov.com >>> www.cov.com >>> >>> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is >>> confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended >>> recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this >>> message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail >>> from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>> BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sgreenblatt76%40gmail.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jlynnbarrow%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com > ________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com > > ________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com > > ________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/laura.wolk%40gmail.com > From wickps at gmail.com Fri Mar 29 01:58:21 2019 From: wickps at gmail.com (Paul Wick) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 18:58:21 -0700 Subject: [blindlaw] Social Security benefits representation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0BFC419D-AE0C-4232-BA53-C4CF646C263D@gmail.com> Dear Scott, I’ve been involved in Assisting SSA claimants in one way or another for most of the last eight years. Everything you could possibly want to know about the process is on the agency website www.ssa.gov. The first thing to know about the process is that how much you can charge and what you can charge for is regulated by statute and The code of federal regulations. You cannot charge an hourly rate for anything, and can only collect A contingent fee of 25% of the claimants past due benefits (I.e. 1/4 of the lump sum benefit check that the claimant receives representing benefits paid from the time SSA determines their disability onset and the approval of their application, subject to time limitations. As such, you have to be able to live on credit cards or other sources as the administrative process does not result in regular payouts even if you win most of your cases unless you have a critical mass of them. Nearly all relevant SSA paperwork can be done online. A larger issue in accessing claimants medical records which are often handwritten. SSA produced an electronic file using TIF files which are unreadable by screen readers. If you like helping people as much as, or more than the law; this can be a great area; just be aware that even in smaller cities there are already usually half a dozen people already doing it; often paired with doing workers comp. I personally only take cases at the appellate level, as I feel like at the initial application stage, there is no legal skill involved, and your just taking people’s money to act as a scribe. Hope this helps, Paul Wick Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 28, 2019, at 4:45 PM, Scott Greenblatt via BlindLaw wrote: > > I am a new attorney thinking of throwing my hat into this area of representation and I am hoping that members on this list can help give me some guidance. Please tell me how I might get started educating myself on carrying out this type of representation. Where can I go to study up on the process? Are the application documents in accessible format for me to help clients fill out? If not, what suggestions do you have to get an accessible copy of these application documents? Can you please explain to me what goes into developing this type of case and what documentation must be gathered to prove someone’s disability? I know that even with a lawyer’s help that very few cases will receive benefits after the initial application, so what goes into the appellate process of these cases? If I’ve done my due diligence and gathered all the necessary documentation to submit with the initial application is there nothing more to do then get it before an administrative law judge to argue the case? I would also like to know how the practitioners on this list charge for these types of services. All advice will be greatly appreciated as I dearly need some mentoring help. > > Sincerely, > Scott Greenblatt Esq. > 914-274f-0232 > sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com > Sent from my iPhone > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/wickps%40gmail.com From sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com Fri Mar 29 14:15:14 2019 From: sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com (Scott Greenblatt) Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 10:15:14 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Social Security benefits representation In-Reply-To: <0BFC419D-AE0C-4232-BA53-C4CF646C263D@gmail.com> References: <0BFC419D-AE0C-4232-BA53-C4CF646C263D@gmail.com> Message-ID: Good morning Paul. Thank you so much for all of the very useful information. I didn’t know about the contingency fee basis of these cases being regulated by the government. I live in Tampa Florida and I know that there are certainly firms in my area who do this work, but I don’t think there are any firms in my area who do this work by a lawyer with a disability like me. I think that I will take your advice and focus my efforts on the appellate level because there’s no reason for me to do scribe work for an initial application. Thank you also for the warning about the inaccessible documents I will have to deal with. I think that I will have to use AIRA to help me interpret those documents that my computer will not read me. I can always have those agents transcribe the documents into an email for me to review. This way I can operate as independently as possible without having to rely on assistance from someone with sight around me. Sincerely, Scott Greenblatt Esq. 914-274f-0232 sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 28, 2019, at 9:58 PM, Paul Wick via BlindLaw wrote: > > Dear Scott, > > I’ve been involved in Assisting SSA claimants in one way or another for most of the last eight years. Everything you could possibly want to know about the process is on the agency website www.ssa.gov. The first thing to know about the process is that how much you can charge and what you can charge for is regulated by statute and The code of federal regulations. You cannot charge an hourly rate for anything, and can only collect A contingent fee of 25% of the claimants past due benefits (I.e. 1/4 of the lump sum benefit check that the claimant receives representing benefits paid from the time SSA determines their disability onset and the approval of their application, subject to time limitations. As such, you have to be able to live on credit cards or other sources as the administrative process does not result in regular payouts even if you win most of your cases unless you have a critical mass of them. > Nearly all relevant SSA paperwork can be done online. A larger issue in accessing claimants medical records which are often handwritten. SSA produced an electronic file using TIF files which are unreadable by screen readers. > If you like helping people as much as, or more than the law; this can be a great area; just be aware that even in smaller cities there are already usually half a dozen people already doing it; often paired with doing workers comp. > I personally only take cases at the appellate level, as I feel like at the initial application stage, there is no legal skill involved, and your just taking people’s money to act as a scribe. > Hope this helps, > > Paul Wick > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 28, 2019, at 4:45 PM, Scott Greenblatt via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> I am a new attorney thinking of throwing my hat into this area of representation and I am hoping that members on this list can help give me some guidance. Please tell me how I might get started educating myself on carrying out this type of representation. Where can I go to study up on the process? Are the application documents in accessible format for me to help clients fill out? If not, what suggestions do you have to get an accessible copy of these application documents? Can you please explain to me what goes into developing this type of case and what documentation must be gathered to prove someone’s disability? I know that even with a lawyer’s help that very few cases will receive benefits after the initial application, so what goes into the appellate process of these cases? If I’ve done my due diligence and gathered all the necessary documentation to submit with the initial application is there nothing more to do then get it before an administrative law judge to argue the case? I would also like to know how the practitioners on this list charge for these types of services. All advice will be greatly appreciated as I dearly need some mentoring help. >> >> Sincerely, >> Scott Greenblatt Esq. >> 914-274f-0232 >> sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com >> Sent from my iPhone >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/wickps%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sgreenblatt76%40gmail.com From laura.wolk at gmail.com Fri Mar 29 15:08:36 2019 From: laura.wolk at gmail.com (Laura Wolk) Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:08:36 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] slightly off-topic: Braille display to borrow? