[Cinci-NFB] FW: [Ohio-Talk] Washington Seminar

[marianne at denningweb.com]

I found this information and hope you will read it to know what issues are important this year. There are attachments but the information is also in the body of the email. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ohio-Talk <ohio-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org> On Behalf Of Todd Elzey via Ohio-Talk
Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 1:59 PM
To: NFB of Ohio Announcement and Discussion List <ohio-talk at nfbnet.org>
Cc: Todd Elzey <toddelzey at gmail.com>
Subject: [Ohio-Talk] Washington Seminar

Good afternoon!  The NFB's annual Washington Seminar is fast approaching.
This year's Washington Seminar will be held February 8-11, 2021 and due to COVID it will be virtual via Zoom. The Washington Seminar will open the evening of February 8, 2021, with the Great Gathering In at 5-7 P.M.  All are invited to attend the Great Gathering In, even if you are unable to join the week's meetings with Legislators.

This year we are promoting four issues: The Access Technology Affordability Act, The Accessible Voting Act, The Accessible Websites Act, and The Medical Device Nonvisual Accessibility Act. The fact sheet for each issue is attached in a separate Microsoft Word document. I am also including the fact sheets in the body of this email for those who may not be able to easily access Microsft Word documents.

This year Ohio is scheduling meetings with Legislators on February 9 and 10. Given that this year's Washington Seminar is a virtual event, this is a fantastic opportunity to participate without the expense of traveling to Washington D.C. or the extensive walking that is often required. But if you wish to participate it is essential that you participate in our advance training events so that you know what is required and how the event will work. If you would like to participate, please contact Legislative Chair Eric Duffy at peduffy63 at gmail.com as soon as possible.

Todd Elzey, Legislative Committee

Fact Sheet: Access Technology Affordability Act

Issue--The cost of critically needed access technology is out of reach for most blind Americans.

*The high cost of access technology creates a difficult economic reality.
Most access technology ranges from $1,000 to $6,000.* For example, a leading screen reader is $900, a popular Braille notetaker is $5,495, one model of a refreshable Braille display is $2,795, and a moderately priced Braille embosser is $3,695. According to the United States Census Bureau
69.1 percent of blind Americans are either unemployed or
underemployed.1 Consequently,
most blind Americans do not have sufficient financial resources needed to purchase these items.2 These financial barriers can ultimately lead to a loss of employment, insufficient education, or even isolation from community activities.

*Medical insurance will not cover the cost of access technology.* Current definitions of "medical care," "medical necessity," and "durable medical equipment" within common insurance policies do not include access technology. These definitions were adopted in the 1960s “when medical care was viewed primarily as curative and palliative, with little or no consideration given to increasing an individual's functional status.”3 Many states’ Medicaid programs and individual health insurance plans have adopted similar definitions and likewise will not cover the cost of access
technology.4

*Access technology enables blind Americans to participate in today’s
workforce.* Blindness is well-defined and measurable,5 but affects each person differently and at different ages. Since individuals’ needs differ, manufacturers have designed various tools that enable each blind American to perform tasks that they were once unable to accomplish themselves due to their blindness. Braille notetakers are frequently used in schools, screen-reading software allows workers to check their email at home, and screen-magnification software can help seniors losing vision learn about community activities. Access technology equips blind Americans to seek employment and stay employed. For the 69.1 percent of blind Americans who are either unemployed or underemployed, it is a vehicle that facilitates the job seeking process. Despite this critical need, public and private entities struggle to meet consumer demand.6 This leads to untimely delays in the delivery of necessary technology and ultimately harms the blind consumer.

Solution--Access Technology Affordability Act:

*Makes access technology more affordable so that blind Americans can procure these items for themselves.* It establishes a refundable tax credit for blind Americans in the amount of $2,000 to be used over a three-year period to offset the cost of access technology. The credit created by ATAA will sunset after five years and will be indexed for inflation.

