[Blindmath] physics/mathematics problem; have a solution?
David Engebretson Jr.
davide at soundandscience.com
Mon Dec 19 20:57:53 UTC 2011
Okay, Michael.
Of course the pain has been sufficient enough for mme to avoid that in the
future. That has nothing to do with the mathematics behind the problem I
have stated.
The ground did not move when the 14" of my rib cage hit the rim of the
hole... My ribs simply contracted and made several large popping and
cracking sounds. The air was hence knocked out of my body. I could no
longer breathe.
Do you mind showing me an example in this context that would support your
arguement that an object of mass 'm' couldn't be stopped instantaneously by
slamming into point 'p'?
Thanks for your help in my understanding of your logic,
David
David Engebretson
Support at PeaceWeaverHosting.com - "We know what our name means"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Whapples" <mwhapples at aim.com>
To: "Blind Math list for those interested in mathematics"
<blindmath at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Blindmath] physics/mathematics problem; have a solution?
> The area of impact will have no influence on the force experienced, the
> area will determine what pressure is encountered. Whether force really
> determines the pain, may be not, the pressure might do that (standing on
> your feet doesn't hurt, however push a pin in your foot with much less
> force and that will hurt.
>
> I still think you probably need to know either the distance the mass is
> stopped over or the time to stop the mass. A wall or the ground which give
> very little (although small it may shift, think of how the ground can
> bump/vibrate as a heavy vehicle passes, e.g. a goods train passing through
> a rail station) will exert a greater force than something like a
> trampoline which gives a long way when you hit it and so is slowing you
> over a greater time or distance (slowing you down slower). Both time and
> distance could be very small (don't know exactly but may be microseconds
> or micro-metres), but a zero time or distance will lead to an infinite
> force and so should be viewed with great suspicion.
>
> Alternative methods might be to assess the damage (e.g.. did it break a
> bone) and then find out what sort of force would be able to cause that
> damage. Another one is to see whether the force was sufficient to make you
> remember the mistake and so avoid it in future.
>
> Michael Whapples
> On 19 Dec 2011, at 15:32, David Engebretson Jr. wrote:
>
>> I don't know, Michael...
>>
>> I'm pretty sure it can be calculated with vectors, but it has been so
>> long since I've done vector calculus that i feel like i don't have the
>> know-how right now.
>>
>> What I see in my head is what I initially described; a 170 pound mass
>> travelling horizontally at 2.5 mph. The horizontal plane drops four
>> feet. The mass is of sufficient height that it hits at the rim of the
>> four foot deep 4 foot diameter hole at nearly the exact time the base of
>> the mass hits the bottom of the hole.
>>
>> Therefore, I'm assuming, all forces, horizontal and vertical, are focused
>> on the rim of the hole when the mass hits it. The 68" mass absorbs some
>> kind of force at its four foot height.
>>
>> The assumptions of an equally distributed mass and a 14 inch wide impact
>> point at the mass' four foot height should have enough to figure out how
>> many newtons of force were placed upon the object, right?
>>
>> Actually, I would just need my HP48G (and some sight) to figure it out.
>> I'm almost certain I did problems like this in college, um, a while ago.
>>
>> And Ken, we should talk... sounds like you have very similar experiences
>> with gravity, force, and pain, that I do.
>>
>> Thank you all for your comments. I really appreciate the brain teaser
>> and all of your insights towards it.
>>
>> I've spent a lot of time norizontal trying to repair the impact point. I
>> keep thinking, "what would the equation look like for that situation?"
>>
>> But then, luckily, I am distracted with the books I read on the Victor
>> Reader Stream while being horizontal.
>>
>> Again, thanks for your help,
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Whapples" <mwhapples at aim.com>
>> To: "Blind Math list for those interested in mathematics"
>> <blindmath at nfbnet.org>
>> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 6:01 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Blindmath] physics/mathematics problem; have a solution?
>>
>>
>>> Coming back to your original question, you could do it without knowing
>>> the time, however the time would still not be zero.
>>>
>>> You could do it by considering what energy was absorbed in the impact
>>> and what distance the force was acting for. I guess a way of calculating
>>> the distance might be to use the size of the impression you left on the
>>> ground and the indent the ground left on you. Well may be a bit more
>>> than just what is left should either the ground or you restore your
>>> shape after the force is removed. Also it may or may not be significant,
>>> if falling don't forget that there is a change in gravitational
>>> potential energy when moving vertically, it possibly is not relevant in
>>> this case as I doubt either indent was that large.
