[blindLaw] Increasing Efficiency in the Workplace

Mon Oct 14 00:45:19 UTC 2024

Hello,

The other thing to remember is that a case usually  discusses several different issues. Skipping the non-relevant issues discussed by the court and jumping to the relevant issue to your specific situation also helps cut down on time. For example, you are researching the basis for a traffic stop. The case you are reading discusses a Miranda rights issue, basis for a traffic stop, and a hearsay exception. You do not need to read about Miranda or the hearsay exception. I usually will read the facts, skimming through those facts that deal with the non-relevant issues. Then I jump to the issue relevant to my situation I.E. the basis for a traffic stop. Doing this cuts down on a lot of time.  

Garret 

James G. Mooney, Esq
President, Maryland Organization of Parents of Blind Children 
(480) 433-8003 
james.garret.mooney at gmail.com

-----Original Message-----
From: BlindLaw <blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org> On Behalf Of sbg sbgaal.com via BlindLaw
Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 7:55 AM
To: Blind Law Mailing List <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Cc: sbg sbgaal.com <sbg at sbgaal.com>
Subject: Re: [blindLaw] Increasing Efficiency in the Workplace

Defined command works well when looking for specific issues when I am reading a case to begin with, I put Asterix next to the points that I think I might end up signing too as far as briefing the case I do what I would call in an abbreviated briefing, I type out at the top of the case which basically is a sentence regarding the issues and the holding the citations I can do based on where I put the Asterix Shannon Brady Geihsler Law Office of Shannon Brady Geihsler, PLLC
1212 Texas Avenue
Lubbock, Texas 79401
Phone:  (806) 763-3999
Mobile:  (806) 781-9296
Fax: (806) 749-3752
E-Mail:  sbg at sbgaal.com
NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is protected by the attorney/client and/or the work/product privileges.  It along with any attachments here to, is also covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2512.  It is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named in the communication, and the privileges are not waived by virtue of this having been sent by electronic mail.  If the person actually receiving this communication or any other reader of the communication is not the named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (please call collect) and delete the original from your system.

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 8, 2024, at 9:32 PM, Julie A. Orozco via BlindLaw <blindlaw at nfbnet.org> wrote:

Hi everyone,

I hope the following question makes some sense. I have just started my first real attorney job out of law school. Although I'm enjoying the work and learning a lot in general, I'm also finding that my methods for doing research and completing work just don't seem as efficient as maybe I thought they were in law school. I am open to any suggestions you might have, but here are a few specific questions to start.

How do you avoid going back after you've written your memo or whatever and citing everything? When I do my research, I don't know which quotes and ideas will be helpful, and I don't want to pin-cite the entire case, especially if it's 30 pages. But going through later to find citations feels like such a drain on my time.

If you have a lot of research to do, and you don't need to read everything in a case to find what you want, how do you skim for it? I've thought of using the find command, going through the case to find headings, and just tracking the thread of the case to see when the relevant issues will be discussed. But I'm open to other strategies too.

When I read cases, I like to brief them because otherwise, I'll never remember them later if I don't. One of my colleagues suggested that might not be a good use of my time. Is briefing cases not a thing outside of law school? How else do people keep track of what they've read. I read so much every day that I'll never remember it all and put it in the correct context if I don't take notes in some way. I've also found that taking notes and summarizing things in my own words helps me process and comprehend what I read. But maybe there's something I'm missing?

Maybe this is because I started law school during the pandemic, or maybe I just didn't learn everything I could. (I was never on journal or anything like that.) But I wish I had better strategies for tracking research, citations, and skimming through very long cases for the right information. I use Jaws, just received a Mantis Braille display through my job, and don't have any issues with accessibility at present. I'm proficient with all my technology but not a tech master or anything.

Thanks for any suggestions. I am so grateful for my current position and really want to do well where I am.

Julie

_______________________________________________
BlindLaw mailing list
BlindLaw at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/sbg%40sbgaal.com
_______________________________________________
BlindLaw mailing list
BlindLaw at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlindLaw:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/james.garret.mooney%40gmail.com