*Provides flexibility for individuals to obtain access technology based upon their specific needs.* Accessibility requires an individualized assessment of one’s own skills and needs. Therefore, blind Americans should be given the opportunity to procure access technology on their own to ensure that they are receiving the tools that are most useful for them.

*Will increase federal income tax revenue.* More blind Americans working means more people paying taxes. It also means that those blind Americans who obtain gainful employment through this tax credit will no longer need to draw from federal programs such as Supplemental Security Income or Social Security Disability Insurance and will instead be paying into the Social Security Program.

*GOAL--IMPROVE AFFORDABILITY OF CRITICALLY NEEDED ACCESS TECHNOLOGY NECESSARY FOR EMPLOYMENT AND INDEPENDENT LIVING.*

Cosponsor the Access Technology Affordability Act (ATAA)

To cosponsor the ATAA in the House of Representatives, contact:
Crozer Connor, Senior Legislative Assistant for Congressman Mike Thompson
(D-CA)
Phone: 202-225-3311, Email: crozer.connor at mail.house.gov

To cosponsor the ATAA in the Senate, contact:
Ryan Losak, Legislative Aide for Senator John Boozman (R-AR)
Phone: 202-224-4843, Email: Ryan_Losak at boozman.senate.gov

For more information, contact:
Jeff Kaloc, Government Affairs Specialist, National Federation of the Blind
Phone: 410-659-9314, extension 2206, Email: jkaloc at nfb.org
------------------------------
1 United States Census Bureau, American Community Survey. “The percentage of non-institutionalized persons aged 21-64 years with a visual disability in the United States who were employed full-time/full-year in 2018.”
Compiled by Cornell University.
https://www.disabilitystatistics.org/reports/acs.cfm?statistic=4
2 Erickson, W., Lee, C., von Schrader, S. (2016). "Disability Statistics from the 2014 American Community Survey (ACS)." Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Employment and Disability Institute (EDI). Retrieved November 11, 2016, from www.disabilitystatistics.org.
3 National Council on Disability, “Federal Policy Barriers to Assistive Technology,” (May 31, 2000) 8, http://www.ncd.gov/rawmedia_repository/c9e48e89_261b_4dda_bc74_203d5915519f.pdf
.
4 Assistive Technology Industry Associates, “AT Resources Funding Guide,”
https://www.atia.org/at-resources/what-is-at/resources- funding-guide/ (last accessed December 10, 2018).
5 See 26 U.S.C § 63(f)(4).
6 See e.g. Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services and Disability Research, “Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Request,”
https://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/budget20/justifications/i-rehab.pdf,
p. I-50.

Fact Sheet: Accessible Voting Act

Issue--The constitutionally protected right to vote that is available to all Americans is inaccessible for blind Americans.

*Current federal election law does not reflect the guarantee of equal access to voting for people with disabilities that is codified in Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. §12132). *The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) ensures that polling locations for federal elections have at least one voting system accessible to individuals with
disabilities.1 However, the ballots produced by many of the accessible voting machines are different in size and content from the hand marked ballots, resulting in a lack of secrecy when only voters with disabilities use the accessible machines.

*Untrained poll workers, voting machine malfunctions, and the lack of accessible voting machines in polling places prevent blind and low-vision voters from fully exercising their right to vote. *The blind and low-vision voter survey conducted by the National Federation of the Blind following the 2020 general election2 found that 27 percent of blind and low-vision voters who voted using an accessible voting machine said the machine was not set up and operating when they arrived at the polls. One-quarter of the voters who completed the survey in 2020 said that poll workers had problems setting up or operating the machine. Fifteen percent of survey respondents in 2020 who marked their ballot using an accessible machine said that poll workers did not provide clear instructions on how to use the machine.