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear all, Thanks to everyone who has reached out. This community is truly something special, and I am so grateful to be a part of it. If all goes well, I will shortly have a temporary replacement, so I think I'm good here. Happy Friday (and briefwriting!) to all. Laura On 3/28/19, Laura Wolk wrote: > Hi all, > > My very old Focus 40 classic has suddenly stopped working. I have a > super important brief due next week, and Braille is my go-to for > proofing and editing. Though I am getting more comfortable using Jaws > sound schemes, I am a Braille reader through and through. If anyone > has a Braille display they either don't use or could part with > temporarily while I purchase a new one, please contact me off-list. I > will pay for shipping, insurance, etc. > > Thanks! > > > > On 3/27/19, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw wrote: >> Understood. I am beginning to suspect that it is an issue with the >> browser, >> so since I am due for a new laptop with updated firm image, I can switch >> over to JAWS 2019 and the latest version of Chrome. I am hoping these >> updates will do the trick. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian >> Unitt >> via BlindLaw >> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 5:45 PM >> To: Blind Law Mailing List >> Cc: Brian Unitt >> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page >> >> In my previous response to this thread, I failed to mention that I use >> the >> text.westlaw.com version of the Westlaw site, and maybe that is why I >> don’t >> have the problem of losing my place on the page. Hope that might help. >> >> Brian >> Brian C. Unitt >> Certified Specialist in Appellate Law >> The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization >> >> Holstein, Taylor and Unitt >> A Professional Corporation >> 4300 Latham Street, Suite 103 >> Riverside, CA 92501 >> Tel: 951-682-7030 >> Fax: 951-684-8061 >> www.holsteinlaw.com >> mailto:brianunitt at holsteinlaw.com >> >> From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Michal Nowicki >> via >> BlindLaw >> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 4:45 PM >> To: Blind Law Mailing List >> Cc: Michal Nowicki >> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page >> >> I experience this issue from time to time. I set JAWS placemarkers to be >> safe. >> >> As for reading cases on Westlaw, I prefer to read them on the website, >> because I can jump quickly between footnotes and text most easily that >> way >> thanks to the hyperlinks. >> >> Michal >> >> Sent from Mail for Windows 10 >> >> From: Brian Unitt via BlindLaw >> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 12:56 PM >> To: Blind Law Mailing List >> Cc: Brian Unitt >> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page >> >> Yes, Chrome now works with JAWS. It used to be terrible, but now it is my >> default browser. >> >> Brian >> Brian C. Unitt >> Certified Specialist, Appellate Law >> The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization >> >> Holstein, Taylor and Unitt >> A Professional Corporation >> 4300 Latham Street, Suite 103 >> Riverside, CA 92501 >> Tel: 951-682-7030 >> Fax: 951-684-8061 >> www.holsteinlaw.com >> mailto:brianunitt at holsteinlaw.com >> >> From: BlindLaw >> On >> Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 8:52 PM >> To: Blind Law Mailing List >> >> Cc: Singh, Nandini >> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page >> >> I am using IE 11 and JAWS 2018. Does JAWS now work with Chrome? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian >> Unitt >> via BlindLaw >> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 7:40 PM >> To: Blind Law Mailing List >> Cc: Brian Unitt >> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page >> >> What browser are you using? I am using chrome with the latest update for >> JAWS 2019, and I am not experiencing that problem. >> Brian >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Mar 21, 2019, at 3:48 PM, Jen Barrow via BlindLaw >> > >> wrote: >> >> Hi Nikki, >> >> Yes, I experience the same problem as you described. It’s very >> frustrating >> when I’m looking at a case on Westlaw and I switch over to word to write >> some notes, and then the JAWS focus is back at the top when I return to >> IE. >> I also started to notice this rather recently… But I can’t remember when. >> >> Jen >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> *This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information. >> If >> you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately and >> delete >> all copies of this message. >> >>> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:56 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >>> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> I guess I can place a bookmark where the main content begins. I am often >>> jumping back and forth between a case and a wordprocessor, so having >>> multiple bookmarks may be impractical as I continue reading through the >>> case. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott >>> Greenblatt via BlindLaw >>> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:52 PM >>> To: Blind Law Mailing List >>> Cc: Scott Greenblatt >>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page >>> >>> I’m not sure why you’re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can >>> give >>> you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or >>> placeholder whatever it’s called into the webpage before you switch out >>> by >>> using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on >>> the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit >>> the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this >>> helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it >>> should >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> Scott Greenblatt Esq. >>> 914-274f-0232 >>> sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work >>>> online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or >>>> whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When >>>> I >>>> bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place >>>> on >>>> the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to >>>> say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left >>>> off >>>> my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web >>>> page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the >>>> meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where >>>> it >>>> was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am >>>> not >>>> sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen >>>> before. >>>> I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not >>>> remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my >>>> laptop. >>>> any ideas would be appreciated. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Nikki >>>> >>>> >>>> Nandini Singh >>>> >>>> Covington & Burling LLP >>>> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >>>> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >>>> T +1 202 662 5113 | >>>> nsingh at cov.com >>>> www.cov.com >>>> >>>> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is >>>> confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended >>>> recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that >>>> this >>>> message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this >>>> e-mail >>>> from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> BlindLaw mailing list >>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>>> BlindLaw: >>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sgreenblatt76%40gmail.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>> BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>> BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jlynnbarrow%40gmail.