[Blindmath] I'm Dying Here

Sun May 18 09:37:43 UTC 2014

While i agree articulation is important, in math classes a vast majority of students could not understand a clearly articulated instruction without pointing.  I do not think this is a fault of the student or teacher but some thing more systematic in math education.  Also there is not a difference in learning to think as a mathematician and doing math.  Learning procedure solely will never be sufficient to sustain one very far.  The thought process is essential and includes but is not limited to being able to solve the problems on a test.  After all ideally you will be able to apply these concepts when you are faced with problems not in your textbook.  

Jon Yaggie
EYH Volunteer Coordinator
UIC Mathematics

> On May 17, 2014, at 23:10, sabra1023 via Blindmath <blindmath at nfbnet.org> wrote:
> 
> I'm sorry Andrew. I agree with John on this one. I don't think it's likely that people come to your class to learn how you think as a mathematician. They're there to learn math. Maybe they're just taking a required course. Further, I think that clear articulation helps sighted people understand what you're talking about. There have been some totally blind mathematicians also, and that proves you don't have to think visually to be one. Additionally, if you talk about what you're going to do before you actually do the problem, you can help your students more easily identify if they're missing background knowledge that they need to understand the problem. For example, if you first explain that you will use the quadratic formula instead of factoring to solving equation, that tells your students that by now, they should know what factoring is and they should know with the quadratic formula is. If they don't, there is a problem. Now, let's say that you dive into the problem without
>  being clear about what you're doing. Some of your students might know that they don't understand, but they might not know why. Do they not understand the current material? Or do they not understand because they're missing something they shouldn't previously had? Also, if you're clear about what you're doing, students will recognize exactly when they don't understand. Textbooks usually don't verbalize or explain the steps that they do either, so your students are depending on you to do this.
> 
>> On May 17, 2014, at 9:42 PM, John Gardner via Blindmath <blindmath at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Andrew you say: " Not only do I think it good pedagogically but as a
>> mathematician then it's how I think so why would I want to deprive the
>> students of that insight?"
>> JAG: First of all Andrew, you are incorrect that it is good pedagogically.
>> A large minority, sometimes estimated at 40% of the population are primarily
>> audio learners.  So while your pedagogy is good for 60% of your class, it is
>> bad for the rest.  I presume you want to use good pedagogy for the whole
>> class. If you are following maureen's advice, you are making your lecture
>> accessible to both visual and audio learners.  And while this may be the way
>> you think as a mathematician, not all mathematicians think alike (God
>> knows!). I suspect that there are even mathematicians who do not instantly
>> grasp everything visually.
>> 
>> In my experience since losing my sight, I can easily distinguish excellent
>> lecturers from the others.  The excellent lecturers unconsciously make the
>> lecture accessible to everybody.
>> 
>> Except for visual jokes.  
>> 
>> Just trying to help.
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Blindmath [mailto:blindmath-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Andrew
>> Stacey via Blindmath
>> Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:38 AM
>> To: Blindmath
>> Subject: Re: [Blindmath] I'm Dying Here
>> 
>>> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 06:16:27AM +0100, Blindmath wrote:
>>> 
>>> Just could not miss a comment on what Maureen said with regards the 
>>> communication. I seriously can not stand when some of the lecturers 
>>> are saying especially my favourite 'You move this guy here upstairs.'. I
>> mean...
>>> come on!
>>> If you are a researcher you could really put the effort in saying 
>>> substitute the variable x, y into the expression in the numerator...
>> 
>> I'm not letting that go!
>> 
>> I will accept the point that if there is a blind person in the lecture hall
>> then I should be more careful about explicitly naming things.  But if there
>> isn't, then I'm going to thump the board and say things like "Now take this
>> <thump> and put it there <thump> and see what happens".  Not only do I think
>> it good pedagogically but as a mathematician then it's how I think so why
>> would I want to deprive the students of that insight?
>> 
>> Andrew
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blindmath mailing list
>> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Blindmath:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/john.gardner%40orst.e
>> du
>> BlindMath Gems can be found at
>> <http://www.blindscience.org/blindmath-gems-home>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blindmath mailing list
>> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Blindmath:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/sabra1023%40gmail.com
>> BlindMath Gems can be found at <http://www.blindscience.org/blindmath-gems-home>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Blindmath mailing list
> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Blindmath:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/jyaggi2%40uic.edu
> BlindMath Gems can be found at <http://www.blindscience.org/blindmath-gems-home>