*Paper absentee ballots cannot be completed privately and independently by blind voters.* An accessible way for blind, low-vision, or other print-disabled voters to privately and independently mark their ballots must be provided, as required by Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and affirmed by federal courts. 3, 4 However, blind and print-disabled voters cannot mark and submit a paper absentee or vote-by-mail ballot privately and independently. For the 2020 general election, only twenty-six states provided an accessible way for blind voters to mark an absentee ballot.5

*Paper voter registration and absentee ballot request forms are inaccessible to blind voters.* Due to the inherent inaccessibility of paper forms, blind and low-vision voters must complete these forms with assistance. In addition, many online versions of these forms are inaccessible with screen-access technology. A 2015 report by the American Civil Liberties Union found that in 2014, only one state had an online voter registration form that was fully accessible.6 Additionally, a 2020 audit of online absentee ballot request forms by Deque Systems found that forty-three states had forms that were not fully accessible.7

Solution--Accessible Voting Act will:

*Ensure that in-person voting is accessible for blind and low-vision voters, in a manner that provides the same opportunity for access and participation (including privacy and independence) as for other
voters.* Registering
to vote and voting must require the exclusive use of accessible and universally designed processes, including electronic ballot marking devices for all voters. Ballot marking devices require the same security that other forms of voting require to ensure the process is safe and fair, and the use of ballot marking devices at polling locations allows blind and print disabled Americans to submit their ballots both privately and independently.

*Require the education of state and local election officials and poll workers in the setup and operation of the machines, including accessibility features. *At a minimum, poll worker training should include instruction on how to navigate through the audio ballot, how low-vision features operate, and how to address potential problems with the nonvisual election technology on Election Day. There must be enough in-person voting locations to make it practical and reasonable to use this option. In addition, it is equally important to ensure that the process for registering to vote is nonvisually accessible (including certification and signature requirements).

*Require that vote-by-mail ballots and related voting materials (including voter registration) in elections must be accessible for blind and low-vision individuals.* It is important to establish that the process for requesting, filling out (including certification and signature requirements), and submitting a vote-by-mail ballot is nonvisually accessible, including electronic ballot delivery and return. Offering an accessible electronic ballot delivery system can provide these voters with an equal opportunity to mark their ballot privately and independently at home using a computer and their own access technology.

*GOAL--ALL METHODS OF VOTING, INCLUDING REGISTRATION, MUST BE ACCESSIBLE TO BLIND AND LOW-VISION CITIZENS.*

Cosponsor the Accessible Voting Act

For more information, contact:
Jeff Kaloc, Government Affairs Specialist, National Federation of the Blind
Phone: 410-659-9314, extension 2206 Email: jkaloc at nfb.org
------------------------------

1U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Help America Vote Act. January, 2021.
https://www.eac.gov/about_the_eac/help_america_vote_act.aspx

2 Based on a survey conducted by the National Federation of the Blind.
(Unpublished)

3Nat’l Fed’n of the Blind v. Lamone, 813 F.3d 494, 506 (4th Cir. 2016)

4Hindel v. Husted, 875 F.3d 344, 349 (6th Cir. 2017).

5Based on research conducted by the National Federation of the Blind.
(Unpublished)

6American Civil Liberties Union. “Access Denied: Barriers to Online Voter Registration for Citizens with Disabilities.” January, 2015.
https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/021915-aclu-voterregonline_0.pdf
7Deque Systems. “Digital Accessibility in 2020 Election: Progress, But a Long Way to Go.” November 24, 2020.
https://www.deque.com/blog/digital-accessibility-in-2020-election/#main-content


Fact Sheet: Accessible Websites Act

Issue--Websites are required by law to be accessible, but without implementing regulations most businesses and retailers have little understanding of what accessible means.


*Websites and mobile applications are an essential part of modern living. *More than 313 million Americans use the internet,1 and 81 percent of Americans say that they access the internet at least once each day.2 That means that nearly the entire country is accessing websites and mobile applications every day. However, the need to access websites and mobile applications doesn’t stop when it reaches Americans with disabilities. According to the American Community Survey, conducted by the United States Census Bureau, there are approximately forty million Americans who currently have a
disability.3 Based on the numbers above, it is more than reasonable to assume that the vast majority of them are using websites and mobile applications.

