[humanser] Interpreting non-verbals and making eye contactwith client's
Anjelina
anjelinac at att.net
Mon Jul 21 10:46:32 UTC 2014
Thank you for this article. I will be able to share it with my instructor.
-Anjelina
Sent from my iPad
> On Jul 19, 2014, at 5:51 PM, "JD Townsend" <43210 at Bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> New York Times Science Desk Section 2014 03
> 25
>
>
> FINDINGS. Their Pants Aren't on Fire. By JOHN TIERNEY. Like
> the rest of us, airport security screeners like to think they can
> read body language. The Transportation Security Administration
> has spent some $1 billion training thousands of 'behavior
> detection officers' to look for facial expressions and other
> nonverbal clues that would identify terrorists.
>
> But critics say there's no evidence that these efforts have
> stopped a single terrorist or accomplished much beyond
> inconveniencing tens of thousands of passengers a year. The
> T.S.A. seems to have fallen for a classic form of
> self-deception: the belief that you can read liars' minds by
> watching their bodies..
>
> Most people think liars give themselves away by averting their
> eyes or making nervous gestures, and many law-enforcement
> officers have been trained to look for specific tics, like gazing
> upward in a certain manner. But in scientific experiments,
> people do a lousy job of spotting liars. Law-enforcement
> officers and other presumed experts are not consistently better
> at it than ordinary people even though they're more confident in
> their abilities.
>
> 'There's an illusion of insight that comes from looking at a
> person's body,' says Nicholas Epley, a professor of behavioral
> science at the University of Chicago. 'Body language speaks to
> us, but only in whispers.
>
> The T.S.A. program was reviewed last year by the federal
> government's Government Accountability Office, which recommended
> cutting funds for it because there was no proof of its
> effectiveness. That recommendation was based on the meager
> results of the program as well as a survey of the scientific
> literature by the psychologists Charles F. Bond Jr. and Bella
> M. DePaulo, who analyzed more than 200 studies.
>
> In those studies, people correctly identified liars only 47
> percent of the time, less than chance. Their accuracy rate was
> higher, 61 percent, when it came to spotting truth tellers, but
> that still left their overall average, 54 percent, only slightly
> better than chance. Their accuracy was even lower in experiments
> when they couldn't hear what was being said, and had to make a
> judgment based solely on watching the person's body language.
>
> 'The common-sense notion that liars betray themselves through
> body language appears to be little more than a cultural fiction,'
> says Maria Hartwig, a psychologist at John Jay College of
> Criminal Justice in New York City. Researchers have found that
> the best clues to deceit are verbal -- liars tend to be less
> forthcoming and tell less compelling stories -- but even these
> differences are usually too subtle to be discerned reliably=
>
>
> JD Townsend LCSW
> Helping the light dependent to see.
> Daytona Beach, Earth, Sol System
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Merry Schoch via humanser
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 10:40 AM
> To: 'Anjelina' ; 'Human Services Division Mailing List'
> Subject: Re: [humanser] Interpreting non-verbals and making eye contactwith client's
>
> Hi Angelina,
>
> JD submitted an article to this list re: this topic. I will look for it to
> repost and also have it posted to our web site.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: humanser [mailto:humanser-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Anjelina
> via humanser
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 10:16 AM
> To: Human Services Mailing List
> Subject: [humanser] Interpreting non-verbals and making eye contact with
> client's
>
> Good morning all,I look forward to hearing about the Human Services meeting.
> The agenda looked very informative.
> I may have asked this question before, so I apologize for any redundancy.
> I am currently enrolled in an advanced standing MSW program. As I was
> discussing with my professor how I would complete an assignment, he asked me
> if I have thought about the challenges of being a totally blind social
> worker since our culture values eye contact and most communication is
> nonvertbal. I informed him there are a lot of practicing social workers who
> are blind.
> What are your thoughts or experiences? How have you dealt with the
> nonverbals of communication? I look forward to sharing your wisdom with my
> professor and proving to skeptics I can be an effective social worker who
> happens to be blind.
>
>
> -Anjelina
> Sent from my iPad
> _______________________________________________
> humanser mailing list
> humanser at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/humanser_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> humanser:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/humanser_nfbnet.org/merrys%40verizon.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> humanser mailing list
> humanser at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/humanser_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for humanser:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/humanser_nfbnet.org/43210%40bellsouth.net
>
> JD Townsend LCSW
> Helping the light dependent to see.
> Daytona Beach, Earth, Sol System
More information about the HumanSer
mailing list