[BlindMath] Accessibility of Latex to PDF
Paulius Lėveris
paulius.leveris at gmail.com
Mon Jan 11 22:50:26 UTC 2021
Hello,
Very interesting facts about PDF accessibility; Thanks, did not know
about that! ;)
And few more words about LaTeX: yes, this system of working with math
is even good for us (as blind people), but sometimes there are
problems that some staff who creates this TeX content are not likely
to share it with us because of their copyrights and so on... Well,
when it comes in tries to get similar content from more official their
makers (presses for example), do not need to expect understanding of
the situation from their side... But that's an OT here already.
Best regards,
Paulius
2021-01-11 23:38 GMT+02:00, Neil Soiffer via BlindMath <blindmath at nfbnet.org>:
> To maybe clear up some confusion, let me add a little bit on the technical
> side about PDF that may help explain why it is often not accessible...
>
> A PDF document is actually structured as a tree, with the main nodes being
> nodes for each page. The design allows PDF renders such as Adobe Reader to
> open a 200 page book quickly and go to any page quickly. Each page contains
> a set of very low level commands that draws graphics and text on the page.
> Those commands are often not in the reading order for the document.
>
> Another node in the PDF tree is one that represents a tree and is referred
> to as the "structure tree". If it is used, it essentially imposes order on
> the document and is the key to accessibility. It maps mosty to HTML in a
> straightforward way and points into the various pages to the actual text of
> the document. As an example, the structure tree has nodes for headings,
> lists, paragraphs, etc. AT uses the structure tree to read the document. If
> there is no structure tree, the PDF is likely to be gibberish if read with
> an AT. A PDF document with a structure tree is often referred to as "tagged
> PDF". Well tagged PDF should be as accessible as well tagged HTML. At the
> moment, well tagged PDF is not the norm.
>
> PDF continues to evolve and in 2017, PDF 2.0 came out. That specifically
> included the MathML namespace as valid in PDF. The PDF/UA committee (the
> one that says what an accessible PDF document is) is working on updating
> their spec (ISO 14289) to PDF 2.0. That update includes what to do about
> math. PDF/UA 1.0 says "add alt text" -- that requires the user to provide
> the alt text. The update draft says "use MathML", which is something that
> doesn't require user intervention. It will be a few years before the PDF/UA
> final version comes out (ISO has a lot of rules about process).
> NVDA+MathPlayer has had the ability to read PDF tagged with MathML ever
> since it was released, but other than a few sample documents, no tools
> generate it at the moment.
>
> This discussion thread has been about TeX. Unfortunately, the tools that
> generate PDF from TeX do not generate a structure tree and so the resulting
> TeX is not accessible. The good news is that a number of people are working
> on making the PDF generated from TeX accessible. There are some
> experimental packages that create a structure tree. I recently tried a few
> and unfortunately NVDA didn't like them -- apparently they didn't get all
> the details down right. I'm sure that will improve in the (hopefully near)
> future. None of the packages do anything about making the math accessible,
> although I think one may have a way to add alt text.
>
> I hope that clears up some questions about PDF accessibility. Accessible
> math on the web has become the norm in the last few years. I hope in a few
> years, the same will be able to be said for PDF. In the meantime, I agree
> with those who have said get the original TeX, get an HTML version, or get
> a Word version.
>
> Neil Soiffer
> _______________________________________________
> BlindMath mailing list
> BlindMath at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> BlindMath:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/paulius.leveris%40gmail.com
> BlindMath Gems can be found at
> <http://www.blindscience.org/blindmath-gems-home>
>
More information about the BlindMath
mailing list