[nabs-l] If the World Went Sighted..
Chris Nusbaum
dotkid.nusbaum at gmail.com
Mon May 2 19:55:18 UTC 2011
I totally agree!
Chris Nusbaum
"A loss of sight, never a loss of vision!" (Camp Abilities motto)
----- Original Message -----
From: Jedi <loneblindjedi at samobile.net
To: nabs-l at nfbnet.org
Date sent: Sun, 01 May 2011 21:44:44 -0400
Subject: Re: [nabs-l] If the World Went Sighted..
I say that disability is a form of diversity, so I wouldn't want
to erase it.
Respectfully,
Jedi
Original message:
Hello all,
This is an interesting discussion, so I thought I'd pop in for a
minute.
This question goes, at the root of it, to how you view
disability. If
you view it as an aspect that creates diversity, then erasing it
would
be like erasing races or different languages. If you view
disability as
a disease, then logically the first response would be to want to
cure it.
What do you guys think?
Briley
On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:55 AM, Jorge Paez wrote:
Arielle:
I think blindness does play a roll--in that it is just one of
many
things that make up an individual,
and in a world where genetics would be preprogramed,
it just be too perfect.
It'd just bee too flawless--too artificial.
I'm sure some people would want it--but a world in which
blindness and
other disabilities are completely eradicated would just be too
artificial,
almost like we literally managed to create our own world in a
way.
Worse, it would make it a whole lot worse for any blind who were
born
cause then everyone would consider them a scientific failure so
to speak.
Of course,
I'm hypothetically talking about a very cold world in which
science
would create people which I hope would never happen but its a
good
talking point anyway.
Jorge
On Apr 27, 2011, at 12:08 AM, Arielle Silverman wrote:
Hi all,
We recently had a discussion about how we would react if some of
our
blind friends could become sighted, and we asked whether it
would be
reasonable for a sighted person to want to go blind. This made
me
think of an interesting, although a bit painful, question:
Would the world be better off, worse off, or about the same if
blindness were completely eradicated, through genetic
engineering
and/or mandatory treatment of all causes of blindness?
The question may sound silly, but for many vision researchers,
eradication of blindness is a real goal. But does the presence
of
blind people in our society have any benefit to the society or
the
world as a whole?
Certainly there are costs of having a small group of people in
society
who read and travel using different techniques than the rest.
These
specialized techniques have to be taught, technology has to be
adapted
to their use and negative public attitudes prevent this minority
of
people who do things differently from having full access to
societal
goods and opportunities. So would it be cheaper and less
resource-demanding if everybody could use the same visual
techniques
to accomplish life tasks?
On the other hand, you could perhaps argue that having people
who use
different senses to do things in society is advantageous.
Technology
is forced to innovate to become usable by those who don't have
vision
as well as those who do. And conceivably, if a darkness plague
struck
the planet, it would be better for the species if some of its
members
could fully function without light.
What do you think? Should we as a society make an effort to get
rid of
blindness? Or does blindness serve any kind of social function?
There obviously isn't a right answer here, but it's something
that,
for better or for worse, could become relevant to us someday.
Arielle
_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account
info for nabs-l:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/computert
echjorgepaez%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account
info for nabs-l:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/brileyp%4
0gmail.com
_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account
info for nabs-l:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/loneblind
jedi%40samobile.net
--
Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network.
Visit
www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.
_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
for nabs-l:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/dotkid.nu
sbaum%40gmail.com
More information about the NABS-L
mailing list