[Faith-talk] {Spam?} Re: {Spam?} Re: {Spam?} SV: {Spam?} Orientalism
Ashley Bramlett
bookwormahb at earthlink.net
Tue Sep 6 03:29:58 UTC 2016
Emanuel,
While I am a Christian, I cannot accept that all religions are false.
I am offended by your pronouncements about it. Remember this is for all
faiths not just christians. Please be careful what you write.
Ashley
-----Original Message-----
From: Emanuel via Faith-Talk
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2016 11:51 PM
To: Ericka via Faith-Talk
Cc: Emanuel
Subject: [Faith-talk] {Spam?} Re: {Spam?} SV: {Spam?} Orientalism
Islam is false !!!!!!!!!!!
Skickat från min kapsys
Ericka via Faith-Talk <faith-talk at nfbnet.org> skrev:
>Yes, Mostafa says he is. A rude one!
>
>You must have an interesting perspective Emmanuel. What your family did to
>you remind me of what Amish do to family who leave or do not embrace their
>fundementalist way of faith & simple lifestyle.
>
>Ericka
>
> from my iPhone 6s
>
>> On Sep 3, 2016, at 4:31 AM, Emanuel via Faith-Talk
>> <faith-talk at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>>
>> Are you muslim ?
>>
>> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
>> Från: Faith-Talk [mailto:faith-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] För Mostafa
>> Almahdy via Faith-Talk
>> Skickat: den 3 september 2016 11:26
>> Till: Faith-talk, for the discussion of faith and religion
>> <faith-talk at nfbnet.org>
>> Kopia: Mostafa Almahdy <mostafa.almahdy at gmail.com>
>> Ämne: [Faith-talk] {Spam?} Orientalism
>>
>> Orientalism is an academic term used by scholars in art, history,
>> literary, Theology, geography and cultural studies for the depiction of
>> Eastern that is( Oriental cultures), including Middle Eastern, North
>> African, South Asian and Southeast Asian cultures done by writers,
>> designers, and artists from the West. In some western universities, these
>> are called (Middle Eastern studies) or just (Eastern Studies) for short.
>> This definition of Orientalism is actually taken from Wikipedia. There is
>> another definition.
>> Orientalism is a way of seeing that imagines, emphasizes, exaggerates and
>> distorts differences of Arab peoples and cultures as compared to that of
>> Europe and the United States. It often involves seeing Arab culture as
>> exotic, backward, uncivilized, and at times dangerous. Well at this
>> point, we must hold the cane from the middle. In other words, we must be
>> fair. I have always told my fellows who reside in the west, that you
>> shouldn’t put all western people in one basket. Each and every culture
>> has different sapidities. There are mild, moderate and severe ones. One
>> of my very close friends is a mechanical engineer. He studies and works
>> in France. He worked in Germany before he moved to France recently.
>> France is a bit closer to the States in its racial discrimination.
>> Concerning Germany, he mentioned to me quite positive and encouraging
>> situations that he encountered with people there. What he mentioned to me
>> defies unworthy Arab stereotypes about the west. So for instance, it
>> refutes the stereotype of westerns being unaccommodating and insensate.
>> Well, quite the opposite, he told me that people surrounded him treated
>> him with recognized cordial and hospitable disposal. It also defies the
>> stereotype of western women being so easy, voluptuous and daring. There
>> are many of them who have ethical motive, virtue, they have erubescent
>> and girlie shyness. He also mentioned to me situations that are
>> sufficient to defy the stereotype of us being constantly despised in the
>> west. It is a proper occasion to clarify my inimical stridence. Whom is
>> it toward? It essentially is intended to campaign against the (Alt Right
>> Movement).
>> The best way to put it is to basically portray it in Trump’s camp.
>> It’s a right-wing southern white supremacy. They aggress against anyone
>> who is different from them. They are intolerant toward people with ethnic
>> diversity. They often are misanthrope and dysphemistic.
