[Electronics-talk] [EXTERNAL]Re: cordless phones etc.

[Sandy]

I have a phone given to me by an equipment distribution program for the 
disabled; this cordless is good as I am hearing impaired.  It is made by 
Sereen and comes with a male voice and built in caller ID.  I also have a 
Clasco corded phone with a male voice for the caller ID, but don't use that 
much as the Sereen is louder.


Sandy

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Baracco, Andrew W" <Andrew.Baracco at va.gov>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 5:44 PM
To: "Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances" 
<electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
Subject: Re: [Electronics-talk] [EXTERNAL]Re:  cordless phones etc.

> I once spoke from someone from Panasonic who said that there is not
> enough time between rings to recite the telephone number. The boxes can
> do this because they are independent from the telephone.
>
> Andy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Electronics-talk [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of Snow White Dove
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 2:41 PM
> To: Gary Lee; Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances
> Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [Electronics-talk] cordless phones etc.
>
> Honestly, if you ask my opinion, which I know you didn't:)
>
> If you get a caller I.D. that says the phone numbers, or have one
> already, what's the point in spending the money on the Panasonic ones
> that slaughter the namesand don't give you the phone numbers.
>
> I'd do it if the menu options spoke as well, but that isn't the case so
> I refuse to spend that much money or effort to find a specific brand
> when it doesn't really have accessible features all the way through.
>
> Brad and I have a separate caller I.D. and when our chord less dies,
> which is a Panasonic I can garontee I'm not gonna let him or myself
> break our necks to get another one.
>
> I had an AT&T one back in the day that sound quality wise kicked the
> Panasonic ones out of the water by a long shot.
>
> JMO,
>
> Jenny
> On Dec 16, 2013, at 11:16 AM, Gary Lee <kb9zuv at arrl.net> wrote:
>
>> anyone with the newer panasonics, do they date/time stamp the
> messages?
>> I have the kx-tg9331 and it does not.
>>
>> really the only feature I  miss.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Electronics-talk mailing list
>> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Electronics-talk:
>>
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/jlperdue3%
> 40gmail.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-talk mailing list
> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Electronics-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/andrew.bar
> acco%40va.gov
>
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-talk mailing list
> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> Electronics-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/sandraburgess%40msn.com
>