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com >> ________________________________ >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com >> >> ________________________________ >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com >> >> ________________________________ >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/laura.wolk%40gmail.com >> > From daniellemorones at icloud.com Fri Mar 29 15:25:28 2019 From: daniellemorones at icloud.com (daniellemorones) Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 08:25:28 -0700 Subject: [blindlaw] slightly off-topic: Braille display to borrow? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I have a blue focus 14 Bluetooth refreshable Braille display  -------- Original message --------From: Laura Wolk via BlindLaw Date: 3/28/19 6:24 PM (GMT-08:00) To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Laura Wolk Subject: [blindlaw] slightly off-topic: Braille display to borrow? Hi all,My very old Focus 40 classic has suddenly stopped working.  I have asuper important brief due next week, and Braille is my go-to forproofing and editing.  Though I am getting more comfortable using Jawssound schemes, I am a Braille reader through and through.  If anyonehas a Braille display they either don't use or could part withtemporarily while I purchase a new one, please contact me off-list.  Iwill pay for shipping, insurance, etc.Thanks!On 3/27/19, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw wrote:> Understood. I am beginning to suspect that it is an issue with the browser,> so since I am due for a new laptop with updated firm image, I can switch> over to JAWS 2019 and the latest version of Chrome. I am hoping these> updates will do the trick.>> -----Original Message-----> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian Unitt> via BlindLaw> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 5:45 PM> To: Blind Law Mailing List> Cc: Brian Unitt> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page>> In my previous response to this thread, I failed to mention that I use the> text.westlaw.com version of the Westlaw site, and maybe that is why I don’t> have the problem of losing my place on the page. Hope that might help.>> Brian> Brian C. Unitt> Certified Specialist in Appellate Law> The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization>> Holstein, Taylor and Unitt> A Professional Corporation> 4300 Latham Street, Suite 103> Riverside, CA 92501> Tel: 951-682-7030> Fax: 951-684-8061> www.holsteinlaw.com> mailto:brianunitt at holsteinlaw.com>> From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Michal Nowicki via> BlindLaw> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 4:45 PM> To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Michal Nowicki > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page>> I experience this issue from time to time. I set JAWS placemarkers to be> safe.>> As for reading cases on Westlaw, I prefer to read them on the website,> because I can jump quickly between footnotes and text most easily that way> thanks to the hyperlinks.>> Michal>> Sent from Mail for Windows 10>> From: Brian Unitt via BlindLaw> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 12:56 PM> To: Blind Law Mailing List> Cc: Brian Unitt> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page>> Yes, Chrome now works with JAWS. It used to be terrible, but now it is my> default browser.>> Brian> Brian C. Unitt> Certified Specialist, Appellate Law> The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization>> Holstein, Taylor and Unitt> A Professional Corporation> 4300 Latham Street, Suite 103> Riverside, CA 92501> Tel: 951-682-7030> Fax: 951-684-8061> www.holsteinlaw.com> mailto:brianunitt at holsteinlaw.com>> From: BlindLaw> On> Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 8:52 PM> To: Blind Law Mailing List> > Cc: Singh, Nandini > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page>> I am using IE 11 and JAWS 2018. Does JAWS now work with Chrome?>> -----Original Message-----> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Brian Unitt> via BlindLaw> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 7:40 PM> To: Blind Law Mailing List> Cc: Brian Unitt> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page>> What browser are you using? I am using chrome with the latest update for> JAWS 2019, and I am not experiencing that problem.> Brian>> Sent from my iPhone>> On Mar 21, 2019, at 3:48 PM, Jen Barrow via BlindLaw> >> wrote:>> Hi Nikki,>> Yes, I experience the same problem as you described. It’s very frustrating> when I’m looking at a case on Westlaw and I switch over to word to write> some notes, and then the JAWS focus is back at the top when I return to IE.> I also started to notice this rather recently… But I can’t remember when.>> Jen>>> Sent from my iPhone>> *This message may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If> you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately and delete> all copies of this message.>>> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:56 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw>> >>> wrote:>>>> I guess I can place a bookmark where the main content begins. I am often>> jumping back and forth between a case and a wordprocessor, so having>> multiple bookmarks may be impractical as I continue reading through the>> case.>>>> -----Original Message----->> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Scott>> Greenblatt via BlindLaw>> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:52 PM>> To: Blind Law Mailing List>> Cc: Scott Greenblatt>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Losing Place on Web Page>>>> I’m not sure why you’re having this problem but as a JAWS user I can give>> you one solution that might help. You can put a temporary bookmark or>> placeholder whatever it’s called into the webpage before you switch out by>> using a controlled windows K command. This way if you lose your focus on>> the webpage when you go back into that window all you have to do is hit>> the letter K and it will bring you back to where you belong. I hope this>> helps you and fixes the problem until JAWS starts behaving the way it>> should>>>> Sincerely,>> Scott Greenblatt Esq.>> 914-274f-0232>> sgreenblatt76 at gmail.com>> Sent from my iPhone>>>>> On Mar 21, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw>>> >>>> wrote:>>>>>> I am wondering if others are experiencing this while conducting work>>> online. I am first on a given web page, maybe Westlaw, a treatise, or>>> whatever else. I then switch over to email or to a Word document. When I>>> bring my browser back into focus, JAWS appears to have lost its place on>>> the web page, and I am right back at the top of the page. Needless to>>> say, this is incredibly annoying, as I have to return to where I left off>>> my work. I guess I could always copy and paste the contents of the web>>> page to a separate Word document, which is my clumsy solution in the>>> meantime, but I am just puzzled why JAWS cannot seem to remember where it>>> was situated on the web page. I am not sure what is going on, so I am not>>> sure how to go about resolving this. However, this did not happen before.>>> I use JAWS 2018, IE 11 browser, and Windows 10, though I am not>>> remembering exactly which version of 10 the firm installed on my laptop.>>> any ideas would be appreciated.