[Electronics-Talk] How many accessible pedestrian signals do you have in your city?

Fri Jan 12 01:54:15 UTC 2018

I don't think anyone is suggesting that you would cross a road based 
solely on what your smart phone is telling you, just as plenty of people 
have pointed out that an APS just tells you the signal has changed but 
doesn't indicate that it's safe to cross or you shouldn't be listening 
for traffic sounds. However, that doesn't mean that a blind pedestrian 
with a smart phone shouldn't be able to take advantage of yet another 
travel aid.

On 01/11/2018 08:37 AM, Abdul Hai via Electronics-Talk wrote:
> I would not trust a smartphone myself. Crossing a road is a judgement call.  You can keep up with me on Twitter.
>
>
>
>
>
>        From: Pamela Dominguez via Electronics-Talk <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
>   To: Discussion of accessible home electronics and appliances <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
> Cc: Pamela Dominguez <geodom at optonline.net>
>   Sent: Thursday, 11 January 2018, 2:50
>   Subject: Re: [Electronics-Talk] How many accessible pedestrian signals do you have in your city?
>     
> Thank you.  It seems that everybody with a smart phone forgets about
> everybody else.  Pam.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald Levy via Electronics-Talk
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:59 AM
> To: Discussion of accessible home electronics and appliances
> Cc: Gerald Levy
> Subject: Re: [Electronics-Talk] How many accessible pedestrian signals do
> you have in your city?
>
>
> But what about the majority of blind pedestrians who do not own smart
> phones?  How would they benefit from an app that could alert a smart phone
> user when it is safe to cross an intersection, even if such an app could
> even be developed in the first place?  The traffic signal would still need
> an audible alert so that it would benefit all blind pedestrians and not just
> those with smart phones in order to comply with the ADA, regardless of the
> expense to the municipality.
>
> Gerald
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tracy Carcione via Electronics-Talk
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:29 AM
> To: 'Discussion of accessible home electronics and appliances'
> Cc: Tracy Carcione
> Subject: Re: [Electronics-Talk] How many accessible pedestrian signals do
> you have in your city?
>
> Hi Jim.
> I also live on a quieter street that crosses a very busy one, and I had the
> exact problem you describe--figuring out a lull in traffic from when I had
> the light.  It's also an offset intersection, with a lot of turning traffic.
> As I said, I had to fight hard to get an APS there, but, every time I was
> thinking of giving up, I'd misjudge the light, and I'd grit my teeth and go
> back to the battle.  I should not have to risk my life, literally, to cross
> the street.  Well, no more than anyone else does. To heck with what it cost
> the county.  I pay taxes, and my life has value in itself.
>
> I have been wondering for years if it would be practical to develop a smart
> phone app that would say when the walk sign was on.  It would have to be
> absolutely real-time, and reliable.  But, if it could be done, it ought to
> be a lot cheaper than APS's are now. And maybe there's a way to make it work
> with any traffic light one encounters.  Do you think such a thing could
> work?
> Tracy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Electronics-Talk [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of Jim McCarthy via Electronics-Talk
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 2:28 PM
> To: 'Discussion of accessible home electronics and appliances'
> Cc: Jim McCarthy
> Subject: Re: [Electronics-Talk] How many accessible pedestrian signals do
> you have in your city?
>
> Tracy,
> I do think that the end point is what you suggest, to have one at every
> intersection that has a traffic light. When there is new development, they
> should be put in at the get go as you suggest they are. In other cases, I do
> think the more complicated intersections should be first; I think that if a
> traffic light needs repair or replacement, an accessible signal should take
> its place; and finally, someday there will be accessible signals at every
> intersection. I did not always think that it needed to be an equality thing
> but that is the way I am headed now also. I live on a north south street
> that is not very busy. It is a plus intersection though so my street crosses
> a very busy street, one of the more busy in that part of the city and one
> that crosses the entire city toward its north end. The busy street is not
> even all that wide so the intersection is not geometrically complicated. It
> does not have an audible signal but might benefit from one. The reason is
> that there is often not traffic on my street crossing. There are some gaps
> on the busy street but a blind travelers is left guessing, "is there a gap
> because the light is favorable?" Perhaps, it is just a traffic lag and one
> may need to race across. Having an audible traffic signal would take away
> the guess work. Is this the most important intersection in the city for a
> signal? Probably not but there would be benefit in having one. I have lived
> in that neighborhood for many years and feel safe crossing so I have not
> asked for this yet.
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Electronics-Talk [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of Tracy Carcione via Electronics-Talk
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2018 11:14 AM
> To: 'Discussion of accessible home electronics and appliances'
> Cc: Tracy Carcione
> Subject: Re: [Electronics-Talk] How many accessible pedestrian signals do
> you have in your city?
>
> Thanks Jim.  I hadn't thought much about what you bring up.  What criteria
> do you think they should use?  Put in an accessible signal at the most
> complicated intersections, and, when those are covered, move on to less
> complicated ones?  Should the goal be to have an accessible signal wherever
> there is a crossing signal?  I didn't used to think so, but now I'm starting
> to think that I have the same right to know the status of the light as my
> sighted neighbors have.
>
