[Dtb-talk] BANA UEB code vote
Greg Kearney
gkearney at gmail.com
Sun Nov 4 23:46:33 UTC 2012
The UEB math codes fundamental problem in my opinion is that it seeks to describe math rather than be a true representation of math itself. A Nementh math expression is just that an expression not a description of math. It is further aided by being developed by a mathmetition a world known expert in the field of math independent of his background in Braille.
Gregory Kearney | Manager Accessible Media
Association for the Blind of WA - Guide Dogs WA
PO Box 101, Victoria Park WA 6979 | 61 Kitchener Ave, Victoria Park WA 6100
Tel: 08 9311 8246 | Fax: 08 9361 8696 | www.guidedogswa.com.au
Tel: 307-224-4022 (North America)
Email: greg.kearney at guidedogswa.com.au
Email: gkearney at gmail.com
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Article 19 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights
On 05/11/2012, at 7:16 AM, "Mike Freeman" <k7uij at panix.com> wrote:
> IMO the problem is that too many who are highly involved in working with
> Braille codes are math-phobic. <grin>
>
> Mike
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dtb-talk [mailto:dtb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Greg
> Kearney
> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 11:26 AM
> To: Discussion of Digital Talking Books
> Subject: Re: [Dtb-talk] BANA UEB code vote
>
> I agree, Nemeth is vastly better than the weak UEB math code. They are
> correct in retaining it while using UEB for literary works.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> Greg Kearney
> Association for the Blind of Western Australia
>
> On 05/11/2012, at 2:20 AM, "Mike Freeman" <k7uij at panix.com> wrote:
>
>> Because its math implementation sucks big-time!
>>
>> Mike Freeman
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dtb-talk [mailto:dtb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Roger
> devin
>> Prater
>> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 9:33 AM
>> To: Discussion of Digital Talking Books
>> Subject: Re: [Dtb-talk] BANA UEB code vote
>>
>> Why use UEB for just literary stuff? That defeats the whole, entire
> purpose
>> of UEB, to be a Unified English Braille code.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Andrews" <dandrews at visi.com>
>> To: "Discussion of Digital Talking Books" <dtb-talk at nfbnet.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 11:25 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Dtb-talk] BANA UEB code vote
>>
>>
>>> Well, I wouldn't jump to any conclusions. One proposal was to use UEB
> for
>>
>>> literary stuff, and still allow Nemeth for Math and Science. Don't know
>>> either way if this is what they did?
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> At 11:10 AM 11/4/2012, you wrote:
>>>> Oh, this is wonderful! Now I won't have to worry about Nimath codes and
>>>> all that anymore? That's what I've always hated about braille notes and
>>>> iPods and things like that, that in US braille I could not do math
> easily
>>>> as I could with UEB. But my goodness I'm going to miss the "to" sign and
>
>>>> the "ation" sign.
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Andrews" <dandrews at visi.com>
>>>> To: "Discussion of Digital Talking Books" <dtb-talk at nfbnet.org>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 11:00 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Dtb-talk] BANA UEB code vote
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I just read on Twitter that BANA voted to adopt UEB, have no details.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave
>>>>>
>>>>> At 03:29 AM 11/4/2012, you wrote:
>>>>>> Does anyone know how BANAs vote on the use of UEB in the U.S. went on
>>>>>> Saturday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greg Kearney
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greg Kearney
>>>>>> Association for the Blind of Western Australia
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dtb-talk mailing list
>>> Dtb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/dtb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>> Dtb-talk:
>>
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/dtb-talk_nfbnet.org/r.d.t.prater%40gmail.c
>> om
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dtb-talk mailing list
>> Dtb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/dtb-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Dtb-talk:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/dtb-talk_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40panix.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dtb-talk mailing list
>> Dtb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/dtb-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Dtb-talk:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/dtb-talk_nfbnet.org/gkearney%40gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dtb-talk mailing list
> Dtb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/dtb-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Dtb-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/dtb-talk_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40panix.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dtb-talk mailing list
> Dtb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/dtb-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Dtb-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/dtb-talk_nfbnet.org/gkearney%40gmail.com
More information about the DTB-Talk
mailing list