[nabs-l] Braille Vs Technology: is there room for only one in town?

Jedi loneblindjedi at samobile.net
Thu Jan 7 03:19:56 UTC 2010


Joseph,

Trust you of all people to outdo me on the harshness and cinicism 
scales. (grin) I think Mike freeman might have a competetor. In fact, I 
would pay to see a phorensic debate between you and freeman. Any bets? 
(Grins while shaking money bags)

In all seriousness, you do have a point that there are quite a few 
errors in posts made to this list. but I don't necessarily think that 
it's all a matter of whether or not someone reads Braille or not. I 
think that, in general, it can be said that some folks just don't care 
enough to spell check or reread/review what they've written. I'm 
guilty, and I suspect you are as well. That, unfortunately, is one 
common error in internet etiquette made by the blind, the sighted, the 
literate, and the illiterate.

I definitely must disagree with one of your points. You said that a 
generation of people (our generation) is beginning to see themselves as 
unemployable due to lacks in Braille education and overall lowered 
expectations. I think that blind people as a whole see themselves as 
employable. However, I think your point is valid in that our generation 
has become increasingly comfortable where it's at. For example, I have 
heard more people in our generation say that we should not judge 
others' levels of independence. I agree, but it's not a bad idea to 
really think and ask ourselves if we're really avoiding judgement or if 
we're allowing ourselves to stay comfortable with lowered expectations 
for ourselves. Am I making sense? I think these past discussions of 
whether or not to use a travel aid vs. human guide in a club and 
whether or not it's okay not to know Braille are good examples. I doubt 
I'm doing myself justice explaining this. Sorry. But it does seem to me 
that fewer people in our generation are really taking a hard look at 
themselves and figuring out where they could improve in favor of 
avoiding making judgements that seem exclusionary and dogmatic. While 
it's good to avoid dogma, going in the opposite direction isn't great, either.

Respectfully,
Jedi
Original message:
> Darian,

> You can argue the maybes and possible futures.  TODAY, Braille is the
> difference between high employment and extremely low.

> I'm going to be more harsh than even Jedi was and say that this list
> often demonstrates just how completely pathetic the language skills
> of those who communicate using primarily speech alone actually are.
> There are people on this list who cannot spell words at even the
> second grade level.  Some have no concept of even a sentence, let
> alone a paragraph.  As far as the world is concerned, they are
> illiterate.

> Few indeed are the jobs for which complete illiteracy is not a
> factor.  Not only that, if you demonstrate the level of literacy
> sometimes evidenced on this list, you could be an absolute genius and
> the average ignorant sighted person is going to assume you're at the
> very least cognitively deficient.

> At this time, we have a whole generation of blind people who have in
> large part grown up functionally illiterate.  They are suffering the
> consequences in that most are unemployed and beginning to come to the
> conclusion that they may in fact be unemployable.  The education
> system has completely failed these people, and it ought to inspire
> nothing short of rage at the notion that it should be allowed to
> continue.

> Joseph

> On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 10:07:31AM -0800, Darian Smith wrote:
>> Joseph,

>> With the advant of and advances in  digital technologies  would one
>> not argue that people are  actually more likely to be employed because
>> access to information is  better than it was even five years ago?
>>  can it  be said that the blind who knnow braille are superior to the
>> blind who arn't? if so, who makes this determination?
>>  Respectfully,
>>  Darian


>> On 1/6/10, T. Joseph Carter <carter.tjoseph at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Darian,

>>> What it makes them is statistically far less likely to be employed,
>>> for one thing.  That alone should convince parents and teachers the
>>> importance of Braille education.

>>> Joseph


>>> On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 07:40:41PM -0800, Darian Smith wrote:
>>>> I hope individuals don't mind my playing devil's advocate  focused
>>>> upon the statement "braille readers are leaders".
>>>>   What does this  make those who arn't very good braille readers,
>>>> don't want to know, or  don't know braille?

>>>> Do you feel the Organization  (the nfb) frowns upon  non-braille readers?
>>>>  respectfullly,
>>>>  Darian

>>>> On 1/4/10, Kerri Kosten <kerrik2006 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi:

>>>>> Just thought I'd share my opinions for what it's worth.

