[Diabetes-talk] technology flaws

Jude DaShiell jdashiel at shellworld.net
Sun Nov 25 21:48:55 UTC 2012


The development will get done and with nanotechnology when it gets too 
expensive not to do the development and no sooner. On Sun, 25 Nov 2012, 
Sandi Ryan wrote:

> Well, we don't exactly get these things free, and we do pay for medications
> and supplies from the pharmaceutical companies who need to develop things that
> are accessible.  I'm willing to pay more for that lancet.  Yes I am!
> 
> Xo
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Freeman" <k7uij at panix.com>
> To: "'Diabetes Talk for the Blind'" <diabetes-talk at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 12:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Diabetes-talk] technology flaws
> 
> 
> > Prey who's gonna pay for all this development?
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Diabetes-talk [mailto:diabetes-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of
> > Jude DaShiell
> > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 10:38 AM
> > To: diabetes-talk at nfbnet.org
> > Subject: [Diabetes-talk] technology flaws
> >
> > At least for blind diabetics, lancets need to get smarter.  The lancet
> > needs to detect a capillary and fire only when it's on one of them if
> > there's enough blood flow through it to get a donation.  Meters need to
> > log every attempt to use them for a reading whether or not a valid reading
> > gets generated.  Doctors probably trivialize the problem of invalid
> > readings because those too are not part of the output from meters.  This
> > second criticism I think holds for all meters in use these days.  Any one
> > of these changes might get engineers and researchers to improve meters to
> > the point that a meter doesn't just give an invalid reading, it could tell
> > you or show a sighted diabetic correctly what the specific problem was
> > that caused the invalid reading in the first place.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > jude <jdashiel at shellworld.net>
> > Adobe fiend for failing to Flash
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Diabetes-talk mailing list
> > Diabetes-talk at nfbnet.org
> > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org
> > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> > Diabetes-talk:
> > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40panix.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Diabetes-talk mailing list
> > Diabetes-talk at nfbnet.org
> > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org
> > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> > Diabetes-talk:
> > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org/sjryan2%40gmail.com
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Diabetes-talk mailing list
> Diabetes-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Diabetes-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org/jdashiel%40shellworld.net
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
jude <jdashiel at shellworld.net>
Adobe fiend for failing to Flash






More information about the Diabetes-Talk mailing list