>>>>>> Regards,>>> Nikki>>>>>>>>> Nandini Singh>>>>>> Covington & Burling LLP>>> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW>>> Washington, DC 20001-4956>>> T +1 202 662 5113 |>>> nsingh at cov.com>>> www.cov.com>>>>>> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is>>> confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended>>> recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this>>> message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail>>> from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________>>> BlindLaw mailing list>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for>>> BlindLaw:>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sgreenblatt76%40gmail.com>>>> _______________________________________________>> BlindLaw mailing list>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for>> BlindLaw:>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com>> _______________________________________________>> BlindLaw mailing list>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for>> BlindLaw:>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jlynnbarrow%40gmail.com>> _______________________________________________> BlindLaw mailing list> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for> BlindLaw:> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com> ________________________________> _______________________________________________> BlindLaw mailing list> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for> BlindLaw:> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com> _______________________________________________> BlindLaw mailing list> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for> BlindLaw:> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com>> ________________________________> _______________________________________________> BlindLaw mailing list> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for> BlindLaw:> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mnowicki4%40icloud.com>> _______________________________________________> BlindLaw mailing list> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for> BlindLaw:> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/brianunitt%40holsteinlaw.com>> ________________________________> _______________________________________________> BlindLaw mailing list> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for> BlindLaw:> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com> _______________________________________________> BlindLaw mailing list> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for> BlindLaw:> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/laura.wolk%40gmail.com>_______________________________________________BlindLaw mailing listBlindLaw at nfbnet.orghttp://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.orgTo unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw:http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/daniellemorones%40icloud.com From gerard.sadlier at gmail.com Sat Mar 30 16:24:00 2019 From: gerard.sadlier at gmail.com (Gerard Sadlier) Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 16:24:00 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App In-Reply-To: <1BAC65FD6F6D1140A9F58F9D21A1A539245E0BD5@SM-EXMAIL03.loeb.com> References: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <4080117E-86C6-4E87-8928-D9042D1B4F52@gmail.com> <1BAC65FD6F6D1140A9F58F9D21A1A539245E0BD5@SM-EXMAIL03.loeb.com> Message-ID: Is it more secure/better than Whats App? On 3/28/19, Angela Matney via BlindLaw wrote: > This is correct. I don’t have any experience with the desktop version, but > I’ve used the mobile version for calls and texts, and it’s quite accessible. > The company also seems to be at least somewhat committed to maintaining > accessibility. In the notes for a recent update to the mobile app, they > mentioned that they had made improvements for Voiceover users (sorry, I > don’t remember exactly how the app was improved). > > Angie > > > Angela Matney, CIPP/US > Attorney at Law > [Loeb & Loeb LLP] > Loeb and Loeb, LLP > 901 New York Avenue NW, Suite 300 East | Washington, DC 20001 > Direct Dial: 202.618.5038 | Fax:202.403.3407 | > E-mail:amatney at loeb.com8 > Los Angeles | New York | Chicago | Nashville | Washington, DC | San > Francisco | Beijing | Hong Kong | www.loeb.com > > > ________________________________ > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files > or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential > information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, > distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to > this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this > transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender. Please destroy > the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in > any manner. Thank you, Loeb & Loeb LLP. > ________________________________ > From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via > BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 11:02 AM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Singh, Nandini > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App > > > > I have not used it yet, but my understanding is that it is an application to > facilitate encrypted communication, both calls and text messaging. > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Howard > Adelsberg via BlindLaw > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 10:59 AM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Howard Adelsberg > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App > > What is it? > >> On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >> > wrote: >> >> Does anyone happen to know how accessible the encrypted messaging app >> Signal is for iPhone? I shall find out soon enough when I install it this >> weekend, but I thought I would still ask here. >> >> Regards, >> Nikki >> >> >> Nandini Singh >> >> Covington & Burling LLP >> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >> T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com >> www.cov.com >> >> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is >> confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, >> please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has >> been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your >> system. Thank you for your cooperation. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/howard.adelsberg%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/amatney%40loeb.com > From cannona at fireantproductions.com Sun Mar 31 00:30:52 2019 From: cannona at fireantproductions.com (Aaron Cannon) Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:30:52 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App In-Reply-To: References: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <4080117E-86C6-4E87-8928-D9042D1B4F52@gmail.com> <1BAC65FD6F6D1140A9F58F9D21A1A539245E0BD5@SM-EXMAIL03.loeb.com> Message-ID: <18605DBD-F1B0-4A1A-B6C9-727B6FC6595F@fireantproductions.com> It's complicated. What's App uses the Signal protocol under the hood, or at least they claim to, so in that regard, they should have about the same security. That being said, Facebook owns What's App, and Whisper Communications owns Signal. When it comes to track records of privacy and security, Facebook does not win. In addition, Signal is open source, so there claims about security, can, and have been verified. What's App is closed source, so you have to take Facebooks word for it. For the above reasons, I prefer Signal, but I would not be too worried if I had to use What's App. Aaron -- This message was sent from a mobile device > On Mar 30, 2019, at 11:24, Gerard Sadlier via BlindLaw wrote: > > Is it more secure/better than Whats App? > >> On 3/28/19, Angela Matney via BlindLaw wrote: >> This is correct. I don’t have any experience with the desktop version, but >> I’ve used the mobile version for calls and texts, and it’s quite accessible. >> The company also seems to be at least somewhat committed to maintaining >> accessibility. In the notes for a recent update to the mobile app, they >> mentioned that they had made improvements for Voiceover users (sorry, I >> don’t remember exactly how the app was improved). >> >> Angie >> >> >> Angela Matney, CIPP/US >> Attorney at Law >> [Loeb & Loeb LLP] >> Loeb and Loeb, LLP >> 901 New York Avenue NW, Suite 300 East | Washington, DC 20001 >> Direct Dial: 202.618.5038 | Fax:202.403.3407 | >> E-mail:amatney at loeb.com8 >> Los Angeles | New York | Chicago | Nashville | Washington, DC | San >> Francisco | Beijing | Hong Kong | www.loeb.com >> >> >> ________________________________ >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files >> or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential >> information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended >> recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended >> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to >> this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this >> transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender. Please destroy >> the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in >> any manner. Thank you, Loeb & Loeb LLP. >> ________________________________ >> From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via >> BlindLaw >> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 11:02 AM >> To: Blind Law Mailing List >> Cc: Singh, Nandini >> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App >> >> >> >> I have not used it yet, but my understanding is that it is an application to >> facilitate encrypted communication, both calls and text messaging. