[Home-on-the-range] FW: [Nfbnet-members-list] URGENT: WE NEED LETTERS TO MAKE E-READERS ACCESSIBLE BY LABOR DAY
David Andrews
dandrews at visi.com
Sat Aug 31 03:23:17 UTC 2013
Do you have his number -- I should call him.
Dave
At 10:13 PM 8/30/2013, you wrote:
>Yeah, I know. I got the bright idea to write to
>Lauren about it for starters, and she said I
>wasn't the only complainer. LOL. And then I got the resend.
>
>Would you miss me though if I didn't complain?
>
>Chuck has moved to a new facility. The one he
>and Mary were in is closing in a few years, and
>they decided to get out while the place was
>still quality. I think that place where they
>were is trying to get them all out so they can close before 2017.
>
>Oh, yeah, and he got an iPhone, and he is so
>very excited that he is learning to use it.
>
>Cindy Lou
>
>On Aug 30, 2013, at 10:07 PM, David Andrews
><<mailto:dandrews at visi.com>dandrews at visi.com> wrote:
>
>>The attachments were embedded in an unusual way, and have been resent.
>>
>>Dave
>>
>>At 11:56 AM 8/30/2013, you wrote:
>>>Yeah, Susie, but what kind of file attachment
>>>is that. I can't open it, and the computers
>>>question it. Also, I don't recognize the name.
>>>I am a little confused by it, so maybe you know more about it than I do.
>>>
>>>Cindy
>>>
>>>On Aug 30, 2013, at 11:51 AM, "Stanzel, Susan
>>>- FSA, Kansas City, MO"
>>><<mailto:Susan.Stanzel at kcc.usda.gov> Susan.Stanzel at kcc.usda.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi Listers,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>We need to take action.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Susie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>From: Nfbnet-members-list [
>>>>mailto:nfbnet-members-list-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Yingling, Valerie
>>>>Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 11:18 AM
>>>>To: <mailto:nfbnet-members-list at nfbnet.org>nfbnet-members-list at nfbnet.org
>>>>Subject: [Nfbnet-members-list] URGENT: WE
>>>>NEED LETTERS TO MAKE E-READERS ACCESSIBLE BY LABOR DAY
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>This letter was originally sent to the
>>>>legislative directors but we are circulating
>>>>it to the entire membership for maximum outreach:
>>>>
>>>>We need your help! The Coalition of E-Reader
>>>>Manufacturers has submitted a Petition for
>>>>Waiver to the FCC asking that e-readers be
>>>>exempt from the Twenty First Century
>>>>Communications and Video Accessibility Act
>>>>(CVAA) accessibility requirements. I have
>>>>attached the Petition. NFB has written
>>>>comments opposing the request, and we are
>>>>asking other groups to sign on. I have also
>>>>attached those comments. But the FCC needs
>>>>to hear from our members blind people who
>>>>want access to e-readers and the more
>>>>people they hear from, the better. We are
>>>>asking all Legislative Directors to find
>>>>people in their respective affiliates to edit
>>>>the attached skeleton letter and return it to
>>>>us. The letter is already formatted and has
>>>>an outline, but it is up to each person to
>>>>make it personal and select which talking
>>>>points they want to use. Finished letters
>>>>should be sent to Valerie Yingling at
>>>><mailto:vyingling at nfb.org>vyingling at nfb.org
>>>>by 8pm on Monday, September 2. Valerie will
>>>>proofread each document to make sure there
>>>>are no typos and the customized points are
>>>>still on message, and then we will submit the
>>>>letters all at once when they are due on
>>>>September 3rd. We are short on time but I
>>>>trust that this issue is pressing to our
>>>>membership and we will get a good amount of letters.
>>>>
>>>>For some background: The CVAA requires that
>>>>all mobile devices with advanced
>>>>communications services (ACS) be accessible
>>>>to blind people, but the law allows
>>>>manufacturers to request a waiver for
>>>>equipment that is not intended for ACS. The
>>>>Coalition (comprised of Amazon, Sony and
>>>>Kobo) claims that the primary purpose of
>>>>e-readers is reading, and that the ACS found
>>>>in e-readers is so incidental and ancillary
>>>>that it is not an intended purpose of the
>>>>device. We know this is not true e-readers
>>>>are outfitted with built-in web browsers and
>>>>designed for social media. The Coalition
>>>>also claims that to make e-readers accessible
>>>>would require a fundamental overhaul that
>>>>would render e-readers obsolete, harm the
>>>>public interest, and not provide substantial
>>>>benefit to blind people. We know that this
>>>>offensive claim is also not true. It is
>>>>critical that the FCC hear from all of us
>>>>it is the only thing that can defeat the
>>>>petition. Regulation is legislations
>>>>sister, so I know we can count on all of you
>>>>to get a good amount of feedback to the
>>>>FCC. If you have any questions, don't
>>>>hesitate to email me or Valerie. Looking
>>>>forward to seeing everyones letters.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Lauren
>>>>
>>>>Lauren McLarney
>>>>Government Affairs Specialist
>>>>NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND
>>>>200 East Wells St.
>>>>Baltimore, MD 21230
>>>>(410) 659 9314 ext. 2207
>>>><mailto:lmclarney at nfb.org>lmclarney at nfb.org
>>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Home-on-the-range mailing list
>><mailto:Home-on-the-range at nfbnet.org>Home-on-the-range at nfbnet.org
>>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/home-on-the-range_nfbnet.org
>>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get
>>your account info for Home-on-the-range:
>>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/home-on-the-range_nfbnet.org/cindyray%40gmail.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>Home-on-the-range mailing list
>Home-on-the-range at nfbnet.org
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/home-on-the-range_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get
>your account info for Home-on-the-range:
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/home-on-the-range_nfbnet.org/dandrews%40visi.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/home-on-the-range_nfbnet.org/attachments/20130830/b8fd7730/attachment.html>
More information about the Home-on-the-Range
mailing list