*The Department of Justice announced its intention to publish accessible website regulations more than a decade ago.* On July 26, 2010, the twentieth anniversary of the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the government published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking to address website accessibility.4  After that initial announcement, no further action was taken to substantially advance website accessibility.

*The past few years have seen a significant increase in the prevalence of so-called “click-by” lawsuits.* Businesses are required by law to make their websites accessible but claim to have no clear-cut definition of what “accessible” actually means. Meanwhile, people with disabilities must cope with inaccessible websites. ADA Title III lawsuits, which include website accessibility suits, hit record numbers in 2019, topping 11,000 for the first time.5  The number of lawsuits has been increasing steadily since 2013, when the figure was first tracked.6

Solution--Accessible Websites Act will:

*Direct the US Access Board to promulgate accessibility regulations.* The US Access Board will have 12 months following the enactment of the legislation to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding website and mobile application accessibility, then an additional 12 months to issue the final rule.

*Promulgate standards that strive to harmonize with Section 508 standards.* The Section 508 standards promulgated by the US Access Board on January 18, 2017, are established guidelines for website and technology accessibility.
Therefore, the regulations promulgated by the Access Board should harmonize with these standards.

*Empower the Department of Justice to investigate the accessibility of websites and mobile applications.* Either of its own volition or via a logged complaint pertaining to inaccessibility, the Department of Justice will have the authority to investigate accessibility concerns and commence civil action if necessary.

*GOAL--END WEBSITE AND MOBILE APPLICATION INACCESSIBILITY FOR BLIND AMERICANS. *

Sponsor the Accessible Websites Act

For more information, contact:
Jeff Kaloc, Government Affairs Specialist, National Federation of the Blind
Phone: 410-659-9314, extension 2206
Email: jkaloc at nfb.org
------------------------------

For more information visit www.nfb.org.
 1 Statista. “Countries with the highest number of internet users as of December 2019.” June 2020.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/262966/number-of-internet-users-in-selected-countries/

 2 Andrew Perrin & Madhu Kumar. “About three-in-ten U.S. adults say they are ‘almost constantly’ online.” July 25, 2019.
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/07/25/americans-going-online-almost-constantly/
 3 United States Census Bureau, American Community Survey. “The number of non-institutionalized, male or female, all ages, all races, regardless of ethnicity, with all education levels in the United States reported a disability in 2018.” Compiled by Cornell University.
https://www.disabilitystatistics.org/reports/acs.cfm?statistic=1
 4 Federal Register. “Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability; Accessibility of Web Information and Services of State and Local Government Entities and Public Accommodations.” July 26, 2010.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2010/07/26/2010-18334/nondiscrimination-on-the-basis-of-disability-accessibility-of-web-information-and-services-of-state
 5 Minh Vu, Kristina Launey, & Susan Ryan. “2019 Was Another Record-Breaking Year for Federal ADA Title III Lawsuits.” February 20, 2020.
https://www.adatitleiii.com/2020/02/2019-was-another-record-breaking-year-for-federal-ada-title-iii-lawsuits/
 6 Ibid.

Fact Sheet: Medical Device Nonvisual Accessibility Act

Issue--Advanced digital interfaces create barriers that prevent blind individuals from independently and safely operating home-use medical devices that are essential to their daily healthcare needs.


*Home-use medical devices are becoming more prevalent and less accessible for blind Americans.* The rapid proliferation of advanced technology is undeniable. Most newer models of home-use medical devices, such as glucose and blood pressure monitors, along with the emergence of in-home devices that offer medical care options, such as chemotherapy treatments and dialysis, require that consumers interact with a digital display or other interfaces. This new technology has been and continues to be developed and deployed without nonvisual accessibility as an integral part of the design phase, which creates a modern-day barrier. The inaccessibility of home-use medical devices is not a mere inconvenience; if accessibility for blind consumers is omitted from the medical technology landscape, the health, safety, and independence of blind Americans will be in imminent danger.

