[nabs-l] Pedestrian safety improvement act

[jonte]

How about putting a mechanism in the cane that detects the hybrid car? I think that would be much more effective than trying to persuade the car companies to accommodate us.
Jonte    

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Spangler <spangler.robert at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 8:06 PM
To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list <nabs-l at nfbnet.org>
Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Pedestrian safety improvement act

I totally agree with you but I think you misunderstand the legislation. 
  It is not necessarily saying that we have to cause setbacks in hybrid 
cars or even how we should be able to hear them.  It simply states that 
the department of transportation would have to research it.  It can be 
done without being a hinderance--there could be a mechanism on the car 
that would make a sound whose speed changes with the speed of the car. 
And let's remember that we don't want noise; we just want something that 
is audible.  I think that most blind people would agree with sighted 
people that they don't want loud trucks driving past their houses.

Thanks,
Robby

Jim Reed wrote:
> Hello,
> I am not quite sure how to feel on this issue. On one hand, quiet cars might pose a saftey risk to blind persons and others, but on the other hand, there is such a thing as noise pollution, air pollution, dependence on forign oil, and enviromental damage.  
> 
> Aditionally, there is another element of this issue related to the support or hinderance of societal progress. Hybrids represent the next great leap in our society, if additional laws are passed regulating this development, it may prove to hinder the development of the hybrid car. Remember, the impact of hybrid cars isnt just a blindness issue, there are much more importiant nation issues at stake. For example, national security risk via a dependence of forign oil.
> 
> There are also economic concerns. The continued research and development of hybrids, alternative fuels, and  "green" energy, will potentially be the savior of our economy. If hybrids become the next big thing, they could jumpstart the nearly dead auto industry, thus helping our economy and individual families. If you go to the national convention in Detroit, you will all see first hand the conciquences of this current economic collapes. Now is the time to be supporting industy and inovation, not hindering it.
> 
> Lastly, if blind independence is truely the goal of the NFB and blind persons, then the burden is on us -- blind people-- to adapt to the changing world, the burden is not on the world to adapt to us. Perhaps in the era of silent cars, it may be time to tweak cane-travel methodologies? 
> 
> I can't support this. I will not be a party to the hinderance of societal progress, continued enviromental degradfation,  or further economic decline. I will not expect industy or tax payers to foot the bill because I (we) refuse to adapt. 
> 
> Well thats my two cents
> Jim
> 
> "Ignorance killed the cat; curiosity was framed." 
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> nabs-l mailing list
> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nabs-l:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/spangler.robert%40gmail.com
> 

-- 
Robert Spangler
The University of Toledo
Student Senate - Recording Secretary
Ohio Association of Blind Students - President

_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nabs-l:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/jonte711%40gmail.com