>>>>> I was taught braille, and am very good at reading it.
>>>>> However, I admit with devices like the Victor Reader Stream, I really
>>>>> don't read in braille much. I have a Pacmate notetaker with a braille
>>>>> display, so I could and probably should download more books and read
>>>>> them digitally, but just listening to a book on the tiny stream is
>>>>> much easier than lugging around a note taker and reading on a braille
>>>>> display.
>>>>> So, I admit even as a great braille reader I don't use braille as much
>>>>> as I should.

>>>>> I do use it at my work though, for when I write previews I take my
>>>>> notes in braille and that helps tremendously...so it definitely has
>>>>> it's uses and children should definitely be taught it.

>>>>> Braille readers are leaders!

>>>>> Kerri+

>>>>> On 1/4/10, Beth <thebluesisloose at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Wow.  I admit to having been taught Braille as a child and my vision
>>>>>> teacher was wonderful, but it doesn't surprise me that a lot of
>>>>>> today's children are not taught that way.  Braille readers are
>>>>>> leaders, they say.
>>>>>> Beth

>>>>>> On 1/4/10, Darian Smith <dsmithnfb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>> Listening to Braille

>>>>>>> By RACHEL AVIV

>>>>>>> Published: December 30, 2009

>>>>>>> AT 4 O’CLOCK each morning, Laura J. Sloate begins her daily reading.
>>>>>>> She calls a phone service that reads newspapers aloud in a synthetic
>>>>>>> voice, and she
>>>>>>> listens to The Wall Street Journal at 300 words a minute, which is
>>>>>>> nearly twice the average pace of speech. Later, an assistant reads The
>>>>>>> Financial Times
>>>>>>> to her while she uses her computer’s text-to-speech system to play The
>>>>>>> Economist aloud. She devotes one ear to the paper and the other to the
>>>>>>> magazine.
>>>>>>> The managing director of a Wall Street investment management firm,
>>>>>>> Sloate has been blind since age 6, and although she reads constantly,
>>>>>>> poring over the
>>>>>>> news and the economic reports for several hours every morning, she
>>>>>>> does not use Braille. “Knowledge goes from my ears to my brain, not
>>>>>>> from my finger to
>>>>>>> my brain,” she says. As a child she learned how the letters of the
>>>>>>> alphabet sounded, not how they appeared or felt on the page. She
>>>>>>> doesn’t think of a
>>>>>>> comma in terms of its written form but rather as “a stop on the way
>>>>>>> before continuing.” This, she says, is the future of reading for the
>>>>>>> blind. “Literacy
>>>>>>> evolves,” she told me. “When Braille was invented, in the 19th
>>>>>>> century, we had nothing else. We didn’t even have radio. At that time,
>>>>>>> blindness
>>>>>>>  was a disability. Now it’s just a minor, minor impairment.”

>>>>>>> A few decades ago, commentators predicted that the electronic age
>>>>>>> would create a postliterate generation as new forms of media eclipsed
>>>>>>> the written word.
>>>>>>> Marshall McLuhan claimed that Western culture would return to the
>>>>>>> “tribal and oral pattern.” But the decline of written language has
>>>>>>> become a reality for
>>>>>>> only the blind. Although Sloate does regret not spending more time
>>>>>>> learning to spell in her youth — she writes by dictation — she says
>>>>>>> she thinks that
>>>>>>> using Braille would have only isolated her from her sighted peers.
>>>>>>> “It’s an arcane means of communication, which for the most part should
>>>>>>> be abolished,”
>>>>>>> she told me. “It’s just not needed today.”

>>>>>>> Braille books are expensive and cumbersome, requiring reams of thick,
>>>>>>> oversize paper. The National Braille Press, an 83-year-old publishing
>>>>>>> house in Boston,
>>>>>>> printed the
>>>>>>> Harry Potter
>>>>>>>  series on its Heidelberg cylinder; the final product was 56 volumes,
>>>>>>> each nearly a foot tall. Because a single textbook can cost more than
>>>>>>> $1,000 and there’s
>>>>>>> a shortage of Braille teachers in public schools, visually impaired
>>>>>>> students often read using MP3 players, audiobooks and
>>>>>>> computer-screen-reading software.