>> Many people in the west are not in favour of this hostile camp. I always
>> make a significant difference between Europe and the United States. We
>> can generically refer to Europeans as mostly reasonable, edified and
>> open-minded. However, many Americans due to media dominance are largely
>> disinformed, insulated and quite prejudiced about other parts of the
>> world. This is why, American culture is quite marginalised, it began to
>> be diminished in our region. Europe is the ideal substitute in my humble
>> opinion. European nations are geographically closer to us. They have long
>> history in affiliation with our region, either during Crusades or modern
>> invasion. They learned a lot about us during neither era. This is why I
>> don’t think they will return to engage against us once again. Of course,
>> we won’t deny the existence of anti-Islam movements in many parts of
>> Europe. It is natural to see such variation. The difference though, that
>> the hostile camp in the States is quite active and possibly influential
>> through their mass media whilst in Europe, they may not necessarily have
>> this impact. In Europe, you may hear about charges of committing hate
>> crimes either by unbearable acts or through abhorrent rhetoric.
>> Well in the States, it’s unlikely to hear charges of hate crimes against
>> detestable southerners, for instance. There are many key factors to
>> critically differentiate between American and European cultures. Whilst
>> both are classified as westernly orientated, there are major differences.
>> First of which, is the social structure of each side. Europe is more open
>> to welcoming various cultures and throughout its educational system,
>> these cultures are smoothly desegregated. In the American camp, there are
>> many communities inhabiting the same region, yet they are constantly
>> skeptic and suspicious of each other.
>> Most people in the States are obsessed with watching movies whilst
>> relaxing. They are sort of television addicts. In contrast, Europeans
>> like to read and they may not be as addicted to television as their
>> rivals. For these reasons and more, I recommend shifting our focus to
>> invest our interest and intellectually in particular with the European
>> side. So Orientalism like any academic discipline, has its pros and cons.
>> Thomas Carlyle is a prominent Scottish author and historian. He wrote
>> about the French revolution and he had very positive perspectives
>> concerning Muslims and prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon
>> him). There are many orientalists who serve in this camp. Our role here
>> is to collaborate with them and produce a mutual work that is based on
>> deferentially scholastic approach. We also must allow a suitable room for
>> worthwhile scrutiny. The west isn’t held accountable for our deplorable
>> state of nescience. We ought to practically refine our education. I have
>> read couple of textbooks on Orientalism in Arabic. Well, they both deal
>> with the subject from the disputing standpoint. It essentially relies on
>> the conspiratorial theory. It studies and examines Orientalism as a tool
>> of Colonialism.
>> It critically studies how Orientalists constantly portray Middle Eastern
>> cultures as strange, awkward and often threatening to western liberty.
>> Thus, it justifies western expeditions to Muslim lands. The United States
>> uses Orientally prejudiced notions to justify its position from the
>> Muslim world. If you listen to how American prominent figures speak, you
>> will recognize their plain indulgence with slanted Orientalism. Islam is
>> tactically expended to terrify and jeopardise lay Americans. The business
>> of insistently demonizing and prejudiciously depicting Muslims as radical
>> terrorists, murderers, plotters and fundamentally fanatics is the norm in
>> America. The portrayal of the prophet (peace and blessings be upon him)
>> as philanderer and paedophile makes us fathom the vicious American
>> version of Orientalism. It is essentially based on obscene and
>> terrifically salacious portrayals. The latter however, is a common
>> characteristic of American society. The United States is filled with many
>> social disintegrations, often pertained to misbehavior and sexual
>> scandals. There are numerous incidents of incest reported in their
>> country which left the subject of intercourse quite sick and bizarre.
>> Therefore, they liken prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon
>> him) to the most horrible practice they ever noticed. This taste of
>> Oriental literature is not the only one of this discipline. There is
>> another version which is classified as the relatively impartial side.