>>>
>>> Also don't forget either using time or distance, these will assume force
>>> is constant over that period and so is an average. If you want the
>>> maximum force then I am not sure it can be calculated with what is known
>>> here and probably would require you to repeat it with something to
>>> measure the pressure/force, either presenting the maximum or taking
>>> readings constantly and then you could process that. While it might be
>>> interesting to know, I am not sure I would want to do that just to find
>>> out what force was encountered.
>>>
>>> Michael Whapples
>>> On 19 Dec 2011, at 13:25, David Engebretson Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sun lamp was fully intact. I didn't purposely protect it with care,
>>>> but it came out of the pit before I did. No oxygen intake for me at
>>>> that point. Innate mover and protector ability, I think.
>>>>
>>>> Ew, I know that seeing stars thing... I was moving a photo processor
>>>> once. The entrance for the photo paper was only about 4 feet tall
>>>> (hmmm, coincidence?) and I was unscrewing the front cover and forgot
>>>> the wall was so short. I stood up really fast to get the next screw
>>>> quickly since I was getting paid by the hour and like to be worth an
>>>> employers time. Top of head bonk at 4 feet trying to move as quickly as
>>>> possible vertically and horizontally at the same time from a crouching
>>>> position. I saw stars and lost at least one inch of height due to neck
>>>> compression. Don't think I ever healed from that one.
>>>>
>>>> Still moved the processor that evening, but might have had to take a
>>>> couple of days off once the concussion or whatever it was took full
>>>> affect.
>>>>
>>>> I think math and physics analysis in an embedded systems environment is
>>>> much safer for most blind folk. Especially if said blind people are
>>>> energetic (er, stupid) enough to get him/her self in trouble with
>>>> physical injury.
>>>>
>>>> Aw heck, sometimes a little physical pain is good for the body. Puts
>>>> hair on your chest, right?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> D
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Perry" <kperry at blinksoft.com>
>>>> To: "'Blind Math list for those interested in mathematics'"
>>>> <blindmath at nfbnet.org>
>>>> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 4:32 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Blindmath] physics/mathematics problem; have a solution?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Ha you should not be ashamed the ones that are ashamed are the ones
>>>>> who do
>>>>> not know they can be as crazy as the sited folks. One of my favorite
>>>>> miss
>>>>> haps close to yours was carrying 50 pounds of roofing tile up two
>>>>> floors on
>>>>> a rickety ladder to teach my teenager how to patch a roof. Now this
>>>>> is all
>>>>> after running into a power pole with the previously mentioned 50
>>>>> pounds of
>>>>> roofing tiles balanced on my head showing off. Can someone come up
>>>>> with the
>>>>> formula for a 180 pound guy hitting the ground from 5 foot 3 and a
>>>>> quarter
>>>>> up and waiting for a 50 pound pile of roofing tiles which landed, yup
>>>>> that's
>>>>> right on my head? All I can say is whatever force is calculated is
>>>>> the same
>>>>> force needed to make stars. Anyway I know sited people who have done
>>>>> worse
>>>>> than us and they can see. I am just glad that I can still do all the
>>>>> wood
>>>>> working and you name it that I still do I would be ashamed if I gave
>>>>> it all
>>>>> up just because of a bit of universal star creation. Hey did you break
>>>>> the
>>>>> lamp? I bet you didn't.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ken
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: blindmath-bounces at nfbnet.org
>>>>> [mailto:blindmath-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>>>>> Behalf Of David Engebretson Jr.
>>>>> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 7:10 AM
>>>>> To: Blind Math list for those interested in mathematics
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Blindmath] physics/mathematics problem; have a solution?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ken,
>>>>>
>>>>> I appreciate your willingness to share. It helps me be less ashamed
>>>>> of my
>>>>> carelessness.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Blindmath mailing list
>>>>> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>>> Blindmath:
>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/kperry%40blinksoft.co
>>>>> m
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Blindmath mailing list
>>>>> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>>> Blindmath:
>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/davide%40soundandscience.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>> Version: 8.5.454 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4089 - Release Date:
>>>> 12/18/11 19:34:00
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Blindmath mailing list
>>>> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>> Blindmath:
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/mwhapples%40aim.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blindmath mailing list
>>> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>> Blindmath:
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/davide%40soundandscience.com
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.454 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4089 - Release Date: 12/18/11
>> 19:34:00
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blindmath mailing list
>> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Blindmath:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/mwhapples%40aim.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blindmath mailing list
> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Blindmath:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/davide%40soundandscience.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.454 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4089 - Release Date: 12/18/11
19:34:00
More information about the BlindMath
mailing list