>>>>>>> A report released last year by the National Federation of the Blind,
>>>>>>> an advocacy group with 50,000 members, said that less than 10 percent
>>>>>>> of the 1.3 million
>>>>>>> legally blind Americans read Braille. Whereas roughly half of all
>>>>>>> blind children learned Braille in the 1950s, today that number is as
>>>>>>> low as 1 in 10,
>>>>>>> according to the report. The figures are controversial because there
>>>>>>> is debate about when a child with residual vision has “too much sight”
>>>>>>> for Braille
>>>>>>> and because the causes of blindness have changed over the decades — in
>>>>>>> recent years more blind children have multiple disabilities, because
>>>>>>> of premature
>>>>>>> births. It is clear, though, that Braille literacy has been waning for
>>>>>>> some time, even among the most intellectually capable, and the report
>>>>>>> has inspired
>>>>>>> a fervent movement to change the way blind people read. “What we’re
>>>>>>> finding are students who are very smart, very verbally able — and
>>>>>>> illiterate,” Jim
>>>>>>> Marks, a board member for the past five years of the Association on
>>>>>>> Higher Education and Disability, told me. “We stopped teaching our
>>>>>>> nation’s blind children
>>>>>>> how to read and write. We put a tape player, then a computer, on their
>>>>>>> desks. Now their writing is phonetic and butchered. They never got to
>>>>>>> learn the
>>>>>>> beauty and shape and structure of language.”

>>>>>>> For much of the past century, blind children attended residential
>>>>>>> institutions where they learned to read by touching the words. Today,
>>>>>>> visually impaired
>>>>>>> children can be well versed in literature without knowing how to read;
>>>>>>> computer-screen-reading software will even break down each word and
>>>>>>> read the individual
>>>>>>> letters aloud. Literacy has become much harder to define, even for
>>>>>>> educators.

>>>>>>> “If all you have in the world is what you hear people say, then your
>>>>>>> mind is limited,” Darrell Shandrow, who runs a blog called Blind
>>>>>>> Access Journal, told
>>>>>>> me. “You need written symbols to organize your mind. If you can’t feel
>>>>>>> or see the word, what does it mean? The substance is gone.” Like many
>>>>>>> Braille readers,
>>>>>>> Shandrow says that new computers, which form a single line of Braille
>>>>>>> cells at a time, will revive the code of bumps, but these devices are
>>>>>>> still extremely
>>>>>>> costly and not yet widely used. Shandrow views the decline in Braille
>>>>>>> literacy as a sign of regression, not progress: “This is like going
>>>>>>> back to the 1400s,
>>>>>>> before Gutenberg’s printing press came on the scene,” he said. “Only
>>>>>>> the scholars and monks knew how to read and write. And then there were
>>>>>>> the illiterate
>>>>>>> masses, the peasants.”

>>>>>>> UNTIL THE 19TH CENTURY, blind people were confined to an oral culture.
>>>>>>> Some tried to read letters carved in wood or wax, formed by wire or
>>>>>>> outlined in felt
>>>>>>> with pins. Dissatisfied with such makeshift methods, Louis Braille, a
>>>>>>> student at the Royal Institute for Blind Youth in Paris, began
>>>>>>> studying a cipher
>>>>>>> language of bumps, called night writing, developed by a French Army
>>>>>>> officer so soldiers could send messages in the dark. Braille modified
>>>>>>> the code so that
>>>>>>> it could be read more efficiently — each letter or punctuation symbol
>>>>>>> is represented by a pattern of one to six dots on a matrix of three
>>>>>>> rows and two
>>>>>>> columns — and added abbreviations for commonly used words like
>>>>>>> “knowledge,” “people” and “Lord.” Endowed with a reliable method of
>>>>>>> written communication
>>>>>>> for the first time in history, blind people had a significant rise in
>>>>>>> social status, and Louis Braille was embraced as a kind of liberator
>>>>>>> and spiritual
>>>>>>> savior. With his “godlike courage,” Helen Keller wrote, Braille built
>>>>>>> a “firm stairway for millions of sense-crippled human beings to climb
>>>>>>> from hopeless
>>>>>>> darkness to the Mind Eternal.”