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Howard >> Adelsberg via BlindLaw >> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 10:59 AM >> To: Blind Law Mailing List >> Cc: Howard Adelsberg >> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App >> >> What is it? >> >>> On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >>> > wrote: >>> >>> Does anyone happen to know how accessible the encrypted messaging app >>> Signal is for iPhone? I shall find out soon enough when I install it this >>> weekend, but I thought I would still ask here. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Nikki >>> >>> >>> Nandini Singh >>> >>> Covington & Burling LLP >>> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >>> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >>> T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com >>> www.cov.com >>> >>> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is >>> confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, >>> please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has >>> been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your >>> system. Thank you for your cooperation. >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>> BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/howard.adelsberg%40gmail.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/amatney%40loeb.com >> > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantproductions.com From NSingh at cov.com Sun Mar 31 01:32:27 2019 From: NSingh at cov.com (Singh, Nandini) Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 01:32:27 +0000 Subject: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App In-Reply-To: <18605DBD-F1B0-4A1A-B6C9-727B6FC6595F@fireantproductions.com> References: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <4080117E-86C6-4E87-8928-D9042D1B4F52@gmail.com> <1BAC65FD6F6D1140A9F58F9D21A1A539245E0BD5@SM-EXMAIL03.loeb.com> <18605DBD-F1B0-4A1A-B6C9-727B6FC6595F@fireantproductions.com> Message-ID: <0c9f5bb5891d4e34ba7dcddb0879e314@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Thanks for this explanation. I did not realize that Whisper owned Signal. For additional context, we have been requested to download Signal onto our phones by a client, which is a sovereign nation, so I can understand the preference for Signal over What's App. -----Original Message----- From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Cannon via BlindLaw Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 8:31 PM To: Blind Law Mailing List Cc: Aaron Cannon Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App It's complicated. What's App uses the Signal protocol under the hood, or at least they claim to, so in that regard, they should have about the same security. That being said, Facebook owns What's App, and Whisper Communications owns Signal. When it comes to track records of privacy and security, Facebook does not win. In addition, Signal is open source, so there claims about security, can, and have been verified. What's App is closed source, so you have to take Facebooks word for it. For the above reasons, I prefer Signal, but I would not be too worried if I had to use What's App. Aaron -- This message was sent from a mobile device > On Mar 30, 2019, at 11:24, Gerard Sadlier via BlindLaw wrote: > > Is it more secure/better than Whats App? > >> On 3/28/19, Angela Matney via BlindLaw wrote: >> This is correct. I don’t have any experience with the desktop version, but >> I’ve used the mobile version for calls and texts, and it’s quite accessible. >> The company also seems to be at least somewhat committed to maintaining >> accessibility. In the notes for a recent update to the mobile app, they >> mentioned that they had made improvements for Voiceover users (sorry, I >> don’t remember exactly how the app was improved). >> >> Angie >> >> >> Angela Matney, CIPP/US >> Attorney at Law >> [Loeb & Loeb LLP] >> Loeb and Loeb, LLP >> 901 New York Avenue NW, Suite 300 East | Washington, DC 20001 >> Direct Dial: 202.618.5038 | Fax:202.403.3407 | >> E-mail:amatney at loeb.com8 >> Los Angeles | New York | Chicago | Nashville | Washington, DC | San >> Francisco | Beijing | Hong Kong | www.loeb.com >> >> >> ________________________________ >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files >> or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential >> information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended >> recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended >> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to >> this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this >> transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender. Please destroy >> the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in >> any manner. Thank you, Loeb & Loeb LLP. >> ________________________________ >> From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via >> BlindLaw >> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 11:02 AM >> To: Blind Law Mailing List >> Cc: Singh, Nandini >> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App >> >> >> >> I have not used it yet, but my understanding is that it is an application to >> facilitate encrypted communication, both calls and text messaging. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Howard >> Adelsberg via BlindLaw >> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 10:59 AM >> To: Blind Law Mailing List >> Cc: Howard Adelsberg >> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App >> >> What is it? >> >>> On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >>> > wrote: >>> >>> Does anyone happen to know how accessible the encrypted messaging app >>> Signal is for iPhone? I shall find out soon enough when I install it this >>> weekend, but I thought I would still ask here. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Nikki >>> >>> >>> Nandini Singh >>> >>> Covington & Burling LLP >>> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >>> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >>> T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com >>> www.cov.com >>> >>> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is >>> confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, >>> please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has >>> been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your >>> system. Thank you for your cooperation. >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>> BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/howard.adelsberg%40gmail.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/amatney%40loeb.com >> > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantproductions.com _______________________________________________ BlindLaw mailing list BlindLaw at nfbnet.org http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com From cannona at fireantproductions.com Sun Mar 31 12:57:19 2019 From: cannona at fireantproductions.com (Aaron Cannon) Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 07:57:19 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App In-Reply-To: <0c9f5bb5891d4e34ba7dcddb0879e314@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> References: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <4080117E-86C6-4E87-8928-D9042D1B4F52@gmail.com> <1BAC65FD6F6D1140A9F58F9D21A1A539245E0BD5@SM-EXMAIL03.loeb.com> <18605DBD-F1B0-4A1A-B6C9-727B6FC6595F@fireantproductions.com> <0c9f5bb5891d4e34ba7dcddb0879e314@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: Smart folks. Aaron -- This message was sent from a mobile device > On Mar 30, 2019, at 20:32, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw wrote: > > Thanks for this explanation. I did not realize that Whisper owned Signal. > > For additional context, we have been requested to download Signal onto our phones by a client, which is a sovereign nation, so I can understand the preference for Signal over What's App. > > -----Original Message----- > From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Cannon via BlindLaw > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 8:31 PM > To: Blind Law Mailing List > Cc: Aaron Cannon > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App > > It's complicated. What's App uses the Signal protocol under the hood, or at least they claim to, so in that regard, they should have about the same security. That being said, Facebook owns What's App, and Whisper Communications owns Signal. When it comes to track records of privacy and security, Facebook does not win. In addition, Signal is open source, so there claims about security, can, and have been verified. What's App is closed source, so you have to take Facebooks word for it. > > For the