[Faith-Talk] Bethlehem avenue, Ali Sina, has failed and he is in hell

[Mustafa Almahdy]

This doesn't make you look better. So, as you guys can see, he bases
his callous assault on mere entropy. I challenge him to cite one
reference for what he viciously claimed about the rulings of those
whom the right hand possesses in Islam. Hasn't he been intently
deceitful, he would have honestly cited his reference of such
disinformation. I sternly challenge you to show me in whichever
Islamic source, rape is permissible. Just show me one single
reference, even if it's counterfeit. Why hasn't he honestly mentioned
to you, that in various instances of perpetrating major offences,
emancipating slaves in general is recognised as a substantial
atonement, as derived from the two basic sources of Shariah and its
jural rulings. This leastwise applies to the following cases. First,
false oath. This is when someone swears formally, that he will do or
avoid doing something and he then doesn't fulfill his solemn plight.
Second, breaking the fast deliberately in Ramadan without valid
excuse. Third, slip murder. This is when someone is killed
incidentally. Fourth, Back ache. In the pre Islamic era, in mostly
pagan Arabia, if a man is enormously tempestuous at his spouse, he
could tell her, you're of me as my mother's back. This means, I intend
to avoid intimate engagement with you for indefinite period. So, she
is neither married nor divorced. She is rather utterly suspended.
Thence, Islam has strictly prohibited such brutal maltreatment of
women and enjoined believing men to totally refrain from doing so. It
has then demanded them to emancipate slaves as an act of atonement
from such disgraceful sin. So, is Ali Sina willing to be outspoken and
somewhat impartial regarding Islam? Well, up until  now, he absolutely
couldn't. He uses his detest of this broadly embraced faith to
bootlick westerns and to fallaciously gain fame among them. Is he
willing to schedule a publicly held debate next Saturday on the
subject of slavery and how Islam delt with it? I am fully prepared, so
is he? I personally consider racial disparity in the States and beyond
a form of modern slavery. When Ali Sina responds to me with his
typical evasion, he doesn't opt reply to all. Nonetheless, when he
destines to purposely defame Islam, he opts it quite plainly. I just
aimed to unambiguously exhibit before the masses, this is the low rate
of edification as it comes to common Islam haters. Ali Sina takes
advantage of people's unawareness of Islam's basics and intently poses
false information about it. If he doesn't, he would have not immorally
concealed the sources of what he has deliberately misrepresented. Did
you know though, that the Koran   in the chapter of light, prohibited
those who have right handedly possessed girls, to coerce them into
prostitution. And, if they have been compelled into that, which is
equal to ravishment, Allah is afterward all forgiving, all merciful.
Reference cited, the Noble Koran, chapter 24, verse, 32. Well, see it
yourselves. How on earth rape is permissible then? I am glad though,
that you're willingly exposing your ignorance about Islam and
concurrent hate of it. The way you insist to viciously affront prophet
Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him doesn't make you more than
just hatefully despicable swine. So, just proceed onto your hate, and,
flee the debate.