>>>>>>> At the time, blindness was viewed not just as the absence of sight but
>>>>>>> also as a condition that created a separate kind of species, more
>>>>>>> innocent and malleable,
>>>>>>> not fully formed. Some scholars said that blind people spoke a
>>>>>>> different sort of language, disconnected from visual experience. In
>>>>>>> his 1933 book, “The
>>>>>>> Blind in School and Society,” the psychologist Thomas Cutsforth, who
>>>>>>> lost his sight at age 11, warned that students who were too rapidly
>>>>>>> assimilated into
>>>>>>> the sighted world would become lost in “verbal unreality.” At some
>>>>>>> residential schools, teachers avoided words that referenced color or
>>>>>>> light because,
>>>>>>> they said, students might stretch the meanings beyond sense. These
>>>>>>> theories have since been discredited, and studies have shown that
>>>>>>> blind children as
>>>>>>> young as 4 understand the difference in meaning between words like
>>>>>>> “look,” “touch” and “see.” And yet Cutsforth was not entirely
>>>>>>> misguided in his argument
>>>>>>> that sensory deprivation restructures the mind. In the 1990s, a series
>>>>>>> of brain-imaging studies revealed that the visual cortices of the
>>>>>>> blind are not
>>>>>>> rendered useless, as previously assumed. When test subjects swept
>>>>>>> their fingers over a line of Braille, they showed intense activation
>>>>>>> in the parts of
>>>>>>> the brain that typically process visual input.

>>>>>>> These imaging studies have been cited by some educators as proof that
>>>>>>> Braille is essential for blind children’s cognitive development, as
>>>>>>> the visual cortex
>>>>>>> takes more than 20 percent of the brain. Given the brain’s plasticity,
>>>>>>> it is difficult to make the argument that one kind of reading —
>>>>>>> whether the information
>>>>>>> is absorbed by ear, finger or retina — is inherently better than
>>>>>>> another, at least with regard to cognitive function. The architecture
>>>>>>> of the brain is
>>>>>>> not fixed, and without images to process, the visual cortex can
>>>>>>> reorganize for new functions. A 2003 study in Nature Neuroscience
>>>>>>> found that blind subjects
>>>>>>> consistently surpassed sighted ones on tests of verbal
>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>> , and their superior performance was caused, the authors suggested, by
>>>>>>> the extra processing that took place in the visual regions of their
>>>>>>> brains.

>>>>>>> Learning to read is so entwined in the normal course of child
>>>>>>> development that it is easy to assume that our brains are naturally
>>>>>>> wired for print literacy.
>>>>>>> But humans have been reading for fewer than 6,000 years (and literacy
>>>>>>> has been widespread for no more than a century and a half). The
>>>>>>> activity of reading
>>>>>>> itself alters the anatomy of the brain. In a report released in 2009
>>>>>>> in the journal Nature, the neuroscientist Manuel Carreiras studies
>>>>>>> illiterate former
>>>>>>> guerrillas in Colombia who, after years of combat, had abandoned their
>>>>>>> weapons, left the jungle and rejoined civilization. Carreiras compares
>>>>>>> 20 adults
>>>>>>> who had recently completed a literacy program with 22 people who had
>>>>>>> not yet begun it. In
>>>>>>> M.R.I.
>>>>>>>  scans of their brains, the newly literate subjects showed more gray
>>>>>>> matter in their angular gyri, an area crucial for language processing,
>>>>>>> and more white
>>>>>>> matter in part of the corpus callosum, which links the two
>>>>>>> hemispheres. Deficiencies in these regions were previously observed in
>>>>>>> dyslexics, and the study
>>>>>>> suggests that those brain patterns weren’t the cause of their
>>>>>>> illiteracy, as had been hypothesized, but a result.