>> It somewhat portrays the moderate approach. It studies Islamic culture
>> for the purpose of recognizing interdependencies. It often avoids
>> engaging in provocative subjects. It may not be as active as we would
>> like it but, it fairly exists. Nevertheless, the prepossessing approach
>> is more likely to be affective due to predominantly vast American
>> dominance. As hellion Donald Trump once uttered in one of his despicable
>> speeches, Americanism is not Globalism. Therefore, we ought to really be
>> careful, there are substantial attempts to Americanise even western
>> cultures. This is why I said to my friends living in Europe, that we need
>> to tenaciously unite to confront this manipulating power, which attempts
>> to deviously dominate us. It essentially relies on racially disparaging
>> remarks, bigotry and detrimental sentiments. The United States is quite
>> popular for issuing visas to fraudsters. They issue visas to people whom
>> they like to hear their plainly counterfeit chronicles about being
>> supposedly, ex Muslims, ha-ha. I on multiple occasions asked U.S pastors
>> to openly confront me on that regard. Until this moment, they never wrote
>> me back and they probably won’t. I would like to ask people who work for
>> U.S embassies a straight question that demands a direct and denotative
>> answer. If someone caught indictable of being mendacious or unclear about
>> his past, as if he said he was Muslim and he wasn’t or, he lied about
>> some of his credit contingents, would you issue this person a
>> visa? Please, yes or no. I specifically
>> address Americans who like to incorrectly assume us popping off to
>> immigrate to their country, your presumption isn’t correct. I am not
>> particularly desperate about obtaining your visas nor residing in your
>> country legally or illegally. It may be challenging economically here at
>> home but, I’d better find somewhere else to settle dignifiedly. The
>> United States is impeached of substantially secernating ethnicities based
>> on racial disparities. That has been proven repeatedly through the last
>> couple of months. American Orientalism is held accountable
>> for this chaotic disarray. American Orientalism is the chief shamed
>> of religious uncertainty. There are many people who tend to ramble
>> between various isms purposelessly. Religion is disapproved in the United
>> States despite insignificant proclamations of being allegedly a Christian
>> nation. What are we to commend or repudiate about this state of iniquity.
>> This is a nation which carries an evangelical banner, yet it has
>> officially accredited same sex marriage as licit last year. I have
>> discussed this subject with many Christian devotees therein. Many of them
>> thought it couldn’t be delt with, whilst others gave credit to separating
>> faith and civil affairs. This is a decisive evident of how paradoxical
>> the United States is. American Orientalism is often expatiated to
>> odiously parallel between Jihad and terrorism. This is why we ought to
>> embrace a scrupulously countering scheme. My role here is to establish
>> solid ground for scrutiny, preferably with European academe. It
>> confidently has been proved to be theologically impartial, far from
>> either explicit hostility or disingenuous flattery. As I mentioned
>> earlier in this piece of composition, they are casually expected to
>> fairly disagree with some of what we assert but, they are highly
>> competent to do so in prestigiously academic manner.
>> The rising tide of Islamophobia visible in mainstream political circles
>> and reflected in the media leaves the Muslim community intemperately
>> susceptible to confront major threats. Racist and Islamophobic rhetoric
>> has already translated into violent and deadly incidents across the
>> States, with further armed threats directed at Muslim institutions and
>> individuals now almost a daily occurrence.
>> These incidents are deliberately unnoticed. We need a greater, more
>> sustained response that both examines the roots of Islamophobia and
>> provides the empirical data to quantify the problem. Only then, we can
>> develop the tools required to educate policymakers and civil society on
>> how best to counter this longstanding crisis. Christian and secular
>> orientalists of the United States are injurious of repulsively aspersing
>> Islam with enormous ignominy and detrimental disparagement.
>> The deficiency of renowned let alone ordinary edification is the chief
>> cause for the rise of such insolence. There might be some Americans who
>> treat the subject objectively. Most of them, however, are unevenly
>> indoctrinated. I’ll repeat this statement, if Americans weren’t easy to
>> fool, someone like Donald Trump would have not been nominated for
>> Republican candidature. Despite his unambiguously inflammatory remarks,
>> he is supported and widely embraced across their country.
>> Despite his appallingly intolerable sentiments which were highly
>> offensive to each and everyone, he is continuously endorsed. Despite his
>> constantly contradicting and simultaneously assaultive statements, he
>> hasn’t been expelled from the presidential race. Donald Trump is
>> eminently embraced in spite of his incredible disqualifications because
>> he says what most Americans like to hear. Donald Trump is tremendously
>> disqualified, yet he is the beseeming president for who lay Americans
>> are. If you want to look at actual Americans, just look at Trump’s
>> spirit. You don’t have to exhaust yourselves with engaging in pretension
>> of counterfeit diplomacy, we recognize what American manner is. I don’t
>> think I’ll ever commit the mistake of believing my enemy. American
>> Orientalism is the one to describe as imbecile, disinforming and
>> extraordinarily ignominious in the slightest.
