[Blindtlk] FW: [nabs-l] accessible video games
T. Joseph Carter
tjcarter at spiritsubstance.com
Thu Sep 15 07:45:36 UTC 2011
In short, it's not an easy task, and I can't even imagine how to do
it for a great many of the games on the market. I say this as one
who has spent some time making video games. Three cases illustrate
the problem I think:
Case 1: Final Fantasy X, Playstation 2
This was the first Final Fantasy to feature recorded voices for most
major characters. It was one of the top-selling games in the Final
Fantasy franchise and frankly one of the top selling games on the
platform. (At one time it was THE top-selling in both categories,
but I no longer know if either is true.)
As I said, most major characters' dialogue was recorded, instead of
being a string of text on the screen. Minor or incidental characters
however were text-only. A screen reader for those didn't exist, and
would've been distracting. The cost of voice actors may have been
prohibitive, and if it had been done it might not have all fit on to
one DVD.
But it could have been done. Mostly. Most of the overdrives
(special attacks available only when enough of something has happened
to a character) would have needed significant changes to become
non-visual. When Tidus tried to learn his father's famous Jecht Shot
(a sports move), memories appear in different portions of the screen
and you have to manipulate the controller in response. It's not
hard to do it simply mashing buttons, but it's still completely
visual.
And then there's exploration, finding treasure, knowing where the
road forks, etc. We navigate with a cane and manage just fine, but
even with terrain clue sounds (which exist but need to be improved
for our purposes), we just don't have the kind of feedback we get
from using a cane that would tell us where we are, and where we are
going.
But it could be solved, and because most of the game (battles and
whatnot) are turn-based, some means could be found to do it.
Conclusion: This kind of game could be made accessible, and it would
be very cool and clever, and it would fit right in to the game
experience if done right.
Case 2: Super Metroid, Super Nintendo Entertainment System
The game involves your character running around a complex side and
vertically scrolling maze of tunnels, platforms, doorways, elevators,
and the like. Crawling, floating, flying, and energy-sucking alien
creatures are everywhere, and you blast them with various weapons,
pick up recharges and ammo reloads left floating where they were
before you disintegrated them, and make complex jumps, climbs,
swings, and the like while avoiding hazards in any direction. I have
no idea how to make this accessible. Wish I did, because it would be
awesome!
Conclusion: Probably not able to make it accessible, at least not
using any scheme I can think up. If another developer can, that's
awesome.
Case 3: Bejeweled 3, Mac/PC and coming sooner or later to iPhone
Bejeweled-type games play out as a grid of colored gems. There are
three now, and they all follow the same premise I outline here, and
many, many clones. You play by taking two adjacent gems and swapping
them either horizontally or vertically. You can only swap gems if
this creates one or more "matches", strings of three or more gems of
the same color either horizontally or vertically. These are cleared
and gravity causes those above to fall along with new gems to fill in
the holes. The game ends when you can no longer make a swap.
This basic game could be made accessible in quite a clever way, at
least on touch-screen devices. When you enable the touch accessible
mode, simple swipes on the screen no longer swap gems. Instead, they
let you "hear" the gems. Each color has its own "resonance" sound.
Power gems would make their color sound and another sound at the same
time. A flame gem could crackle, and a star gem could maybe make a
tinkling sound. The other special gems are the hypercube and
supernova gems, and these too could have their own sounds.
Control would be to touch with one finger to select a gem. Touch and
hold to get a verbal description of the gem (special gems have a
tool-tip type thing on the Mac/PC version already). Swipe with two
fingers in one of the cardinal directions to swap with the gem in
that direction.
Sounds great, innovatively accessible, and fun to play right? Yeah,
and not even hard to write it! I dunno how you'd interface it so you
could do this with VoiceOver enabled, but it would be fun and it
would bring many of you into one of the greatest time-wasters ever
invented. *grin*
Adding voice tags to menu controls and badges and the like would mean
the Bejeweled Guy (don't know his name) has a lot more to say than
"Welcome back", "Go", "Level complete", etc. But it wouldn't be that
difficult to add to the game at all!