On 12/10/19, FFI <faithfreedom2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh yeah. Looking at women is prohibited in Islam but raping non Muslim
> women is not only permitted it is recommended. Muslims are encouraged to
> fight and kill non Muslims and take their daughters and wives are captives
> or as the Quran calls them "right hand possessions." There is no limit to
> how many women a Muslim man can have as his right hand possession and no
> restriction as what he can do with them. He can rape them, beat them, sell
> them and even kill them.  Please spare us flaunting your holier than thou
> BS for us. You people are the scum of the earth and not the best people as
> your pedophile prophet told you. Islamic societies are hellish and that is
> why every Muslim wants to immigrate to a non-Muslim country only to bring
> with him his demonic faith and terrorism. Keep you beautiful religion to
> yourself and leave us alone.  The world is a hell because people who know
> least think they know it all and refuse to learn. The Germans were not bad
> people, the communists are not bad people, the socialists are not bad
> people, the Muslims are not bad people. They are all stupid people who
> refuse to listen. They think they have found the truth and there is no
> reason to search more. It is others that have to be indoctrinated,  You
> prove this so clearly.
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:59 PM Mustafa Almahdy
> <against.trump2001 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Well, you're in hell as of being such a miserable failure, not able to
>> respond to my longly held debating challenge. As for good looking
>> women, that's the maximum rate of someone at your disposal. I don't
>> know about these things. But I know, that staring at women illicitly
>> is strictly prohibited in Islam. Now, as these evangelists who
>> cluselessly fend for your plainly hateful attitude may have noticed,
>> you're not proselytising  to their faith in any manner. You're just
>> spreading hate and deceit about Islam. Nonetheless, that seems to be
>> quite sufficient for them to unconsciously endorse you. I think we're
>> fully aware as of right now, who is truly detestable, despicable and
>> immensely hypocritical. I still want to know, where did you earn the
>> 100000$ which you sardonically offered from? Is working for
>> Islamophobia and hatefully relevant industries eminently so profitable
>> in western culture? As you're currently residing in the region of
>> southeastern Europe, I wonder, what are you doing there? As Iranian
>> based who has been extremely notorious of intently spreading hate, I
>> couldn't unveil the nature of your work. Where does it fill? Ali Sina
>> aims to provoke attenuated Muslims until they ultimately apostate. Be
>> that as it may, he doesn't care about what do they embrace afterward.
>> Is he promoting western secularism? I wonder if he perhaps could
>> illustrate onto that. He says before that he is not an evangelist.
>> Fine, what is he then? As to the faith talk folks, well, someone there
>> has just told me, that I was demanded not to post to the list anymore.
>> Well, excuse me but, this request clearly contradicts with an explicit
>> statement that belongs to the list's essential guidelines. On your
>> main info page, it says, "Persons of all faiths are welcome. Feel free
>> to post, and have fun!". That what does it state there, very clearly.
>> You can go to the list's info page and verify this claim. So, you may
>> either remove the above statement and replace it with a statement that
>> informs all viewers, that this list is exclusively restricted to
>> Christian conversation and relevantly affiliated blindness interests.
>> Or, you may say, that each and everyone that is not believing
>> Christian is welcome to post except Muslims. We don't want them here
>> anymore. I bet you couldn't post such thing on your main page because
>> you will plainly violate allegedly embraced tenets of multiculturalism
>> and coexistence. No no, sure you could. Hasn't Trump, master of peace
>> and tolerance insistently declared such kind remarks about Muslims in
>> the States and other minorities? What happened when I posted to the
>> faith talk list stuff that may not necessarily concur with their
>> beliefs or convictions as of religious and political orientation?
>> Well, they immediately banned me from posting to the list. In other
>> words, forcefully unsubscribed me. Well, if I will anyway be
>> ostracised because of my religious and political opinion, what is then
>> the proper use of the following statement? As quoted above, it says on
>> your main info page, "persons of all faiths are welcome." So, it's
>> either I am welcome or not welcome. I wonder if it could be both? It
>> could be, as long as I speak against my own religion to please
>> Americans, lords of the world. I unfortunately couldn't cope with such
>> demand. So, I hope the temperament of the list's owners is clarified a
>> bit. As for Ali Sina, good luck at your glorious journey of courting
>> gorgeous women.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/2/19, FFI <faithfreedom2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I am in Ukraine, If this is hell it is too cold this time of the year.
>> But
>> > the women here are actually very very beautiful.  Nice hell.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:45 PM Mustafa Almahdy
>> > <against.trump2001 at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> For nearly three successive months, I have been persistently
>> >> challenging Ali Sina to enter in a debate with me about the filth that
>> >> he presumptuously writes about Islam. He obstinately calls the
>> >> lasciviously based soliloquy of his own sickened prejudice worthwhile
>> >> critique. He thence is afraid of venturing into this altercating
>> >> field, so he may not lose his averred credibility among disinformed
>> >> audience. He runs a vicious website entitled Ali Sina dot org. At its
>> >> inception he writes, everything you need to know about Islam. He
>> >> should have actually written, everything I intently lie to you about
>> >> Islam. He unfortunately takes advantage of people's ignorance. He
>> >> deliberately misleads his indoctrinated viewers. On his detestable
>> >> website, he often writes about arbitrarily anonymous mortals who are
>> >> allegedly Muslims. Therein, they have supposedly sought his eminent
>> >> advice which has led to their ultimate apostasy. He evades conversing
>> >> with me because I massively resemble a major threat to his reputation.
>> >> I discredited his character and have posed decisive rebuttals to his
>> >> truthiness. First off, why couldn't he release his accredited
>> >> credentials or whatever that might be? Second, does he know Arabic? I
>> >> previously demanded him to compose a basic sentence in Arabic, but he
>> >> just couldn't. Third, in his recent message to me, he asked me to
>> >> bring him someone to debate with, and he proposed to pay us 100000$,
>> >> arranged half to half, between me and the one that I will bring. My
>> >> question here is, why couldn't you just debate me for free? And, where
>> >> did you get all this money from? Is working in the field of
>> >> Islamophobia that profitable in the west? I hope he bravely answers
>> >> any of these critical questions. Now, to those who purposely harbour
>> >> such fugitives  and hatemongers, you must plainly fathom, that the
>> >> current situation won't ever be infinite in any manner. I one day
>> >> shall catch this Ali Sina and will then coerce him into direct
>> >> engagement, whereas people as of Muslims and others alike can
>> >> certainly see and judge. I genuinely believe that attainting this
>> >> person's competency is much worse than actually putting him to death.
>> >> If you're truly a man, you may then accept debating me. As of right
>> >> now, he cowardly hides like a nasty mous. He is absolutely terrified
>> >> of being caught and exposed. Had he been confident of himself, he
>> >> would have then accepted my longly suspended debating proposal. His
>> >> financial offer etc is just an enact to deride and avoid any potential
>> >> confrontation. I, however, won't ever leave him on his own. Even if he
>> >> hides below the seventh ground, I will chase him. I will keep beating
>> >> him up until he is wholly destroyed. I knew where do you currently
>> >> reside in Europe. We're going to meet soon, so watch out, son of
>> >> Sina.,
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > alisina.org <http://www.alisina.org>
>> > faithfreedom.org <http://www.faithfreedom.org>
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> alisina.org <http://www.alisina.org>
> faithfreedom.org <http://www.faithfreedom.org>
>