above reasons, I prefer Signal, but I would not be too worried if I had to use What's App. > > Aaron > > -- > This message was sent from a mobile device > > >> On Mar 30, 2019, at 11:24, Gerard Sadlier via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> Is it more secure/better than Whats App? >> >>> On 3/28/19, Angela Matney via BlindLaw wrote: >>> This is correct. I don’t have any experience with the desktop version, but >>> I’ve used the mobile version for calls and texts, and it’s quite accessible. >>> The company also seems to be at least somewhat committed to maintaining >>> accessibility. In the notes for a recent update to the mobile app, they >>> mentioned that they had made improvements for Voiceover users (sorry, I >>> don’t remember exactly how the app was improved). >>> >>> Angie >>> >>> >>> Angela Matney, CIPP/US >>> Attorney at Law >>> [Loeb & Loeb LLP] >>> Loeb and Loeb, LLP >>> 901 New York Avenue NW, Suite 300 East | Washington, DC 20001 >>> Direct Dial: 202.618.5038 | Fax:202.403.3407 | >>> E-mail:amatney at loeb.com8 >>> Los Angeles | New York | Chicago | Nashville | Washington, DC | San >>> Francisco | Beijing | Hong Kong | www.loeb.com >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files >>> or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential >>> information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended >>> recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended >>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to >>> this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this >>> transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender. Please destroy >>> the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in >>> any manner. Thank you, Loeb & Loeb LLP. >>> ________________________________ >>> From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via >>> BlindLaw >>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 11:02 AM >>> To: Blind Law Mailing List >>> Cc: Singh, Nandini >>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App >>> >>> >>> >>> I have not used it yet, but my understanding is that it is an application to >>> facilitate encrypted communication, both calls and text messaging. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Howard >>> Adelsberg via BlindLaw >>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 10:59 AM >>> To: Blind Law Mailing List >>> Cc: Howard Adelsberg >>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App >>> >>> What is it? >>> >>>> On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> Does anyone happen to know how accessible the encrypted messaging app >>>> Signal is for iPhone? I shall find out soon enough when I install it this >>>> weekend, but I thought I would still ask here. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Nikki >>>> >>>> >>>> Nandini Singh >>>> >>>> Covington & Burling LLP >>>> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >>>> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >>>> T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com >>>> www.cov.com >>>> >>>> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is >>>> confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, >>>> please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has >>>> been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your >>>> system. Thank you for your cooperation. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> BlindLaw mailing list >>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>>> BlindLaw: >>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/howard.adelsberg%40gmail.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>> BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>> BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/amatney%40loeb.com >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantproductions.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantproductions.com From sy.hoekstra at gmail.com Sun Mar 31 17:31:45 2019 From: sy.hoekstra at gmail.com (Sybren Hoekstra) Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 13:31:45 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App In-Reply-To: References: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <4080117E-86C6-4E87-8928-D9042D1B4F52@gmail.com> <1BAC65FD6F6D1140A9F58F9D21A1A539245E0BD5@SM-EXMAIL03.loeb.com> <18605DBD-F1B0-4A1A-B6C9-727B6FC6595F@fireantproductions.com> <0c9f5bb5891d4e34ba7dcddb0879e314@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: Today is not great. Could we talk sometime tomorrow evening? Maybe around 730 Eastern time? Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 31, 2019, at 08:57, Aaron Cannon via BlindLaw wrote: > > Smart folks. > > Aaron > > -- > This message was sent from a mobile device > > >> On Mar 30, 2019, at 20:32, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw wrote: >> >> Thanks for this explanation. I did not realize that Whisper owned Signal. >> >> For additional context, we have been requested to download Signal onto our phones by a client, which is a sovereign nation, so I can understand the preference for Signal over What's App. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Cannon via BlindLaw >> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 8:31 PM >> To: Blind Law Mailing List >> Cc: Aaron Cannon >> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App >> >> It's complicated. What's App uses the Signal protocol under the hood, or at least they claim to, so in that regard, they should have about the same security. That being said, Facebook owns What's App, and Whisper Communications owns Signal. When it comes to track records of privacy and security, Facebook does not win. In addition, Signal is open source, so there claims about security, can, and have been verified. What's App is closed source, so you have to take Facebooks word for it. >> >> For the above reasons, I prefer Signal, but I would not be too worried if I had to use What's App. >> >> Aaron >> >> -- >> This message was sent from a mobile device >> >> >>> On Mar 30, 2019, at 11:24, Gerard Sadlier via BlindLaw wrote: >>> >>> Is it more secure/better than Whats App? >>> >>>> On 3/28/19, Angela Matney via BlindLaw wrote: >>>> This is correct. I don’t have any experience with the desktop version, but >>>> I’ve used the mobile version for calls and texts, and it’s quite accessible. >>>> The company also seems to be at least somewhat committed to maintaining >>>> accessibility. In the notes for a recent update to the mobile app, they >>>> mentioned that they had made improvements for Voiceover users (sorry, I >>>> don’t remember exactly how the app was improved). >>>> >>>> Angie >>>> >>>> >>>> Angela Matney, CIPP/US >>>> Attorney at Law >>>> [Loeb & Loeb LLP] >>>> Loeb and Loeb, LLP >>>> 901 New York Avenue NW, Suite 300 East | Washington, DC 20001 >>>> Direct Dial: 202.618.5038 | Fax:202.403.3407 | >>>> E-mail:amatney at loeb.com8 >>>> Los Angeles | New York | Chicago | Nashville | Washington, DC | San >>>> Francisco | Beijing | Hong Kong | www.loeb.com >>>> >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files >>>> or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential >>>> information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended >>>> recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended >>>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, >>>> distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to >>>> this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this >>>> transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender. Please destroy >>>> the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in >>>> any manner. Thank you, Loeb & Loeb LLP. >>>> ________________________________ >>>> From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, Nandini via >>>> BlindLaw >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 11:02 AM >>>> To: Blind Law Mailing List >>>> Cc: Singh, Nandini >>>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have not used it yet, but my understanding is that it is an application to >>>> facilitate encrypted communication, both calls and text messaging. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Howard >>>> Adelsberg via BlindLaw >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 10:59 AM >>>> To: Blind Law Mailing List >>>> Cc: Howard Adelsberg >>>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App >>>> >>>> What is it? >>>> >>>>> On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Does anyone happen to know how accessible the encrypted messaging app >>>>> Signal is for iPhone? I shall find out soon enough when I install it this >>>>> weekend, but I thought I would still ask here. