<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Beth,</div><div>I strongly agree and want to add to your comments. Even when I had significant Sight, but was in the process of losing it, my friends assumed that there was no way that I could continue to cook. Even after many years and today many of my best friends Still do not understand how I can possibly cook and new acquaintances assume that either my husband will cook or that we eat out. Periodically we have as many as 20 people at our house for a sitdown dinner and I frequently cook all the food myself from scratch.</div><div>I do not drive, but generally act as navigator using Apple Maps and searching for directions and addresses.</div><div>We do need to show the world that we are capable of lots of things.</div><div>Patricia</div><div>Patricia.</div><div><div dir="ltr">Sent from my iPhone</div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On Oct 14, 2025, at 10:59\u202fAM, Merribeth Greenberg via CCCNFBW <cccnfbw@nfbnet.org> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">\ufeff<div dir="ltr"><div>I hope it is okay to leave a comment that I did not get to make on Saturday.</div><div>Even the word Blind or Deaf "able bodied" or "normal" people have negative responses to them, it is something they wer taught growing up. I fell like that is why when they become disabled , such as being blind, they sit at home for 5 years because they think it is a negative thing, "well I am blind, my life is over, I might as well sit here and let people do things for me". Not knowing that we do so many more things than just take care of ourselves. </div><div>We need to show what we can do to show the able bodied people that blind people, not just one of use but lots of us, do things for ourselves and other everyday. </div><div><br></div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><font face="comic sans ms,sans-serif">Beth Greenberg</font></div></div></div></div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Oct 11, 2025 at 1:51\u202fPM Don Mitchell via CCCNFBW <<a href="mailto:cccnfbw@nfbnet.org">cccnfbw@nfbnet.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="msg-4444909809872501212"><div lang="EN-US" style="overflow-wrap: break-word;"><div class="m_-4444909809872501212WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">Below are two resolutions from 2024 and a referral to a resolution made in1993 that discuss the use of the words blind, visually impaired and related verbiage used in talking about blind people.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">RESOLUTION 2024-21: Regarding Calling Upon the News Media to Use the Word \u201cBlind\u201d<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, blind people are held back by a common set of misconceptions about being blind, low expectations for blind people, and barriers resulting from a lack of equal access to information and public services; and <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, since 1940 the National Federation of the Blind has used the word \u201cblind\u201d as an inclusive term with a functional definition that encompasses individuals with varying degrees of blindness, but who have in common the need to use nonvisual tools and techniques, some or all of the time, in order to learn, work, play, and otherwise live the lives we want; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, throughout our history, we have rejected the tendency of society to treat the word \u201cblind\u201d as a word to be avoided; and <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, for example, in 1993, our convention affirmed in Resolution 1993-01 that \u201cWe believe that it is respectable to be blind, and although we have no particular pride in the fact of our blindness, neither do we have any shame in it. To the extent that euphemisms are used to convey any other concept or image, we deplore such use\u201d; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, because of our belief in the normality and capacity of blind people, we reject the idea that eyesight or vision is a requirement for success, and believe that vision-centered language focuses on what we are perceived to lack, a negative framing of blindness, rather than on our fundamental normality as people who share a characteristic that, while it does not define us, is a positive part of who we are; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, increasingly other groups of people with disabilities and the wider society have embraced the idea that \u201cblind\u201d and other words describing disabilities are not words to be avoided, but positive indicators of identity; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, a common euphemism for the word blind is the phrase \u201cvisually impaired,\u201d or variants thereof, which is an example of vision-centered language that portrays us as broken because of our lack of eyesight; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, the news media, in all its forms and to varying degrees, uses words to inform and shape the perceptions of those who consume it; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, the phrase \u201cvisually impaired\u201d continues to be used by many media outlets to describe blind people, even in stories about individuals who embrace their identity as blind people and which purport to be positive and affirming: Now, therefore,<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">BE IT RESOLVED by the National Federation of the Blind in Convention assembled this seventh day of July, 2024, in the City of Orlando, Florida, that we call upon all of the major broadcast, print, and digital news outlets, services, and other entities that influence the language used throughout the American news media to stop using the term \u201cvisually impaired\u201d to describe blind people, and to instead use the word \u201cblind\u201d in the way that those of us who have the authentic lived experience of blindness