[Blindmath] [gui-talk] Availability of Braille symbols for Symbolic Logic

[Kevin Fjelsted]

In my experience with taking logic courses, all logic symbols accept the "not" symbol are integrated into Nemeth.

This has caused some confusion for example, Duxbury translates the "not" to the   "asterisk" dots 4-3456.
THis in turn leads some transcribers to take this as the logica not symbol which it is not. Not sure why the logical not was left out.
Is that enough "nots?"

-Kevin

On Apr 30, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Humberto <humbertoa5369 at netzero.net> wrote:

> Hello all,
> It's been a while since I've posted to one of more of these lists. but, I'm taking an intro to Symbolic Logic course at my college this spring quarter and I need some input.
> Does anyone around on this list know of, or have heard about braille equivalents for symbols used in logic, just like there are braille symbols for Math (nemeth code)? If there is such a code for symbolic logic, where can I learn about it or where can I start getting information about it?
> Alternatively, are logic symbols integrated into the Nemeth code system? Or is logic separate from the nemeth (math) part? If so, what is that Braille code called?
> Any help is appreciated.
> Sincerely,
> Humberto
> 
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> Fast, Secure, NetZero 4G Mobile Broadband. Try it.
> http://www.netzero.net/?refcd=NZINTISP0512T4GOUT2
> _______________________________________________
> gui-talk mailing list
> gui-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gui-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for gui-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/gui-talk_nfbnet.org/kfjelsted%40gmail.com