>>>>>>> There is no doubt that literacy changes brain circuitry, but how this
>>>>>>> reorganization affects our capacity for language is still a matter of
>>>>>>> debate. In moving
>>>>>>> from written to spoken language, the greatest consequences for blind
>>>>>>> people may not be cognitive but cultural — a loss much harder to
>>>>>>> avoid. In one of
>>>>>>> the few studies of blind people’s prose, Doug Brent, a professor of
>>>>>>> communication at the University of Calgary, and his wife, Diana Brent,
>>>>>>> a teacher of
>>>>>>> visually impaired students, analyzed stories by students who didn’t
>>>>>>> use Braille but rather composed on a regular keyboard and edited by
>>>>>>> listening to their
>>>>>>> words played aloud. One 16-year-old wrote a fictional story about a
>>>>>>> character named Mark who had “sleep bombs”:

>>>>>>> He looked in the house windo that was his da windo his dad was walking
>>>>>>> around with a mask on he took it off he opend the windo and fell on
>>>>>>> his bed sleeping
>>>>>>> mark took two bombs and tosed them in the windo the popt his dad lept
>>>>>>> up but before he could grab the mask it explodedhe fell down asleep.

>>>>>>> In describing this story and others like it, the Brents invoked the
>>>>>>> literary scholar Walter Ong, who argued that members of literate
>>>>>>> societies think differently
>>>>>>> than members of oral societies. The act of writing, Ong said — the
>>>>>>> ability to revisit your ideas and, in the process, refine them —
>>>>>>> transformed the shape
>>>>>>> of thought. The Brents characterized the writing of many audio-only
>>>>>>> readers as disorganized, “as if all of their ideas are crammed into a
>>>>>>> container, shaken
>>>>>>> and thrown randomly onto a sheet of paper like dice onto a table.” The
>>>>>>> beginnings and endings of sentences seem arbitrary, one thought
>>>>>>> emerging in the
>>>>>>> midst of another with a kind of breathless energy. The authors
>>>>>>> concluded, “It just doesn’t seem to reflect the qualities of organized
>>>>>>> sequence and complex
>>>>>>> thought that we value in a literate society.”

>>>>>>> OUR DEFINITION of a literate society inevitably shifts as our tools
>>>>>>> for reading and writing evolve, but the brief history of literacy for
>>>>>>> blind people makes
>>>>>>> the prospect of change particularly fraught. Since the 1820s, when
>>>>>>> Louis Braille invented his writing system — so that blind people would
>>>>>>> no longer be
>>>>>>> “despised or patronized by condescending sighted people,” as he put it
>>>>>>> — there has always been, among blind people, a political and even
>>>>>>> moral dimension
>>>>>>> to learning to read. Braille is viewed by many as a mark of
>>>>>>> independence, a sign that blind people have moved away from an oral
>>>>>>> culture seen as primitive
>>>>>>> and isolating. In recent years, however, this narrative has been
>>>>>>> complicated. Schoolchildren in developed countries, like the U.S. and
>>>>>>> Britain, are now
>>>>>>> thought to have lower Braille literacy than those in developing ones,
>>>>>>> like Indonesia and Botswana, where there are few alternatives to
>>>>>>> Braille. Tim Connell,
>>>>>>> the managing director of an assistive-technology company in Australia,
>>>>>>> told me that he has heard this described as “one of the advantages of
>>>>>>> being poor.”


>>>>>>> Braille readers do not deny that new reading technology has been
>>>>>>> transformative, but Braille looms so large in the mythology of
>>>>>>> blindness that it has assumed
>>>>>>> a kind of talismanic status. Those who have residual vision and still
>>>>>>> try to read print — very slowly or by holding the page an inch or two
>>>>>>> from their
>>>>>>> faces — are generally frowned upon by the National Federation of the
>>>>>>> Blind, which fashions itself as the leader of a civil rights movement
>>>>>>> for the blind.
>>>>>>> Its president, Marc Maurer, a voracious reader, compares Louis Braille
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> Abraham Lincoln
>>>>>>> . At the annual convention for the federation, held at a Detroit
>>>>>>> Marriott last July, I heard the mantra “listening is not literacy”
>>>>>>> repeated everywhere,
>>>>>>> from panels on the Braille crisis to conversations among middle-school
>>>>>>> girls. Horror stories circulating around the convention featured
>>>>>>> children who don’t
>>>>>>> know what a paragraph is or why we capitalize letters or that “happily
>>>>>>> ever after” is made up of three separate words.

