[Electronics-talk] Digital TV Discussion

Sat Jan 26 21:32:12 UTC 2013

to the person  wants to knmow as to where Cable TV get their signal from for 
satellite sereception such as HBO and SHO they have to use different C-band 
receiver which are on different channels from the main Sat receiver, then 
those channeles are sent to a down converter which causes a signal loss of 
about 5db to 10db and then is asighned to their current receivers which 
might be on Cable 124 or 125 for HBO or SHO as examples
Please keep in mind the original Satellite Cband signal of 3.7Ghz to 4.2Ghz 
is processes or downconverter which also causes a signal loss as well and 
that is the reason for many of the cable subscribers which are having such a 
difficult time with their reception issues. That is not asome in my book. 
The sames applied with the small pizza pan dishes from DirecTV and Dish 
Network for they have to do th same with their receivers. I hope this helps 
also keep in minds their is a 10 second delay from the original for which 
you will find from these providers. there is no delay when usind a 
conventional rooftop antenna or a cband dish sistem for the reason their 
signal is a direct raw feed and there is no delay, also keep in mind the 
audio specrtum from the original is 350 Mhz as where as Cable systems and 
small dish systems compressed the audio down from 128mhz as low as 60Mhz
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jude DaShiell" <jdashiel at shellworld.net>
To: "Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances" 
<electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Electronics-talk] Digital TV Discussion


> No it isn't.  Where do you think cable companies download their signal
> from?  Satellite.  I knew this before I went home for about a month for
> Christmas and got to use a TV hooked up to directv which had basic service
> and signal broke with that setup too.On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, Ashley Bramlett
> wrote:
>
>> our cable tv ocasionally breaks the signal too and as others said it 
>> sucks
>> when you need to hear all words to make sense of the dialogue such as a
>> recipie or instructions.
>> I heard satalite is better.
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: cheez
>> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 9:12 AM
>> To: Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances
>> Subject: Re: [Electronics-talk] Digital TV Discussion
>>
>> Nice to hear I'm not the only one that has broken digital signals.  I'm 
>> just
>> about ready to drop Cox for TV and go satellite.  I may even just use
>> Netflix and Hulu.
>> Vince
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jude DaShiell" 
>> <jdashiel at shellworld.net>
>> To: "Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances"
>> <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 12:20 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Electronics-talk] Digital TV Discussion
>>
>>
>> > Digital tv needs to go far away.  The reception on it has degraded to
>> > shortwave quality for the sound.  What's worse, cable users are having
>> > broken digital signals sent to them through the cable systems so 
>> > because
>> > analog went away, even the cable signals are degraded.  The satelite
>> > signals are no better either.  People are going to need to dump digital 
>> > tv
>> > entirely and use web pages for the critical stuff to get all the 
>> > missing
>> > information digital signals have left out.  It's frustrating when
>> > listening to cooking shows where recipes are given to have several 
>> > words
>> > in the recipe missing because of digital technology.  Also many others 
>> > who
>> > are sighted I've talked with think digital stinks as well.
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > jude <jdashiel at shellworld.net> Adobe fiend for failing to Flash
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Electronics-talk mailing list
>> > Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>> > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>> > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> > Electronics-talk:
>> > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/cheez%40cox.net
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Electronics-talk mailing list
>> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Electronics-talk:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/bookwormahb%40earthlink.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Electronics-talk mailing list
>> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Electronics-talk:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/jdashiel%40shellworld.net
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> jude <jdashiel at shellworld.net>
> Adobe fiend for failing to Flash
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-talk mailing list
> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> Electronics-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/cbandman1949%40surewest.net
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.2890 / Virus Database: 2639/6056 - Release Date: 01/25/13
>