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Nikki >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nandini Singh >>>>> >>>>> Covington & Burling LLP >>>>> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >>>>> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >>>>> T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com >>>>> www.cov.com >>>>> >>>>> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is >>>>> confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, >>>>> please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has >>>>> been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your >>>>> system. Thank you for your cooperation. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> BlindLaw mailing list >>>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>>>> BlindLaw: >>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/howard.adelsberg%40gmail.com >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> BlindLaw mailing list >>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>>> BlindLaw: >>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> BlindLaw mailing list >>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>>> BlindLaw: >>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/amatney%40loeb.com >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantproductions.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantproductions.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sy.hoekstra%40gmail.com From cannona at fireantproductions.com Sun Mar 31 20:48:13 2019 From: cannona at fireantproductions.com (Aaron Cannon) Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 15:48:13 -0500 Subject: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App In-Reply-To: References: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <4080117E-86C6-4E87-8928-D9042D1B4F52@gmail.com> <1BAC65FD6F6D1140A9F58F9D21A1A539245E0BD5@SM-EXMAIL03.loeb.com> <18605DBD-F1B0-4A1A-B6C9-727B6FC6595F@fireantproductions.com> <0c9f5bb5891d4e34ba7dcddb0879e314@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: Sorry, I'm confused. Are you requesting to meet via phone, or did you intend to send this email to someone else? Aaron On 3/31/19, Sybren Hoekstra via BlindLaw wrote: > Today is not great. Could we talk sometime tomorrow evening? Maybe around > 730 Eastern time? > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 31, 2019, at 08:57, Aaron Cannon via BlindLaw >> wrote: >> >> Smart folks. >> >> Aaron >> >> -- >> This message was sent from a mobile device >> >> >>> On Mar 30, 2019, at 20:32, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >>> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for this explanation. I did not realize that Whisper owned Signal. >>> >>> For additional context, we have been requested to download Signal onto >>> our phones by a client, which is a sovereign nation, so I can understand >>> the preference for Signal over What's App. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Aaron >>> Cannon via BlindLaw >>> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 8:31 PM >>> To: Blind Law Mailing List >>> Cc: Aaron Cannon >>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App >>> >>> It's complicated. What's App uses the Signal protocol under the hood, or >>> at least they claim to, so in that regard, they should have about the >>> same security. That being said, Facebook owns What's App, and Whisper >>> Communications owns Signal. When it comes to track records of privacy and >>> security, Facebook does not win. In addition, Signal is open source, so >>> there claims about security, can, and have been verified. What's App is >>> closed source, so you have to take Facebooks word for it. >>> >>> For the above reasons, I prefer Signal, but I would not be too worried if >>> I had to use What's App. >>> >>> Aaron >>> >>> -- >>> This message was sent from a mobile device >>> >>> >>>> On Mar 30, 2019, at 11:24, Gerard Sadlier via BlindLaw >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Is it more secure/better than Whats App? >>>> >>>>> On 3/28/19, Angela Matney via BlindLaw wrote: >>>>> This is correct. I don’t have any experience with the desktop version, >>>>> but >>>>> I’ve used the mobile version for calls and texts, and it’s quite >>>>> accessible. >>>>> The company also seems to be at least somewhat committed to maintaining >>>>> accessibility. In the notes for a recent update to the mobile app, they >>>>> mentioned that they had made improvements for Voiceover users (sorry, I >>>>> don’t remember exactly how the app was improved). >>>>> >>>>> Angie >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Angela Matney, CIPP/US >>>>> Attorney at Law >>>>> [Loeb & Loeb LLP] >>>>> Loeb and Loeb, LLP >>>>> 901 New York Avenue NW, Suite 300 East | Washington, DC 20001 >>>>> Direct Dial: 202.618.5038 | Fax:202.403.3407 | >>>>> E-mail:amatney at loeb.com8 >>>>> Los Angeles | New York | Chicago | Nashville | Washington, DC | San >>>>> Francisco | Beijing | Hong Kong | www.loeb.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, >>>>> files >>>>> or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential >>>>> information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended >>>>> recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended >>>>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, >>>>> distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached >>>>> to >>>>> this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this >>>>> transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender. Please >>>>> destroy >>>>> the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving >>>>> in >>>>> any manner. Thank you, Loeb & Loeb LLP. >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, >>>>> Nandini via >>>>> BlindLaw >>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 11:02 AM >>>>> To: Blind Law Mailing List >>>>> Cc: Singh, Nandini >>>>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I have not used it yet, but my understanding is that it is an >>>>> application to >>>>> facilitate encrypted communication, both calls and text messaging. >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Howard >>>>> Adelsberg via BlindLaw >>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 10:59 AM >>>>> To: Blind Law Mailing List >>>>> Cc: Howard Adelsberg >>>>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App >>>>> >>>>> What is it? >>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone happen to know how accessible the encrypted messaging app >>>>>> Signal is for iPhone? I shall find out soon enough when I install it >>>>>> this >>>>>> weekend, but I thought I would still ask here. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Nikki >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Nandini Singh >>>>>> >>>>>> Covington & Burling LLP >>>>>> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >>>>>> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >>>>>> T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com >>>>>> www.cov.com >>>>>> >>>>>> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is >>>>>> confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended >>>>>> recipient, >>>>>> please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message >>>>>> has >>>>>> been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your >>>>>> system. Thank you for your cooperation. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> BlindLaw mailing list >>>>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>>>>> BlindLaw: >>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/howard.adelsberg%40gmail.com >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> BlindLaw mailing list >>>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>>>> BlindLaw: >>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> BlindLaw mailing list >>>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>>>> BlindLaw: >>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/amatney%40loeb.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> BlindLaw mailing list >>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>>> BlindLaw: >>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantproductions.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>> BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>> BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantproductions.