[Blindmath] LaTeX with a screen reader
Michael Whapples
mwhapples at aim.com
Sat Jun 15 19:27:15 UTC 2013
I think what was being spoken about was to make it easier to work with
LaTeX with a screen reader when writing a document.
My view though is that one probably is best to create their own set of
commands using the in built LaTeX stuff for new commands rather than
someone trying to create a general DSL. My thinking being that everyone
has there own needs and so will want different commands and so a general
DSL will be hard to design which will satisfy many people.
It is worth noting that possibly one might say there are already ways
you can write documents in other more concise formats and then convert
to LaTeX (eg. reStructuredText
http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html), so why create another?
Also I do sort of agree with what you said, should someone really be put
off by having to use any of the options mentioned above and they want
good spoken output then LaTeX is probably not the thing for them and
they may be better served by MathType or one of the specialist editors
like ChattyInfty, triangle, LAMBDA, etc or soon LEAN math which John
Gardner has been working on.
So I also am not quite sure what problem it is trying to solve.
Michael Whapples
On 15/06/2013 18:20, Susan Jolly wrote:
> Hi Jamal,
>
> You are correct that I did not realize you were talking about using
> LaTeX with a screen reader.
>
> Why would you want to do that? If you prefer spoken math to braille
> math, there are already several ways to get spoken math including
> using MathType or one of the gh products that uses MathSpeak.
>
> Sincerely,
> SusanJ
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blindmath mailing list
> Blindmath at host.nfbnet.org
> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Blindmath:
> http://host.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/mwhapples%40aim.com
>
More information about the BlindMath
mailing list