*Advancements in home-use medical devices have the potential to transform how people live in society but are currently designed for those with no functional limitations.*1 This flaw in product design limits options for blind Americans who need nonvisual access to critically important devices that help them to maintain their health and are available to people without
disabilities.2

*Nonvisual access is achievable, as demonstrated by a number of mainstream
products.* Apple has incorporated VoiceOver (a text-to-speech function) into all of their products, making iPhones, Macbooks and Mac desktops, and iPads fully accessible to blind people right out of the box. Virtually all ATMs manufactured in the United States are accessible, and every polling place is required to have a nonvisually accessible voting machine.
Frequently, a simple audio output or vibrotactile feature can make a product fully accessible at little to no additional cost for manufacturers.

*Current disability laws are not able to keep up with advancements due to the expeditious evolution of medical technology and its incorporation into home-use medical devices. *Although the Americans with Disabilities Act and other laws require physical accessibility for people with disabilities (e.g., wheelchair ramps, Braille in public buildings), no laws protect the blind consumer’s right to technology such as home-use medical devices. The National Council on Disability concluded that accessibility standards lag behind the rapid pace of technology, which can interfere with technology
access.3 This trend of inaccessibility will continue if accessibility solutions are ignored. Only a fraction of medical device manufacturers have incorporated nonvisual access standards into their product design, while others continue to resist these solutions.

Solution--Medical Device Nonvisual Accessibility Act:

*Calls on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to promulgate nonvisual accessibility standards for home-use medical devices. *The FDA will consult with stakeholders with disabilities and manufacturers and issue a notice of proposed rulemaking no later than twelve months after the date of enactment of the act. No later than 24 months after the date of enactment of the act, the FDA will publish the final rule including the nonvisual accessibility standards.

*Requires manufacturers of home-use medical devices to make their products nonvisually accessible.* Manufacturers will have twelve months following the publication of the final rule to ensure that all of the home-use medical devices they produce are nonvisually accessible.

*Authorizes the FDA to enforce the nonvisual access standards for home-use medical devices.* Any manufactured device found to be out of compliance, whether by a public complaint to the FDA or by an independent FDA investigation, will incur the same penalties as failing to meet the same safety standards as other home-use medical devices.

*GOAL--END UNEQUAL ACCESS TO HOME-USE MEDICAL DEVICES FOR BLIND AMERICANS. *

Cosponsor the Medical Device Nonvisual Accessibility Act

For more information, contact:
Stephanie Flynt, Government Affairs Specialist, National Federation of the Blind Phone: 410-659-9314, extension 2210
Email: sflynt at nfb.org
------------------------------

1 See NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITIES, National Disability Policy Progress
Report: Technology that enables access to the full opportunities of citizenship under the Constitution is a right at 19 (October 7, 2016), available at https://ncd.gov/progressreport/2016/progress-report-october-2016.

2 See Id.

3 See Id.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ATAA Fact Sheet.docx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 34409 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/cinci-nfb_nfbnet.org/attachments/20210124/db46488f/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Medical Device Nonvisual Access Act.docx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 33711 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/cinci-nfb_nfbnet.org/attachments/20210124/db46488f/attachment-0001.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Accessible Websites Act Fact Sheet.docx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 33743 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/cinci-nfb_nfbnet.org/attachments/20210124/db46488f/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Accessible Voting Fact Sheet.docx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 34419 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/cinci-nfb_nfbnet.org/attachments/20210124/db46488f/attachment-0003.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Untitled attachment 01121.txt
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/cinci-nfb_nfbnet.org/attachments/20210124/db46488f/attachment.txt>