[blindLaw] FW: EEOC News: Mercy Medical Center To Pay $570, 000 To Settle EEOC Disability Discrimnation Lawsuit

Scott C. LaBarre slabarre at labarrelaw.com
Fri Sep 20 13:08:38 UTC 2019


Tim Elder and I have worked on this case since 2015 and it ended quite well this week with an excellent consent decree and substantial settlement.  They fired our client, Alina, because they believed it would have been too dangerous for a blind person to work in a kitchen.  

 

Best,

Scott

 

From: Linda Li <Linda.Li at eeoc.gov> 
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 11:35 AM
To: slabarre at labarrelaw.com
Subject: EEOC News: Mercy Medical Center To Pay $570,000 To Settle EEOC Disability Discrimnation Lawsuit

 




  <http://us.vocuspr.com/Publish/3573235/vcsPRAsset_3573235_122022_2ee93c25-d5ed-4dd9-9869-056ec99bf758_0.png> 




FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:    September 19, 2019

 

CONTACTS: Roberta Steele, Regional Attorney (415) 522-3011
Marcia Mitchell, Supervisory Trial Attorney (415) 522-3143
Ami Sanghvi, Senior Trial Attorney (415) 516-1939

 

 


MERCY MEDICAL CENTER TO PAY $570,000 TO SETTLE EEOC DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION LAWSUIT
Dignity Health Refused to Accommodate and Then Fired Employee With Vision Loss, Federal Agency Charged

 


REDDING, Calif. – Dignity Health, which operates Mercy Medical Center in Redding, Calif., will pay $570,000 and take important steps to prevent future discrimination to settle a disability dis­crimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency announced today. 

 

The EEOC’s suit charged that the medical center failed to accommodate Alina Sorling, a 10-year cafeteria employee who had survived a severe illness that left her with vision loss. Sorling’s work as a food service technician involved tasks such as cashiering, grilling, cleaning and stocking. In 2015, after a successful rehabilitation where she was trained to proficiency in kitchen skills, Sorling sought to return to work and informed her employer of multiple accommodations that she or the California Department of Rehabilitation could provide to allow her to perform her job duties. Dignity Health rejected the suggestions and fired Sorling. 

 

Such alleged conduct violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which prohibits employers from discriminating based on disability and requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to employees unless it would be an undue hardship. After an investigation by EEOC Investigators Patricia Finnegan and Malinda Tuazon and after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process, the EEOC filed suit (CIV# 3:18-cv-04135) in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Sorling was also independently represented by other counsel, Timothy Elder and Scott LaBarre.

 

The three-year consent decree settling the lawsuit provides $570,000 to Sorling in lost wages, compensatory damages and attorneys’ fees, and requires Dignity Health to update its policies, proce­dures and training. The company will provide anti-discrimination training to all leadership and emp­loyees; make its policies available to all employees; report to the EEOC all complaints of disability discrimination for the duration of the consent decree; and post a notice for employees about the decree and employees’ rights under federal law.

 

“Speaking out against discrimination at work is hard, but I am really glad I did,” said Sorling. “I am hopeful this settlement will help to make the medical center more open to workers with vision loss and other disabilities. I am thankful to the EEOC and my attorneys for standing by me and seeing this through.” 

 

“The EEOC commends Dignity Health for resolving this matter quickly and amicably and demonstrating its commitment to complying with the law,” said EEOC Regional Attorney Roberta Steele. “The company will ensure that it has effective policies and practices in place about the ADA and the processing of requests for reasonable accommodations that are communicated effectively to emp­loyees.”

 

EEOC Trial Attorney Ami Sanghvi said, “The ADA requires a two-way interactive process between the employer and employee. This consent decree provides for such a process, which will help all employees with disabilities who need reasonable accommodations to perform their jobs and stay employed.” 

 

EEOC Enforcement Manager Dana Johnson added, “Violations of the ADA continue to be a problem in today’s workplaces. Dignity Health worked collaboratively with the EEOC to resolve this lawsuit by a consent decree that shows its willingness to comply with the ADA.” 

 

According to company information, Dignity Health, headquartered in San Francisco, is the fifth-largest health system in the United States and comprises more than 60,000 caregivers and staff, deliver­ing care to communities across 21 states. Dignity Health is the largest hospital provider in California and operates Mercy Medical Center in Redding. 




The EEOC advances opportunity in the workplace by enforcing federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. More information is available at www.eeoc.gov <https://u7061146.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=84Em28S1K9SvtzcUtu04Etz-2FoVYnGkijOLsSWj4lafU-3D_-2BPR8hJ9LgnI-2Bx-2BIyI4VtXlHXLpNWhoMubQ1ReCW06WK9INeUKb0fnpSn0cb-2BdehmsTh8ESb8iLfH9343RicS0iUI-2FWhxr55qM-2BQ-2F-2B771CgdcA8ZTiZZl2X1jWgK4o1nDajg9kApwpHVi186fFGfBaRVfyd-2FQnRerl7JJe-2BavmiEwdPw4WlXatfp6h2F3xxRVc6shk7pciLRszQVpPd-2FCd4EAwSS2TVCxQA4-2F99tQ6KP4Zy50M1q4k1tXKEk1OIyphsV67kZR3Ge2YHfL-2BcrbK52DbKsG2pi-2Fol32PbdA3Vd9bKIW8ezGW3FD2XQDQYnI7dsOgQjZmtiE-2BDO8fEp25hRhtfhWnbcBTOlIZk3vWoM-3D> . Stay connected with the latest EEOC news by subscribing to our email updates.

# # #

 

If you would rather not receive future communications from Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, let us know by clicking here.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, San Francisco District Office 450 Golden Gate Avenue, POB 36025, 5th Floor West, San Francisco, CA 94102 United States

  <https://u7061146.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/open?upn=-2BPR8hJ9LgnI-2Bx-2BIyI4VtXlHXLpNWhoMubQ1ReCW06WK9INeUKb0fnpSn0cb-2BdehmsTh8ESb8iLfH9343RicS0iUI-2FWhxr55qM-2BQ-2F-2B771CgdcA8ZTiZZl2X1jWgK4o1nDajg9kApwpHVi186fFGfBaRVfyd-2FQnRerl7JJe-2BavmiEwdPw4WlXatfp6h2F3xxRVc6shk7pciLRszQVpPd-2FCd6g1DZlMNdapqOwYCFk-2BQwd7ffSrZcNDAyVwK-2BdHx1nl-2ByJb-2BMHtJTJi-2BGoeoP81poovmDTxR0boddkhqE2oaJjvrivh2PFMJBAmzURa-2BD3yt1jhd-2FmfBY-2BIE24EdtR9m7BZVqoD-2BseaWz6PFYQyeqc-3D> 




More information about the BlindLaw mailing list