>> Clifford Wilson, you previously mentioned to me that you studied world
>> religions but you never heard of the term Orientalism. Well I hope you
>> now have a glimpse of what it is. Mister Wilson, I suppose you are
>> sufficiently aware of the broad repudiation to your explicitly
>> disheartening supremacy. Your regionally Mexican neighbors are the first
>> to be troubled with this. Donald Trump on Mexico is unprecedentedly
>> paradoxical. When he spoke about Mexico to his rallies, he spoke with
>> intolerable belligerence. But when he spoke to Mexican officials, his
>> tone of voice has changed. This is quite typical for American manner.
>> They speak at our face with a softened tone, but when they speak to their
>> allies, they often change their tune. This is their typical paradox. I
>> won’t ever speak to people with ambidextrous. I am plain to people
>> whether I am friend or enemy to them. My temperament is essentially based
>> on clarity and honesty. This is how I strongly built my various
>> relationships with people domestically and overseas. So please Clifford,
>> you may discern that I consider you from the camp that I’ll stand firm
>> against. The reason for that is your demonstratively southern manner. You
>> mentioned in an e-mail to a mass list for the American Council of the
>> blind that you are seventy-two years old, that means you are considered a
>> senior citizen in the States. I urge you sir to thoroughly be edified
>> about other parts of the world. Your quarantined and heavily persuaded
>> southern region is a decisive barrier for reputed edification. Mister
>> Wilson, I fairly consider myself more educated than you. I fluently speak
>> and properly compose in a highly notable form of your language, yet you
>> barely type in colloquially American English. I of course am not sure
>> about your speaking competency. Now we can see where the cultural gap
>> come from. I again, urge you to fairly revise the facts I just outlined
>> and then ask yourself, is it necessarily that an individual coming from a
>> sophisticated nation to be more educated than someone who comes from a
>> developing one? People here are constantly bewildered, they want to
>> adhere their identity whilst looking up to western civilization with
>> considerable attraction. I treat the matter with a moderate proposition.
>> I admittedly recognize western significant advancement on technology and
>> contemporary education. At the same time, I steadfastly adhere my
>> heritage and tradition. With both in mind, I am able to fairly stand
>> between recognizing western advancement and Muslim traditionality. They
>> both are fairly consolidative. Unlike predominantly secularized Muslims,
>> I am not influenced with western manipulation. I recognize that my
>> religion enjoins me to relentlessly seek knowledge. I am aware of what
>> Muslim scholars have substantially contributed to various scientific
>> fields as the prominently outstanding Muslim physician and philosopher,
>> (Abu Ali al-Husain ibn Abdallah ibn Sina). Western orientalists have
>> altered his name to (Avicenna) in order to somehow conceal his Muslim
>> identity. I also recognize that in their numerous encyclopedias, they
>> altered the name of prominent Muslim philosopher and initial interpreter
>> of Aristotle works into Arabic. They altered his name from
>> (Ibn-Roshd) to a mispronounced name, they called him (Averroes) in order
>> to again, withdraw his Muslim identity. This is a common practice of
>> Christians. They did so to their own scriptures in order to make them
>> basically suit what they like, they did so to make them suit their
>> interest. There are many instances of what I call biblical revisal for
>> theological motivation. They purposely pick up the translation that suits
>> their interest of the text and preach it outloud to their disinformed
>> congregations. Well gratefully, we aren’t consented to do so to the Noble
>> Koran. Its sacred text is infinitely intact and Providentially preserved.
>> Even when we translate the Koran into different languages, we recognize
>> that it is a humanly contribution. Thus, it is consequently susceptible
>> to error. This is why, it’s vitally necessary to revise and countercheck
>> Koran translations and instantly correct them where that is relevant.
>> Christian evangelists and orientalists aren’t so outspoken about the text
>> at their hands nor they fairly look into the credibility of the
>> translator. The King James version is a widely recognized and trusted
>> edition of the Holy Bible in Christian English speaking communities.
>> However, it has been later declared fallible and thus, a revised standard
>> edition had to be written. Those are the ones who purposely evoke doubts
>> about Islam in lay Muslim minds. Those are the ones who attempt to
>> distort Islam in either a diplomatic or a hostilely manner.
>> Don’t ever assume that the intention of those who often speak gently is
>> so innocent. It is quite inconsistent for a Muslim to go study Islam in
>> their colleges, it’s utterly nonsensical. When I said we demand to
>> collaborate with them on that regard, I basically meant that Muslim
>> certified theologians, clerics and renowned scholars are to be opted to
>> lecture abroad, to teach those orientalists about the proper discernment
>> of Islamic Theology. A mutually academic practice has to be broadened.