>>>>>>> Declaring your own illiteracy seemed to be a rite of passage. A vice
>>>>>>> president of the federation, Fredric Schroeder, served as commissioner
>>>>>>> of the Rehabilitation
>>>>>>> Services Administration under President Clinton and relies primarily
>>>>>>> on audio technologies. He was openly repentant about his lack of
>>>>>>> reading skills. “I
>>>>>>> am now over 50 years old, and it wasn’t until two months ago that I
>>>>>>> realized that ‘dissent,’ to disagree, is different than ‘descent,’ to
>>>>>>> lower something,”
>>>>>>> he told me. “I’m functionally illiterate. People say, ‘Oh, no, you’re
>>>>>>> not.’ Yes, I am. I’m sorry about it, but I’m not embarrassed to admit
>>>>>>> it.”

>>>>>>> While people like Laura Sloate or the governor of New York,
>>>>>>> David A. Paterson
>>>>>>> , who also reads by listening, may be able to achieve without the help
>>>>>>> of Braille, their success requires accommodations that many cannot
>>>>>>> afford. Like Sloate,
>>>>>>> Paterson dictates his memos, and his staff members select pertinent
>>>>>>> newspaper articles for him and read them aloud on his voice mail every
>>>>>>> morning. (He
>>>>>>> calls himself “overassimilated” and told me that as a child he was
>>>>>>> “mainstreamed so much that I psychologically got the message that I’m
>>>>>>> not really supposed
>>>>>>> to be blind.”) Among people with fewer resources, Braille-readers tend
>>>>>>> to form the blind elite, in part because it is more plausible for a
>>>>>>> blind person
>>>>>>> to find work doing intellectual rather than manual labor.

>>>>>>> A 1996 study showed that of a sample of visually impaired adults,
>>>>>>> those who learned Braille as children were more than twice as likely
>>>>>>> to be employed as
>>>>>>> those who had not. At the convention this statistic was frequently
>>>>>>> cited with pride, so much so that those who didn’t know Braille were
>>>>>>> sometimes made
>>>>>>> to feel like outsiders. “There is definitely a sense of peer pressure
>>>>>>> from the older guard,” James Brown, a 35-year-old who reads using
>>>>>>> text-to-speech
>>>>>>> software, told me. “If we could live in our own little Braille world,
>>>>>>> then that’d be perfect,” he added. “But we live in a visual world.”

>>>>>>> When deaf people began getting
>>>>>>> cochlear implants
>>>>>>>  in the late 1980s, many in the deaf community felt betrayed. The new
>>>>>>> technology pushed people to think of the disability in a new way — as
>>>>>>> an identity
>>>>>>> and a culture. Technology has changed the nature of many disabilities,
>>>>>>> lifting the burdens but also complicating people’s sense of what is
>>>>>>> physically natural,
>>>>>>> because bodies can so often be tweaked until “fixed.” Arielle
>>>>>>> Silverman, a graduate student at the convention who has been blind
>>>>>>> since birth, told me that
>>>>>>> if she had the choice to have vision, she was not sure she would take
>>>>>>> it. Recently she purchased a pocket-size reading machine that takes
>>>>>>> photographs of
>>>>>>> text and then reads the words aloud, and she said she thought of
>>>>>>> vision like that, as “just another piece of technology.”

