<div dir="auto"><div>Tim</div><div dir="auto">Thank you for your leadership. A few thoughts to take or leave.</div><div dir="auto">1. There is already precedent for not cutting AAR access when routes are cut as this was done during COVID. This would not be inconvenient for users, it would completely cut them out of community. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">2. I suggest we take a communuty centric approach. A thriving city or metro area needs functioning transit. We have already seen that transit use declines as frequency declines. Maybe we can get with PIRG and transit alliance, unions, and others to have unified voice against reduced service and increased fares. While it clearly affects those of us who can't drive or cannot afford a vehicle the most, the lack of transit is bad for our community. In these times of division and scarcity mindsets I think a message about bettering our whole community might resonate more than messaging solely about us. </div><div dir="auto">3. RTD fairly recently did a whole fare study and reduced fares after learning we were one of the most expensive regions in the country. Increasing fares so soon after all of that work doesn't promote strategic thinking. Also, during the experiment of free fare for better air ridership improved significantly as did the atmosphere on the busses. I am not suggesting we recommend eliminating fares during a fiscal crisis, just that we point to data and advocate not increasing them..at least not significantly. Again, I would advocate a more community centric approach pointing out that with the affordability issues throughout the metro area an increase could further erode ridership. I have no idea if this is possible or if it would be worth it but I wonder if their tech could accommodate a voluntary increase for individuals. Like could we set up our my ride accounts to add some amount like 25 or 50 cents per ride as a choice so those that could afford it and want to support transit could without burdening the whole system? It might not work because we have lost so many of the choice riders. </div><div dir="auto">I am curious what NFB thinks about reducing Flex Ride services? </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Thanks everyone for your advocacy. I hope that if us non drivers can team with unions and environmental activists we can build a large enough coalition because no matter what we will need to back to the voters next year. I think that may be a tough sell.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div><br></div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Julie Reiskin Co Executive Director CCDC</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, May 27, 2026, 8:17\u202fAM Tim Keenan via Colorado-Talk <<a href="mailto:colorado-talk@nfbnet.org">colorado-talk@nfbnet.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-US" link="#467886" vlink="#96607D" style="overflow-wrap: break-word;"><div class="m_-493055299195943394WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal"><span>Hey, RTD riders and transit advocates!<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>Time is short, so please read this carefully.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>Yesterday RTD management released their latest proposal for addressing the agency's budget deficit. <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>The good news: the hard push for an immediate 20% service cut appears to be off the table for now. <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>The bad news: service cuts are still very much in play, and the disability community has serious concerns about what's in this proposal. ADAPT Colorado, a fellow disability rights organization that has been watching this closely, has already identified three major red flags. We agree with every one of them.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>Red flag number one: route reductions could reduce paratransit eligibility. If RTD cuts fixed routes, the ADA-mandated paratransit service area shrinks with them -- and existing riders could lose their eligibility entirely. ADAPT has been pushing RTD to grandfather existing paratransit riders if cuts do occur, so that people who are eligible today don't lose access they've come to depend on. Chair O'Keefe has indicated support for this, but there is resistance from other quarters. We need the board to hear that grandfathering existing riders is the bare minimum.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>Red flag number two: fixed-route fare increases are on the table, and paratransit riders could feel the impact. By law, paratransit fares cannot exceed twice the standard fixed-route fare. That's a ceiling, not a floor -- RTD isn't required to raise paratransit fares if fixed-route fares go up. But given the financial pressure management is under, the risk is real. For riders who just absorbed a significant fare increase on Access-on-Demand on January 1st, any further increase would be a serious hardship.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>Red flag number three: at least one board member continues to push for eliminating Access-on-Demand entirely. This is deeply alarming. ADAPT has demonstrated using RTD's own data that AOD is the most cost-effective paratransit option RTD offers -- and that Access-a-Ride is currently failing on multiple performance measures. AOD is the only reliable option for many riders. Eliminating it would not save money. It would shift those riders to a more expensive service that is already struggling, and it would expose RTD to serious legal liability under the ADA.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>Management's new approach has shifted from a specific 20% cut proposal to a menu of options for the board to prioritize. That sounds less alarming, but it isn't -- because buried in that menu are options that could devastate our community. The key votes are now scheduled for June 9 and June 10 in committee, with a full board vote on June 23. Those dates are coming up fast, and tonight's meeting is the first opportunity to speak directly to the board since this proposal was released. We need to get our perspective on the record while there's still time to influence the outcome.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>We do have allies on the Board. Directors Benker, Ruscha, Larsen, and Guzman have all pushed back on management's approach. They need to see us in that room tonight.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>Tonight's meeting: Wednesday, May 27, 5:30 PM, 1660 Blake Street, Denver. In person is more powerful -- please come if you can. <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>Zoom registration: </span><span style="font-size:11pt"><a href="https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_x8BY5TdBSH-kLMrJO3zOUg#/registration" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_x8BY5TdBSH-kLMrJO3zOUg#/registration</a></span><span> <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>Written comments, please send ASAP if you haven\u2019t already: <a href="mailto:RTD.Directors@rtd-denver.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">RTD.Directors@rtd-denver.com</a>.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>See you tonight.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>Tim Keenan <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>State Transportation Chair <u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span>National Federation of the Blind of Colorado<u></u><u></u></span></p></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
Colorado-Talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Colorado-Talk@nfbnet.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Colorado-Talk@nfbnet.org</a><br>
<a href="http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/colorado-talk_nfbnet.org" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/colorado-talk_nfbnet.org</a><br>
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Colorado-Talk:<br>
<a href="http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/colorado-talk_nfbnet.org/jreiskin%40ccdconline.org" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/colorado-talk_nfbnet.org/jreiskin%40ccdconline.org</a><br>
List archives can be found at <<a href="http://www.nfbnet.org/pipermail/colorado-talk_nfbnet.org" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.nfbnet.org/pipermail/colorado-talk_nfbnet.org</a>><br>
</blockquote></div>
<br>
<span style="color:rgb(0,0,128);font-family:Arial;font-size:x-small">The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.</span><br>