[blparent] Baby names- middle names
Bridgit Pollpeter
bpollpeter at hotmail.com
Sat Apr 28 09:40:29 UTC 2012
Me too, but also it's because it was established this way in most of our
homes. Of course if you hear your middle name when in trouble, a
conditioning response takes place letting a child know they are in more
trouble than usual, starting that association. If a child does not have
a middle name, they never make this association. It's all just
perspective, and honestly, why give a name that will be more associated
with trouble than anything else?
Nothing against middle names, I just don't like them myself unless
having meaning and intent of some kind. I have no intention of giving
another child a middle name unless we have one with meaning, such as a
parent or grandparent name.
But a child will only make associations if they are present in their
life. Devoid of a middle name, there will be no reason to ever hear
angry or frustrated tones connected with the middle name, and therefore
not think they are in less trouble because they lack a third name when
in trouble, grin.
There's some psycho stuf for the list, smile.
Sincerely,
Bridgit Kuenning-Pollpeter
Read my blog at:
http://blogs.livewellnebraska.com/author/bpollpeter/
"History is not what happened; history is what was written down."
The Expected One- Kathleen McGowan
Message: 33
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:23:56 -0400
From: "Tammy" <tcl189 at rogers.com>
To: "Blind Parents Mailing List" <blparent at nfbnet.org>
Subject: Re: [blparent] Baby names
Message-ID: <C062B83167D74F3A9108A32D557DA000 at laptop>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Hi,
My middle name always, always had meaning, it meant I was in big big
trouble. grin It's the same with my kids, they know they're in trouble
when I call them by their middle names.
Tammy
More information about the BlParent
mailing list