[Faith-talk] Bible Translations

[Ashley Bramlett]

Jeanette,
Me too. I used the niv because it was the only one I could find in braille.
I think I like the Good News Bible too. If I get another bible either in 
audio or electronic text, I want to read the NKJ. I think I'd follow it 
better than KJ since that has the thous and thee's and  thine, etc in it.

Ashley

-----Original Message----- 
From: Jeanette
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 7:45 PM
To: Faith-talk,for the discussion of faith and religion
Subject: Re: [Faith-talk] Bible Translations

i learned many scriptures and did many a bible study with the NIV it was the
only version i could get in braille for many years, i now have a nkjv and
enjoy it but have also used the nasv and the rsv for study, many folks, good
Christian folks as far as i know like all kinds of versions, i thinkit again
is a personal preference and we should not judge others for the version they
use, i find the idea that one version is the only one to use part of the
legalism that some folks love and push, thanks for the information in this
email
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ryan Kwaak" <kwaakproductions at gmail.com>
To: "Faith-talk,for the discussion of faith and religion"
<faith-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 5:39 PM
Subject: [Faith-talk] Bible Translations


> Well the topic of good and bad Bible versions has come up, and I
> believe it merits a new thread. As some of you might have guessed by
> my Baptist roots, I hold to the Authorized King James version and
> continue to use it exclusively. However, I used to believe that it was
> the ONLY Word of God for the English-speaking population because that
> was what my church teaches. Not only that, but to my knowledge the KJV
> wasn't copyrighted by a nonprofit corporation with a vested economic
> interest in its usage like the more modern versions. That was until I
> did the research. Turns out, The KJV is public domain worldwide except
> in Great Britain. The laws in force at that time pre-date any modern
> copyright legislation, but the right to disseminate the KJV is
> bestowed upon whomever the Sovereign wishes to grant it to, and today
> that right is held by Cambridge University Press. Not only that, but
> the KJV was written by Anglicans with an ulterior political agenda,
> and nothing could go into the KJV that the king, as the
> self-proclaimed spiritual authority in England, did not first approve.
> However, I still hold to the KJV because it sparked a myriad of
> old-time revivals and turned many a gambling drunkard into a
> Christian. Although the newer versions may be easier to understand,
> some of the corporations producing these newer Bibles tend to water
> the message down and compromise the Word of God to be more politically
> correct. A good new version that claims not to compromise the truth is
> the New American Standard Bible, but old habits are hard to break, and
> I for one will keep my KJV.
>
> -- 
> KWAAK PRODUCTIONS
>
> PROFESSIONAL-QUALITY VOICE IMAGING AND AUDIO SERVICES.
>
> Call (815) 315-9492) for a price quote.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Faith-talk mailing list
> Faith-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/faith-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> Faith-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/faith-talk_nfbnet.org/nettiecosp%40yahoo.com


_______________________________________________
Faith-talk mailing list
Faith-talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/faith-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
Faith-talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/faith-talk_nfbnet.org/bookwormahb%40earthlink.net