[nabs-l] should the blind adapt to the world, or should the world adapt to us?
Jess
jessica.trask.reagan at gmail.com
Mon Jun 22 10:43:29 UTC 2009
Joseph,
>From what I understand the Treasury Department wasn't planning on changing
the one dollar bill because then all vending machines would have to be
replaced . I believe that the currency is still being worked on although I
haven't recently heard an update from ACB in quite some time.
Jessica
----- Original Message -----
From: "T. Joseph Carter" <carter.tjoseph at gmail.com>
To: "National Association of Blind Students mailing list"
<nabs-l at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:49 AM
Subject: Re: [nabs-l] should the blind adapt to the world,or should the
world adapt to us?
> Alena,
>
> I promise at these two intersections, it IS loud enough in the right
> conditions. The block is really short, less than 100 yards, and there's a
> tall building that the sound bounces off of. When the wind is right, it
> sounds like the sound's in a different spot than it is, and it's got
> enough volume to be confused easily.
>
> I actually tried to come up with a way to change all bills but the dollar,
> and I couldn't find a good way to do it. Neither the ACB nor the NFB nor
> the Treasury Department came up with a good way to do it either, but all
> of them concluded that changes should be made to all but the dollar.
>
> I say change the dollar, but change it last. Produce the $100 bill first
> at the current size (or a fraction longer), and decrease the length of the
> bills from there. This allows current cash registers to be used, but
> causes money handling machines to need to be changed. That's acceptable,
> provided that times and tax breaks equating the cost of retrofitting over
> time are provided to offset the cost to the private sector. The $20 and
> $1 should be last, since the $20 affects the majority of ATMs and the $1
> affects vending machines.
>
> Option #2 is to stop printing the $1 bill. The $1 coin would be much
> easier for vending machines to support, and some already do.
>
> Ultimately, we don't know what the Treasury Department will ultimately do.
> Right now they're considering options, including electronic bill
> identifiers. I think a barcode printed to be read with a specific
> wavelength of light makes the most sense for this, but again it's a change
> to the currency. Granted, it's a change that makes readers cost like $30,
> but it's still a change. It also helps deter counterfeiters and gives the
> blind a way to detect a counterfeit bill other than by it not feeling
> right (the most common means of detecting a forgery today..)
>
> This one's a settled issue in my mind. The ACB won, and I'm not sorry
> they did. I think they took one hell of a risk in our name to do it.
> That's water under the bridge. We continued to fight against the ACB on
> this one beyond a point where our efforts could only cause what we most
> feared, in my opinion. But that too is water under the bridge. Taxpayers
> are going to foot the bill for this one, and that is settled. Our job now
> is to make sure they get what they're paying for, in my opinion.
>
> Joseph
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 07:30:38PM -0700, alena roberts wrote:
>>I want to respond to a couple of things. I think we're really off
>>topic from where we started with, but that's okay. I think that
>>conversation is what I wanted, and all of you have given that to me.
>>
>>I have never crossed because I heard an audible signal a block away.
>>My hearing knows that the sound isn't loud enough, so I ignore it, I
>>also always listen to my traffic and the audible signal. I agree with
>>Len that the quiter signals that talk to you are better than the
>>chirpers, but in my opinion having something is better than nothing.
>>Before I moved to Corvallis, I had to cross at inersections that were
>>unsafe for me because they wre hard to read. In those cases, audible
>>signals would have been very helpful.
>>
>>As far as the currency goes, I don't think it matters how many
>>american dollars are made vs. some other countries currency. There are
>>ways to transform the bills without using tactile markings, and if the
>>$1 wasn't changed, most vending machines wouldn't have to be changed.
>>Money management is such a vital skill in my opinion, and I think that
>>I should have the right to use cash if I want to. I choose not to
>>because I can't distinguish it on my own, I don't have an expensive
>>machine that will tell me what denomination I have, and I am trusting
>>sighted people to be honest with me.
>>
>>Those are just some thoughts.
>>
>>--
>>Alena Roberts
>>Blog: http://www.blindgal.com/
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>nabs-l mailing list
>>nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>nabs-l:
>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/carter.tjoseph%40gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> nabs-l mailing list
> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nabs-l:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/jessica.trask.reagan%40gmail.com
More information about the NABS-L
mailing list