[nabs-l] If the World Went Sighted..
Chris Nusbaum
dotkid.nusbaum at gmail.com
Thu Apr 28 20:03:59 UTC 2011
Hi, Arielle and all.
What an interesting question! I'm interested to see what
discussion that brings about on the list. I'm of the opinion
that blindness is generally indifferent to our daily function.
In fact, I have been asked many times, "If it were ever possible
for you to surgically regain your sight, would you do it?"
Surprisingly to all the sighted people who ask that question, my
answer is "No." See, I believe that blindness is the most
adaptable disability there is. Think about it. If you're deaf,
you can't communicate with others except for the small group of
people (compared to the number of people in America or the world
at that) who know sign language. If you're wheelchair-bound, you
can either buy a power wheelchair, which is pretty expensive, or
you'll need somebody to push that thing for you everywhere unless
you push it yourself. If you're mentally handicapped, you can't
learn well with your peers and will probably have trouble
communicating, depending on the severity of it. But if you're
blind, you can still learn, walk, communicate, and do most
everything that sighted people can independently with just a few
minor adaptations. As the great Dr. Kenneth Jernigan said, "The
real problem of blindness is not the loss of eyesight. The real
problem is the lack of understanding and education which exist.
If a blind person has the proper training and opportunity,
blindness can be reduced to a minor physical nuissance." But keep
in mind, though, that I'm blind from birth, so I'm a little
biassed. Probably someone who lost their sight later in life
would want to try to regain their sight in a heartbeat. So, I
don't think it would be necessary to get rid of all blindness
altogether. I think blindness has presented a great educational
opportunity to the sighted world, because from blind people like
the ones in NFB, they've learned that they don't have to rely on
their sight for everything in life. That's why when people ask
me, "What's it like to be blind," I answer, "It's pretty much the
same as being sighted. You just travel with a long cane and read
Braille, but that's really the only difference." And yes, you can
use that line if you want, LOL. Hopefuly, I gave some food for
thought to you all. What do you think?
Chris Nusbaum
"A loss of sight, never a loss of vision!" (Camp Abilities motto)
----- Original Message -----
From: Arielle Silverman <nabs.president at gmail.com
To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
<nabs-l at nfbnet.org
Date sent: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:08:30 -0600
Subject: [nabs-l] If the World Went Sighted..
Hi all,
We recently had a discussion about how we would react if some of
our
blind friends could become sighted, and we asked whether it would
be
reasonable for a sighted person to want to go blind. This made
me
think of an interesting, although a bit painful, question:
Would the world be better off, worse off, or about the same if
blindness were completely eradicated, through genetic engineering
and/or mandatory treatment of all causes of blindness?
The question may sound silly, but for many vision researchers,
eradication of blindness is a real goal. But does the presence
of
blind people in our society have any benefit to the society or
the
world as a whole?
Certainly there are costs of having a small group of people in
society
who read and travel using different techniques than the rest.
These
specialized techniques have to be taught, technology has to be
adapted
to their use and negative public attitudes prevent this minority
of
people who do things differently from having full access to
societal
goods and opportunities. So would it be cheaper and less
resource-demanding if everybody could use the same visual
techniques
to accomplish life tasks?
On the other hand, you could perhaps argue that having people who
use
different senses to do things in society is advantageous.
Technology
is forced to innovate to become usable by those who don't have
vision
as well as those who do. And conceivably, if a darkness plague
struck
the planet, it would be better for the species if some of its
members
could fully function without light.
What do you think? Should we as a society make an effort to get
rid of
blindness? Or does blindness serve any kind of social function?
There obviously isn't a right answer here, but it's something
that,
for better or for worse, could become relevant to us someday.
Arielle
_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
for nabs-l:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/dotkid.nu
sbaum%40gmail.com
More information about the NABS-L
mailing list