[humanser] Jury finds IA Dept. for Blind's guide dog policy does not discriminate

Doug Lee dgl at dlee.org
Fri Feb 20 04:19:50 UTC 2009


That one could start quite a discussion of course... but from the
perspective of the case, these are not even the relevant questions.
The training center teaches classes, and one of those is a travel
class, and the travel class teaches cane skills, not dog skills.  Just
as you don't go to a driving class to learn how to fly an airplane,
you don't go to a cane school to learn guide dog use.  The school has
the right to choose what skills to teach, and the student has the
right to take what the school has to offer and the right not to.  Of
course, the student also has the right to visit the school with cane
or dog at any time visitation is possible I'm sure. :)

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:27:10PM -0600, James Brown wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Can you share some knowledge with someone who has always been a cane user?
>
> Setting aside all the legalities, what does everyone think about this 
> case? Any die hard cane users out there?  How about you guide dog lovers, 
> what do you think?
>
> Is there a significant difference between using a cane or dog?  Is either 
> one really that perfect?
>
> Are we trying to shape other blind people into our own image, all the 
> while damaging the individuality of the blind population?
>
> whether it's a stick or a dog, aren't we all depending on something?
>
> Is this a kind of twisted psychology, or is it more about being practical?
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> JB
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wilson,Joanne (by way of David 
> Andrews <dandrews at visi.com>)" <JWilson at nfb.org>
> To: <david.andrews at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 4:24 PM
> Subject: [humanser] Jury finds IA Dept. for Blind's guide dog policy does 
> not discriminate
>
>
>
> ----------
> From: Brammer, Robert [AG] [mailto:rbrammer at ag.state.ia.us]
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 1:53 PM
> To: Brammer, Robert [AG]
> Subject: Atty. Gen. release: Jury finds IA Dept.
> for Blind's guide dog policy does not discriminate
>
> To News Editors.   From Bob Brammer (Iowa
> Attorney General's Office - 515-281-6699.)
> Please find a release pasted below.  This will be
> posted soon at
> <http://www.iowaattorneygeneral.org/>www.IowaAttorneyGeneral.org
> .  A jury entered a verdict Wednesday in this
> case in Polk County District Court.
> Best regards,  Bram
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> For immediate release - Thursday, February 19, 2009.
> Contact Bob Brammer - 515-281-6699
>
> Jury finds Iowa Department for the Blind's
> Guide Dog Policy Does Not Discriminate
>
>             Des Moines.  A Polk County jury has
> rejected a Des Moines woman's claim that the
> State of Iowa Department for the Blind
> discriminated against her by refusing her request
> to use a guide dog while she attended the
> Department's orientation and adjustment training program.
>
>             The Department for the Blind
> orientation and training program is a
> comprehensive program that utilizes a totally
> non-visual approach to teaching blindness
> skills.  Students with partial vision are
> required to wear eyeshades to prevent reliance
> upon any visual cues during training.  Department
> policies prohibit the use of any visual aids
> within the orientation and training program,
> including guide dogs.  The Department has no
> objection to guide dogs in other situations.
>
>             Stephanie Dohmen, who is legally
> blind, attended the program for several months
> beginning in September 2000 and sought to
> re-enter the program in June 2002 accompanied by her guide dog.
>
>             Dohmen claimed in her lawsuit that
> the Department's policy violated her rights under
> the Iowa Civil Rights Act and under federal laws
> that prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability.
>
>             After a six-day trial, the
> eight-person jury rejected Dohmen's claims in a verdict entered Wednesday.
>
>
>             The Department for the Blind, which
> was represented in the trial by the Iowa
> Attorney General, argued that a totally
> non-visual approach - and training without
> assistance of a guide-dog or other visual aids -
> is the most effective approach for
> visually-impaired persons who are learning skills
> and techniques for dealing with blindness.
>
>             The Department places no limitations
> upon the use of guide dogs in other settings,
> including in the Department for the Blind
> building in downtown Des Moines.   For example,
> Karen Keninger, the Director of the Department,
> uses a guide dog, and the dog accompanied
> Keninger during her testimony at the trial.
>
>             The orientation program typically
> includes about six months of full-time training
> in various problem-solving skills, such as
> cane-travel on public streets, using Braille,
> using computers, and dealing with many other situations.
>
>             The Department for the Blind's
> orientation and adjustment program was
> established in 1959 and is considered by many to
> be one of the most effective in the country.
>
>             During the trial, the State
> Department for the Blind presented testimony from
> Joanne Wilson and Frederic K. Schroeder, each a
> former Commissioner of the U.S. Rehabilitation
> Services Administration, which oversees programs
> for the blind around the country.
>
>             "Iowa's orientation program
> profoundly changes lives," said Wilson, who also
> is Executive Director of the National Federation
> of the Blind.  "It works.  It's a cutting-edge
> program and a model for other states."  Wilson is
> a Webster City native and ISU graduate who went
> through the Iowa Department for the Blind's orientation program herself.
>
>             Schroeder said:  "To me the central
> point is that individuals have a choice in the
> type of training they take.  While programs must
> and should make reasonable accommodations, they
> cannot be required to alter the fundamentals of the program."
>
> - 30 -
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> humanser mailing list
> humanser at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/humanser_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for  
> humanser:
 
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/humanser_nfbnet.org/jbrown321%40comcast.net 
> 
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> humanser mailing list
> humanser at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/humanser_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for humanser:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/humanser_nfbnet.org/dgl%40dlee.org

-- 
Doug Lee                 dgl at dlee.org                http://www.dlee.org
SSB BART Group           doug.lee at ssbbartgroup.com   http://www.ssbbartgroup.com
Freedom is not the ability to have what we want.  Freedom is merely the
ability to seek it.  To be free defines what we can do, not what we can get.
(03/28/05)




More information about the HumanSer mailing list