>>>>>>> The modern history of blind people is in many ways a history of
>>>>>>> reading, with the scope of the disability — the extent to which you
>>>>>>> are viewed as ignorant
>>>>>>> or civilized, helpless or independent — determined largely by your
>>>>>>> ability to access the printed word. For 150 years, Braille books were
>>>>>>> designed to function
>>>>>>> as much as possible like print books. But now the computer has
>>>>>>> essentially done away with the limits of form, because information,
>>>>>>> once it has been digitized,
>>>>>>> can be conveyed through sound or touch. For sighted people, the
>>>>>>> transition from print to digital text has been relatively subtle, but
>>>>>>> for many blind people
>>>>>>> the shift to computerized speech is an unwelcome and uncharted
>>>>>>> experiment. In grappling with what has been lost, several federation
>>>>>>> members recited to
>>>>>>> me various takes on the classic expression Scripta manent, verba
>>>>>>> volant: What is written remains, what is spoken vanishes into air.

>>>>>>> Rachel Aviv is a Rosalynn Carter fellow for mental-health journalism
>>>>>>> with the Carter Center and writes frequently on education for The
>>>>>>> Times.

>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> The National Federation of the Blind has launched a nationwide teacher
>>>>>>> recruitment campaign to help attract energetic and passionate
>>>>>>> individuals into the field of blindness education, and we need your
>>>>>>> help!   To Get Involved  go to:
>>>>>>> www.TeachBlindStudents.org


>>>>>>> "And if you will join me in this improbable quest, if you feel destiny
>>>>>>> calling, and see as I see, a future of endless possibility stretching
>>>>>>> before us;
>>>>>>> if you sense, as I sense, that the time is now to shake off our
>>>>>>> slumber, and slough off our fear, and make good on the debt we owe
>>>>>>> past and future generations,
>>>>>>> then I'm ready to take up the cause, and march with you, and work with
>>>>>>> you. Together, starting today, let us finish the work that needs to be
>>>>>>> done, and
>>>>>>> usher in a new birth of freedom on this Earth."- Baraq Obama

>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>>>>> nabs-l:
>>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/thebluesisloose%40gmail.com


>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>>>> nabs-l:
>>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/kerrik2006%40gmail.com


>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>>> nabs-l:
>>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/dsmithnfb%40gmail.com



>>>> --
>>>> The National Federation of the Blind has launched a nationwide teacher
>>>> recruitment campaign to help attract energetic and passionate
>>>> individuals into the field of blindness education, and we need your
>>>> help!   To Get Involved  go to:
>>>> www.TeachBlindStudents.org


>>>> "And if you will join me in this improbable quest, if you feel destiny
>>>> calling, and see as I see, a future of endless possibility stretching
>>>> before us;
>>>> if you sense, as I sense, that the time is now to shake off our
>>>> slumber, and slough off our fear, and make good on the debt we owe
>>>> past and future generations,
>>>> then I'm ready to take up the cause, and march with you, and work with
>>>> you. Together, starting today, let us finish the work that needs to be
>>>> done, and
>>>> usher in a new birth of freedom on this Earth."- Baraq Obama

>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>> nabs-l:
>>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/carter.tjoseph%40gmail.com

>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>> nabs-l:
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/dsmithnfb%40gmail.com



>> --
>> The National Federation of the Blind has launched a nationwide teacher
>> recruitment campaign to help attract energetic and passionate
>> individuals into the field of blindness education, and we need your
>> help!   To Get Involved  go to:
>> www.TeachBlindStudents.org


>> "And if you will join me in this improbable quest, if you feel destiny
>> calling, and see as I see, a future of endless possibility stretching
>> before us;
>> if you sense, as I sense, that the time is now to shake off our
>> slumber, and slough off our fear, and make good on the debt we owe
>> past and future generations,
>> then I'm ready to take up the cause, and march with you, and work with
>> you. Together, starting today, let us finish the work that needs to be
>> done, and
>> usher in a new birth of freedom on this Earth."- Baraq Obama

>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nabs-l:
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/carter.tjoseph%40gmail.com

> _______________________________________________
> nabs-l mailing list
> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nabs-l:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/loneblindjedi%40samobile.net

-- 
Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network.  Visit 
www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.


More information about the NABS-L mailing list