[Blindtlk] Use of the Term Visually Impaired

[justin williams]

If you are writing on the master's level, then you can't.  In normal
everyday speech, I wouldn't, but in writing, I would; you can't get
published.  

-----Original Message-----
From: blindtlk [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Gloria
Whipple
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 5:17 PM
To: 'Blind Talk Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Use of the Term Visually Impaired

That is what my late husband and I would tell people. We are blind and that
is that!

What in the world is wrong with the word blind for heaven sakes!

Gloria Whipple

-----Original Message-----
From: blindtlk [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Carly
Mihalakis
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 14:09
To: Blind Talk Mailing List; 'Blind Talk Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Use of the Term Visually Impaired

Here in Berkeley, they routinely ram that person first shit down our throats
but I have to say, i am enucleated and therefore am not "impaired" by any
strech of anyone's imagination, but am stone ass BLIND. When, in public
people refer to my blind partner and I as "visually in paired" or
"unsighted" I quickly correct them by  saying "no, I'm blind." People feel
seem to feel so strongly about such an issue yet, those who conceivers of
this so called People First lingo,to the best of my knowledge, are not
themselves effected by anything separating them from the main stream.
Oughtn't effected people be them deaf, blind  or  crippled, inform society
as to how they would like to be referred?
for today, Car
>From: blindtlk [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of 
>Christine Szostak
>Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 4:38 PM
>To: Blind Talk Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Use of the Term Visually Impaired
>
>Hi,
>   I suspect that actually the issue was not really with the term 
>visually impaired, but rather with the order. When you say a "visually 
>impaired person" the disability comes first as  opposed to saying a 
>"person with a visual impairment". Thus, having the disability first is 
>objected to, at least this is what I am assuming the blogger was getting
at.
>Happy Friday!
>Chris
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Kelby Carlson" <kelbycarlson at gmail.com>
>To: <blindtlk at nfbnet.org>
>Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 4:24 PM
>Subject: [Blindtlk] Use of the Term Visually Impaired
>
>
> > Hi everybody!
> >
> > So, since I'm not aware of any incendiary debates flaring up around 
> > here recently, I thought I'd bring up something I read recently that 
> > I found utterly baffling.  This was on a blog thread about proper 
> > etiquette
around
>
> > people with disabilities.  Towards the end, a discussion of language 
> > appropriateness came up, and someone said that "visually impaired" 
> > was
an
> > unacceptable term that should not be used.  Instead, one should say
"with
> > a visual impairment." I have heard similar things regaring the 
> > phrasing
of
>
> > a "blind person" versus "a person with blindness", but this was
especially
>
> > perplexing because I can't recall ever meeting someone in my entire 
> > life who was opposed to the term "visually impaired", at least when 
> > it was
used
>
> > to describe someone who had some functional vision.  I don't have 
> > strong feelings either way, but I would actually lean more to 
> > towards
preferring
> > visually impaired than "partially sighted", though I think neither 
> > one
is
> > more linguistically accurate than the other.
> >
> > I have encountered the issue of language surrounding disability many 
> > times, and it's always been a bit strange-don't we, as blind people
(among
>
> > other people with various kinds of disabilities) have higher 
> > priorities
on
>
> > our lists of "things to fix in the world"? These are just my 
> > thoughts on the matter.
> >
> > Kelby S.  Carlson
> >
> > Vanderbilt University
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > blindtlk mailing list
> > blindtlk at nfbnet.org
> > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
> > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
> > for
> > blindtlk:
> >
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/szostak.1%40bucke
>yema
i
>l.osu.edu
> >
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>blindtlk mailing list
>blindtlk at nfbnet.org
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>blindtlk:
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/justin.williams2%
>40gm
a
>il.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>blindtlk mailing list
>blindtlk at nfbnet.org
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>blindtlk:
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/carlymih%40comcas
>t.ne
t


_______________________________________________
blindtlk mailing list
blindtlk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindtlk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/glowhi%40centurylink.n
et


_______________________________________________
blindtlk mailing list
blindtlk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindtlk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/justin.williams2%40gma
il.com