[nabs-l] Comparing Braille Embossers

David Andrews dandrews at visi.com
Tue Jun 16 02:30:55 UTC 2009


The Tiger embossers should be quiet as they are not grossly 
mechanical, the way others are  Nothing is going to be completely 
quiet though.

Fast is a relative term, the fastest embossers are in the $30,000 to 
$100,000 range, and I don't think you can afford those.  If you can I 
will be your tech guy!

The index basic D has improved, and we have had good luck with them.

Also, the Braille quality on the Tiger isn't its strongest point, so 
make sure you have seen it first.  It is best at graphics, and 
graphics/text mixes.

Dave

At 07:12 PM 6/15/2009, you wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I'm interested in finding a quiet and fast embosser with which to 
>emboss textbooks for college. I hear that the Tiger embossers are 
>among the quietest, but I can't find out exactly how quiet they are. 
>Does anyone know how the noise level of the Tiger embossers compares 
>to the Juliet Pro 60? I'm also interested in the Index Basic D since 
>it is very portable, but I'm not sure whether it can handle large 
>print jobs. Also, a review by IBTC in 2001 states that Index 
>embossers are temperamental and prone to jamming and breaking. Is 
>that still the case in 2009?
>
>thanks,
>Haben
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>nabs-l mailing list
>nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nabs-l:
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/dandrews%40visi.com
>
>
>__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
>signature database 4157 (20090615) __________
>
>The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
>http://www.eset.com
>
>





More information about the nabs-l mailing list