> I had to fight tooth and claw to get the first signal in my county.  I had
> to get my state assemblywoman involved, and threaten the county with an ADA
> lawsuit.  But now, a few years later, they have put in 2 more signals on the
> main drag all on their own.  They seem to be putting them where there is new
> development--new businesses going in.  I'm not sure what their criteria are,
> but I am glad to have them.
> Tracy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Electronics-Talk [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of Jim McCarthy via Electronics-Talk
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2018 10:23 AM
> To: 'Discussion of accessible home electronics and appliances'
> Cc: Jim McCarthy
> Subject: Re: [Electronics-Talk] How many accessible pedestrian signals do
> you have in your city?
>
> I have been reading this thread with some interest. It seems to me that much
> of the time, the answer will be like Mike has said here that there is some
> certain number in his area and he knows this because he asked for and got
> their installation. What I have not noticed in the thread is a reason for
> knowing how many there are. This is information a city transportation or
> traffic department probably has but I think the number a jurisdiction has
> does not matter very much. The trend of installation is more important to
> indicate progress in the installation. It still bothers me that many
> jurisdictions react as Fort Collins did for Mike, that is that they install
> them in areas that blind people frequent or only when a blind person or
> enough of us make the request. The result is that in many of the places
> these are installed, they do not offer actual assistance to blind travelers
> and in places where they would offer that help, they are not installed
> because there is not an entity expected to be frequented by people who are
> blind or because no requests have been made.    I suppose though that if the
> trigger for installation is that there has been a request, I am glad Fort
> Collins has responded as they have. In many instances, the answer is that
> they are expensive so we can't or won't install. To me the right approach is
> to have as a part of a long term transportation plan the goal of installing
> some number per year. It also strikes me as best to rank intersections based
> on criteria so that the really complicated ones receive the devices also.
> Jim McCarthy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Electronics-Talk [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of Mike Sedmak via Electronics-Talk
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 5:25 PM
> To: Discussion of accessible home electronics and appliances
> Cc: Mike Sedmak
> Subject: Re: [Electronics-Talk] How many accessible pedestrian signals do
> you have in your city?
>
> We have five in my corner of Fort Collins, CO.  I called the city traffic
> operations engineer and asked him to install them on all the crossings I
> frequent.  I would recommend asking for them in your area if you like them.
>
>
> Our city ops said they are relatively expensive, so they only install them
> when requested.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> Sent from my iPhone, please forgive the typos.
>
>> On Jan 4, 2018, at 1:19 PM, Andy Baracco via Electronics-Talk
> <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>> Interestingly enough, I don't think that we have that many in the
>> entire
> city of Los Angeles.
>> Andy
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike via Electronics-Talk"
>> <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
>> To: <Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org>
>> Cc: "Mike" <mrmikie273 at gmail.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 2:29 AM
>> Subject: [Electronics-Talk] How many accessible pedestrian signals do
>> you
> have in your city?
>>
>>> How many accessible pedestrian signals do you have in your city or
>>> area? In the greater Daytona Beach Florida we now have 32 of them.
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Electronics-Talk mailing list
>>> Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Electronics-Talk:
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/wq6r%40
>>> socal.rr.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Electronics-Talk mailing list
>> Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Electronics-Talk:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/mcsedmak
>> %40gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-Talk mailing list
> Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Electronics-Talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/jmccarthy%40md
> tap.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-Talk mailing list
> Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Electronics-Talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/carcione%40acc
> ess.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-Talk mailing list
> Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Electronics-Talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/jmccarthy%40md
> tap.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-Talk mailing list
> Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Electronics-Talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/carcione%40acc
> ess.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-Talk mailing list
> Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Electronics-Talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/bwaylimited%40verizon.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-Talk mailing list
> Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Electronics-Talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/geodom%40optonline.net
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-Talk mailing list
> Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Electronics-Talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/ahai11london%40yahoo.co.uk
>
>
>     
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-Talk mailing list
> Electronics-Talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Electronics-Talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/chaltain%40gmail.com

-- 
Christopher (CJ)
Chaltain at Gmail