[BlindRUG] VI() function does not do the alternative summary() job as before.

[JooYoung Seo]

Ahha, now I found the problem Dr. Godfrey.

The VI() function does not support the alternative summary() function
for a specified variable.
Since my dataset is really large, I need to use summary function for a
specific continuous variable.
Say for example, we can use summary function like this: summary(df$variable)
However, the VI() function does not support this VI(df$variable).

Could you please add this capability?
Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

JooYoung



On 11/4/17, Godfrey, Jonathan via BlindRUG <blindrug at nfbnet.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just checked using
>
> class(airquality)
> VI(airquality)
>
> And got what I expected. "data.frame" and a variable by variable summary. My
> guess is that the object you are working with is not a data.frame.  Please
> check the class and let's then see if another VI() function is required.
>
> Jonathan
>
> From: BlindRUG [mailto:blindrug-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Jooyoung
> via BlindRUG
> Sent: Saturday, 4 November 2017 5:22 p.m.
> To: 'Blind R Users Group'
> Cc: Jooyoung
> Subject: [BlindRUG] VI() function does not do the alternative summary() job
> as before.
>
> Hello Dr. Godfrey,
>
> I hope this email finds you well.
>
> I think you may have changed some functionalities of VI().
> It does not do the alternative summary() job as before for continuous
> variable like showing central tendencies and quantile horizontally.
> Could you please walk me through how I can achieve  it?
> I do not like the base summary.
> Please advise me.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> JooYoung
>
>
>


-- 
       JooYoung Seo
--------------------
  Doctoral Student,
  Learning, Design, and Technology
  Learning and Performance Systems
  The Pennsylvania State University
  Phone: +1 (814) 777-5825
  E-mail: jzs323 at psu.edu