>> The purpose of this has to primarily be based on illustrating Muslim
>> culture to the western world. There are many publications on Islam in
>> many libraries. However, they mostly lack the least of critical
>> examination which is accredited citation.
>> Orientalism is not particularly accurate about multiple Islamic subjects.
>> They express their perspective about them. This is why I find it so
>> strange for a Muslim to study Islam in western universities. I actually
>> was interested to do so. But, after studying Orientalism and its essence,
>> I completely changed my mind. I decisively recognize that Orientalism
>> factors aren’t intended for devotion nor even for scholarly objectives.
>> They rather are intended for cultural disarray and religious imbalance.
>> As all we know, religion is not particularly prised in western
>> traditions. This is why, western orientalists may not be able to fathom
>> its crucial role in our daily life. In the United States, there are
>> pliable masses of people ripe for propaganda. This is why it’s quite
>> difficult to educate people there. September has just began, and this is
>> the month during Muslims are threatened of being subjected to demeaning
>> search and seizure in U.S airports for damnable security reasons. I know
>> someone who during 2011, arrived at Miami’s airport on 9-11 anniversary.
>> He faced inappropriate attitude, racial discrimination, he had been
>> sequestered in a dark room, he had been asked intolerable questions
>> whether he was affiliated with terrorist organisations, why did he go to
>> Saudi and other ridiculous stuff. His luggage then were opened
>> disrespectfully and all items were indiscriminately thrown on the floor.
>> He arrived at almost 11:00 in the morning, yet he left the airport after
>> midnight when there was no transportation to pick him.
>> Incidentally, he looked quite secular. If someone chose to visit this
>> country in such time, he should not blame but himself. Orientalism is a
>> wide subject. I attempted to get through some of its principles.
>> (Edward Said) is the best author on Orientalism. Now, if this is the
>> month of recalling 9-11, I have one question for American recipients.
>> How could a civil jet fly into the Pentagon’s airspace, crash into it
>> without being instantaneously detected? I intended to test your
>> intelligence versus what you are told. Trust me Americans, you have got
>> much to learn about lots of things. I won’t ever visit your country in
>> such time of the year, time of ignorance and irrational fear. I won’t
>> ever visit unless I am treated civilly and properly. I won’t ever
>> tolerate improper screening or damnable search and seizure.
>> I am convinced that media controls what people believe allover the world,
>> yet it has the biggest influence on Americans. They have no control out
>> of it. Media, television, journalism, online publication and video taping
>> are the tools by which people are dominated in the States. That is the
>> vital proof for dominating capitalism. People who have got money could do
>> anything even, run for president despite their plain incompetency. Unlike
>> many people in my part of the world, I am not deceived about what the
>> United States is. It may look attractive outwardly but inwardly, it’s
>> fragile. I am disliked there because unlike Donald Trump, I don’t write
>> what most Americans like to hear. I am used to typical American ignorance
>> and discourtesy, even if they attempt to pretend otherwise. My writing
>> style has to continue because I believe I have independent freedom to
>> express my opinion in whatever manner. I feel dignified not falling in
>> the manipulating camp. Well, I suppose I am done with this piece. It’s
>> close to noon time here in Cairo. I commend you for patiently reading
>> through, Mostafa
>>
>>
>> --
>> (Seeking knowledge is compulsory from cratle to grave because it is a
>> shoreless ocean.)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Faith-Talk mailing list
>> Faith-Talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/faith-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Faith-Talk:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/faith-talk_nfbnet.org/psalmtjugotre%40gmail.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Faith-Talk mailing list
>> Faith-Talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/faith-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Faith-Talk:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/faith-talk_nfbnet.org/dotwriter1%40gmail.com
>_______________________________________________
>Faith-Talk mailing list
>Faith-Talk at nfbnet.org
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/faith-talk_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>Faith-Talk:
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/faith-talk_nfbnet.org/psalmtjugotre%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Faith-Talk mailing list
Faith-Talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/faith-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Faith-Talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/faith-talk_nfbnet.org/bookwormahb%40earthlink.net
More information about the Faith-Talk
mailing list