There's just one problem. The game has other modes, and some of them
are timed. You could not keep track of the board with all the gems
cleared and new ones falling from the top and still meet the time
challenges which depend on split-second recognition of visual info.
And changing the timing to make it "reasonable" skews the scoring if
you mix accessible and standard play, which matters on the iPhone
where you can share your scores online. If you find a way to make
the timing fair and equitable, you will find sighted people playing
this mode in order to cheat and get higher scores than their friends
making these modes completely unfair for the blind player to
"compete" with friends. (Disable the screen maybe? It's an option!)
Or would we be content to have a game where only half of the modes
you could play were accessible?
Conclusion: The most promising, because it requires the fewest mods
to an existing game and the lowest development cost, but it wouldn't
be accessible on the computer. Then again, it takes the touch
screen, so long the bane of the blind's existence in the technical
world, and turns it into the key to accessibility! Poetic justice in
that. Only about half of the game modes could be made easily
accessible to the blind, and would we really consider half a game
better than none?
Now I've got absolutely NO idea if anyone at PopCap Games, the makers
of Bejeweled, even care that we blind folks exist! My guess is that
they've never thought about it. But if they want one of their games
to be about as ubiquitous amongst blind iPhone owners as a deck of
brailled UNO cards is, they'd seriously consider a limited version of
Bejeweled 3 for the iPhone with the above accessibility features and
offering only the untimed game modes.
In fact, they could use the Bejeweled 2 engine (since we won't miss
the new prettier graphics) and just add the new gems. I'd miss
Diamond Mine mode, but content myself with Butterflies, Zen, Classic,
and Poker modes. I don't often play the two timed modes Lightning
and Ice Storm. The eighth mode, Quest, is a combination of the other
modes plus a few others in short challenges that get downright hard
before you get your ivy leaves! Oh MAN did I work for that!
*ahem*
Anyway, I might be willing to investigate the matter, see if I could
contact someone at PopCap, and see if they'd be willing to discuss
it. They might ignore me, or they might say they're not interested.
If you think I should, and if this thread isn't active sometime next
week, gimme a nudge and I'll see if they're interested in doing
something that no other mainstream game publisher has ever tried to
do before. There's perhaps a legal issue associated with them doing
it as I suggested, but I'll commit to giving them royalty-free
license to whatever intellectual property in this message they need
to implement it.
They can gimme an iTunes code for the result (for demo purposes only
of course!) and maybe mention either my name or the NFB somewhere in
the credits for the inspiration and I consider myself compensated.
Maybe in two or four years, we'll have video game development as one
of the things a person can sign up for at Youth Slam, who knows?
I'll put this Pipe Dream to rest before I become tempted to go and
play, well, Pipe Dream. *grin*
Joseph
Gaming nerd
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 06:06:26PM -0700, Humberto Avila wrote:
>This question was asked on the student list. Read below.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf
>Of Patrick Molloy
>Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 6:00 PM
>To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
>Subject: [nabs-l] accessible video games
>
>Hi All,
>I'm curious to get your thoughts on this question that's been in the
>back of my mind recently: Why haven't mainstream video game companies
>even attempted to make their products accessible to blind people?
>Wouldn't it grow their profits? And would it be all that difficult to
>make a video game accessible? We have described movies, after all, and
>there's the blind driver car. If they can make an accessible CAR, why
>not video games? What do others think about this issue?
>Patrick
>
>_______________________________________________
>nabs-l mailing list
>nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>nabs-l:
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/avila.bert.humberto2%40g
>mail.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>blindtlk mailing list
>blindtlk at nfbnet.org
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for blindtlk:
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/tjcarter%40spiritsubstance.com
More information about the BlindTlk
mailing list