use it; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that we call upon all of these entities to consult with the National Federation of the Blind as they review and revise their guidance to journalists, editors, and producers, and otherwise make decisions about the language they use in describing and characterizing blindness and blind people. <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">RESOLUTION 2024-22 - Regarding the use of the term "visually impaired" when referring to blind people with some vision<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, language plays a crucial role in shaping society's perceptions and understanding of different perspectives and aspects of life; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, accurate terminology is an essential factor in the creation of a climate which fosters respect and inclusivity for everyone, including the blind; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, at its 1993 convention, the National Federation of the Blind unanimously adopted Resolution 93-01, which says in relevant part, \u201c\u2026the word blind accurately and clearly describes the condition of being unable to see, as well as the condition of having such limited eyesight that alternative techniques are required to do efficiently the ordinary tasks of daily living that are performed visually by those having good eyesight\u2026\u201d; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, this resolution clearly declares that the word "blind" is meant to include people with poor vision or no vision and does not circumvent the use of a word which, in other circles, is either avoided altogether or combined with other terms such as "visually impaired," "visually challenged," \u201csight challenged\u201d or "hard of seeing,"--euphemisms which are thought to be more acceptable and less off-putting to the broader community; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, the term "visually impaired" (often combined with the word "blind" as in Blind and Visually Impaired) is used by many programs and agencies serving the blind as an attempt to clarify that their services are available to individuals with limited or no eyesight and not just to individuals who are totally blind; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, the word "impaired" when combined with the word "vision" or "visual" implies a sense of deficiency and inferiority and perpetuates the incorrect notion that people who have lost part or all of their eyesight are automatically less capable or limited in their abilities as compared to people with normal eyesight; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, when referring to a group of people comprised of individuals with varying degrees of sight--from total blindness to legal blindness to significant vision loss--the term "blind and low vision" is a more accurate and positive description in that it correctly indicates less-than-20 20 vision without connoting the negative assumptions and stereotypes that have too often been associated with the blind; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, other minorities, such as the deaf community, have successfully advocated for the use of terms like "deaf or hard of hearing" in place of "deaf and hearing impaired," recognizing the value of moving away from terminology that includes the word "impaired"; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, self-advocacy and asserting preferred terminology can do much to challenge existing misconceptions and encourage others to adopt more accurate and respectful language; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">WHEREAS, raising awareness and educating the public to use appropriate terminology that is free from negative assumptions and stereotypes can be achieved through educational campaigns, media initiatives, and inclusive language guidelines in academic and professional settings: Now, therefore,<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">BE IT RESOLVED by the National Federation of the Blind, in Convention assembled this seventh day of July, 2024, in the city of Orlando, Florida, that this organization reaffirm the respectability of the word "blind" as articulated in Resolution 93-01; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this organization call upon organizations, agencies, and entities that work with or serve individuals who are blind who feel that it is appropriate to use terms such as "blind and visually impaired," "visually impaired," or similar terminology in their names and/or promotional materials to use instead "blind," "blind and low vision," "low vision," or similar phrasing instead; and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this organization acknowledge and praise the United States Federal Government for making a strong effort to use the term \u201cblind and low vision\u201d.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
CCCNFBW mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CCCNFBW@nfbnet.org" target="_blank">CCCNFBW@nfbnet.org</a><br>
<a href="http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/cccnfbw_nfbnet.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/cccnfbw_nfbnet.org</a><br>
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for CCCNFBW:<br>
<a href="http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/cccnfbw_nfbnet.org/merribeth.manning%40gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/cccnfbw_nfbnet.org/merribeth.manning%40gmail.com</a><br>
</div></blockquote></div>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>CCCNFBW mailing list</span><br><span>CCCNFBW@nfbnet.org</span><br><span>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/cccnfbw_nfbnet.org</span><br><span>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for CCCNFBW:</span><br><span>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/cccnfbw_nfbnet.org/pmaddix%40comcast.net</span><br></div></blockquote></div></body></html>