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sy.hoekstra%40gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for > BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantproductions.com > From sy.hoekstra at gmail.com Sun Mar 31 21:00:52 2019 From: sy.hoekstra at gmail.com (Sybren Hoekstra) Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 17:00:52 -0400 Subject: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App In-Reply-To: References: <3a2d9a85f2204bea9a87c620c3af26d4@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> <4080117E-86C6-4E87-8928-D9042D1B4F52@gmail.com> <1BAC65FD6F6D1140A9F58F9D21A1A539245E0BD5@SM-EXMAIL03.loeb.com> <18605DBD-F1B0-4A1A-B6C9-727B6FC6595F@fireantproductions.com> <0c9f5bb5891d4e34ba7dcddb0879e314@CBIvEX03eUS.cov.com> Message-ID: <2D99249B-5339-4C8B-9A58-13824B850297@gmail.com> The latter. Sorry for the confusion... Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 31, 2019, at 16:48, Aaron Cannon via BlindLaw wrote: > > Sorry, I'm confused. Are you requesting to meet via phone, or did you > intend to send this email to someone else? > > Aaron > >> On 3/31/19, Sybren Hoekstra via BlindLaw wrote: >> Today is not great. Could we talk sometime tomorrow evening? Maybe around >> 730 Eastern time? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Mar 31, 2019, at 08:57, Aaron Cannon via BlindLaw >>> wrote: >>> >>> Smart folks. >>> >>> Aaron >>> >>> -- >>> This message was sent from a mobile device >>> >>> >>>> On Mar 30, 2019, at 20:32, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks for this explanation. I did not realize that Whisper owned Signal. >>>> >>>> For additional context, we have been requested to download Signal onto >>>> our phones by a client, which is a sovereign nation, so I can understand >>>> the preference for Signal over What's App. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Aaron >>>> Cannon via BlindLaw >>>> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 8:31 PM >>>> To: Blind Law Mailing List >>>> Cc: Aaron Cannon >>>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App >>>> >>>> It's complicated. What's App uses the Signal protocol under the hood, or >>>> at least they claim to, so in that regard, they should have about the >>>> same security. That being said, Facebook owns What's App, and Whisper >>>> Communications owns Signal. When it comes to track records of privacy and >>>> security, Facebook does not win. In addition, Signal is open source, so >>>> there claims about security, can, and have been verified. What's App is >>>> closed source, so you have to take Facebooks word for it. >>>> >>>> For the above reasons, I prefer Signal, but I would not be too worried if >>>> I had to use What's App. >>>> >>>> Aaron >>>> >>>> -- >>>> This message was sent from a mobile device >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Mar 30, 2019, at 11:24, Gerard Sadlier via BlindLaw >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Is it more secure/better than Whats App? >>>>> >>>>>> On 3/28/19, Angela Matney via BlindLaw wrote: >>>>>> This is correct. I don’t have any experience with the desktop version, >>>>>> but >>>>>> I’ve used the mobile version for calls and texts, and it’s quite >>>>>> accessible. >>>>>> The company also seems to be at least somewhat committed to maintaining >>>>>> accessibility. In the notes for a recent update to the mobile app, they >>>>>> mentioned that they had made improvements for Voiceover users (sorry, I >>>>>> don’t remember exactly how the app was improved). >>>>>> >>>>>> Angie >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Angela Matney, CIPP/US >>>>>> Attorney at Law >>>>>> [Loeb & Loeb LLP] >>>>>> Loeb and Loeb, LLP >>>>>> 901 New York Avenue NW, Suite 300 East | Washington, DC 20001 >>>>>> Direct Dial: 202.618.5038 | Fax:202.403.3407 | >>>>>> E-mail:amatney at loeb.com8 >>>>>> Los Angeles | New York | Chicago | Nashville | Washington, DC | San >>>>>> Francisco | Beijing | Hong Kong | www.loeb.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, >>>>>> files >>>>>> or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential >>>>>> information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended >>>>>> recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended >>>>>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, >>>>>> distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached >>>>>> to >>>>>> this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this >>>>>> transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender. Please >>>>>> destroy >>>>>> the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving >>>>>> in >>>>>> any manner. Thank you, Loeb & Loeb LLP. >>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>> From: BlindLaw On Behalf Of Singh, >>>>>> Nandini via >>>>>> BlindLaw >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 11:02 AM >>>>>> To: Blind Law Mailing List >>>>>> Cc: Singh, Nandini >>>>>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I have not used it yet, but my understanding is that it is an >>>>>> application to >>>>>> facilitate encrypted communication, both calls and text messaging. >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: BlindLaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Howard >>>>>> Adelsberg via BlindLaw >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 10:59 AM >>>>>> To: Blind Law Mailing List >>>>>> Cc: Howard Adelsberg >>>>>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Signal iOS App >>>>>> >>>>>> What is it? >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Singh, Nandini via BlindLaw >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does anyone happen to know how accessible the encrypted messaging app >>>>>>> Signal is for iPhone? I shall find out soon enough when I install it >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> weekend, but I thought I would still ask here. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Nikki >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nandini Singh >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Covington & Burling LLP >>>>>>> One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW >>>>>>> Washington, DC 20001-4956 >>>>>>> T +1 202 662 5113 | nsingh at cov.com >>>>>>> www.cov.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is >>>>>>> confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended >>>>>>> recipient, >>>>>>> please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message >>>>>>> has >>>>>>> been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your >>>>>>> system. Thank you for your cooperation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> BlindLaw mailing list >>>>>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>>>>>> BlindLaw: >>>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/howard.adelsberg%40gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> BlindLaw mailing list >>>>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>>>>> BlindLaw: >>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> BlindLaw mailing list >>>>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>>>>> BlindLaw: >>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/amatney%40loeb.com >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> BlindLaw mailing list >>>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>>>> BlindLaw: >>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantproductions.com >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> BlindLaw mailing list >>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>>> BlindLaw: >>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/nsingh%40cov.com >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> BlindLaw mailing list >>>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>>> BlindLaw: >>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantproductions.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BlindLaw mailing list >>> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >>> BlindLaw: >>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sy.hoekstra%40gmail.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> BlindLaw mailing list >> BlindLaw at nfbnet.org >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for >> BlindLaw: >> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantproductions.com >> > > _______________________________________________ > BlindLaw mailing list > BlindLaw at nfbnet.org > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw: > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sy.hoekstra%40gmail.com