[nabs-l] window-eyes

[Peter Donahue]

Hello Josh and listers,

But we need specifics. We're not talking about one screen reader vs. 
another. We're talking about applications like Microsoft Office, Sonar, 
Sound Forge, Real Player, Winamp, etc. How well were you able to use them 
with System Access to Go and other free or low-cost screen readers compared 
to JAWS and Window-Eyes?I hope this makes sense.

Peter Donahue

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Josh" <jkenn337 at gmail.com>
To: <nabs-l at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 8:04 AM
Subject: [nabs-l] window-eyes


Hi

window-eyes performed about as well as jfw. I prefer nvda and system access 
or satogo because the commands are the same across all three screen readers 
whereas window-eyes and hal's commands are very different.

Josh Kennedy jkenn337 at gmail.com
my blog is at http://jkenn337.klangoblog.net (updated frequently). Tired of 
Microsoft Windows and paying thousands for screen-readers? try out NVDA, get 
a mac--, nvda--for Windows, or try out and switch to grml, Ubuntu, Vinux, or 
knoppix-adriane Linux desktops. Knoppix ubuntu and vinux-cli-max are the 
most accessible for beginners. also try vinux-gui and encourage those at 
www.cherrypal.com to use windows-xp and nvda knoppix-adriane Vinux-cli-max 
or grml so all blind people can have an accessible computer.
_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
nabs-l:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/pdonahue1%40sbcglobal.net