[humanser] EEOC letter regarding drivers license

[Merry Schoch]

Hello!

 

Thought the  list would be interested in the below:

 

 

EEOC Informal Discussion Letter Concerning Driver licenses (6262006)

 

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 

  _____  

EEOC Office of Legal Counsel staff members wrote the following informal
discussion letter in response to an inquiry from a member of the public.
This letter is intended to provide an informal discussion of the noted issue
and does not constitute an official opinion of the Commission. 

  _____  

ADA/Drivers License/Essential Functions/Reasonable Accommodation

June 21, 2006

Dear :

This is in response to your letter dated May 9, 2006, in which you asked us
to review a draft “driving accommodation guideline” to be used by your Human
Resources office when processing applications for [Division] employment. The
draft guideline states that the [Division] will require an individual to
have a valid driver’s license when it “has determined that driving is an
essential or non-essential function of the particular job classification or
position.” In cases where driving is a non-essential function, the guideline
indicates that the [Division] will provide reasonable accommodation to a
person who does not have a driver’s license because of a disability.
Specifically, the [Division] will make an exception to the driving
requirement and it may reassign the driving duties to others. The guideline
concludes by instructing individuals that requests for reasonable
accommodation should be directed to the Human Resources Manager.

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), an employer may impose
qualification standards that are job-related and consistent with business
necessity. 29 C.F.R. §1630.10. As explained in the appendix to the ADA
regulations, “the purpose of this provision is to ensure that individuals
with disabilities are not excluded from job opportunities unless they are
actually unable to do the job.” 29 C.F.R. pt. 1630 app. §1630.10. A job
requirement that is related to an individual’s ability to perform an
essential function of the job would be consistent with business necessity.
However, a selection criterion that excludes a person because of a
disability but “does not concern an essential function of the job would not
be consistent with business necessity.”

Thus, the [Division] may require that individuals have a valid driver’s
license for a particular position if driving is an essential function of
that position. The guideline is incorrect in stating that it will impose
this requirement when driving is a non-essential function of a particular
classification or position.

The guideline does not explain how the [Division] will determine if driving
is an essential or non-essential function of a specific job. If [the
Division] incorrectly identifies driving as an essential function for a
particular position and excludes an individual whose disability makes
driving impossible, it may violate the ADA.

In determining whether driving is an essential function, the [Division]
should evaluate each position taking into account the factors listed in 29
C.F.R. §1630.2(n) and any others that may be relevant. It is important that
the [Division] carefully evaluate each position, and not just each job
classification, to determine if driving really is required for a specific
position. It is possible that persons with the same job classification or
title might nonetheless perform different essential functions. Thus, driving
may be an essential function for one person in a job classification but not
another. When determining whether any function is essential, the ADA looks
to a specific position and not simply a classification or job title. 

Furthermore, it is important to determine whether driving is the objective
to be accomplished or an incidental means for accomplishing the true
objective. For example, driving could be an essential function for a person
whose job requires that he deliver water pipes. This is especially true
where others load and unload the pipes and this individual’s function is
simply to drive the truck to make the delivery.

But, driving may not be an essential function for an engineer who must
inspect pipes around the district. Engineers generally may drive themselves,
but the essential function is to inspect the pipes. Driving is incidental to
this job function -- the means to get to the site where pipes need to be
inspected. The critical function is using one’s experience, skills, and
expertise to inspect pipes, evaluate the need for repairs or replacements,
to bring in other skilled workers if necessary, and to order appropriate
repairs or replacements.

In many areas, an engineer who cannot drive due to a disability may be able
to take public transportation, taxis, or use a car service to get to
locations where pipes need to be inspected. If a team of engineers or other
employees always make inspections together, then it might not be a problem
to exempt a particular engineer from driving since other employees would be
available to drive to the site. All reasonable accommodations need to be
evaluated in terms of their effectiveness in enabling an individual to
perform the essential functions of the position and whether they would cause
an undue hardship.

Clearly, lack of public transportation to get to a site would rule out that
accommodation. Even if public transportation was possible, it would be an
undue hardship if it would take so long to get to and from a site that the
engineer was unable to do an inspection in a timely manner or to meet
production standards imposed on all engineers conducting inspections. If an
engineer must take heavy or dangerous equipment to do an inspection, then
use of public transportation or even taxis may not be feasible. However, the
fact that the [Division] might incur certain costs, for example if it
allowed the engineer to use a car service, would not be an undue hardship
unless the [Division] could show that it constituted a “significant”
expense. The [Division] could exclude an individual whose disability made it
impossible for him to drive from a job that involves conducting inspections,
but only after the agency determines that possible reasonable accommodations
would either not allow performance of the essential function (i.e., the
inspections) or would constitute an undue hardship. 

Training is a key component for ensuring that guidelines are accurately
implemented. Many employees tend to read guidelines literally, and will only
do what is specified in the guidelines. To illustrate, your guideline
suggests that where driving is a non-essential function then those duties
may be reassigned to others. 29 C.F.R. pt. 1630 app. §1630.2(o)
(redistribution of non-essential functions is a form of reasonable
accommodation). But, there may be other accommodations that would work
better. For example, if driving is a non-essential function because it is
only the incidental means to accomplishing a certain task, an employee with
a disability might still be able to perform the main task by using
alternative forms of transportation. The Human Resources staff should be
able to think broadly about all accommodations that could work, rather than
focusing on only one type.

Finally, your letter states that this guideline will be used with
applicants. To the extent that a job announcement, based on this guideline,
incorrectly conveys that a driver’s license is required (i.e., driving is
not an essential function of the position being advertised and therefore
requiring a driver’s license would not be consistent with business
necessity) the announcement would be misleading and could result in
qualified individuals with disabilities failing to apply for a job or being
inappropriately screened out by your Human Resources staff or managers.
Supervisors conducting interviews for this position could screen out a
qualified individual with a disability based on the incorrect assessment
that driving is an essential function and/or no reasonable accommodation is
possible. Employers that wish to make a categorical statement that driving
is an essential function and therefore a driver’s license is required for
the job should be sure that is true for each position advertised.

I hope this information is helpful. Contrary to what you may have
understood, this letter is not an official opinion of the U.S. Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The EEOC does not provide official
approval or endorse an employer’s policies but instead offers technical
assistance concerning issues raised in a policy.

If you would care to discuss this issue further, please feel free to contact
me at (202) 663-4676.

Sincerely,

/s/

Sharon Rennert